Search

Advances in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have prolonged life expectancy in various medical settings. However, the issue of hypersensitivity to components of CIEDs is still a concern. Since 1970, allergic reactions to metallic and nonmetallic components of CIEDs have been reported. Hypersensitivity reactions to medical devices are rare and not fully understood. In some cases, diagnosis and treatment are difficult. Cardiologists should always keep in mind pacemaker allergy when a patient appears with wound complications and no signs of infection. Patch testing should be tailored toward the specific biomaterials used in a device, in addition to testing with standard screening allergens in select cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Brugada syndrome (BrS) has a dynamic ECG pattern that might be revealed by certain conditions such as fever. We evaluated the incidence and management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) related to COVID‐19 infection and vaccination among BrS patients carriers of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) or implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) and followed by remote monitoring. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients were carriers of devices with remote monitoring follow‐up. We recorded VAs 6 months before COVID‐19 infection or vaccination, during infection, at each vaccination, and up to 6‐month post‐COVID‐19 or 1 month after the last vaccination. In ICD carriers, we documented any device intervention. Results: We included 326 patients, 202 with an ICD and 124 with an ILR. One hundred and nine patients (33.4%) had COVID‐19, 55% of whom developed fever. Hospitalization rate due to COVID‐19 infection was 2.76%. After infection, we recorded only two ventricular tachycardias (VTs). After the first, second, and third vaccines, the incidence of non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) was 1.5%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. The incidence of VT was 1% after the second dose. Six‐month post‐COVID‐19 healing or 1 month after the last vaccine, we documented NSVT in 3.4%, VT in 0.5%, and ventricular fibrillation in 0.5% of patients. Overall, one patient received anti‐tachycardia pacing and one a shock. ILR carriers had no VAs. No differences were found in VT before and after infection and before and after each vaccination. Conclusions: From this large multicenter study conducted in BrS patients, followed by remote monitoring, the overall incidence of sustained VAs after COVID‐19 infection and vaccination is relatively low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) predisposes to the development of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in DM1 patients with conduction system disease.Methods and Results: Arrhythmic CArdiac DEath in MYotonic dystrophy type 1 patients (ACADEMY 1) is a double-arm non-randomized interventional prospective study. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients with permanent cardiac pacing indication were eligible for the inclusion. The study population underwent to pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to the inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at PVS. Primary endpoint of the study was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy and cardiac arrhythmic death. The secondary study endpoint was all-cause mortality. Seventy-two adult-onset DM1 patients (51 ± 12 years; 39 male) were enrolled in the study. A ventricular tachyarrhythmia was induced in 25 patients (34.7%) at PVS (PVS+) who underwent dual chambers ICD implantation. The remaining 47 patients (65.3%) without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmia (PVS-) were treated with dual-chamber PM. During an average observation period of 44.7 ± 10.2 months, nine patients (12.5%) met the primary endpoint, four in the ICD group (16%) and five (10.6%) in the PM group. Thirteen patients died (18.5%), 2 in the ICD group (8%) and 11 in PM group (23.4%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a significantly different risk of both primary and secondary endpoint event rates between the two groups.Conclusions: The inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias has shown a limited value in the arrhythmic risk stratification among DM1 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left axis deviation (LAD) patients may have poor response to resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to assess if LBBB and LAD patients show a specific pattern of mechanical asynchrony.Methods: CRT candidates with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB were categorized as having normal QRS axis (within -30° and +90°) or LAD (within -30° and -90°). Patients underwent tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) to measure time interval between onset of QRS complex and peak systolic velocity in ejection period (Q-peak) at basal segments of septal, inferior, lateral and anterior walls, as expression of local timing of mechanical activation.Results: Thirty patients (mean age 70.6years; 19 males) were included. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.28±0.06. Mean QRS duration was 172.5±13.9ms. Fifteen patients showed LBBB with LAD (QRS duration 173±14; EF 0.27±0.06). The other 15 patients had LBBB with a normal QRS axis (QRS duration 172±14; EF 0.29±0.05). Among patients with LAD, Q-peak interval was significantly longer at the anterior wall in comparison to each other walls (septal 201±46ms, inferior 242±58ms, lateral 267±45ms, anterior 302±50ms; p<0.0001). Conversely, in patients without LAD Q-peak interval was longer at lateral wall, when compared to each other (septal 228±65ms, inferior 250±64ms, lateral 328±98ms, anterior 291±86ms; p<0.0001).Conclusions: Patients with heart failure, presenting LBBB and LAD, show a specific pattern of ventricular asynchrony, with latest activation at anterior wall. This finding could affect target vessel selection during CRT procedures in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus is the standard treatment for patients suffering from typical atrial flutter. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of tissue thickness and lesion transmurality measurement by a novel dielectric system. This was a retrospective multicentric non-randomized open-label, single-arm study. The atrial wall thickness was significantly higher close to the tricuspid annulus than close to the inferior vena cava and a trend towards a progressive decrease of atrial wall thickness was observed moving the mapping catheter from the tricuspid valve to the inferior vena cava. The possibility to visualize the tissue thickness could modify the way to deliver radiofrequency energy, allowing a tailored approach in cardiac ablation procedures., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) predisposes to the development of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in DM1 patients with conduction system disease., Methods and Results: Arrhythmic CArdiac DEath in MYotonic dystrophy type 1 patients (ACADEMY 1) is a double-arm non-randomized interventional prospective study. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients with permanent cardiac pacing indication were eligible for the inclusion. The study population underwent to pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to the inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at PVS. Primary endpoint of the study was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy and cardiac arrhythmic death. The secondary study endpoint was all-cause mortality. Seventy-two adult-onset DM1 patients (51 ± 12 years; 39 male) were enrolled in the study. A ventricular tachyarrhythmia was induced in 25 patients (34.7%) at PVS (PVS+) who underwent dual chambers ICD implantation. The remaining 47 patients (65.3%) without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmia (PVS-) were treated with dual-chamber PM. During an average observation period of 44.7 ± 10.2 months, nine patients (12.5%) met the primary endpoint, four in the ICD group (16%) and five (10.6%) in the PM group. Thirteen patients died (18.5%), 2 in the ICD group (8%) and 11 in PM group (23.4%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a significantly different risk of both primary and secondary endpoint event rates between the two groups., Conclusions: The inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias has shown a limited value in the arrhythmic risk stratification among DM1 patients., (© Crown copyright 2021.)

COVID pandemic emergency has forced changes from traditional in-person visits to application of telemedicine in order to overcome the barriers and to deliver care. COVID-19 has accelerated adoption of digital health. During this time, the distance is itself a prevention tool and the use of technology to deliver healthcare services and information has driven the discovery of mobile and connected health services. Health services should to be prepared to integrate the old model of remote monitoring of CIEDs and adopt new digital tools such as mobile Apps and connected sensors., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. © The Author(s) 2020.)