Search

Significance: Liquid biopsy is increasingly being used in oncology for tumor molecular characterization. CHIP is a common incidental finding in cfDNA, and its prevalence increases with age. This study builds on growing evidence of common CHIP variants in patients with solid tumors. The results suggest a possible clinical impact of CHIP on treatment outcomes from immunotherapy or chemotherapy. This may have implications for treatment selection for patients with solid tumors., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Nutritional stress is a mechanism that allows tumor cells to evade the immune system. Arginine (ARG), an amino acid involved in immunomodulation, aids in regulating T-lymphocyte cell activity and the antitumor response. ARG deficiency in the tumor microenvironment can impair T-cell response while ARG supplementation may promote antitumor immune activity. In this exploratory post hoc analysis of the randomized phase II CO.26 trial, we investigated the role of plasma ARG in predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with microsatellite stable refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: CO.26 randomized patients with refractory mCRC to durvalumab plus tremelimumab (D+T) versus best supportive care (BSC). Plasma ARG concentrations were determined from pretreatment blood samples using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The median plasma ARG value was used as a cut-off stratifying patients into ARG-high (≥10 700 ng/mL) versus ARG-low (<10 700 ng/mL) groups. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the prognostic and predictive impacts of ARG on OS., Results: Of 180 patients enrolled in CO.26, 161 (N=114 treated with D+T and 47 BSC) had pretreatment blood samples for ARG analysis. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients included in this analysis and the total study patients, or between ARG-high and ARG-low patients. In the BSC arm, the median OS was 3.09 months for ARG-high versus 4.27 months for ARG-low patients (univariable HR 0.89 (0.49-1.65), p=0.72). In the D+T arm, the median OS was 7.62 months for ARG-high versus 5.27 months for ARG-low patients (univariable HR 0.68, (0.48-1.0], p=0.048). In ARG-high patients, D+T significantly improved OS (median OS 7.62 months with D+T vs 3.09 months BSC; HR 0.61 (0.37-0.99), p=0.047; adjusted p=0.042 for interaction). In ARG-low patients there was no OS benefit with D+T (median OS 5.27 months D+T vs 4.27 months BSC; HR 0.87 (0.52-1.46), p=0.61)., Conclusion: High baseline plasma ARG was predictive of improved OS in patients with mCRC treated with D+T. Further investigations are needed to validate ARG as a biomarker. Therapeutic approaches targeting the ARG pathway may augment ICI activity., Trial Registration Number: NCT02870920., Competing Interests: Competing interests: LM: Consulting or Advisory Role—Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb. DJ: Consulting or Advisory Role—AstraZeneca. HFK: Honoraria—Exelixis, Natera; Consulting or Advisory Role—TerSera; Speakers' Bureau—Natera; Research Funding—Exelixis (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst). SB: Consulting or Advisory Role—Amgen, Apobiologix, MDBriefCase, Merck, Taiho Oncology. FC: Consulting or Advisory Role—Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis Canada Pharmaceuticals. JRG: Honoraria—AstraZeneca; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses—AstraZeneca. PK: Consulting or Advisory Role—Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Canada, Taiho Pharmaceutical. BS: Honoraria—AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical; Consulting or Advisory Role—AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical. FA: Consulting or Advisory Role—Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Incyte, Merck, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical; Speakers’ Bureau—Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Merck, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical. Research Funding—Bristol Myers Squibb/Medarex (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Merck (Inst), Novartis (Inst). JML: Consulting or Advisory Role—Advanced Accelerator Applications, Amgen, Bayer, Ipsen, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical; Research Funding—Amgen (Inst), Ipsen (Inst). EC: Honoraria—AstraZeneca Canada, Bayer, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche; Research Funding—1Globe Health Institute, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, NuBiyota, Repare Therapeutics, Roche Canada., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Palliative treatment options for painful hepatic cancer can be restricted due to patients eventually becoming refractory to standard treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether radiotherapy improves hepatic pain from cancer., Methods: In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial (CCTG HE1) done in nine cancer centres across Canada, we included patients aged 18 years or older with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases, who were refractory to standard treatment, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3, with life expectancy of more than 3 months, and pain or discomfort at its worst in the past 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) of at least 4 out of 10, which was stable for up to 7 days before randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a minimisation method after stratification by centre and type of cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma vs liver metastases), to single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) to the liver with 8 mg ondansetron (or equivalent) orally and 4 mg dexamethasone orally given 1-2 h before radiotherapy plus best supportive care (including non-opioid or opioid analgesia, or dexamethasone, or a combination of these) or best supportive care alone. The primary endpoint was improvement in patient-reported liver cancer pain or discomfort of at least 2 points on worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month after randomisation. All patients with both baseline and 1-month assessments were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511522, and is complete., Findings: Between July 25, 2015, and June 2, 2022, 66 patients were screened and randomly assigned to radiotherapy plus best supportive care (n=33) or best supportive care (n=33). Median age was 65 years (IQR 57-72), 37 (56%) of 66 patients were male, 29 (44%) were female, 43 (65%) had liver metastases, and 23 (35%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (data on race and ethnicity were not collected). As of data cutoff (Sept 8, 2022), median follow-up was 3·2 months (95% CI 3·0-3·4). 24 (73%) of 33 in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group and 18 (55%) of 33 in the best supportive care only group completed baseline and 1-month assessments. An improvement in hepatic pain of at least 2 points in worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month was seen in 16 (67%) of 24 patients in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group versus four (22%) of 18 patients in the best supportive care group (p=0·0042). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events within 1 month after randomisation were abdominal pain (three [9%] of 33 in the radiotherapy group vs one [3%] of 33 in best supportive care group) and ascites (two [6%] vs one [3%]). No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths were observed., Interpretation: Single-fraction radiotherapy plus best supportive care improved pain compared with best supportive care alone in patients with liver cancer, and could be considered a standard palliative treatment., Funding: Canadian Cancer Society., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests LAD had a licensing agreement with Raysearch Oncology and has received a grant from Merck and an honorarium from AstraZeneca. DR is the current president of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (CARO) and has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Accuray and Varian Medical Systems. PW has received a grant from AstraZeneca. JJK has received grants from Ibsen, Roche, and Merck and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Ibsen, Incyte, Roche, and Eisai. ASB has received an honorarium from Eisai. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Purpose: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), RAS mutations drive resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. It is unclear whether RAS mutations ever become clonally undetectable., Methods: CO.26 was a phase II clinical trial that assessed durvalumab + tremelimumab in heavily pretreated mCRC. RAS mutation status was tracked over time using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing at baseline, week 8, and on progression., Results: Among the 95 patients with KRAS/NRAS mutations in their archival tumor tissue, 6.3% (6/95) had undetectable RAS mutations in ctDNA collected at baseline or week 8 of the CO.26 study. Of these, 67% (4/6) of disappearances were transient, with the same mutation reappearing with progressive disease. In three cases, the simultaneous persistence of other preexisting CRC-associated truncal mutations could not be demonstrated, suggestive of low tumor shedding of ctDNA, leaving the incidence of true clonal reversion to RAS -wildtype (WT) possibly as low as 3.2% (3/95). Fewer patients in the neo- RAS -WT group (33%) had greater than four lesions at trial baseline compared with patients with persistent RAS mutations (75%), P = .046. The likelihood of synchronous metastases at cancer diagnosis (33% v 63%; P = .15) or liver metastases at trial baseline (50% v 68.5%; P = .17) was not significantly different between patients with disappearing versus persistent RAS mutations. Overall survival from stage IV diagnosis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.72]; P = .52) was not significantly different between those with disappearing versus persistent RAS mutations. The disappearance of RAS mutations was not associated with primary tumor sidedness ( P = .41), archival BRAF/MEK/ERK -mutant status ( P = .16/1.00/.09), nor baseline ctDNA HER2 amplifications ( P = 1.00)., Conclusion: We identified a 3.2%-6.3% prevalence of the neo- RAS -WT phenomenon in the CO.26 trial. However, 67% of apparent cases were transient with subsequent re-emergence.

