Search

Background: Breast cancer treatment is multimodal, but not all patients benefit from each treatment, and many experience morbidities significantly impacting quality of life. There is increasing interest in tailoring breast cancer treatments to optimize oncological outcomes and reduce treatment burden, but it is vital that future trials focus on treatments that most impact patients. This study was designed to explore patient experiences of treatment to inform future research., Methods: An online survey was co-developed with patient advocates to explore respondents' experiences of breast cancer treatment. Questions included simple demographics, treatments received, and views regarding omitting treatments if that is deemed safe. The survey was circulated via social media and patient advocacy groups. Responses were summarized by using simple statistics; free text was analyzed thematically., Results: Of the 235 participants completing the survey, 194 (82.6%) would choose to omit a specific treatment if safe to do so. The most commonly selected treatments were chemotherapy (n = 69, 35.6%) and endocrine therapy (n = 61, 31.4%) mainly due to side effects. Fewer respondents would choose to omit surgery (n = 40, 20.6%) or radiotherapy (n = 20, 10.3%). Several women commented that survival was their "absolute priority" and that high-quality evidence to support the safety of reducing treatment would be essential., Conclusions: Patients with breast cancer are individuals who may wish to optimize different components of their treatment. A portfolio of studies co-designed with patients is needed to establish an evidence base for greater treatment personalization with studies focused on reducing avoidable chemotherapy and endocrine therapy a priority., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Breast cancer screening programmes frequently detect early, good prognosis breast cancers with significant treatment burden for patients, and associated health-cost implications. Emerging evidence suggests a role for minimally invasive techniques in the management of these patients enabling many women to avoid surgical intervention. Minimally invasive techniques include vacuum-assisted excision, cryoablation, and radiofrequency ablation. We review published evidence in relation to the risks and benefits of each technique and discuss ongoing trials. Data to date are promising, and we predict a trend towards minimally invasive treatment for early, good-prognosis breast cancer as technical skills, suitability criteria, and follow-up protocols are established., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology.)

The tip of the tibial tubercle (TTT) is used to assess tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, it can be difficult to palpate and visualize intraoperatively. Several more easily accessible soft-tissue structures have been proposed as intraoperative assessments, including the patellar tendon's medial border (MBPT) and the junction of the medial third of the patellar tendon (mt-PT). No studies have described the relationship between the TTT and these proposed landmarks. The aims of the study were to (1) determine the relationship of the soft-tissue landmarks to the TTT and (2) identify any sex differences in these measures. Measurements of the position of these soft-tissue landmarks relative to the TTT were made on 56 cadaveric knees (28 female) by two observers at the level of the standard tibial cut (10 mm distal to the lateral tibial plateau). The results obtained were compared by sex and side. On average, 50.7% (SD 6.79, range 33.1%-63.1%) of the patellar tendon footprint was medial to the TTT. There were no significant differences between the sexes or left and right lower limbs. However, there was large variability in the position of all the soft-tissue landmarks relative to the TTT. The results indicate that, on average, the patellar tendon footprint is evenly spread around the TTT. However, there is a large variability in the anatomical relationship between the soft-tissue landmarks and the TTT. Caution is advised if relying on these structures intraoperatively., (© 2022 American Association of Clinical Anatomists and British Association of Clinical Anatomists.)