Search

Objective: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by type of antihypertensive used in participants of the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy) trial., Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP, an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment compared with standard care (no treatment unless severe hypertension developed) in pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-104 mm Hg before 20 weeks of gestation) and singleton pregnancies. We performed three comparisons based on medications prescribed at enrollment: labetalol compared with standard care, nifedipine compared with standard care, and labetalol compared with nifedipine. Although active compared with standard care groups were randomized, medication assignment within the active treatment group was not random but based on clinician or patient preference. The primary outcome was the occurrence of superimposed preeclampsia with severe features, preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The key secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We also compared medication adverse effects between groups. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with log binomial regression to adjust for confounding., Results: Of 2,292 participants analyzed, 720 (31.4%) received labetalol, 417 (18.2%) received nifedipine, and 1,155 (50.4%) received no treatment. The mean gestational age at enrollment was 10.5±3.7 weeks; nearly half of participants (47.5%) identified as non-Hispanic Black; and 44.5% used aspirin. The primary outcome occurred in 217 (30.1%), 130 (31.2%), and 427 (37.0%) in the labetalol, nifedipine, and standard care groups, respectively. Risk of the primary outcome was lower among those receiving treatment (labetalol use vs standard adjusted RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; nifedipine use vs standard adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99), but there was no significant difference in risk when labetalol was compared with nifedipine (adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.82-1.18). There were no significant differences in SGA or serious adverse events between participants receiving labetalol and those receiving nifedipine., Conclusion: No significant differences in predetermined maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected on the basis of the use of labetalol or nifedipine for treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02299414., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Brenna L. Hughes reports receiving payment from UpToDate. Rodney K. Edwards' institution received payment from the Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology and the Presbyterian Health Foundation. He received payment from the NIH through Oklahoma CTR grant for a pilot trial on warming preterm infants during delayed cord clamping. He received a Presbyterian Health Foundation grant for a pilot trial on omega-3 fatty acid supplementation effects on maternal triglycerides and fetal growth. He received an NIH grant for evaluation of atherogenic lipoproteins changes with immediate prepregnancy intervention and whether they were maintained during pregnancy. He received a grant from Cepheid for the clinical evaluation of the Xpert Xpress GBS test using vaginal/rectal swabs collected intrapartum. He was awarded an Oklahoma State DOH contract for support for patient-centered, comprehensive pregnancy care for women with substance use disorders. He received an NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of intensive glycemic targets in women with overweight and obesity with GDM. Lastly, he has a pending NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of prophylactic antibiotics for induction of labor in women with obesity. He has served on an expert witness case regarding a medical malpractice claim. Kelly S. Gibson's institution received an NHCID-MFMU network grant and Materna Medical research support (EASE). She received payment from NIH as a RADx grant reviewer and was an Ohio AIM grant recipient as an AIM webinar speaker. Rachel Sinkey received funding paid to her institution from the NIH and the American Heart Association. Kelly S. Gibson reports her institution received an NHCID-MFMU network grant and Materna Medical research support (EASE). She received payment as a NIH-RADx grant reviewer. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, as she has been a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial (institution received money to conduct study). Her institution also received payment for her to serve as a site PI for a COVID-19 vaccination trial in pregnancy. She has received payment from Pfizer as a site PI for a pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Sean Esplin received payment from Laborie. Mary E. Norton received payment from Luna Genetics. Daniel Skupski received payment from Organon and Cooper Surgical. Leonardo Pereira's institution received payment from Johnson & Johnson/Janssen Pharmaceuticals for an FDA trial on alloimmunization management. Everett F. Magann is a co-author on and UpToDate chapter on amniotic fluid volume assessment. Heather Frey also received royalties for contributions to UpToDate on the topic of uterine rupture. Alan T.N. Tita's institution received funding from Pfizer. Torri D. Metz received UpToDate royalties for two topics on trial of labor after cesarean. Her institution received payment from Pfizer, as she has been a site PI for a phase III respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine trial, a COVID-19 vaccine trial in pregnancy, and pharmacokinetic study of Paxlovid in pregnancy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (institution received money to conduct studies). Kara K. Hoppe's institution received an NIH grant for a multicenter RCT of remote blood pressure monitoring with health coaching versus standard of care, HHS funding for a hypertension challenge initiative, Marani to study implementation of their remote patient monitoring platform for hypertensive patients in pregnancy and postpartum. Additionally, she received payment for the NIH as a grant reviewer and WisPQC for providing physician leadership for the state quality initiative on hypertension in pregnancy. Eugene Chang received payment from Roche diagnostics for research on sflt-1/plgf. Sherri Longo acknowledges the financial support received for the Prospect study and other NIH-funded studies including CHAP maternal follow-up and CSOAP follow-up. She is also an investigator for the Moms on the Bayou research project with Tulane University and is receiving funding from the NIH Maternal Health Research Center of Excellence awarded to a collaborative effort between Tulane University, Ochsner Health, and RHI. Alan T.N. Tita's institution received funding from Pfizer. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disorder, and it is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The application of pharmacogenetics to antihypertensive agents and dose selection in women with preeclampsia is still in its infancy. No current prescribing guidelines from the clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) exist for preeclampsia. Although more studies on pharmacogenomics are underway, there is some evidence for the pharmacogenomics of preeclampsia therapies, considering both the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of drugs used in preeclampsia. It has been revealed that the CYP2D6*10 variant is significantly higher in women with preeclampsia who are non-responsive to labetalol compared to those who are in the responsive group. Various genetic variants of PD targets, i.e., NOS3, MMP9, MMP2, TIMP1, TIMP3, VEGF, and NAMPT, have been investigated to assess the responsiveness of antihypertensive therapies in preeclampsia management, and they indicated that certain genetic variants of MMP9, TIMP1, and NAMPT are more frequently observed in those who are non-responsive to anti-hypertensive therapies compared to those who are responsive. Further, gene-gene interactions have revealed that NAMPT, TIMP1, and MMP2 genotypes are associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, and they are more frequently observed in the non-responsive subgroup of women with preeclampsia. The current evidence is not rigorous enough for clinical implementation; however, an institutional or regional-based retrospective analysis of audited data may help close the knowledge gap during the transitional period from a traditional approach (a "one-size-fits-all" strategy) to the pharmacogenomics of preeclampsia therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Members of beta blockers drugs possess significant antioxidant activities. The current research is to assess the effect of the labetalol on acetic acid (AA-induced) colitis in rat model., Methods: Forty adult Wistar rats were separated into 4 groups, including the negative control group, AA group, AA + sulfasalazine (100 mg/kg/day) group, and AA + labetalol (300 mg/kg/day) group. Colitis was induced in rats by the interrectal installation of 2 mL of 4% (v/v) AA. Sulfasalazine and labetalol were administered orally for 7 days after 2 hours of induction. The following parameters were measured: disease activity index (DAI), histopa-thological changes and colon tissue homogenate concentrations of proinflammatory mediators IL-1β, adhesion molecules ICAM-1, and oxidative stress marker myeloperoxidase (MPO)., Results: The treatment with labetalol significantly reduced DAI and histopathological changes induced by AA. Also, labetalol markedly decreased the concentrations of IL-1β, ICAM-1, and MPO in colonic tissue that were increased by AA. The effects of labetalol were significantly lower than that produced by sulfasalazine as standard drug., Conclusions: Labetalol exerts ameliorative effects on disease activity and histopathological features of AA-induced colitis in rats possibly through antioxidant effects and inhibition of inflammatory mediators.