Purpose: Tissue-derived tumor mutation burden (TMB) of ≥10 mutations/Mb is a histology-agnostic biomarker for the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab. However, the dataset in which this was validated lacked colorectal cancers (CRC), and there is limited evidence for immunotherapy benefits in CRC using this threshold., Patients and Methods: CO.26 was a randomized phase II study of 180 patients, comparing durvalumab and tremelimumab (D + T, n = 119 patients) versus best supportive care (BSC; n = 61 patients). ctDNA sequencing was available for 168 patients (n = 118 D + T; n = 50), of whom 165 had evaluable plasma TMB (pTMB). Tissue sequencing was available for 108 patients. Optimal thresholds for stratifying patients based on OS were determined using a minimal P value approach. This report includes the final OS analysis., Results: Tissue TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb was not predictive of benefit from D + T compared with BSC in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic CRC [HR, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.28-1.80); P = 0.47]. No tissue TMB threshold could identify a high TMB group that benefited from ICI. By contrast, plasma TMB (pTMB) ≥28 mutations/Mb was predictive of benefit from D + T [HR, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.13-0.85); P = 0.022], as was clonal pTMB ≥10.6 mutations/Mb [HR, 0.10 (95% CI, 0.014-0.79); P = 0.029] and subclonal pTMB ≥25.9/Mb [HR, 0.20 (95% CI, 0.061-0.69); P = 0.010]. Higher pTMB was associated with length of time on cytotoxic agents (P = 0.021) and prior anti-EGFR exposure (P = 2.44 × 10-06)., Conclusions: pTMB derived from either clonal or subclonal mutations may identify a group likely to benefit from immunotherapy, although validation is required. Tissue TMB provided no predictive utility for immunotherapy in this trial., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Although contact days-days with health-care contact outside home-are increasingly adopted as a measure of time toxicity and treatment burden, they could also serve as a surrogate of treatment-related harm. We sought to assess the association between contact days and patient-reported outcomes and the prognostic ability of contact days., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of CO.17 that evaluated cetuximab vs supportive care in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CO.17 collected European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 instrument data. We assessed the association between number of contact days in a window and changes in physical function and global health status and the association between number of contact days in the first 4 weeks with overall survival., Results: There was a negative association between the number of contact days and change in physical function (per each additional contact day: at 4 weeks, 1.50-point decrease; 8 weeks, 1.06-point decrease; P < .0001 for both) but not with global health status. This negative association was seen in patients receiving cetuximab but not supportive care. More contact days in the first 4 weeks was associated with worse overall survival for all participants and patients receiving cetuximab (per each additional contact day: all participants, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.10; and cetuximab, adjusted HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.11; P < .0001 for both)., Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of a clinical trial, more contact days early in the course were associated with declines in physical function and worse survival in all participants and in participants receiving cancer-directed treatment., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Many research studies have investigated the relationship between baseline factors or exposures, such as patient demographic and disease characteristics, and study outcomes such as toxicities or quality of life, but results from most of these studies may be problematic because of potential confounding effects (eg, the imbalance in baseline factors or exposures). It is important to study whether the baseline factors or exposures have causal effects on the clinical outcomes, so that clinicians can have better understanding of the diseases and develop personalized medicine. Mendelian randomization (MR) provides an efficient way to estimate the causal effects using genetic instrumental variables to handle confounders, but most of the existing studies focus on a single outcome at a time and ignores the correlation structure of multiple outcomes. Given that clinical outcomes like toxicities and quality of life are usually a mixture of different types of variables, and multiple datasets may be available for such outcomes, it may be much more beneficial to analyze them jointly instead of separately. Some well-established methods are available for building multivariate models on mixed outcomes, but they do not incorporate MR mechanism to deal with the confounders. To overcome these challenges, we propose a Bayesian-based two-stage multivariate MR method for mixed outcomes on multiple datasets, called BMRMO. Using simulation studies and clinical applications on the CO.17 and CO.20 studies, we demonstrate better performance of our approach compared to the commonly used univariate two-stage method., (© 2023 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Sidedness is prognostic and predictive of anti-EGFR efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Transverse colon has been historically excluded from several analyses of sidedness and the optimal division between left- and right-sided colorectal cancer is unclear. We investigated transverse colon primary tumor location as a biomarker in mCRC., Experimental Design: Pooled analysis of CCTG/AGITG CO.17 and CO.20 trials of cetuximab in chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. Outcomes of patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type (WT) mCRC from CO.17 and KRAS WT mCRC from CO.20 were analyzed according to location., Results: A total of 553 patients were analyzed, 32 (5.8%) with cancers from the transverse, 101 (18.3%) from right, and 420 from (75.9%) left colon. Transverse mCRC failed to reach significant benefit from cetuximab versus best supportive care (BSC) for overall survival [OS; median, 5.9 vs. 2.1 months; HR, 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-1.42; P=0.26] and progression-free survival (PFS; median, 1.8 vs. 1.3 months; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.26-1.28; P=0.16). Analyzing exclusively patients randomized to cetuximab, right-sided and transverse had comparable outcomes for OS (median, 5.6 vs. 5.9 months; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50-1.34; P=0.43) and PFS (median, 1.9 vs. 1.8 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.49-1.26; P=0.31). Patients with left-sided mCRC had superior outcomes with cetuximab compared with transverse for OS (median, 9.7 vs. 5.9 months; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.67; P=0.0002) and PFS (median, 3.8 vs. 1.8 months; HR, 0,49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.76; P=0.001). Location was not prognostic in patients treated with BSC alone., Conclusions: Transverse mCRC has comparable prognostic and predictive features with right-sided mCRC., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Suboptimal treatment outcomes with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folate, the standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), have generated interest in optimizing the folate. Arfolitixorin ([6R]-5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate) is an immediately active folate and may improve outcomes over the existing standard of care (leucovorin)., Experimental Design: AGENT was a randomized, phase III study (NCT03750786). Patients with mCRC were randomized to arfolitixorin (120 mg/m2 given as two intravenous bolus doses of 60 mg/m2) or leucovorin (400 mg/m2 given as a single intravenous infusion) plus 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab. Assessments were performed every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the superiority of arfolitixorin for overall response rate (ORR)., Results: Between February 2019 and April 2021, 490 patients were randomized (245 to each arm). After a median follow-up of 266 days, the primary endpoint of superiority for ORR was not achieved (48.2% for arfolitixorin vs. 49.4% for leucovorin, Psuperiority = 0.57). Outcomes were not achieved for median progression-free survival (PFS; 12.8 and 11.6 months, P = 0.38), median duration of response (12.2 and 12.9 months, P = 0.40), and median overall survival (23.8 and 28.0 months, P = 0.78). The proportion of patients with an adverse event of grade ≥3 severity was similar between arms (68.7% and 67.2%, respectively), as was quality of life. BRAF mutations and MTHFD2 expression were both associated with a lower PFS with arfolitixorin., Conclusions: The study failed to demonstrate clinical benefit of arfolitixorin (120 mg/m2) over leucovorin. However, it provides some useful insights from the first-line treatment setting, including the effect of gene expression on outcomes., Significance: This phase III study compared arfolitixorin, a direct-acting folate, with leucovorin in FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in mCRC. Arfolitixorin (120 mg/m2) did not improve the ORR, potentially indicating a suboptimal dose., (© 2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited activity in microsatellite-stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer. Recent findings suggest the efficacy of ICIs may be modulated by the presence of liver metastases (LM)., Objective: To investigate the association between the presence of LM and ICI activity in advanced MSS colorectal cancer., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this secondary analysis of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO26 (CCTG CO.26) randomized clinical trial, patients with treatment-refractory colorectal cancer were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to durvalumab plus tremelimumab or best supportive care alone between August 10, 2016, and June 15, 2017. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) with 80% power and 2-sided α = .10. The median follow-up was 15.2 (0.2-22.0) months. In this post hoc analysis performed from February 11 to 14, 2022, subgroups were defined based on the presence or absence of LM and study treatments., Intervention: Durvalumab plus tremelimumab or best supportive care., Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) and 90% CIs were calculated based on a stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model. Plasma tumor mutation burden at study entry was determined using a circulating tumor DNA assay. The primary end point of the study was OS, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR)., Results: Of 180 patients enrolled (median age, 65 [IQR, 36-87] years; 121 [67.2%] men; 19 [10.6%] Asian, 151 [83.9%] White, and 10 [5.6%] other race or ethnicity), LM were present in 127 (70.6%). For patients with LM, there was a higher proportion of male patients (94 of 127 [74.0%] vs 27 of 53 [50.9%]; P = .005), and the time from initial cancer diagnosis to study entry was shorter (median, 40 [range, 8-153] vs 56 [range, 14-181] months; P = .001). Plasma tumor mutation burden was significantly higher in patients with LM. Patients without LM had significantly improved PFS with durvalumab plus tremelimumab (HR, 0.54 [90% CI, 0.35-0.96]; P = .08; P = .02 for interaction). Disease control rate was 49% (90% CI, 36%-62%) in patients without LM treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab, compared with 14% (90% CI, 6%-38%) in those with LM (odds ratio, 5.70 [90% CI, 1.46-22.25]; P = .03). On multivariable analysis, patients without LM had significantly improved OS and PFS compared with patients with LM., Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of the CCTG CO.26 study, the presence of LM was associated with worse outcomes for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients without LM had improved PFS and higher DCR with durvalumab plus tremelimumab. Liver metastases may be associated with poor outcomes of ICI treatment in advanced colorectal cancer and should be considered in the design and interpretation of future clinical studies evaluating this therapy.

