Search

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have emerged as promising tools for rapidly identifying patterns in large amounts of healthcare data to help guide clinical decision making, as well as to assist with medical education and the planning of research studies. Accumulating evidence suggests AI techniques may be particularly useful for aiding the diagnosis and clinical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI)—a considerably heterogeneous neurologic condition that can be challenging to detect and treat. However, important methodological and ethical concerns with the use of AI in medicine necessitate close monitoring and regulation of these techniques as advancements continue. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of common AI techniques in medical research and describe recent studies on the possible clinical applications of AI in the context of TBI. Finally, the review describes the ethical challenges with the use of AI in medicine, as well as guidelines from the White House, the Department of Defense (DOD), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), and other organizations on the appropriate uses of AI in research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Deliberately inducing hypothermia, or low body temperature, in patients with brain injury does not appear to improve their outcome. This was the conclusion of a study of 392 patients in a coma after a head injury who were randomly assigned to hypothermia treatment or no cooling.

Cooling patients with brain injuries for about 24 hours appears to improve their prognosis but only if their prognosis was initially good. Researchers randomly assigned 82 patients with brain injuries to 24 hours of hypothermia or 24 hours of normal temperatures. After one year, the hypothermia treatment reduced the chance of a bad outcome by 50% overall. However, this was only true in those with Glasgow coma scores of 5 to 7, which is an indication of mild to moderate injury. At one year, these patients' chance of a bad outcome was reduced 70%.

In June 2019, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched the VA Mission Act, which expanded veterans’ health‑care access to the private sector. Since civilian primary care providers may see more veterans in their practice, it will be important to understand the unique experiences, comorbidities, and culture of this population in order to provide optimal care. Military service members (SMs) are at an increased risk for traumatic brain injury (TBI), and comorbidities, such as post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), increasing the likelihood of prolonged symptoms. Military training and repetitive low‑level blast exposure may cause symptoms similar to TBI or increase long‑term negative effects in SMs. Military culture often has a strong influence in this population. Those who serve in the military identify with military values and have a strong team mentality, which places emphasis on the mission above all else, not accepting defeat, and not ever leaving a fellow SM behind. These values can impact the way a SM/veteran seeks care and/or communicates with his or her health‑care provider. Taking a detailed history to understand how these factors apply, as well as screening for mental health comorbidities, are recommended. Understanding the military cultural influences can assist in promoting a stronger therapeutic alliance and encourage more open communication. Ultimately, it is the trusting and respectful relationship between the SM/veteran and the provider that will determine the most effective treatment and result in the most effective resolution of TBI and comorbid symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When would you initiate hypothermia in a patient with brain injury or stroke who may be a candidate for craniectomy? Early craniectomy appears to confer survival and outcome benefits. Might [...]

Objective: To compare rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI) diagnosis before and after overseas military deployment. Design: We conducted a retrospective examination of a cohort of 119 353 active duty US military service members (Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines) whose first lifetime overseas deployment began at any time between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011, and lasted at least for 30 days. For this cohort, TBI diagnoses were examined during the 76 weeks prior to deployment, during deployment, and 76 weeks following the end of deployment. Main Measures: 4-week rates of TBI diagnosis. Results: The risk of being diagnosed with TBI within 4 weeks after returning from deployment was 8.4 times higher than the average risk before deployment. The risk gradually decreased thereafter up to 40 weeks postdeployment. However, during the 41 to 76 weeks following deployment, risk stabilized but remained on average 1.7 times higher than before deployment. Conclusion: An increased rate of TBI diagnosis following deployment was identified, which may be partly due to delayed diagnosis of TBIs that occurred while service members were deployed. Also, the increased rate may partly be due to riskier behaviors of service members following deployment that results in an increased occurrence of TBIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Currently, there is considerable debate within the sports medicine community about the role of concussion and the risk of chronic neurological sequelae. This concern has led to significant confusion among primary care providers and athletic trainers about how to best identify those athletes at risk and how to treat those with concussion. During the first quarter of 2013, several new or updated clinical practice guidelines and position statements were published on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of mild traumatic brain injury/concussion in sports. Three of these guidelines were produced by the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, The American Academy of Neurology, and the Zurich Consensus working group. The goal of each group was to clearly define current best practices for the definition, diagnosis, and acute and post-acute management of sports-related concussion, including specific recommendations for return to play. In this article, we compare the recommendations of each of the three groups, and highlight those topics for which there is consensus regarding the definition of concussion, diagnosis, and acute care of athletes suspected of having a concussion, as well as return-to-play recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Activation of protein kinase B (PKB, also known as Akt) by phosphorylation at serine-473 and threonine-308 promotes cell survival in multiple in vitro and in vivo models where neuronal death is seen, including traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, whether PKB is activated in humans after TBI was heretofore unknown. Activated PKB inhibits apoptogenic factors and is involved in the regulation of several transcription factors. Accordingly, we examined phosphorylation of the PKB signaling pathway in humans as well as rats after TBI using phosphospecific antibodies. Increased phosphorylation of PKB and PKB substrates was detected in injured brain from both humans and rats. In humans, increased phosphorylation of the PKB signaling pathway-related proteins Bad and forkhead transcription factor (FKHR) was detected in patients with TBI versus controls. In rats, increased phosphorylation of FKHR, inhibitor of κBα, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate responsive element binding protein (CREB) was detected after TBI versus controls. The deoxyribonucleic acid-binding activity of CREB was also enhanced after TBI in rats. Increased phosphorylation of PKB and PKB substrates was identified in neurons and other cell types by immunohistochemistry in both humans and rats. These data show increased phosphorylation of PKB, PKB substrates, and related proteins after both experimental and clinical TBI, suggesting either activation of the PKB signaling pathway or reduced phosphatase activity in both species.Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2006) 26, 915–926. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600238; published online 19 October 2005 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]