De novo - or as a continuum of antenatal hypertension -postpartum hypertension complicates ~2% of pregnancies. Many maternal complications, such as eclampsia and cerebrovascular accidents, occur in the postpartum period. Despite widespread use of antihypertensives during pregnancy and childbirth, there is a paucity of data on preferred medications in the postpartum period. This randomized controlled study enrolled 130 women who were started on antihypertensives. They were randomized to receive oral Labetalol(LAB, maximum 900 mg per day in three doses) or oral Amlodipine(AML, maximum 10 mg per day given in two doses). In the immediate postpartum, all women were closely monitored for neurological symptoms, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, urine output, and deep tendon reflex. The primary outcome was the time to achieve sustained blood pressure control for 12 h from the initiation of medication; secondary outcomes included side effects of both medications. Mean time to achieve sustained blood pressure control was lower in women who received AML than in those who received LAB-(mean difference 7.2 h; 38 95% CI 1.4, 12.9, p = 0.011). There were fewer severe hypertensive episodes among those with AML than in those who received LAB. However, the proportion of women who continued to require antihypertensives at discharge was higher in the AML group than in the LAB group (55.4% versus 32.3%, p = 0.008). None of the participants developed drug-related side effects. Among women with postpartum persistence or new-onset hypertension, oral AML achieved sustained blood pressure control in a shorter duration, with fewer hypertensive emergencies than oral LAB. (CTRI/2020/02/023236).Trial Registration details: The study protocol was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India with CTRI Number CTRI/2020/02/023236 dated 11.02.2020. Protocol can be accessed at https://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pdf_generate.php?trialid=40435&EncHid=&modid=&compid=%27,%2740435det%27 ., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Objectives: Current evidence supporting the use of continuous intravenous labetalol for blood pressure (BP) control in neurosurgical patients is limited. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of labetalol in neurosurgical patients and identify potential contributing factors to these outcomes., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of neurosurgical patients who received continuous labetalol infusion for BP control. Efficacy was assessed based on the time needed to achieve the target BP (systolic BP ≤ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≤ 90 mmHg). Safety was assessed according to adverse events that occurred during labetalol administration. Factors associated with efficacy and safety were analyzed using a logistic regression model., Results: Among 79 patients enrolled in this study, 47 (59.49%) achieved the target BP within 1 hour (early response). No factors were significantly associated with an early response. Hypotension was observed in 11 patients (13.9%), and bradycardia was observed in 8 patients (10.1%). Hypotension was significantly associated with patient age and motor impairment, while bradycardia was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus., Conclusion: The efficacy and safety profiles of labetalol infusion suggest this treatment as a promising option for BP control in neurosurgical patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Background: Approximately one in ten women have high blood pressure during pregnancy. Hypertension is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, and as treatment improves maternal outcomes, antihypertensive treatment is recommended. Previous trials have been unable to provide a definitive answer on which antihypertensive treatment is associated with optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes and the need for robust evidence evaluating maternal and infant benefits and risks remains an important, unanswered question for research and clinical communities., Methods: The Giant PANDA study is a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of a treatment initiation strategy with nifedipine (calcium channel blocker), versus labetalol (mixed alpha/beta blocker) in 2300 women with pregnancy hypertension. The primary objective is to evaluate if treatment with nifedipine compared to labetalol in women with pregnancy hypertension reduces severe maternal hypertension without increasing fetal or neonatal death or neonatal unit admission. Subgroup analyses will be undertaken by hypertension type (chronic, gestational, pre-eclampsia), diabetes (yes, no), singleton (yes, no), self-reported ethnicity (Black, all other), and gestational age at randomisation categories (11 + 0 to 19 + 6, 20 + 0 to 27 + 6, 28 + 0 to 34 + 6 weeks). A cost-effectiveness analysis using an NHS perspective will be undertaken using a cost-consequence analysis up to postnatal hospital discharge and an extrapolation exercise with a lifetime horizon conditional on the results of the cost-consequence analysis., Discussion: This trial aims to address the uncertainty of which antihypertensive treatment is associated with optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes. The trial results are intended to provide definitive evidence to inform guidelines and linked, shared decision-making tools, thus influencing clinical practice., Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2020-003410-12, ISRCTN: 12,792,616 registered on 18 November 2020., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are associated with increased risk of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. It is important to distinguish between pre-existing (chronic) hypertension and gestational hypertension, developing after 20 weeks of gestation and usually resolving within 6 weeks postpartum. There is a consensus that systolic blood pressure ≥ 170 or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg is an emergency and hospitalization is indicated. The selection of the antihypertensive drug and its route of administration depend on the expected time of delivery. The current European guidelines recommend initiating drug treatment in pregnant women with persistent elevation of blood pressure ≥ 150/95 mmHg and at values > 140/90 mmHg in women with gestational hypertension (with or without proteinuria), with pre-existing hypertension with the superimposition of gestational hypertension, and with hypertension with subclinical organ damage or symptoms at any time during pregnancy. Methyldopa, labetalol, and calcium antagonists (the most data are available for nifedipine) are the drugs of choice. The results of the CHIPS and CHAP studies are likely to reduce the threshold for initiating treatment. Women with a history of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, particularly those with pre-eclampsia, are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease later in life. Obstetric history should become a part of the cardiovascular risk assessment in women., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Asymptomatic severe hypertension (also known as hypertensive urgency) is frequently encountered in the hospital. Previous evidence suggests that management with one-time doses of intravenous (IV) antihypertensives may increase adverse events. Despite this, single-dose treatment remains common in the emergency department and inpatient settings., Methods: This quality initiative was launched at New York City Health + Hospitals, the largest safety net hospital system in the United States. The initiative involved two changes to electronic orders for IV hydralazine and IV labetalol: a nonintrusive advisory statement within the order instructions and a mandatory requirement to document the indication for IV antihypertensive use., Results: This initiative took place from November 2021 to October 2022. Of the indications selected for IV antihypertensive orders, 60.7% were for hypertensive emergency, 15.3% were for patients who were strictly NPO, 21.2% were for other, and 2.8% selected more than one indication. For ED-only encounters, aggregate IV hydralazine and IV labetalol orders per 1,000 patient encounters were 2.53 preintervention and 1.55 postintervention (38.7% reduction, p < 0.001). For inpatient encounters, aggregate IV hydralazine and IV labetalol orders per 1,000 patient-days were 18.25 preintervention and 15.81 postintervention (13.4% reduction, p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for individual orders of IV hydralazine and IV labetalol. There were significant reductions in 7 of the 11 hospitals in inpatient administration of aggregate IV hydralazine and labetalol orders per 1,000 patient-days., Conclusion: This quality improvement initiative successfully reduced unnecessary IV antihypertensive use in an 11-hospital safety net system., (Copyright © 2023 The Joint Commission. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are common complications of pregnancy and the main cause of perinatal adverse outcomes. Clinicians mostly adopt comprehensive treatment strategies, including anticoagulants and micronutrients. At present, the clinical effects of a strategy combining labetalol + low-dose aspirin + vitamin E and calcium aren't completely clear., Objective: The study intended to investigate the efficacy of a combined therapy of labetalol + low-dose aspirin + vitamin E and calcium for the treatment of HDP and the relationship of the levels of expression of microRNA-126 and placenta growth factor (PLGF) to outcomes, to provide better treatment strategies for patients., Design: The research team performed a randomized controlled trial., Setting: The study took place in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Jinan Maternity and Child Care Hospital in Jinan, China., Participants: Participants were 130 HDP patients at the hospital between July 2020 and September 2022., Intervention: The research team divided participants into two groups, with 65 participants each, using the random number table method: (1) a control group that received a combined therapy of labetalol + vitamin E and calcium and (2) an intervention group that received a combined therapy of labetalol + low-dose aspirin + vitamin E and calcium., Outcome Measures: The research team measured clinical efficacy, blood pressure parameters, 24 h urinary protein, microRNA-126, PLGF, and drug-related adverse reactions., Results: The intervention group's efficacy rate was 96.92%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group at 83.08% (P = .009). Postintervention, the intervention group's systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and 24 h urinary protein levels were significantly lower than those of the control group (all P < .05), while the microRNA-126 and PLGF levels were significantly higher (both P < .05). No significant differences existed in the rate of drug-related adverse reactions between the groups, at 4.62% and 6.15%, respectively (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: The combined therapy of labetalol + low-dose aspirin + vitamin E and calcium had a high efficacy rate and could significantly reduce blood pressure and 24h urine protein and significantly increase microRNA-126 and PLGF levels, with a high safety profile.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intravenous Labetalol and intravenous Hydralazine in reduction of blood pressure in patients with severe pre-eclampsia., Methodology: This comparative study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi from1st June 2019 to 30th June 2020. Total 208 pregnant women having severe pre-eclampsia (systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and diastolic pressure ≥110mmHg) were included in study. Group A received I/V Labetalol. Group B received I/V Hydralazine. Efficacy of drugs was observed by reduction in blood pressure and the number of doses administered. Data was analysed using SPSS version 26., Results: Systolic blood pressure reduction in Labetalol group was significantly lower than in hydralazine group (105.5 ±11.3 vs. 115.8 ±17.1, p≤ 0.001). Diastolic blood pressure reduction was also lower in labetalol group than in hydralazine group (p= 0.03). Number of dosage of drugs in Group A (Labetalol) was 3.2 ±1.2 vs. Group B (Hydralazine) was 4.4±1.4, p =0.006)., Conclusion: The results of this study show that Labetalol is more effective as compared to Hydralazine in terms of reducing the systolic and diastolic blood pressure and number of doses (Drugs) for in patients with severe preeclampsia., Competing Interests: none, (© 2023 Kausar M et al.)