Background: Cetuximab is a standard of care therapy for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) advanced colorectal cancer. Limited data suggest a wide variation in cetuximab plasma concentrations after standard dosing regimens. We correlated cetuximab plasma concentrations with survival and toxicity., Methods: The CO. 20 study randomized patients with RAS WT advanced colorectal cancer in a 1:1 ratio to cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 intravenously followed by weekly maintenance of 250 mg/m 2 , plus brivanib 800 mg orally daily or placebo. Blood samples obtained at week 5 precetuximab treatment were analyzed by ELISA. Patients were grouped into tertiles based on plasma cetuximab concentrations. Cetuximab concentration tertiles were correlated with survival outcomes and toxicity. Patient demographic and biochemical parameters were evaluated as co-variables., Results: Week 5 plasma cetuximab concentrations were available for 591 patients (78.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.4 months and 7.8 months for patients in the highest (T3) and lowest tertiles (T1) respectively. On multivariable analysis, plasma cetuximab concentration was associated with OS (HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.83, P < .001, T3 vs. T1), and a trend towards progression-free survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.02, P = .07, T3 vs. T1). There was no association between cetuximab concentration and skin toxicity or diarrhea., Conclusion: The standard cetuximab dosing regimen may not be optimal for all patients. Further pharmacokinetic studies are needed to optimize cetuximab dosing given the potential improvement in OS., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have not demonstrated dramatic benefits in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), and this may be a function of poor patient selection. TKI-induced hypertension is reportedly a surrogate marker for treatment benefit for some tumor types. Our objective was to determine whether hypertension was associated with benefit in the context of CRC treatment, and also to gain insight on the pathogenesis of TKI-induced hypertension by monitoring associated changes in the circulating metabolome., Patients and Methods: Clinical data were acquired from clinical trial patients with metastatic CRC randomized to cetuximab ± the TKI brivanib (N = 750). Outcomes were evaluated as a function of treatment-induced hypertension. For metabolomic studies, plasma samples were taken at baseline, as well as at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment initiation. Samples were submitted to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to identify treatment-related metabolomic changes associated with TKI-induced hypertension, compared to pre-treatment baseline. A model based on changes in metabolite concentrations was generated using orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA)., Results: In the brivanib treated group, 95 patients had treatment-related hypertension within 12 weeks of initiating treatment. TKI-induced hypertension was not associated with a significantly higher response rate, nor was it associated with improved progression-free or overall survival. In metabolomic studies, 386 metabolites were identified. There were 29 metabolites that changed with treatment and distinguished patients with and without TKI-induced hypertension. The OPLS-DA model for brivanib-induced hypertension was significant and robust (R 2 Y score = 0.89, Q 2 Y score = 0.70, CV-ANOVA = 2.01 e-7). Notable metabolomic features previously reported in pre-eclampsia and associated with vasoconstriction were found., Conclusion: TKI-induced hypertension was not associated with clinical benefit in metastatic CRC. We have identified changes in the metabolome that are associated with the development of worsening brivanib-induced hypertension that may be useful in future efforts of characterizing this toxicity., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The number of somatic mutations detectable in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is highly heterogeneous in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The optimal number of mutations required to assess disease kinetics is relevant and remains poorly understood., Objectives: To determine whether increasing panel breadth (the number of tracked variants in a ctDNA assay) would alter the sensitivity in detecting ctDNA in patients with mCRC., Design: We used archival tissue sequencing to perform an in silico assessment of the optimal number of tracked mutations to detect and monitor disease kinetics in mCRC using sequencing data from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 trial., Methods: For each patient, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 16 of the most clonal (highest variant allele frequency) somatic variants were selected from archival tissue-based whole-exome sequencing and assessed for the proportion of variants detected in matched ctDNA at baseline, week 8, and progression timepoints., Results: Data from 110 patients were analyzed. Genes most frequently encountered among the top four highest VAF variants in archival tissue were TP53 (51.9% of patients), APC (43.3%), KRAS (42.3%), and SMAD4 (9.6%). While the frequency of detecting at least one tracked variant increased when expanding beyond variant pool sizes of 1 and 2 in baseline ( p  = 0.0030) and progression ( p  = 0.0030) ctDNA samples, we observed no significant benefit to increases in variant pool size past four variants in any of the ctDNA timepoints ( p  < 0.05)., Conclusion: While increasing panel breadth beyond two tracked variants improved variant re-detection in ctDNA samples from patients with treatment refractory mCRC, increases beyond four tracked variants yielded no significant improvement in variant re-detection., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Purpose: The time spent in pursuing treatments for advanced cancer can be substantial. We have previously proposed a pragmatic and patient-centered metric of these time costs-which we term time toxicity-as any day with physical health care system contact. This includes outpatient visits (eg, bloodwork, scans, etc), emergency department visits, and overnight stays in a health care facility. Herein, we sought to assess time toxicity in a completed randomized controlled trial (RCT)., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.17 RCT that evaluated weekly cetuximab infusions versus supportive care alone in 572 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Initial results reported a 6-week improvement in median overall survival (OS) with cetuximab (6.1 v 4.6 months). Subsequent analyses reported that benefit was restricted to patients with K-ras wild-type tumors. We calculated patient-level time toxicity by analyzing trial forms. We considered days without health care contact as home days. We compared medians of time measures across arms and stratified results by K-ras status., Results: In the overall population, median time toxic days were higher in the cetuximab arm (28 v 10, P < .001) although median home days were not statistically different between arms (140 v 121, P = .09). In patients with K-ras -mutated tumors, cetuximab was associated with almost numerically equal home days (114 days v 112 days, P = .571) and higher time toxicity (23 days v 11 days, P < .001). In patients with K-ras wild-type tumors, cetuximab was associated with more home days (186 v 132, P < .001)., Conclusion: This proof-of-concept feasibility study demonstrates that measures of time toxicity can be extracted through secondary analyses of RCTs. In CO.17, despite an overall OS benefit with cetuximab, home days were statistically similar across arms. Such data can supplement traditional survival end points in RCTs. Further work should refine and validate the measure prospectively.[Media: see text].

Purpose: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies are effective treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer. Improved understanding of acquired resistance mechanisms may facilitate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring, anti-EGFR rechallenge, and combinatorial strategies to delay resistance., Methods: Patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (n = 169) enrolled on the CO.26 trial had pre-anti-EGFR tissue whole-exome sequencing (WES) compared with baseline and week 8 ctDNA assessments with the GuardantOMNI assay. Acquired alterations were compared between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapy (n = 66) and those without. Anti-EGFR therapy occurred a median of 111 days before ctDNA assessment., Results: ctDNA identified 12 genes with increased mutation frequency after anti-EGFR therapy, including EGFR ( P = .0007), KRAS ( P = .0017), LRP1B ( P = .0046), ZNF217 ( P = .0086), MAP2K1 ( P = .018), PIK3CG ( P = .018), BRAF ( P = .048), and NRAS ( P = .048). Acquired mutations appeared as multiple concurrent subclonal alterations, with most showing decay over time. Significant increases in copy-gain frequency were noted in 29 genes after anti-EGFR exposure, with notable alterations including EGFR ( P < .0001), SMO ( P < .0001), BRAF ( P < .0001), MET ( P = .0002), FLT3 ( P = .0002), NOTCH4 ( P = .0006), ERBB2 ( P = .004), and FGFR1 ( P = .006). Copy gains appeared stable without decay 8 weeks later. There were 13 gene fusions noted among 11 patients, all but one of which was associated with prior anti-EGFR therapy. Polyclonal resistance was common with acquisition of ≥ 10 resistance related alterations noted in 21% of patients with previous anti-EGFR therapy compared with 5% in those without ( P = .010). Although tumor mutation burden (TMB) did not differ pretreatment ( P = .63), anti-EGFR exposure increased TMB ( P = .028), whereas lack of anti-EGFR exposure resulted in declining TMB ( P = .014)., Conclusion: Paired tissue and ctDNA sequencing identified multiple novel mutations, copy gains, and fusions associated with anti-EGFR therapy that frequently co-occur as subclonal alterations in the same patient.

