Search

Background: The cause of early graft failure within 1 year of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) remains unclear. The association of early failure with a nonanatomic horn position of the allograft after lateral MAT with the keyhole technique has never been evaluated. Hypothesis: A nonanatomic horn position of an allograft would be a significant risk factor for a premature graft tear as compared with an anatomically positioned allograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: From October 2007 to October 2016, 208 patients (214 knees) with primary isolated lateral MAT in a single center were enrolled. A >5-mm or 10% discrepancy between pre- and postoperative horn position was defined as "nonanatomic," and the early failure rate was compared. Among 214 cases of lateral MAT, 54 were nonanatomically positioned, and 160 were anatomically positioned. The early failures (within 1 year after MAT) were defined as (1) grade 3 signal intensities (tears) over one-third of the allograft on magnetic resonance image or (2) removal of more than one-third of the allograft because of tears. Results: Among the early failure cases, 6 were in the nonanatomic group and 5 in the anatomic group. The failure rate was 11.1% (6 of 54) in the nonanatomic group and 3.1% (5 of 160) in the anatomic group, with a 5.1% (11 of 214) overall early failure rate. The nonanatomic horn position group had an increased risk of early graft failure as compared with the anatomically positioned group (odds ratio = 3.88; 95% CI, 1.13-13.26). Anteriorized and lateralized horn position was identified in the nonanatomic group as compared with the anatomic group. Differences in patient age, sex, body mass index, involved knee, cartilage status, alignment of lower extremity, and joint space width were not statistically significant between the groups. Conclusion: Horn position discrepancy was associated with an increased risk of early graft failures. Meticulous insertion of a bone bridge is needed to ensure anatomically correct horn positioning to avoid early graft failure in lateral MAT with the keyhole technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Meniscal extrusion is related to degeneration of the native knee joint. However, the clinical effect of the phenomenon after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has not been clearly identified. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in meniscal extrusion in both the coronal and sagittal planes after lateral MAT through the midterm follow-up period. We hypothesized that meniscal extrusion does not progress during the midterm follow-up period. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 46 patients with a mean follow-up of 51.1 ± 7.1 months were included in the study. The patients underwent lateral MAT using the keyhole technique. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 6-week, 1-year, and midterm (3- to 5-year) follow-up. In the coronal plane, the absolute value of meniscal subluxation and the relative percentage of extrusion (RPE) were measured. In the sagittal plane, meniscal subluxation was measured as the absolute and relative anterior cartilage meniscal distance (ACMD) and posterior cartilage meniscal distance (PCMD). The joint-space width (JSW) on weightbearing radiographs with 2 different knee positions was measured preoperatively and at 1-year and midterm follow-up. The Lysholm score was assessed at the same time points. Results: In the coronal plane, the mean absolute meniscal extrusion at 6-week, 1-year, and final follow-up was 2.90 ± 0.94, 2.85 ± 0.97, and 2.83 ± 0.89 mm, respectively, and the mean RPE was 27.0% ± 9.4%, 27.1% ± 10.1%, and 27.8% ± 9.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in absolute and relative coronal extrusion among the 3 time periods (P > .05). The percentage of patients with meniscal extrusion (≥3 mm) was 37.0% at 6-week follow-up and 34.8% at 1-year and final follow-up. In the sagittal plane, the mean absolute ACMD was 2.59 ± 1.75, 2.58 ± 1.85, and 2.37 ± 1.60 mm, respectively, and the mean relative ACMD was 20.7% ± 13.1%, 20.6% ± 13.8%, and 19.0% ± 12.2%, respectively, at the 3 follow-up time points. The mean absolute PCMD was −1.23 ± 3.34, −1.28 ± 3.08, and −1.42 ± 2.77 mm, respectively, and the mean relative PCMD was −10.3% ± 25.9%, −11.0% ± 24.6%, and −12.2% ± 23.2%, respectively, at the same time points. Sagittal extrusion was not significantly different between the time points (P > .05). The mean JSW at 2 days preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and midterm follow-up was 5.40 ± 1.07, 5.44 ± 1.04, and 5.43 ± 0.98 mm, respectively, on anterior-posterior radiographs with full extension, and it was 4.90 ± 0.94, 4.94 ± 0.98, and 4.89 ± 0.96 mm, respectively, on posterior-anterior radiographs with 45° of flexion. The mean JSW values were not significantly different between the 3 different time points (P > .05). The mean preoperative Lysholm score was 58. 