Objective: The purpose is to investigate the influence of nifedipine, labetalol, and magnesium sulfate on blood pressure control, blood coagulation, and maternal and infant outcome in those suffering from pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH)., Methods: From January 2019 to April 2021, 100 participants with PIH in our center were randomly assigned to a control group and a research group. As a control, nifedipine combined with magnesium sulfate was administered. Nifedipine, labetalol, and magnesium sulfate were administered to the research group. The curative effect, blood pressure level, blood coagulation function, vascular endothelial function, and pregnancy comparisons were made between the two groups., Results: Based on the results of the study, the effective rate totaled 92.00%, while as for the control group, it was 80.0%, which indicates that there was a statistically significant difference between the effective rates of the research group and that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). Blood pressure and blood coagulation function did not differ significantly between the two groups before treatment, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). After treatment, both groups experienced a significant drop in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. After treatment, a higher PT index was found in the research group than in the control group. Likewise, the Fbg, D-D, and PLT were lower compared to those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). Neither group had significantly different vascular endothelial function before treatment, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). After treatment, the ET-1 of the two groups decreased, and the level of NO increased. There was a lower ET-1 in the research group than in the control group as well as a higher NO level in the research group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). Compared with the pregnancy outcome, in comparison to the controls, the research group had a higher vaginal delivery rate. Significantly, fewer cases of fetal distress, intrauterine asphyxia, and placental abruption were reported in the research group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Nifedipine, in combination with magnesium sulfate and labetalol, is effective at treating PIH, reducing blood pressure, improving blood coagulation, preventing cardiovascular events and vascular endothelial function, and further improve the pregnancy outcome., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Yuping Shao et al.)

Background and Objective: Current recommendations prescribe either nicardipine or labetalol as the first-line treatment for acute hypertension due to ease of use, availability, and low price. However, it is unclear if these drugs have different effectiveness and safety profiles. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of labetalol and nicardipine in patients with acute stroke., Materials and Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were electronically searched for the eligible publications from inception until March 2022. All full-text journal papers in English which compared the efficacy of nicardipine with that of labetalol on lowering blood pressure (BP; or treating hypertension) in all subtypes of acute stroke were included. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Data were analyzed using specific statistical methods., Results: Following the abstract and full-text screening, this meta-analysis included five retrospective cohorts and one prospective pseudorandomized cohort. Nicardipine's effect on time at goal BP was significantly superior to that of labetalol in patients with acute stroke (0.275 standardized mean difference [SMD], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.112-0.438, P = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the nicardipine group than that in the labetalol group. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 1.509 (95% CI: 1.077-2.113, I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.757). The quality of included studies was found to be low., Conclusion: More prospective, comparative trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of BP management as well as clinical outcomes in acute stroke patients receiving continuous labetalol and nicardipine infusions., Competing Interests: None

Objectives: This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) hydralazine, oral nifedipine, and IV labetalol with different dosage regimens in the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effects of hydralazine, nifedipine, and labetalol in the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy., Results: A total of 21 RCTs with 2183 patients comparing 7 regimens (oral nifedipine 50,60,90 mg; hydralazine 15,25 mg; and labetalol 220,300 mg) were identified. Compared with IV labetalol 300 mg, nifedipine 50,60, and 90 mg significantly improved the successful treatment rate of severe hypertension during pregnancy, nifedipine 50 and 90 mg and IV hydralazine 25 mg required significantly fewer doses to achieve target blood pressure (BP), and nifedipine 50 mg took significantly shorter time to achieve target BP. Subgroup analysis showed that only nifedipine 50 mg tablets, not capsules, required a significantly shorter time and fewer doses to achieve target BP than IV labetalol 300 mg. Moreover, nifedipine 60,90 mg showed superior effectiveness than IV hydralazine 15,25 mg in the successful treatment rate of severe hypertension during pregnancy. SUCRA analysis suggested that nifedipine 50,60,90 mg as the better regimens with the lower rates of overall ADR and neonatal complications., Conclusion: These findings demonstrated the superiority of oral nifedipine 50,60,90 mg, especially oral nifedipine 50 mg tablets, in the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy than IV labetalol 300 mg, while oral nifedipine 60,90 mg also showed superiority in the successful treatment rate of severe hypertension during pregnancy than IV hydralazine 15,25 mg. However, the limitations of the underlying data indicate that future large-scale and rigorous RCTs are needed to confirm such findings.

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) labetalol in the management of hypertensive crisis in children., Methods: A retrospective chart review of 56 consecutive children (age > 1 mo to ≤ 12 y) with hypertensive crisis admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from July 2009 to 2019., Results: The proportion of children attaining the primary endpoint (target 95th percentile in > 12 to ≤ 48 h) was significantly more in the group receiving labetalol as first-line or add-on (n = 23) as compared to those not receiving labetalol (n = 33) (62% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.03). Higher proportion of neurological recovery was seen in the labetalol group (56.2% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.02). The proportion of children with hypotension before 12 h was similar in both treatment groups (13% vs. 15%, p = 0.82). The practice variations between two periods of 5 y each (2009-2013 and 2014-2019) showed significantly more use of labetalol in the latter cohort (53% for 2014-2019 vs. 25% for 2009-2013, p = 0.03)., Conclusion: Labetalol, when used alone or as an add-on drug, was more efficacious than IV nitroprusside/nitroglycerine in attaining the primary endpoint in children up to ≤ 12 y of age with hypertensive crisis. Labetalol was safe and associated with higher neurological recovery., (© 2021. Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation.)

Background: Medical management for type B aortic dissections (TBADs) require aggressive blood pressure and heart rate control to minimize further dissection extension and to restore perfusion to vital organs. Current guidelines recommend β-blockers (BB) as first-line therapy, however do not differentiate an ideal agent for use., Objective: This study evaluated the hemodynamic safety of continuous infusion labetalol compared to esmolol combination (EC) therapies for TBADs., Methods: This single-center, retrospective analysis identified patients with a TBAD who received high dose continuous intravenous labetalol (HD-CIVL) or EC therapies. Patients who received HD-CIVL or EC therapies for a minimum of 2 hours, during which a minimum of 4 blood-pressure readings were recorded, were included. The primary end point was the incidence of hemodynamic instability with the use of HD-CIVL versus EC therapies., Results: A total of 20 patients receiving HD-CIVL and 22 patients receiving EC therapy were included in the analysis. Ten (50%) of patients receiving HD-CIVL and 7 (32%) of patients receiving EC therapies met the clinical definition of hemodynamic instability ( P = .23). Patients experiencing hemodynamic instability were all due to hypotension, with one also being due to bradycardia. Over half the patients in both groups had discontinued therapy ( P = .06) and were administered bolus fluids ( P = .27). Only one patient receiving HD-CIVL required vasopressor administration while none in the EC group ( P = .48)., Conclusion: Our study suggests that HD-CIVL is associated with a nonstatistical significant higher incidence of hemodynamic instability compared to an EC regimen in TBADs. Further studies are warranted in this patient population.