Purpose: Organ-sparing therapy for early-stage I/IIA rectal cancer is intended to avoid functional disturbances or a permanent ostomy associated with total mesorectal excision (TME). The objective of this phase II trial was to determine the outcomes and organ-sparing rate of patients with early-stage rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by transanal excision surgery (TES)., Methods: This phase II trial included patients with clinical T1-T3abN0 low- or mid-rectal adenocarcinoma eligible for endoscopic resection who were treated with 3 months of chemotherapy (modified folinic acid-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin 6 or capecitabine-oxaliplatin). Those with evidence of response proceeded to transanal endoscopic surgery 2-6 weeks later. The primary end point was protocol-specified organ preservation rate, defined as the proportion of patients with tumor downstaging to ypT0/T1N0/X and who avoided radical surgery., Results: Of 58 patients enrolled, all commenced chemotherapy and 56 proceeded to surgery. A total of 33/58 patients had tumor downstaging to ypT0/1N0/X on the surgery specimen, resulting in an intention-to-treat protocol-specified organ preservation rate of 57% (90% CI, 45 to 68). Of 23 remaining patients recommended for TME surgery on the basis of protocol requirements, 13 declined and elected to proceed directly to observation resulting in 79% (90% CI, 69 to 88) achieving organ preservation. The remaining 10/23 patients proceeded to recommended TME of whom seven had no histopathologic residual disease. The 1-year and 2-year locoregional relapse-free survival was, respectively, 98% (95% CI, 86 to 100) and 90% (95% CI, 58 to 98), and there were no distant recurrences or deaths. Minimal change in quality of life and rectal function scores was observed., Conclusion: Three months of induction chemotherapy may successfully downstage a significant proportion of patients with early-stage rectal cancer, allowing well-tolerated organ-preserving surgery.

Background: Complementary medicines (CM) are frequently used by patients with cancer. Controversy exists over the effectiveness and risk that CM may add to conventional cancer therapy. The incidence of CM use among patients enrolled in phase III clinical trials is unknown., Methods: Medication lists from 6 international phase III clinical trials were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients using CM. Patients had metastatic breast, colorectal, or lung cancers. Quality of life, adverse events, overall survival, and progression-free survival were compared between CM users and non-users. Baseline differences between groups were adjusted with propensity score matching groups., Results: Seven hundred and six of 3446 patients (20.5%) used at least one CM. CM use was highest among patients with breast cancer (35.6%). CM users had more favorable baseline prognostic factors (ECOG 0-1, non-smoking status, younger age, and fewer metastases). CM use was associated with lower rates of adverse events (50% vs. 62%, P = .002) and quality of life was similar between both groups. After adjustment with propensity score matching, CM use was also associated with longer overall survival in patients with lung cancer (adjusted hazard ratio 0.80, 95%CI, 0.68-0.94, P =.0054). However, several key control variables like EGFR status were not available., Conclusion: One in 5 patients in phase III clinical trials report using CM. CM was not associated with worse cancer-specific outcomes. However, CM users had more favorable baseline prognostic factors, and likely other confounders that may have contributed to improved outcomes observed in the lung cohort. Physicians should monitor for CM use and potential interactions with clinical trial drugs., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Purpose: Chemotherapy options for treating CRC have rapidly expanded in recent years, and few have predictive biomarkers. Oncologists are challenged with evidence-based selection of treatments, and response is evaluated retrospectively based on serial imaging beginning after 2-3 months. As a result, cumulative toxicities may appear in patients who will not benefit. Early recognition of non-benefit would reduce cumulative toxicities. Our objective was to determine treatment-related changes in the circulating metabolome corresponding to treatment futility., Methods: Metabolomic studies were performed on serial plasma samples from patients with CRC in a randomized controlled trial of cetuximab vs. cetuximab + brivanib ( N = 188). GC-MS quantified named 94 metabolites and concentrations were evaluated at baseline, Weeks 1, 4 and 12 after treatment initiation. In a discovery cohort ( N = 68), a model distinguishing changes in metabolites associated with radiographic disease progression and response was generated using OPLS-DA. A cohort of 120 patients was used for validation of the model., Results: By one week after treatment, a stable model of 21 metabolites could distinguish between progression and partial response (R2Y = 0.859; Q2Y = 0.605; P = 5e-4). In the validation cohort, patients with the biomarker had a significantly shorter OS ( P < 0.0001). In a separate cohort of patients with HCC on axitinib, appearance of the biomarker also signified a shorter PFS (1.7 months vs. 9.2 months, P = 0.001)., Conclusion: We have identified changes in the metabolome that appear within 1 week of starting treatment associated with treatment futility. The novel approach described is applicable to future efforts in developing a biomarker for early assessment of treatment efficacy., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright: © 2022 Rattner et al.)

Purpose: Expanded RAS/BRAF mutations have not been assessed as predictive for single-agent cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and low mutant allele frequency (MAF) mutations are of unclear significance. We aimed to establish cetuximab efficacy in optimally selected patients using highly sensitive beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics (BEAMing) analysis, capable of detecting alterations below standard clinical assays., Patients and Methods: CO.17 trial compared cetuximab versus best supportive care (BSC) in RAS/BRAF -unselected mCRC. We performed RAS/BRAF analysis on microdissected tissue of 242 patients in CO.17 trial using BEAMing for KRAS/NRAS (codons 12/13/59/61/117/146) and BRAF V600E. Patients without BEAMing but with previous Sanger sequencing-detected mutations were included., Results: KRAS, NRAS , and BRAF mutations were present in 53%, 4%, and 3% of tumors, respectively. Cetuximab improved overall survival [OS; HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.81; P = 0.004] and progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15-0.41; P < 0.0001) compared with BSC in RAS/BRAF wild-type patients. Cetuximab did not improve OS/PFS for KRAS-, NRAS- , or BRAF- mutated tumors, and tests of interaction confirmed expanded KRAS ( P = 0.0002) and NRAS ( P = 0.006) as predictive, while BRAF mutations were not ( P = 0.089). BEAMing identified 14% more tumors as RAS mutant than Sanger sequencing, and cetuximab lacked activity in these patients. Mutations at MAF < 5% were noted in 6 of 242 patients (2%). One patient with a KRAS A59T mutation (MAF = 2%) responded to cetuximab. More NRAS than KRAS mutations were low MAF (OR, 20.50; 95% CI, 3.88-96.85; P = 0.0038)., Conclusions: We establish single-agent cetuximab efficacy in optimally selected patients and show that subclonal RAS/BRAF alterations are uncommon and remain of indeterminate significance., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) assigned to the transit-amplifying (TA) CRCAssigner subtype are more sensitive to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. We evaluated the association between the intratumoral presence of TA signature (TA-high/TA-low, dubbed as TA-ness classification) and outcomes in CRCs treated with anti-EGFR therapy., Patients and Methods: The TA-ness classes were defined in a discovery cohort (n = 84) and independently validated in a clinical trial (CO.20; cetuximab monotherapy arm; n = 121) and other samples using an established NanoString-based gene expression assay. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR) according to TA-ness classification were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: The TA-ness was measured in 772 samples from 712 patients. Patients (treated with anti-EGFR therapy) with TA-high tumors had significantly longer PFS (discovery hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.64; P < .001; validation HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.93; P = .018), longer OS (discovery HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.78; P = .003; validation HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.98; P = .04), and higher DCR (discovery odds ratio [OR]; 14.8; 95% CI, 4.30 to 59.54; P < .001; validation OR, 4.35; 95% CI, 2.00 to 9.09; P < .001). TA-ness classification and its association with anti-EGFR therapy outcomes were further confirmed using publicly available data (n = 80) from metastatic samples (PFS P < .001) and patient-derived xenografts ( P = .042). In an exploratory analysis of 55 patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type and left-sided tumors, TA-high class was significantly associated with longer PFS and trend toward higher response rate (PFS HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.00; P = .049; OR, 5.88; 95% CI, 0.71 to 4.55; P = .09; response rate 33% in TA-high and 7.7% in TA-low)., Conclusion: TA-ness classification is associated with prognosis in patients with mCRC treated with anti-EGFR therapy and may further help understanding the value of sidedness in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type tumors., Competing Interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center. Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments). Elisa FontanaConsulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma (I), Celgene (I), Servier (I), Bristol Myers Squibb (I) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent No: 1716712.3 pending (I) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb (I), Servier (I)Gift NyamundandaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Prognostic and treatment response prediction in gastric cancer – Priority Patent CSC/BP7295892, Patient classification and prognostic method – patent application number – PCT/EP2019/053845, Patent application number 2011213.2David CunninghamStock and Other Ownership Interests: OVIBIO Consulting or Advisory Role: OVIBIO Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Merrimack (Inst), Celgene (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Bayer (Inst), 4SC (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Eli Lilly (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Merck (Inst)Maggie C. U. CheangPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: M.C.U.C. has a patent for Breast Cancer Classifier: US Patent No. 9,631,239 with royalties paid Other Relationship: NanoString TechnologiesLillian L. SiuLeadership: Treadwell Therapeutics (I) Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Agios (I) Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, MorphoSys, Roche, Loxo, Voronoi, Oncorus, Symphogen, Mirati Therapeutics, GSK, Seattle Genetics, Treadwell Therapeutics, Arvinas, Navire Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Genentech (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Merck (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Shattuck Labs (Inst), Symphogen (Inst), Avid (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Intensity Therapeutics (Inst), Karyopharm Therapeutics (Inst)Francesco SclafaniConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Research Funding: Bayer (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Roche (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer, Eli LillyJonathan M. LoreeConsulting or Advisory Role: Taiho Pharma Canada, Ipsen, Novartis, Bayer, Amgen, Eisai Research Funding: Ipsen (Inst)Paul M. WaringEmployment: AstraZeneca Leadership: Pillar Biosciences, Xing Technologies, ORI Healthcare Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Genentech, Roche (I), Pillar Biosciences, Xing Technologies Consulting or Advisory Role: Pillar Biosciences, Xing Technologies, ORI Healthcare Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pillar Biosciences, Xing TechnologiesTimothy J. PriceConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Roche (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst) Research Funding: Amgen (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AmgenChiara CremoliniHonoraria: Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Servier Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Bayer, Amgen Speakers' Bureau: Servier Research Funding: Merck Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, ServierNaureen StarlingHonoraria: Eli Lilly, MSD Oncology, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier Consulting or Advisory Role: Servier, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer Research Funding: Astra Zeneca (Inst), Pfizer/EMD Serono (Inst), BMS (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD OncologyFilippo PietrantonioConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Merck Serono, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, Servier Research Funding: Bristol Myers SquibbLivio TrusolinoHonoraria: Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck Research Funding: Symphogen (Inst), Merus (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Servier (Inst), Menarini (Inst)Anguraj SadanandamConsulting or Advisory Role: Ploughshare Innovations Research Funding: Merck, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent – “Colorectal cancer classification with differential prognosis and personalized therapeutic responses” (patent number PCT/IB2013/060416), Prognostic and treatment response prediction in gastric cancer – Priority Patent CSC/BP7295892, Patent – Patient classification and prognostic method (GEP-NET) – Priority Patent – EP18425009.0, Patent – “Molecular predictors of therapeutic response to specific anti-cancer agents” (patent number US9506926B2) No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Importance: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition has not shown activities in advanced refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), other than in those patients who are microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H)., Objective: To evaluate whether combining programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition improved patient survival in metastatic refractory CRC., Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized phase 2 study was conducted in 27 cancer centers across Canada between August 2016 and June 2017, and data were analyzed on October 18, 2018. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; received all available standard systemic therapies (fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab if appropriate; cetuximab or panitumumab if RAS wild-type tumors; regorafenib if available); were aged 18 years or older; had adequate organ function; had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and measurable disease., Interventions: We randomly assigned patients to receive either 75 mg of tremelimumab every 28 days for the first 4 cycles plus 1500 mg durvalumab every 28 days, or best supportive care alone (BSC) in a 2:1 ratio., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and a 2-sided P<.10 was considered statistically significant. Circulating cell-free DNA from baseline plasma was used to determine microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB)., Results: Of 180 patients enrolled (121 men [67.2%] and 59 women [32.8%]; median [range] age, 65 [36-87] years), 179 were treated. With a median follow-up of 15.2 months, the median OS was 6.6 months for durvalumab and tremelimumab and 4.1 months for BSC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 90% CI, 0.54-0.97; P = .07). Progression-free survival was 1.8 months and 1.9 months respectively (HR, 1.01; 90% CI, 0.76-1.34). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were significantly more frequent with immunotherapy (75 [64%] patients in the treatment group had at least 1 grade 3 or higher adverse event vs 12 [20%] in the BSC group). Circulating cell-free DNA analysis was successful in 168 of 169 patients with available samples. In patients who were microsatellite stable (MSS), OS was significantly improved with durvalumab and tremelimumab (HR, 0.66; 90% CI, 0.49-0.89; P = .02). Patients who were MSS with plasma TMB of 28 variants per megabase or more (21% of MSS patients) had the greatest OS benefit (HR, 0.34; 90% CI, 0.18-0.63; P = .004)., Conclusions and Relevance: This phase 2 study suggests that combined immune checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab plus tremelimumab may be associated with prolonged OS in patients with advanced refractory CRC. Elevated plasma TMB may select patients most likely to benefit from durvalumab and tremelimumab. Further confirmation studies are warranted., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02870920.

Background: The safety and efficacy of targeted therapy in older patients (≥ 70 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer is not well evaluated., Patients and Methods: Outcomes of older patients (including overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], toxicity, and quality of life [QoL]) were compared to young patients using data from 2 large previously reported clinical trials, CO.17 (cetuximab vs. best supportive care) and CO.20 (cetuximab plus placebo vs. cetuximab plus brivanib). Only patients with wild-type KRAS tumors were included., Results: A total of 251 (26.3%) of 955 patients were ≥ 70 years old. No significant differences in OS, PFS, or grade 3/4 adverse events were observed between older and younger patients treated with cetuximab (or cetuximab with placebo) in either trial. Younger patients trended toward superior OS in both CO.17 (hazard ratio = 1.80; P = .16) and CO.20 (hazard ratio = 1.34; P = .07). QoL maintenance favored younger patients in CO.17 (3.6 vs. 5.7 months; P = .046) but no difference of QoL maintenance was observed in the larger CO.20 trial (1.7 vs. 1.8 months; P = .64). Combination therapy of cetuximab and brivanib was significantly more toxic in older adults (87% vs. 77%; P = .03)., Conclusion: OS, PFS, and toxicities were similar between older and younger patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer when treated with cetuximab. Both age groups likely experience similar QoL maintenance with cetuximab. Dual targeted therapy was significantly more toxic in older patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Two germ line Fc-γ receptor (FCGR) polymorphisms, rs1801274 [FCGR2A; His(H)131Arg(R)] and rs396991 [FCGR3A; Phe(F)158Val(V)], produce altered proteins through amino acid substitutions. We previously reported that the FCGR2A H/H genotype was associated with longer overall survival (OS) in cetuximab-treated chemotherapy-refractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we aimed to replicate and extend this finding in the Canadian Clinical Trials Group CO.20 trial., Methods: After germ line DNA genotyping, polymorphic