Search

Introduction Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) stands as a leading global cause of death and disability, posing a significant challenge with limited treatment options, especially for chronic patients. Recent advances in stem cell therapies have opened new avenues for therapeutic potential. Our previous preclinical research has demonstrated that intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) combined with a recombinant human collagen type I scaffold enables higher cell survival and engraftment and holds promising potential. In this article, we present the protocol for a novel clinical trial, named ‘Research on Advanced Intervention using Novel Bone MarrOW stem cells for chronic intracerebral haemorrhage’ (RAINBOW-Hx).Methods and analysis RAINBOW-Hx is a phase I/II, open-label, uncontrolled study with the primary objective of assessing the safety and efficacy of intracerebral transplantation of autologous BMSCs combined with the scaffold (HUFF-01) in patients with chronic ICH. Eight patients, experiencing moderate to severe neurological deficits for 12 months or longer, will be enrolled. The haemorrhage location will be limited to the basal ganglia and thalamus. Approximately 50 mL of bone marrow will be extracted from the iliac bone of each patient, and BMSCs will be cultured using autologous platelet lysate. 3 days before transplantation, BMSCs will be combined with the scaffold to generate HUFF-01. Each patient will receive a 50 000 HUFF-01 dose, containing approximately 50 million BMSCs, through stereotactic transplantation into the haemorrhagic cavity. Neurological assessments, MRI, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 123I-Iomazenil single-photon emission CT will be performed for 1 year after administration.Ethics and dissemination The trial protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hokkaido University Hospital (R5-11), and this study is conducted according to Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.Trial registration number jRCT2013230053, Japan Registry of Clinical Trials.

Introduction In patients with combined lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS), a herniated intervertebral disc (IVD) that compresses the dura mater and nerve roots is surgically treated with discectomy after laminoplasty. However, defects in the IVD after discectomy may lead to inadequate tissue healing and predispose patients to the development of IVD degeneration. Ultrapurified stem cells (rapidly expanding clones (RECs)), combined with an in situ-forming bioresorbable gel (dMD-001), have been developed to fill IVD defects and prevent IVD degeneration after discectomy. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of a new treatment method in which a combination of REC and dMD-001 is implanted into the IVD of patients with combined LSCS.Methods and analysis This is a multicentre, prospective, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Forty-five participants aged 20–75 years diagnosed with combined LSCS will be assessed for eligibility. After performing laminoplasty and discectomy, participants will be randomised 1:1:1 into the combination of REC and dMD-001 (REC-dMD-001) group, the dMD-001 group or the laminoplasty and discectomy alone (control) group. The primary outcomes of the trial will be the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. The effectiveness will be assessed using visual analogue scale scores of back pain and leg pain as well as MRI-based estimations of morphological and compositional quality of the IVD tissue. Secondary outcomes will include self-assessed clinical scores and other MRI-based estimations of compositional quality of the IVD tissue. All evaluations will be performed at baseline and at 1, 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks after surgery.Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by the ethics committees of the institutions involved. We plan to conduct dissemination of the outcome data by presenting our data at national and international conferences, as well as through formal publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration number jRCT2013210076.

Background. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentration measured by homogeneous particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINA) may be overestimated due to its cross-reactivity with pharmacologically inactive MPA glucuronide (MPAG), as well as other minor metabolites, accumulated with renal function impairment or co-administered cyclosporine A. In contrast, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is precise because it can exclude the cross-reactivity. In this study, we assumed HPLC values for MPA (HPLC-MPA) as a reference and aimed to develop a formula correcting PETINA values for MPA (PETINA-MPA) to more precisely reflect HPLC-MPA. Methods. MPA trough concentrations were measured both by HPLC-UV and PETINA in 39 samples issued from 39 solid-organ transplant recipients. MPAG concentrations were also measured using HPLC UV assay. We determined the impacts of renal function and coadministered calcineurin inhibitor on concentrations of MPA and MPAG measured by HPLC. Then, we evaluated the difference between PETINA-MPA and HPLC-MPA. Finally, we develop a formula to reflect HPLC-MPA by using multilinear regression analysis. Results. MPAG concentration was negatively correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (R2 = 0.376, P < 0.001), although MPA was not correlated with eGFR. There were no significant differences in MPA or MPAG concentrations per dose between the patients who were co-administered tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A. Finally, we developed the formulas to reflect HPLC-MPA: Formula 1: Estimated MPA concentration = 0.048 + 0.798 × PETINA‐MPA Formula 2: Estimated MPA concentration = − 0.059 + 0.800 × PETINA‐MPA + 0.002 × eGFR However, there was no significant improvement in the coefficient of determination with addition of eGFR in the formula, suggesting that HPLC-MPA can be well predicted by only 1 variable, PETINA-MPA. Conclusions. This study developed a formula so that PETINA-MPA can be corrected to more precisely reflect HPLC-MPA.