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of continuous infusion (CIV)-labetalol compared to -nicardipine in controlling blood pressure (BP) in the acute stroke setting., Materials: Patients were eligible if they had a diagnosis of an acute stroke and were administered either CIV-labetalol or CIV-nicardipine. Study outcomes were assessed within the first 24 h of the antihypertensive infusion., Results: A total of 3,093 patients were included with 3,008 patients in the CIV-nicardipine group and 85 in the CIV-labetalol group. No significant difference was observed in percent time at goal BP between the nicardipine (82%) and labetalol (85%) groups (p = 0.351). There was also no difference in BP variability between nicardipine (37%) and labetalol (39%) groups (p = 0.433). Labetalol was found to have a shorter time to goal BP as compared to nicardipine (24 min vs. 40 min; p = 0.021). While CIV-nicardipine did have a higher incidence of tachycardia compared to labetalol (17% vs. 4%; p <0.001), the incidence of hypotension (13% vs. 15%; p = 0.620) and bradycardia (24% vs. 22%; p = 0.797) were similar., Conclusions: These results indicate that CIV-labetalol and CIV-nicardipine are comparable in safety and efficacy in controlling BP for patients with acute stroke., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Current guidelines for the management of asymptomatic hypertension (HTN) in the inpatient setting recommend the use of oral antihypertensives. However, in clinical practice, intravenous (IV) antihypertensives are commonly utilised with little supporting evidence. The objective of this study was to evaluate literature examining the safety/efficacy of IV hydralazine and labetalol in hospitalised patients with non-emergent, asymptomatic HTN., Methods: The PRISMA guidelines were utilised to structure the systematic review. A search strategy composed of drug-, inpatient- and HTN-related terms was conducted utilising PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases through May 2020. Full-text, English-language articles describing IV labetalol and/or hydralazine use for non-emergent HTN in an inpatient setting that focused on clinical outcomes (ie vitals, adverse effects, healthcare utilisation) were included. Identified studies were screened/extracted using DistillerSR by two reviewers at each stage, and studies were evaluated qualitatively for the presence of bias., Results: From 3362 records identified in the search, a final set of 10 articles were identified. Four studies focused on labetalol (40%), five studies on hydralazine and labetalol (50%), and one study on hydralazine (10%). The included studies presented a variety of outcomes, but several trends were identified, including reduction in average blood pressure in eight (80%) studies, a risk of adverse effects in six (60%) and increased length of stay in one (10%)., Discussion: The studies identified in this review raise concerns regarding the safety of IV hydralazine and labetalol in non-emergent HTN. Despite relatively broad clinical experience with these drugs, experimental investigations regarding their utility are recommended., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The adverse effects of long-term maternal exposure of labetalol on neonates have been recognized clinically. But there are few systematic studies on their clinical demonstrations and potential mechanisms., Methods: A death case of an infant with long-term maternal labetalol exposure was reported and compared with two case reports from the literature. A systematic literature review was carried out followed by a retrospective analysis on neonatal labetalol withdrawal effects., Results: It was discovered that labetalol withdrawal effects initially cause various degrees of hypotension, hypoglycemia, and bradycardia among exposed neonates. Some life-threatening cases can also occur within 1 week after birth. Long-term maternal exposure of labetalol, preterm infants with birth asphyxia, acidosis, hypoalbuminemia, and cardiac defects are their primary features. Possible mechanisms were concluded as labetalol-induced effects on the vascular and sympathetic nervous system as well as tissue oxygen extraction., Conclusions: Neonatal labetalol withdrawal effects include early-onset and late-onset demonstrations, the latter can be life-threatening. A possible mechanism is multiple factors induced imbalance of sympathetic homeostasis increases neonatal vulnerability to common stresses. Long-term exposed preterm infants complicated with asphyxia, acidosis, hypoalbuminemia and cardiac defects, should be provided with intense care during the first week after birth. Further work is necessary to enrich this hypothesis.

Response to acute treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy in Asian women was not known. Labor and delivery checklists of Thai women treated with intravenous hydralazine or labetalol for systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 110 mm Hg from January 2011 to December 2013 were reviewed as parts of an audit. Primary outcome was prompt achievement of SBP 140-150 and DBP 90-100 mm Hg after the first bolus. Secondary outcomes were medication-related undesired effects. The mean ± standard deviation age and prevalence of chronic hypertension in hydralazine (n = 62) versus labetalol (n = 64) groups were 32.5 ± 6 versus 29.9 ± 6.8 years and 50% versus 21.9%, respectively (P < .05). Magnesium sulfate was promptly administered on admission to every woman to prevent seizure. Targeted blood pressure was timely achieved in 41.9% and 67.2% of the hydralazine and labetalol groups, respectively (P < .05). Nonreassuring fetal heart rate occurred in 51.6% and 32.8% of the hydralazine and labetalol groups, respectively (P = .05). The prevalence of cesarean section and Apgar score < 7 were not significantly different (P > .05). Real-life clinical experiences suggested significant advantages of intravenous labetalol over hydralazine in pregnant women with severe hypertension., (© 2020, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Intravenous (IV) hydralazine, enalapril and labetalol are oftentimes used without indication for the treatment of asymptomatic hypertension in the hospital setting and have been shown to have substantial adverse effects that are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as longer length of stay. Their use is also associated with greater monetary costs. In this project, we studied the frequency of use and consequences of these medications before and after a series of education cycles which clarified when and when not to use intravenous antihypertensives (IVAHs). Our initial aim was to decrease the unindicated use of IVAH by at least 25% in the setting of asymptomatic hypertension in our community hospital within a 1-year period after introducing education on the topic. Multidisciplinary involvement throughout three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles yielded favourable results. We focused on education towards a hospital-wide knowledge gap stemming from a lack of guidelines regarding the treatment of asymptomatic hypertension, as well as the guideline indications for IVAH. After three cycles of education targeting different groups, the unindicated use of IVAH fell by a total of 66%, decreasing patient exposure by approximately 248 cases over the total course of the study and ultimately, yielding a 52% increase in patient safety. Secondary outcome included a reduction in cost. It was noted that IV drugs cost more than their oral counterparts. The culture change in switching away from IVAH unless otherwise indicated was driven by repetitive education and group discussion to close the gap created by a lack of guidelines., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The purpose of the study was to clarify whether short-acting antihypertensives are associated with the occurrence of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This was a retrospective case-crossover study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We identified all adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke or ICH between January 2005 and December 2013. For each case, short-term and long-term exposure to short-acting antihypertensives, including nifedipine, labetalol and captopril, during the case vs. control periods were compared, and odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ischemic stroke or ICH were calculated with adjustment for confounders. Among 272785 ischemic stroke and 77798 ICH patients, the mean age was 77.8 ± 14.3 years and 70.8 ± 16.6 years, respectively. The short-term use of the three short-acting antihypertensives were all associated with an increase in the incidence of ischemic stroke (nifedipine: OR 4.51, 95% CIs 3.99-5.11; labetalol: OR 2.07; 95% CIs 1.71-2.51; captopril: OR 1.98, 95% CIs 1.72-2.29) and ICH (nifedipine: OR 2.98, 95% CIs 2.30-3.84; labetalol: OR 2.37; 95% CIs 1.66-3.39; captopril: OR 2.48; 95% CIs 1.69-3.63). The long-term use of short-acting nifedipine for 30 days was associated with a modest increase in the risk for ischemic stroke (OR 1.86; 95% CIs 1.42-2.45). Overall, the short-term use of short-acting antihypertensives is associated with a modest increase in the incidence of stroke, and short-acting nifedipine is linked to a substantial rise in the incidence of ischemic stroke. The long-term use of short-acting nifedipine was also related to an increased incidence of ischemic stroke. Physicians should be cautious of prescribing these short-acting antihypertensives.