relationships with survival were assessed using log-rank tests and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for known prognostic factors. The dominant genetic inheritance model was used for the main analysis., Results: Of 592 wild-type KRAS patients treated with cetuximab, those with the FCGR2A H/H genotype (n = 165, 28%) had improved OS (HR: 0.66, P < 0.001; median absolute benefit, 1.3 months) compared to those with R/- genotype (n = 427, 72%). Patients with H/R had intermediate results under a codominant genetic inheritance model (HR: 0.72, P = 0.003). No significant associations were found between FCGR3A genotype and OS. In an exploratory analysis, patients with the combination of FCGR2A H/H + FCGR3A F/F genotype had significantly better OS (HR: 0.33, P = 0.003; median absolute benefit, 12.5 months) than patients with the combination of double-variant R/R + V/V genotype. Progression-free survival results were similar to OS. Toxicity rates were not associated with either polymorphism., Conclusions: The FCGR2A genotype was associated with efficacy but not with toxicity in wild-type KRAS, cetuximab-treated colorectal cancer patients. FCGR3A genotype may modulate the relationship between FCGR2A polymorphism and outcome. FCGR2A is a promising biomarker for clinical management for these patients., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Oncolytic reovirus pelareorep might preferentially infect and destroy rat sarcoma (RAS)-activated cells, and has preclinical and early clinical activity against colorectal cancer (CRC)., Patients and Methods: After a 6-patient safety run-in, 103 patients with metastatic CRC were randomly assigned to standard first-line leucovorin/5-FU/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6)/bevacizumab (FOLFOX/BEV) every 2 weeks with (n = 51) or without (n = 52) pelareorep 3 × 10 10 tissue culture infective dose 50 on days 1 to 5 (cycles 1, 2, 4, and alternate cycles thereafter). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life, and correlative analyses., Results: At 13 months' median follow-up, PFS was inferior in the pelareorep arm (median 7 vs. 9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.59 [80% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-2.15]; P = .046). There was no statistical difference in OS (median, 19.2 vs. 20.1 months; HR, 1.22; P = .38). An increased ORR was observed with pelareorep (adjusted odds ratio, 2.52 [80% CI, 1.44-4.41]; P = .03), but with a shorter median duration of response (5 vs. 9 months; P = .028). Pelareorep patients experienced more hypertension and proteinuria, and were more likely to omit bevacizumab before progression. A trend to lower dose intensity and shorter oxaliplatin and bevacizumab treatment duration was observed with pelareorep., Conclusion: Combination pelareorep with FOLFOX/BEV was tolerable with an increased ORR, but PFS was inferior. Subgroup analysis of baseline variables including Kirsten rat sarcoma oncogene did not identify subgroups with PFS benefit. Decreased treatment intensity with standard agents likely contributed to the lack of benefit with pelareorep. Future studies might consider alternate pelareorep/chemotherapy strategies or combination therapy with novel agents., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Napabucasin is a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that targets STAT3, which is a poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. This study aimed to test napabucasin in advanced colorectal cancer., Methods: This study was a double-blind randomised phase 3 trial done at 68 centres in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer with a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0-1) for whom all available standard therapies had failed were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive placebo or napabucasin through a web-based system with a permuted block method, after stratification by ECOG performance status, KRAS status, previous VEGF inhibitor treatment, and time from diagnosis of metastatic disease. Napabucasin 480 mg or matching placebo was taken orally every 12 h. All patients received best supportive care. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in an intention-to-treat analysis. This is the final analysis of this trial, which is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01830621., Findings: Accrual began on April 15, 2013, and was stopped for futility on May 23, 2014, at which point 282 patients had undergone randomisation (138 assigned to the napabucasin group and 144 to the placebo group). Overall survival did not differ significantly between groups: median overall survival was 4·4 months (95% CI 3·7-4·9) in the napabucasin group and 4·8 months (4·0-5·3) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·13, 95% CI 0·88-1·46, p=0·34). The safety population included 136 patients in the napabucasin group and 144 patients in the placebo group. More patients who received napabucasin had any grade of treatment-related diarrhoea (108 [79%] of 136 patients), nausea (69 [51%]), and anorexia (52 [38%]) than did patients who received placebo (28 [19%] of 144 patients, 35 [24%], and 23 [16%], respectively). The most common severe (grade 3 or worse) treatment-related adverse events were abdominal pain (five [4%] patients receiving napabucasin vs five [3%] receiving placebo), diarrhoea (21 [15%] vs one [1%]), fatigue (14 [10%] vs eight [6%]), and dehydration (six [4%] vs one [1%]). 251 (89%) patients had data on pSTAT3 expression, of whom 55 (22%) had pSTAT3-positive tumours (29 in the napabucasin group, 26 in the placebo group). In a prespecified biomarker analysis of pSTAT3-positive patients, overall survival was longer in the napabucasin group than in the placebo group (median 5·1 months [95% CI 4·0-7·5] vs 3·0 months [1·7-4·1]; HR 0·41, 0·23-0·73, p=0·0025)., Interpretation: Although there was no difference in overall survival between groups in the overall unselected population, STAT3 might be an important target for the treatment of colorectal cancer with elevated pSTAT3 expression. Nevertheless, these results require validation., Funding: Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and Boston Biomedical., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Studies of germline polymorphisms as predictors of tumor response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody agents in metastatic colorectal cancer have reported inconsistent results. We performed a systematic review of studies from 1990 to September 2015, followed by random-effects meta-analyses for polymorphisms examined in at least three studies. Of 87 studies, 40 passed the criteria for systematic review and 23 for meta-analysis. The polymorphisms suitable for meta-analysis were CCND1 (rs17852153), COX2 (rs20417), EGF (rs4444903), EGFR (rs712829, rs11543848, 3'UTR CA repeat), FCGR2A (rs1801274), FCGR3A (rs396991), IL8 (rs4073), KRAS (rs61764370) and VEGFA (rs3025039). Meta-analysis yielded nominal significance (at α=0.05) for rs4444903 and rs11543848, but showed no significant results after multiple testing correction; this was unchanged by sensitivity analyses to address subgroups, funnel-plot asymmetries, and study quality. This highlights a tendency for lack of replication in the face of initial positive results, and possibly the unsuitability of relying on tumor response as a surrogate marker in this setting.

Background: Combination chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes in trials of selected fit patients with advanced colorectal cancer (acrc). For older or less-fit patients, combination chemotherapy is associated with greater toxicity and less benefit. Capecitabine monotherapy is a reasonable option for those patients, but the optimal dose remains controversial., Methods: A multicentre phase i/ii trial of reduced-dose capecitabine (2000 mg/m 2 , days 1-14 every 21 days) was conducted in 221 patients representing one or more of the following subsets: age greater than 65 years ( n = 167), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ecog) performance status of 1 or greater ( n = 139), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) ( n = 105), or prior pelvic radiation ( n = 54). Based on phase i results, patients with prior pelvic radiation received capecitabine 750 mg/m 2 twice daily. The goal was to ascertain efficacy in a design that was unlikely to cause high levels of toxicity., Results: Median age in the patient cohort was 72 years. A median of 5 and a mean of 8 capecitabine cycles were given (range: 0-50 cycles). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in 25% of patients during the first 3 cycles (8.1% hand-foot syndrome, 7.7% diarrhea). The response rate was 13.6%, with a 69.7% disease control rate. Median progression-free survival (pfs) was 5.6 months. Post progression, 56 patients received further capecitabine monotherapy (median of 4 additional cycles). Median overall survival duration for the patients was 14.3 months. Median survival was significantly higher for those who, at baseline, had an ecog performance status of 0 (compared with 1 or more) and normal ldh (compared with elevated ldh)., Conclusions: Toxicity is less with dose-reduced capecitabine than with historical full-dose capecitabine, with only a small trade-off in efficacy, seen as a lower objective response rate. The improved tolerability could lead to an increased number of cycles of therapy, and pfs appears to be consistently higher at the lower dose. Those observations should, in the absence of a head-to-head clinical trial, be viewed as compelling evidence that 1000 mg/m 2 , or even 750 mg/m 2 , twice daily is an appropriate dose in elderly or frail patients with acrc.

