Search

Background: Malnutrition among hospitalized patients has clinical implications, and interest has arisen to find screening tools able to identify subjects under risk. At present, there is no consensus about the most suitable nutrition screening tool for pediatric patients. Aim: To validate STAMP (Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics) pediatric screening tool in Spain. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of patients admitted to a 3rd level children's hospital with both medical and surgical specialities. During the first 24 hours of admission, STAMP screening tool was applied. For its validation, results were compared with those obtained from a nutritional assessment performed by specialist staff, which included clinical, anthropometric and body composition data. Results: A sample of 250 children was studied. Nutritional assessment identified 64 patients (25.6 %) under risk, 40 of whom were malnourished (16 %). STAMP classified 48.4% of the patients as being under nutritional risk. This tool showed 75% sensitivity and 60.8% specificity when identifying patients under risk according to nutritional assessment. It showed 90% sensitivity and 59.5% specificity when identifying malnourished patients. Comments: Malnutrition was less frequent than that reported in other European countries, although diagnosis technique was different. STAMP is a simple and useful tool for nutritional screening, avoiding the need to assess all patients on admission in order to identify those under nutritional risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence of eight mutations in 84 patients with β-thalassaemia major and in 16 subjects with thalassaemia intermedia was investigated. All of the patients were Italian, originating from Eastern Sicily (Messina area) and some Calabrian regions. Genomic DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). DNA molecular investigations were performed by allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridization, to identify the following β-thalassaemia mutations: CD39 (C-T), IVS1-110 (G-A), IVS1-6 (T-C), IVS1-1 (G-A), IVS2-745 (C-G), IVS2-1 (G-A), -87 (C-G), CD6 A (-A). Our data underline that in thalassemia intermedia two mutations were statistically prevalent: IVS1-6 T→C (P < 0.001) and CD 6-A (P < 0.05). CD 39 was statistically prevalent in β-thalassaemia major patients (P < 0.01). The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant for all the other mutations. Five different genotypes were recorded among thalassaemia intermedia and 15 among β-thalassaemia major patients. Twenty-five percent of the intermedia patients and 4.5% of the major patients had homozygosity for mild mutations (group I); 62.5% of the intermedia patients and 26.2% of the major patients had combinations of mild/severe mutations (group II). In addition, homozygosity or double heterozygosity for severe mutations (group III) was found in 12.5% of the intermedia patients and 69% of the major patients. Some genotypes were restricted to thalassaemia intermedia, including heterozygosity -87/IVS1-6 and IVS1-6/CD 6-A. It is essential to understand the distribution and frequency of the relevant mutations in each population where β-thalassaemias exist. This is of particular importance for genotype–phenotype correlation and for carrier detection, genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]