Background: Hypertensive emergency is commonly associated with acute ischemic stroke and can be a predictor of poor outcome in these patients. Nicardipine and labetalol are commonly administered for the treatment of acute hypertension following stroke. Yet, data are lacking on the safety of these agents in this setting., Objective: This study aimed to determine all-cause in-hospital mortality, medication-related hypotensive episodes, development of hospital acquired infections and hospital length of stay between nicardipine and labetalol use for the management of hypertension after acute ischemic stroke., Methods: This retrospective study used a prospective database of individuals admitted to the neurointensive care unit at a university-based hospital over 39 months. Patients with confirmed ischemic strokes were included in this analysis. Data were recorded for administration of nicardipine and labetalol following acute stroke., Results: A total of 244 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included in this analysis (mean age, 64.3 ± 15 years; 52.2% males). Nicardipine use after acute ischemic stroke was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-15.7; P = .02). A single episode of hypotension in the first 72hours of admission was also significantly associated with mortality (OR 4.35 [95% CI 1.2-14.9]; P = .02)., Conclusions: Nicardipine was associated with an increased risk of short-term mortality after acute ischemic stroke. This may have been due to hypotension, tachycardia, or pulmonary edema which were not apparent in our study. Further studies are required to elucidate the cause of this association., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Neonatal hypertension is increasingly recognized as dramatic improvements in neonatal intensive care, advancements in our understanding of neonatal physiology, and implementation of new therapies have led to improved survival of premature infants. A variety of factors appear to be important in determining blood pressure in neonates, including gestational age, birth weight, and postmenstrual age. Normative data on neonatal blood pressure values remain limited. The cause of hypertension in an affected neonate is often identified with careful diagnostic evaluation, with the most common causes being umbilical catheter-associated thrombosis, renal parenchymal disease, and chronic lung disease. Clinical expertise may need to be relied upon to decide the best approach to treatment in such patients, as data on the use of antihypertensive medications in this age group are extremely limited. Available data suggest that long-term outcomes are usually good, with resolution of hypertension in most infants. In this review, we will take a case-based approach to illustrate these concepts and to point out important evidence gaps that need to be addressed so that management of neonatal hypertension may be improved.

Objective: Various pharmacological agents have been tried to attenuate the pressor response in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. We have compared single pre-induction intravenous injection of dexmedetomidine with labetalol for attenuation of haemodynamic stress response., Methods: A total of 160 patients were considered for this prospective, randomized, double blind clinical study done in a single tertiary care institution. Patients were either included in group D, to receive 1.0μg·kg -1 i.v. dexmedetomidine or group L, to receive 0.3 mg·kg -1 i.v. labetalol in 100ml of normal saline before induction of anaesthesia. Patient's hemodynamic parameters were noted pre-operatively before starting infusion and at fixed intervals afterwards till extrubation., Results: After intubation, mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was higher in patients of group L (128.0 ± 13.866) as compared to group D (123.2 ± 10.672). Afterwards the SBP was comparable until extrubation. Similarly, after intubation patients in group D tended to have lower diastolic pressure (73.1 ± 9.683 vs. 79.2± 14.153, P value .0017) compared to patients in group L. Also, the relative incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in patients who had received inj. labetalol., Conclusion: In patients predisposed to significant fluctuations in blood pressure or heart rate dexmedetomidine may be more suitable than labetalol due to better preservation of normal haemodynamics especially during periods of stress showing a relatively lower incidence of side effects., (Copyright © 2018 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Asymptomatic blood pressure elevation is common in the inpatient setting. National guidelines recommend treating with oral agents to slowly decrease blood pressure; however, many clinicians use intravenous antihypertensive medications, which can lead to unpredictable changes in blood pressure., Objective: To decrease the number of inappropriate orders (without symptoms of hypertensive emergency or order for NPO) of intravenous antihypertensives and adverse events associated with intravenous orders., Design: Quasi-experimental study with multidisciplinary intervention., Participants: Inpatients with a one-time order for an intravenous antihypertensive agent from January 2016 to February 2018., Main Measures: The main outcomes were the total numbers of orders and inappropriate orders, adverse events, and alternate etiologies per 1,000 patient-days. As a balancing measure, patients were monitored for adverse events when blood pressure was elevated and not treated., Key Results: There were a total of 260 one-time orders of intravenous antihypertensives on two medical units. Inappropriate orders decreased from 8.3 to 3.3 per 1,000 patient days (P = .0099). Adverse events associated with intravenous antihypertensives decreased from 3.7 to 0.8 per 1,000 patient days (P = .0072)., Conclusion: This initiative demonstrated a significant reduction in inappropriate use of IV antihypertensives and an associated reduction in adverse events.

Purpose: The study assesses the safety of high-dose intravenous (i.v.) labetalol in adults., Methods: This is a retrospective administrative record review of 28 hospitals in one health care system, from October 2010 through October 2015. Patients were included if they received 300 mg of i.v. labetalol within a 24-hour period. Vital signs, adverse events and cumulative medication doses were obtained for up to 24 hours while on labetalol. Adverse events were defined as any systolic blood pressure measurement less than 90 mm Hg or heart rate less than 60 beats per minute., Results: We analyzed the records of 188 patients who received i.v. labetalol at higher than the maximum recommended dose of 300 mg. The mean dose of labetalol was 996 mg (range 300 to 4465 mg). The cumulative labetalol dose was not associated with adverse safety outcomes (p = 0.428), although eighty-one patients (44.3%) experienced adverse events. Sixty-six patients (36.5%) developed bradycardia and 34 patients (18.6%) developed hypotension. Only five patients (2.7%) required a rescue agent for refractory adverse events., Conclusion: A retrospective review of high-dose i.v. labetalol hydrochloride with doses greater than 300 mg in 24 hours observed a high rate of bradycardia and hypotension, but the study found that these events rarely caused clinically significant hemodynamic compromise and was not statistically associated with adverse events.