9 ± 8.3; the score increased to 90.4 ± 9.7 at 1 year postoperatively and 90.5 ± 10.1 at final follow-up, which is a significant improvement compared with the preoperative status (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference between the scores at the 2 postoperative time points (P > .05). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that extrusion of the meniscal allograft did not significantly progress either in the coronal or sagittal plane after lateral MAT during the midterm follow-up period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Little is known about clinical outcomes after revision meniscal allograft transplantation (RMAT), and there are no studies on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations during the early remodeling period. Hypothesis: The objective imaging results, as determined by MRI evaluation, would be inferior to those of published data on primary meniscal allograft transplantations (MATs), although short-term clinical improvement would be achieved after RMAT. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 9 consecutive patients (6 male and 3 female) who underwent RMAT from 2010 to 2014. The mean patient age was 33 years (range, 28-45 years). All patients had prior failed MATs in the lateral compartment. None of the patients had malalignment or ligament instability, and 7 patients had grade 3 or higher chondral degeneration. We assessed the RMAT with routine MRI evaluations during the remodeling period of the first postoperative year to determine graft healing and the mode of refailures, if any. We also investigated the problems specific for revision operations, as well as clinical outcomes. Results: Four of the 9 RMAT patients had significant intra-articular fibrosis with or without motion limitations at the time of RMAT. MRI evaluations demonstrated that the overall early refailure rate was 33.3% (3/9) during the first year; bucket-handle displacement with no meniscocapsular healing was the mode of all failures. Insufficient meniscal healing was also found in 2 other RMATs without premature failure. After a mean follow-up of 29.2 months (range, 21-45 months) in the 6 patients with preserved RMATs, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores showed significant improvements over preoperative scores (from 53.3 ± 6.0 to 87.7 ± 2.9 [P = .028] and from 53.4 ± 9.0 to 69.9 ± 4.8 [P = .043], respectively; Wilcoxon signed rank test). Conclusion: The MRI findings showed that poor or insufficient meniscal healing to the host joint capsule was the major drawback of RMAT. Although more than half of our patients experienced clinical improvement after RMAT, the short-term graft survival was inferior to that of primary MATs in the literature. Our findings suggest that this challenging revision procedure requires great caution, especially with regard to the effects of poor host tissue quality on meniscal healing. Although RMAT can be an effective treatment, close observation with routine MRI evaluation is necessary during the early remodeling period to assess the status of the revised meniscal allograft. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Part-time or night-time bracing has been introduced to address the poor compliance and psychological burden of full-time bracing. The results of various bracing methods vary, however, due to a lack of consistent inclusion criteria and definitions of brace effectiveness. We have evaluated the effectiveness of the Charleston night-time bending brace in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on the new standardized criteria proposed by the Scoliosis Research Society., Methods: To be included in this study, patients met the following criteria proposed by the Scoliosis Research Society: diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, age 10 years and older when the orthosis was prescribed, Risser 0-2, a primary curve magnitude of 25 to 40 degrees, and no prior treatment. A total of 95 patients (87 girls, 8 boys) were included., Results: At skeletal maturity, 80 patients (84.2%) had 5 degrees or less curve progression and 15 (15.8%) had 6 degrees or more progression. Seven patients (7.8%) were recommended to undergo or underwent surgery before skeletal maturity. Eleven patients (12.6%) progressed beyond 45 degrees. According to these 3 criteria, the Charleston night-time brace was successful in 74 patients (77.9%). Depending on curve type, we observed success rates of 78.3% (47/60) for double, 71.4% (15/21) for thoracic, 83.3% (5/6) for thoracolumbar, and 87.5% (7/8) for lumbar curves. Success rates of 80.0% (36/45) and 76.0% (38/50) were observed in patients with curve magnitudes at bracing of 25 to 30 degrees and 31 to 40 degrees, respectively. Patients with high apex curves had a 67.6% (23/34) success rate, and those with low apex curves had 83.0% (39/47) success rate. Brace success rates among patients with initial Risser signs of 0, 1, and 2 were 68.8% (22/32), 80.6% (25/31), and 84.4% (27/32), respectively., Conclusions: Compared with the results of previous natural history and conventional brace study, the Charleston night-time bending brace is effective for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis., Level of Evidence: Level VI.