Beta-blockers are one of the most commonly prescribed classes of antihypertensive medications during pregnancy. Previous studies reported an association between beta-blocker exposure and intrauterine growth restriction. Whether some beta-blocker subtypes may be associated with higher risk is not known. This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women exposed to beta-blockers in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Region between 2003 and 2014. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate association between exposure to different beta-blocker agents and risk of low fetal birth weights. In a cohort of 379 238 singleton pregnancies, 4847 (1.3%) were exposed to beta-blockers. The four most commonly prescribed beta-blockers were labetalol (n = 3357), atenolol (n = 638), propranolol (n = 489), and metoprolol (n = 324). Mean birth weight and % low birth weight (<2500 g) were 2926 ± 841 g and 24.4% for labetalol, 3058 ± 748 g and 18.0% for atenolol, 3163 ± 702 g and 13.3% for metoprolol, 3286 ± 651 g and 7.6% for propranolol, and 3353 ± 554 g and 5.2% for non-exposed controls. Exposure to atenolol and labetalol were associated with increased risks of infant born small for gestational age (SGA) (atenolol: adjusted OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7-3.3; labetalol: adjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI: 2.6-3.2). Risk of SGA associated with metoprolol or propranolol exposure was not significantly different from the non-exposed group (metoprolol: adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI: 0.9-2.3; propranolol: adjusted OR 1.3, 95% CI: 0.9-1.9). Association between beta-blocker exposure and SGA does not appear to be a class effect. Variations in pharmacodynamics and confounding by indication may explain these findings., (©2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: Several antihypertensive drugs are used in the treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy. The present study is a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of these drugs., Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing drugs used in the treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy. The number of women achieving the target blood pressure (BP) was the primary outcome. Doses required and time taken for achieving the target BP, failure rate, and incidences of maternal tachycardia, palpitation, hypotension, headache, and neonatal death and stillbirth were the secondary outcomes. Mixed treatment comparison pooled estimates were generated using a random-effects model. Odds ratios for the categorical and mean difference for the numerical outcomes were the effect estimates., Results: Fifty-one studies were included in the systematic review and 46 in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in the number of patients achieving target BP was observed between any of the drugs. Diazoxide [-15 (-20.6, -9.4)], nicardipine [-11.8 (-22.3, -1.2)], nifedipine/celastrol [-19.3 (-27.4, -11.1)], nifedipine/vitamin D [-17.1 (-25.7, -9.7)], nifedipine/resveratrol [-13.9 (-22.6, -5.2)] and glyceryl trinitrate [-33.8 (-36.7, -31)] were observed to achieve the target BP (in minutes) more rapidly than hydralazine. Nifedipine required fewer doses than hydralazine for achieving the target BP. Glyceryl trinitrate and labetalol were associated with fewer incidences of tachycardia and palpitation respectively than hydralazine. Trial sequential analysis concluded adequate evidence for hydralazine and nifedipine compared with labetalol. Moderate quality of evidence was observed for direct comparison estimate between labetalol and hydralazine but was either low or very low for other comparisons., Conclusion: The present evidence suggests similar efficacy between nifedipine, hydralazine and labetalol in the treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy. Subtle differences may exist in their safety profile. The evidence is inadequate for other drugs., (© 2018 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Purpose: Early onset preeclampsia (PPE) contributes to life-threatening maternal complications and fetal demise. Pharmacogenomics is a precision medicine, and metabolizing enzymes responsive to antihypertensive remains understudied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations of polymorphisms of cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 6 (CYP2D6) and cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 9 (CYP2C9) with PPE and the relationship among CYP2D6, CYP2C9 polymorphisms and response to labetalol therapy., Methods: Totally 105 gravidas diagnosed with PPE (case) and 103 healthy gravidas (control) were recruited between August 2013 and July 2016. Labetalol was given to control blood pressures (BP) with PPE. If labetalol administration alone did not exceed the mean dose and effectively controlled the BP, it would be considered to be valid (n = 75). Genotype and allele frequencies of CYP2C9 gene (rs1057910 and rs4918758) and CYP2D6 gene (rs1065852, rs28371725, rs35742686, and rs3892097) were analyzed by TaqMan PCR. Differences in the genotype and allele frequencies were compared between case-control groups, and the responsive and nonresponsive to labetalol in PPE., Results: Out of six variants, only CC and CT genotypes of the CYP2D6 variants (rs28371725) in PPE were significantly higher than those in the control group [18.1% (19/105) vs 14.6% (15/103); 56.2% (59/105) vs 42.7% (44/103); χ2 = 6.707]. However, there were no differences in maternal age, diastolic pressure, BMI, BW, serum triglyceride, and creatinine were observed among women with CC, CT, or TT genotype of CYP2D6 gene rs28371725 in the experimental group (all P > 0.05). Compared with the gravidas with CT or TT genotype of CYP2D6 gene rs28371725, those with CC genotype had longer gestational age [(32.5 ± 2.1) vs (29.5 ± 1.8) and (29.8 ± 2.2) weeks] and higher plasma albumin [(27.2 ± 9.3) vs (20.3 ± 10.4) and (22.5 ± 7.4) g/L], but lower systolic pressure and 24 h urine protein (LSD test, all P < 0.05). The G allele frequency in CYP2D6 gene rs1065852 nonresponsive to labetalol group was higher than that in responsive labetalol group [93.3% (56/60) vs 76.0% (114/150), χ2 = 8.351, P = 0.004]., Conclusions: The polymorphism of CYP2D6 gene rs28371725 may be associated with PPE, and the allele of G in CYP2D6 gene rs1065852 may be associated with the efficacy of labetalol in treatment of PPE.

Objective: To estimate whether the diagnosis of asthma is associated with the use of specific uterotonic and antihypertensive medications during delivery hospitalizations., Methods: We used Perspective, an administrative database, to determine whether women hospitalized for delivery complicated by postpartum hemorrhage or preeclampsia received uterotonics and antihypertensive medications differentially based on the absence or presence of asthma from 2006 to 2015. Given that carboprost and intravenous (IV) labetalol may be associated with asthma exacerbation, adjusted models for receipt of these medications were created with adjusted risk ratios with 95% CIs as measures of effect. Risk for status asthmaticus based on receipt of carboprost and IV labetalol was analyzed., Results: Over the study period, a total of 5,691,178 women were analyzed, of whom 239,915 (4.2%) had preeclampsia and 139,841 postpartum hemorrhage (2.5%). Carboprost was used less frequently in patients with asthma compared with patients with no asthma (11.4% vs 18.0%) in comparison with IV labetalol, which was used more commonly when a diagnosis of asthma was present (18.5% vs 16.7%). In unadjusted analysis, the presence of asthma was associated with a 37% decrease in likelihood of carboprost use and an 11% increase in likelihood of labetalol use. In adjusted analysis, the presence of asthma was associated with a 32% decrease in likelihood of carboprost use (adjusted risk ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.62-0.74) compared with a 7% decrease in labetalol use (adjusted risk ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). Risk for status asthmaticus was significantly increased with use of IV labetalol compared with other antihypertensive medications (6.5 vs 1.7/1,000 delivery hospitalizations, P<.01)., Conclusion: There may be an opportunity to reduce use of β-blockers and carboprost among patients with asthma. Given their association with status asthmaticus, these drugs should be used cautiously in women with asthma.

Background: Labetalol and nicardipine are antihypertensives commonly used in the management of elevated blood pressure (BP) following an acute stroke, but there is limited evidence to suggest which agent as a continuous infusion should be used preferentially in this setting., Objective: This study aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, and ease of administration of continuous-infusion labetalol with continuous-infusion nicardipine following an acute stroke., Methods: This retrospective cohort study of patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage included patients if they received either study agent within 24 hours of admission. The primary outcome was percent time spent at goal BP. Secondary outcomes included time to goal BP, the number of dose adjustments, and use of rescue antihypertensives., Results: The analysis included 99 patients who received labetalol- (n = 34) or nicardipine- (n = 65) continuous infusions. Intracerebral hemorrhage was the most common stroke subset (n = 81) followed by acute ischemic stroke (n = 18). There was no statistical difference in time at goal BP (labetalol 68.0%, nicardipine 67.0%; P = .885), rescue antihypertensive use (labetalol 14.7%, nicardipine 24.6%; P = .2570), time spent 10% above or below mean systolic BP (labetalol 35.5%, nicardipine 33.5%; P = .885), time to goal BP (labetalol 81.4 minutes, nicardipine 56.3 minutes; P = .162), and mean number of dose adjustments (labetalol 5.9, nicardipine 6.9; P = .262)., Conclusions: Labetalol- and nicardipine-continuous infusions were comparable in the studied safety and efficacy outcomes including time at goal and BP variability. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these safety and efficacy findings and to assess clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To compare the blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of labetalol and nifedipine modified release (MR) in hypertensive pregnant women. We also investigated the effect on the heart rate (HR) and determined the proportion of time spent in target., Methods: This was an exploratory study. Women with chronic hypertension taking either labetalol or nifedipine were offered 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Sleep, wake and drug ingestion times were self-reported. An indirect response model was used to analyse the systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and HR time-series; the effect of gestation and type of drug was evaluated., Results: Forty-eight women were recruited: 24 in each group. There was no difference in clinical characteristics. In women taking nifedipine there was a positive association between the dose of nifedipine and pre-dose BP p = .002, this was not present in the labetalol group. There was a difference between the drug effects on both the SBP and DBP time-series (p = .014). In comparison to labetalol, there was less variation in day time BP in those women prescribed nifedipine. Women on labetalol spent a larger proportion of time with their DBP below target (<80 mmHg). The HR dynamics were qualitatively different, a stimulatory effect was found with nifedipine compared to an inhibitory effect with labetalol., Conclusion: There are significant and important differences between the BP lowering effects of nifedipine and labetalol. A large randomised control trial is required to investigate the relationship between BP variability and time in target on pregnancy outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of as-needed (PRN) labetalol and hydralazine [intravenous (IV) or oral] in hospitalized medicine patients for the treatment of severe asymptomatic hypertension and to examine the potential negative outcomes associated with their use., Methods: The electronic health record of 250 medicine patients hospitalized at the University of Colorado Hospital between November 2014 and April 2016 who received at least one dose of PRN IV or oral hydralazine or labetalol were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was to describe the use of PRN antihypertensive medications in this population., Results: A total of 573 PRN doses of antihypertensive medication were administered. Oral hydralazine was the most common (521 doses, 90.9%). A total of 36% of PRN administrations were given for a systolic blood pressure (SBP) <180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <110 mmHg (cut-point for acute severe hypertension). No serious adverse events were related to PRN antihypertensive administration. Despite receiving at least one PRN antihypertensive medication during hospitalization, 40.8% of patients were not continued on their home antihypertensive medication(s) while hospitalized, and 62.4% of patients did not have their home regimens intensified at discharge., Conclusion: As-needed oral hydralazine is frequently prescribed for acute blood pressure lowering with administration thresholds often less than what are used to define acute severe hypertension. Many patients are prescribed PRN antihypertensive medication instead of being continued on their home regimens, and most patients do not have the intensity of their home regimens increased. Providers need to be educated about the use of PRN antihypertensive medication for the management of severe asymptomatic hypertension in the hospital setting.

Data from randomized controlled trials to guide antihypertensive agent choice for chronic hypertension in pregnancy are limited; this study aimed to compare labetalol and nifedipine, additionally assessing the impact of ethnicity on treatment efficacy. Pregnant women with chronic hypertension (12 +0 -27 +6 weeks' gestation) were enrolled at 4 UK centers (August 2014 to October 2015). Open-label first-line antihypertensive treatment was randomly assigned: labetalol- (200-1800 mg/d) or nifedipine-modified release (20-80 mg/d). Analysis included 112 women (98%) who completed the study (labetalol n=55, nifedipine n=57). Maximum blood pressure after randomization was 161/101 mm Hg with labetalol versus 163/105 mm Hg with nifedipine (mean difference systolic: 1.2 mm Hg [-4.9 to 7.2 mm Hg], diastolic: 3.3 mm Hg [-0.6 to 7.3 mm Hg]). Mean blood pressure was 134/84 mm Hg with labetalol and 134/85 mm Hg with nifedipine (mean difference systolic: 0.3 mm Hg [-2.8 to 3.4 mm Hg], and diastolic: -1.9 mm Hg [-4.1 to 0.3 mm Hg]). Nifedipine use was associated with a 7.4-mm Hg reduction (-14.4 to -0.4 mm Hg) in central aortic pressure, measured by pulse wave analysis. No difference in treatment effect was observed in black women (n=63), but a mean 4 mm Hg reduction (-6.6 to -0.8 mm Hg; P =0.015) in brachial diastolic blood pressure was observed with labetalol compared with nifedipine in non-black women (n=49). Labetalol and nifedipine control mean blood pressure to target in pregnant women with chronic hypertension. This study provides support for a larger definitive trial scrutinizing the benefits and side effects of first-line antihypertensive treatment., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN40973936., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: Although medication is generally avoided wherever possible during pregnancy, pharmacotherapy is required for the treatment of pregnancy associated hypertension, which remains a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The long-term effects to the child of in-utero exposure to antihypertensive agents remains largely unknown., Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review published studies on adverse outcomes to the child associated with in-utero exposure to antihypertensive medications., Methods: OVID, Scopus, EBSCO Collections, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant publications published between January 1950 and October 2016 and a total of 688 potentially eligible studies were identified., Results: Following review, 47 primary studies were eligible for inclusion. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to assess study quality. Five studies were of excellent quality; the remainder were either mediocre or poor. Increased risk of low birth weight, low size for gestational age, preterm birth, and congenital defects following in-utero exposure to all antihypertensive agents were identified. Two studies reported an increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder following exposure to labetalol, and an increased risk of sleep disorders following exposure to methyldopa and clonidine., Conclusion: The current systematic review demonstrates a paucity of relevant published high-quality studies. A small number of studies suggest possible increased risk of adverse child health outcomes; however, most published studies have methodological weaknesses and/or lacked statistical power thus preventing any firm conclusions being drawn.

Background and Purpose: Increased sympathetic tone causes hypertension after intracerebral hemorrhage, and blood pressure reduction has been studied as a way to decrease hemorrhage growth and improve outcomes. It is unknown if the antihypertensive used to achieve blood pressure goals influences either. Because sympatholytic drugs reduce death and infection in animal models, we hypothesized that labetalol would improve outcomes compared with nicardipine., Methods: Prospective data from a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients receiving labetalol, nicardipine, or both during their first 3 days of hospitalization were included. Outcomes included in-hospital death; discharge modified Rankin Score >2; and in-hospital urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or bacteremia. Patients were compared with propensity scoring and analyzed with linear models adjusted for significant confounders., Results: Of 1066 admissions, 525 were treated with labetalol or nicardipine and are included; 229 (43.6%) received labetalol, 107 (20.4%) received nicardipine, and 189 (36.0%) received both. Mortality and infection rates were 40.2% and 15.8%, respectively, 77.2% had a modified Rankin Score >2. After adjustment, compared with nicardipine alone, labetalol alone was associated with infection (odds ratio, 3.12; confidence interval, 1.27-7.64; P =0.013) but not when combined with nicardipine (odds ratio, 2.44; confidence interval, 0.98-6.07; P =0.055). Labetalol, with or without nicardipine, was not associated with death or discharge modified Rankin Score >2., Conclusions: Compared with nicardipine, labetalol was associated with increased in-hospital infections, but not mortality or modified Rankin Score >2. These findings do not support our hypothesis that labetalol use improves outcomes relative to nicardipine in intracerebral hemorrhage., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Objective: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) affect foetal outcome. Labetalol is frequently used to lower maternal blood pressure and prolong pregnancy. Conflicting evidence exists for specific neonatal side effects described after maternal labetalol treatment. Our aim was to investigate neonatal effects of foetal exposure to labetalol on cerebral oxygenation and extraction., Methods: In a prospective observational study, clinical characteristics, vital parameters and cerebral oxygen delivery and extraction were collected during the first 24 h of life in labetalol-exposed preterm neonates and compared with two control groups., Results: Twenty-two infants with a mean gestational age of 28.9 weeks, born from labetalol-treated mothers with HDP were included and matched with 22 infants with non-labetalol-treated mothers with HDP and 22 infants without maternal HDP. No significant differences between groups were found neither in heart rate, blood pressure and inotropic support, nor in mean regional cerebral oxygen saturation and fractional tissue oxygen extraction., Conclusion: Foetal labetalol exposure associated effects on preterm heart rate, blood pressure, cerebral oxygenation and extraction are not demonstrated. Maternal disease severity seems to play a more important role in neonatal cerebral haemodynamics. Maternal labetalol treatment has no clinically important short term side effects in the preterm neonate.

The study was performed to assess the response & side effects of injectable Labetalol in the treatment of pregnancy induced severe hypertension. This interventional study was carried out on 72 patients having pregnancy induced severe hypertension attended in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mymensingh Medical College & Hospital (MMCH), Mymensingh, Bangladesh from November 2009 to October 2010. All patients were treated with intravenous Labetalol 20mg & the dose was repeated at sequential escalating dosages every 15 minutes until a therapeutic goal of systolic blood pressure <160mm of Hg & diastolic blood pressure <105mm of Hg were achieved. Among 72 respondents highest number were observed having systolic blood pressure 160-169 and 180 & above mm of Hg. The mean systolic & the diastolic blood pressure at the initiation of the study were observed 198±13.17mm of Hg & 119±8.6mm of Hg respectively. After use of injection Labetalol mean systolic blood pressure were 138.61±15.43mm of Hg, which is statistically significant (p value <0.001) & mean diastolic blood pressure were 96.18±9.7mm of Hg, which is also statistically significant (p value <0.001). It was observed that majority patients' blood pressure was controlled by 1-2 doses. It was noticed that injection Labetalol controls blood pressure in 80% antenatal cases & 86% postnatal cases. Out of 72 patients 4 cases (5.5%) experienced nausea & vomiting and only 1 case (1.1%) experienced headache. Regarding fetal outcome 48% patients delivered healthy baby, about 31% patients delivered asphyxiated baby & neonatal death were noticed in 4% cases. This study assessing the response & side effects of intravenous antihypertensive drug in the treatment of pregnancy induced severe hypertension shows that Labetalol fulfils the criteria of an antihypertensive drug for this purpose.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of labetalol versus nitroglycerin for induction of controlled hypotension during sinus endoscopic surgery., Design: A prospective, double-blind and randomized study., Setting: Carried out in operating room in university hospital., Patients: 60 patients of both sexes, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, age range from 20 to 60years; scheduled for elective sinus endoscopic surgery under general anesthesia (GA)., Interventions: Patients were divided into two groups (30 each). NTG group received nitroglycerin infusion at a dose of 2-5μg/kg/min, LAB group received labetalol infusion at a dose of 0.5-2mg/min., Measurements: Surgical condition was assessed by surgeon using average category scale (ACS) of 0-5, a value of 2-3 being ideal. In both groups mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was gradually reduced till the ideal ACS for assessment of surgical condition, the target of ACS was 2-3 or lower., Results: Both studied drugs achieved desired hypotension and improved visualization of surgical field by decreasing bleeding in the surgical site, but ideal surgical conditions were created at mild hypotension (MAP 70-75) in LAB group while same conditions were created at MAP of 65-69mmHg in NTG group. Mean heart rate (HR) was significantly higher in NTG group as compared to LAB group. Blood loss decreased significantly in LAB group., Conclusion: Both labetalol and NTG are effective and safe drugs for induction of controlled hypotension during sinus endoscopic surgery. While, labetalol was better as it offered optimum operative condition with mild decrease in blood pressure, decreased surgical bleeding and less tachycardia during the surgery., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: β blockers are widely used in the treatment of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. These medications cross the placenta and may cause physiologic changes in neonates exposed in utero. We sought to define the risks of neonatal hypoglycemia and bradycardia associated with maternal exposure to β blockers at the time of delivery in a large, nationwide cohort of Medicaid beneficiaries., Methods: We used a cohort of 2 292 116 completed pregnancies linked to liveborn infants of Medicaid-enrolled women from 2003 to 2007. We examined the risks of neonatal hypoglycemia and neonatal bradycardia associated with maternal exposure to β blockers at the time of delivery. Propensity score matching was used to control for potential confounders including maternal demographics, obstetric and medical conditions, and exposure to other medications., Results: There were 10 585 (0.5%) pregnancies exposed to β blockers at the time of delivery. The risk of neonatal hypoglycemia was 4.3% in the β blocker-exposed neonates versus 1.2% in the unexposed; the risk of neonatal bradycardia was 1.6% in the exposed versus 0.5% in the unexposed. After controlling for confounders, risk remained elevated for both neonatal hypoglycemia and bradycardia among exposed pregnancies versus unexposed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.68, 95% confidence interval, 1.50-1.89 and adjusted odds ratio, 1.29, 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.55, respectively)., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that neonates born to mothers exposed to β blockers in late pregnancy, including labetalol, are at elevated risk for neonatal hypoglycemia and bradycardia., Competing Interests: POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Hernandez-Diaz has consulted for AstraZeneca and UCB for unrelated projects, and served as investigator on grants to the Brigham & Women’s Hospital from Lilly and Pfizer. The Pharmacoepidemiology Program at the Harvard School of Public Health is supported by Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, and Asisa. Drs Huybrechts and Bateman are investigators on grants to the Brigham & Women’s Hospital from Lilly and Pfizer, and Dr Bateman is an investigator on grants from Baxalta, unrelated to the topic of this manuscript. The other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Objective: To determine whether the incidence of hypotension or adverse fetal heart tracing (FHT) category change differed following antepartum administration of intravenous (IV) labetalol versus hydralazine., Methods: Blood pressure and FHT categories were assessed one hour before and after medication administration. Hypotension was defined as ≥30% reduction in baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) or SBP <90 mmHg. Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) were also compared. The National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) three-tier category system was used to describe the FHT. For all category II tracings, Parer and Ikeda's system was also used., Results: Sixty-nine women received hydralazine and 31 women received labetalol during the study period. The incidence of hypotension (≥30% reduction in SBP) was similar between the labetalol (10%) and hydralazine (11%) groups (p = 0.98). No women experienced post-treatment SBP <90 mmHg. No association was observed between fetal heart rate category change and drug used. No women required emergent delivery for fetal indications., Conclusions: The incidence of maternal hypotension was low and did not differ following antepartum IV labetalol versus hydralazine use. These data should reassure providers about the use of parenteral labetalol and hydralazine for the treatment of severe hypertension.

The prevalence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy is increasing. The etiology and pathophysiology of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy remain poorly understood. Hypertensive disorders are a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Treatment of hypertension decreases the incidence of severe hypertension, but it does not impact rates of preeclampsia or other pregnancy complications. Several antihypertensive medications are commonly used in pregnancy, although there is a lack of randomized controlled trials. Severe hypertension should be treated immediately to prevent maternal end-organ damage. Appropriate antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum management is important in caring for patients with hypertensive disorders., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Labetalol, a combined alfa and beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist, is used as an antihypertensive drug. We report a case of an acute rise in blood pressure and lower limb pain due to the inadvertent intrathecal administration of labetalol, mistaking it for bupivacaine, during obstetric anesthesia. The situation was rescued by converting to general anesthesia. The cesarean delivery was uneventful, and mother as well as newborn child showed no ill-effect. This particular medication error was attributable to a failure on the part of the doctors administering the injection to read and cross-check medication labels and the practice of keeping multiple injections together. In the absence of an organized medication error reporting system and action on that basis, such events may recur in future.

Case Description: Hyperkalemia can cause altered cardiac electrical conduction resulting in death. We describe a case of a 23-year old pregnant patient who presented with severe epigastric pain and vomiting. She was severely pre- eclamptic and received initial treatment with intravenous labetalol and decision was taken to deliver. She quickly became hyperkalaemic (serum potassium level 6.4 mmol/L) and labetalol was discontinued and intravenous hydralazine commenced. Post-surgery, her potassium levels were normal but due to rapidly rising blood pressure labetalol was recommenced, resulting in elevated potassium levels. Labetolol was discontinued, hydralazine prescribed, and potassium levels normalised. The adverse reaction was classified as 'probably' due to labetolol using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction scale., Conclusion: This is the first reported case of labetolol induced hyperkalaemia in pregnancy, with life threatening consequences and hence all health professionals should be alert to this potential effect.