The prognosis for locally advanced esophageal cancer is poor despite the use of trimodality therapy. In this phase II study, we report the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of adjuvant sunitinib. Included were patients with stage IIa, IIB or III cancer of the thoracic esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Neoadjuvant therapy involved Irinotecan (65 mg/m 2 ) + Cisplatin (30 mg/m 2 ) on weeks 1 and 2, 4 and 5, 7 and 8 with concurrent radiation (50Gy/25 fractions) on weeks 4-8. Sunitinib was commenced 4-13 weeks after surgery and continued for one year. Sixty-one patients were included in the final analysis, 36 patients commenced adjuvant sunitinib. Fourteen patients discontinued sunitinib due to disease recurrence (39%) within the 12-month period, 12 (33%) discontinued due to toxicity, and 3 (8%) requested cessation of therapy. In the overall population, median survival was 26 months with a 2 and 3-year survival rate of 52% and 35%, respectively. The median survival for the 36 patients treated with sunitinib was 35 months and 2-year survival probability of 68%. In a historical control, a prior phase II study with the same trimodality therapy (n = 43), median survival was 36 months, with a 2-year survival of 67%. Initiation of adjuvant sunitinib is feasible, but poorly tolerated, with no signal of additional benefit over trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer., (© 2015 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Background: There is insufficient information regarding the prognostic significance of baseline and change in quality of life (QoL) scores on overall survival (OS) in advanced pancreatic cancer., Methods: QoL was assessed prospectively using the EORTC QLQ-C30 as part of the PA.3 trial of gemcitabine + erlotinib (G + E) vs. gemcitabine + placebo (G + P). Relevant variables and QoL scores at baseline and change at 8 weeks were analyzed by Cox stepwise regression to determine predictors of OS., Results: 222 of 285 patients (pts) treated with G + E and 220 of 284 pts treated with G + P completed baseline QoL assessments. In a multivariable Cox analysis combining all pts, better QoL physical functioning (PF) score independently predicted longer OS (HR 0.86; CI: 0.80-0.93), as did non-white race (HR 0.64; CI: 0.44-0.95), PS 0-1 (HR 0.65; CI: 0.50-0.85), locally advanced disease (HR 0.55; CI: 0.43-0.71) and G + E (HR 0.78; CI: 0.64-0.96). Improvement in physical function at week 8 also predicted for improved survival (HR 0.89; CI: 0.81-0.97 for 10 point increase in score, p = 0.02)., Conclusion: In addition to clinical variables, patient reported QoL scores at baseline and change from baseline to week 8 added incremental predictive information regarding survival for advanced pancreatic cancer patients., (Copyright © 2016 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background Olaparib is an orally available inhibitor of PARP-1. In pre-clinical studies, olaparib was shown to potentiate anti-tumor effects of irinotecan in colon cancer cell lines. This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of olaparib in combination with irinotecan. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced colorectal cancer whose disease progressed after at least one systemic therapy regimen were enrolled. Dose escalation and de-escalation were based on toxicity assessment. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected in Cycle 1 for olaparib, irinotecan and SN-38. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled, 11 patients on a schedule of continuous olaparib and irinotecan every 3 weeks (Part A) and 14 patients on a schedule of intermittent olaparib and irinotecan every 2 weeks (Part B). Continuous olaparib administration was associated with higher than expected toxicities and was not considered to be tolerable. Intermittent olaparib administration was better tolerated, and the recommended phase 2 doses were olaparib 50 mg p.o twice daily days 1-5 and irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) i.v. every 2 weeks. Common toxicities included fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and abdominal pain. Nine patients had stable disease as the best response, 2 from Part A (3 and 9 months respectively), and 7 from Part B (median duration: 7.4 months; range: 4 to 13 months). There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between olaparib and irinotecan. Conclusions Olaparib can be combined with irinotecan if administered intermittently. Both olaparib and irinotecan required significant dose reductions. The lack of anti-tumor efficacy observed in this trial makes this combination of little interest for further clinical development. Trial Registration ID NCT00535353.

Background: Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is an anticoagulant with antimetastatic properties. The homozygous CC polymorphism of TFPI (-33T → C) is associated with higher TFPI levels and lower venous thromboembolism risk. This study was the first to evaluate the impact of this polymorphism on disease-free survival (DFS) in cancer patients after curative resection., Methods: A prospectively maintained tumor bank with clinical data was used to identify patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer between 1994 and 2006. Germline DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded normal colonic mucosa. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for TFPI (-33T → C), factor V Leiden (G1691A), and prothrombin (G20210A) were determined by polymerase chain reaction. Survival analysis was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable regression analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model., Results: Of the 127 patients identified, the CC genotype was found in 11 %. Venous thromboembolism incidence was 18 % in the TT/TC (wild type/heterozygous) genotypes and 7 % in the CC genotype (p = 0.46). The CC genotype was associated with superior DFS (hazard ratio 0.34, 95 % confidence interval 0.14-0.84; p = 0.02) with 5-year DFS of 63 vs. 24 % for CC vs. TT/TC, respectively. In multivariate analysis, CC polymorphism (hazard ratio 0.28, p = 0.008) was independently associated with improved DFS. The prevalence of factor V Leiden (0.8 %) and prothrombin (1.6 %) polymorphisms was too low to detect interaction with TFPI polymorphism or DFS., Conclusions: These findings indicate that the inherited anticoagulant homozygous -33T → C TFPI polymorphism may protect against colon cancer recurrence and suggests a mediating role for the coagulation system in cancer outcomes.

Background: There is strong interest in testing lifestyle interventions to improve cancer outcomes; however, the optimal methods for achieving behavior change in large-scale pragmatic trials are unknown. Here, we report the 1-year feasibility results for exercise behavior change in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.21 (CHALLENGE) Trial., Methods: Between 2009 and 2014, 273 high-risk stage II and III colon cancer survivors from 42 centers in Canada and Australia were randomized to a structured exercise program (SEP; n = 136) or health education materials (HEM; n = 137). The primary feasibility outcome in a prespecified interim analysis was a difference between randomized groups of ≥5 metabolic equivalent task (MET)-hours/week in self-reported recreational physical activity (PA) after at least 250 participants reached the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included health-related fitness., Results: The SEP group reported an increase in recreational PA of 15.6 MET-hours/week compared with 5.1 MET-hours/week in the HEM group [mean difference = +10.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = +3.1-+17.9; P = 0.002]. The SEP group also improved relative to the HEM group in predicted VO2max (P = 0.068), 6-minute walk (P < 0.001), 30-second chair stand (P < 0.001), 8-foot up-and-go (P = 0.004), and sit-and-reach (P = 0.08)., Conclusions: The behavior change intervention in the CHALLENGE Trial produced a substantial increase in self-reported recreational PA that met the feasibility criterion for trial continuation, resulted in objective fitness improvements, and is consistent with the amount of PA associated with improved colon cancer outcomes in observational studies., Impact: The CHALLENGE Trial is poised to determine the causal effects of PA on colon cancer outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(6); 969-77. ©2016 AACR., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Two germline Fc-γ receptor (FCGR) polymorphisms, rs1801274 [FCGR2A;His(H)131Arg(R)] and rs396991 [FCGR3A;Phe(F)158Val(V)] produce altered proteins through amino acid substitutions; both are reported to be associated with cetuximab-related outcomes. We performed a validation of these polymorphisms in NCIC CTG CO.17, a randomized trial of cetuximab monotherapy in refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer expressing EGFR., Experimental Design: DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was genotyped. In addition to log-rank tests, Cox proportional hazard models assessed their relationships with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), adjusting for clinically important prognostic factors, along with a polymorphism-treatment arm interaction term., Results: Somatic KRAS status was wild-type for exon 2 in 153 (52%) of 293 patients, from whom tumor DNA was available. For FCGR2A H/H, a genotype-treatment interaction for KRAS wild-type patients was observed for OS (P = 0.03). In KRAS wild-type patients carrying FCGR2A H/H, cetuximab (vs. no cetuximab) improved survival substantially, with adjusted HRs (aHR) of 0.36 (OS) and 0.19 (PFS) and absolute benefits of 5.5 months (OS; P = 0.003) and 3.7 months (PFS; P = 0.02). In contrast, patients carrying FCGR2A R alleles (H/R or R/R) had aHRs of only 0.78 (OS; 2.8-month benefit) and 0.53 (PFS; 1.6-month benefit). No relationships were found for rs396991 (FCGR3A)., Conclusions: In the CO.17 trial, cetuximab worked best for patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancers carrying FCGR2A H/H genotypes. Significantly lower benefits were observed in patients carrying germline FCGR2A R alleles. Clin Cancer Res; 22(10); 2435-44. ©2016 AACR., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) stands as a pressing global health issue, marked by the unbridled proliferation of immature cells influenced by multifaceted internal and external factors. Numerous studies have explored the intricate mechanisms of tumorigenesis in CRC, with a primary emphasis on signaling pathways, particularly those associated with growth factors and chemokines. However, the sheer diversity of molecular targets introduces complexity into the selection of targeted therapies, posing a significant challenge in achieving treatment precision. The quest for an effective CRC treatment is further complicated by the absence of pathological insights into the mutations or alterations occurring in tumor cells. This study reveals the transfer of signaling from the cell membrane to the nucleus, unveiling recent advancements in this crucial cellular process. By shedding light on this novel dimension, the research enhances our understanding of the molecular intricacies underlying CRC, providing a potential avenue for breakthroughs in targeted therapeutic strategies. In addition, the study comprehensively outlines the potential immune responses incited by the aberrant activation of signaling pathways, with a specific focus on immune cells, cytokines, and their collective impact on the dynamic landscape of drug development. This research not only contributes significantly to advancing CRC treatment and molecular medicine but also lays the groundwork for future breakthroughs and clinical trials, fostering optimism for improved outcomes and refined approaches in combating colorectal carcinoma., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are used as predictive biomarkers to select therapy with EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Other factors may be significant determinants of benefit., Methods: Individual patient data from randomised trials with a head-to-head comparison between EGFR mAb versus no EGFR mAb (chemotherapy alone or best supportive care) in mCRC, across all lines of therapy, were pooled. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups. Treatment effects within the predefined KRAS biomarker subsets were estimated by adjusted hazard ratio (HR adj ) and 95% confidence interval (CI). EGFR mAb efficacy was measured within the KRAS wild-type subgroup according to BRAF and NRAS mutation status. In both KRAS wild-type and mutant subgroups, additional factors that could impact EGFR mAb efficacy were explored including the type of chemotherapy, line of therapy, age, sex, tumour sidedness and site of metastasis., Results: 5675 patients from 8 studies were included, all with known mCRC KRAS mutation status. OS (HR adj 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.98, p = 0.01) and PFS benefit (HR adj 0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.79, p < 0.001) from EGFR mAbs was observed in the KRAS wild-type group. PFS benefit was seen in patients treated with fluorouracil (HR adj 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.82) but not with capecitabine-containing regimens (HR adj 1.04, 95% CI 0.86-1.26) (p interaction  = 0.002). Sidedness also interacted with EGFR mAb efficacy, with survival benefit restricted to left-sided disease (p interaction  = 0.038). PFS benefits differed according to age, with benefits greater in those under 70 (p interaction  = 0.001). The survival benefit was not demonstrated in those patients with mutations found in the KRAS, NRAS or BRAF genes. The presence of liver metastases interacted with EGFR mAb efficacy in patients with KRAS mutant mCRC (p interaction  = 0.004)., Conclusion: The benefit provided by EGFR mAbs in KRAS WT mCRC is associated with left-sided primary tumour location, younger patient age and absence of NRAS or BRAF mutations. Survival benefit is observed with fluorouracil but not capecitabine. Exploratory results support further research in KRAS mutant mCRC without liver metastases., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Context: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have KRAS codon 12- or KRAS codon 13-mutated tumors are presently excluded from treatment with the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab.Objective: To test the hypothesis that KRAS codon 13 mutations are associated with a better outcome after treatment with cetuximab than observed with other KRAS mutations.Design, Setting, and Patients: We studied the association between KRAS mutation status (p.G13D vs other KRAS mutations) and response and survival in a pooled data set of 579 patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab between 2001 and 2008. Patients were included in the CO.17, BOND, MABEL, EMR202600, EVEREST, BABEL, or SALVAGE clinical trials or received off-study treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses, adjusting for possible prognostic factors and data set, were performed. The effect of the different mutations was studied in vitro by constructing isogenic cell lines with wild-type KRAS, p.G12V, or p.G13D mutant alleles and treating them with cetuximab.Main Outcome Measures: The main efficacy end point was overall survival. Secondary efficacy end points were response rate and progression-free survival.Results: In comparison with patients with other KRAS-mutated tumors, patients with p.G13D-mutated tumors (n = 32) treated with cetuximab had longer overall survival (median, 7.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 5.7-20.5] months vs 5.7 [95% CI, 4.9-6.8] months; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81; P = .005) and longer progression-free survival (median, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.9-6.2] months vs 1.9 [95% CI, 1.8-2.8] months; adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81; P = .004). There was a significant interaction between KRAS mutation status (p.G13D vs other KRAS mutations) and overall survival benefit with cetuximab treatment (adjusted HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.67; P = .003). In vitro and mouse model analysis showed that although p.G12V-mutated colorectal cells were insensitive to cetuximab, p.G13D-mutated cells were sensitive, as were KRAS wild-type cells.Conclusions: In this analysis, use of cetuximab was associated with longer overall and progression-free survival among patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer with p.G13D-mutated tumors than with other KRAS-mutated tumors. Evaluation of cetuximab therapy in these tumors in prospective randomized trials may be warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Synergistic cytotoxicity with high-dose statins and erlotinib has been demonstrated in preclinical models across a number of tumour types. In this phase I study, we evaluated the safety and potential anti-tumour activity of escalating doses of rosuvastatin in combination with the standard clinical dose of erlotinib in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumours., Methods: This was a single-center, phase I open-label study to determine the safety and recommended phase two dose (RPTD) of rosuvastatin in combination with 150 mg/day standard dose of erlotinib. Using a 3 + 3 study design and 28-day cycle, escalating doses of rosuvastatin from 1 to 8 mg/kg/day × 2 weeks (cycle 1) and 3 weeks (subsequent cycles) given concurrently with erlotinib were evaluated. In order to expand the experience and to gain additional safety and pharmacokinetic data, two expansions cohorts using concurrent or alternating weekly dosing regimens at the RPTD were also evaluated., Results: All 24 patients enrolled were evaluable for toxicity, and 22 for response. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of reversible muscle toxicity was seen at the 2 mg/kg/day dose level. Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 1 mg/kg/day. Thirty-three percent of patients developed at least 1 ≥ grade 2 muscle toxicity (rhabdomyolysis: 1/24, myalgia: 7/24) resulting in one study-related death. Durable stable disease for more than 170 days was seen in 25 % of patients that received concurrent treatment and were evaluable for response (n = 16). Plasma erlotinib levels on study were unaffected by the addition of rosuvastatin., Conclusions: The observed disease stabilization rate of 25 % with combination therapy in this heavily pretreated population is encouraging, however, the high levels of muscle toxicities observed limited this combination strategy.

Purpose: The TWEAK-Fn14 pathway represents a novel anticancer target that is being actively investigated. Understanding the relationship between pharmacokinetics of anti-TWEAK therapeutics and tumor pharmacodynamics is critical. We investigated exposure-response relationships of RG7212, an anti-TWEAK mAb, in patients with Fn14-expressing tumors., Experimental Design: Patients with Fn14-positive tumors (IHC ≥ 1+) treated in a phase I first-in-human study with ascending doses of RG7212 were the basis for this analysis. Pharmacokinetics of RG7212 and dynamics of TWEAK were determined, as were changes in tumor TWEAK-Fn14 signaling in paired pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies. The objectives of the analysis were to define exposure-response relationships and the relationship between pretreatment tumor Fn14 expression and pharmacodynamic effect. Associations between changes in TWEAK-Fn14 signaling and clinical outcome were explored., Results: Thirty-six patients were included in the analysis. RG7212 reduced plasma TWEAK to undetectable levels at all observed RG7212 exposures. In contrast, reductions in tumor Fn14 and TRAF1 protein expression were observed only at higher exposure (≥ 300 mg*h/mL). Significant reductions in tumor Ki-67 expression and early changes in serum concentrations of CCL-2 and MMP-9 were observed exclusively in patients with higher drug exposure who had high pretreatment tumor Fn14 expression. Pretreatment tumor Fn14 expression was not associated with outcome, but a trend toward longer time on study was observed with high versus low RG7212 exposure., Conclusions: RG7212 reduced tumor TWEAK-Fn14 signaling in a systemic exposure-dependent manner. In addition to higher exposure, relatively high Fn14 expression might be required for pharmacodynamic effect of anti-TWEAK monoclonal antibodies., (©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Right- and left-sided colon cancers (RC, LC) differ with respect to biology, pathology and epidemiology. Previous data suggest a mortality difference between RC and LC. We examined if primary tumour side also predicts for outcome in chemotherapy refractory, metastatic colon cancer (MCC). We also compared RC versus LC as a predictor of efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition with cetuximab., Methods: Reanalyzing NCIC CO.17 trial (cetuximab versus best supportive care [BSC]), we coded the primary tumour side as RC (caecum to transverse colon) or LC (splenic flexure to rectosigmoid). The association between tumour side and baseline characteristics was assessed. Cox regression models determined factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS)., Results: Patients with RC (150/399) had more poorly differentiated, mutant KRAS, mutated PIK3CA and wild-type BRAF tumours, fewer liver and lung metastases, and shorter interval between diagnosis and study entry. Among BSC patients, tumour side was not prognostic for PFS (hazard ratios (HR) 1.07 [0.79-1.44], p = 0.67) or OS (HR 0.96 [0.70-1.31], p = 0.78). Among wild-type KRAS patients, those with LC had significantly improved PFS when treated with cetuximab compared to BSC (median 5.4 versus 1.8 months, HR 0.28 [0.18-0.45], p < 0.0001), whereas those with RC did not (median 1.9 versus 1.9 months, HR 0.73 [0.42-1.27], p = 0.26), [interaction p = 0.002]., Conclusion: In refractory MCC, tumour location within the colon is not prognostic, but is strongly predictive of PFS benefit from cetuximab therapy. Additional research is needed to understand the molecular differences between RC and LC and their interaction with EGFR inhibition., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anal cancer is uncommon. We reviewed the treatment and outcomes of anal cancer patients in a population referred to the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre (TOHCC) over a 12-year period., Methods: A chart review was conducted with patient data collected from hospital records, including: demographic, treatment and outcome information. Outcomes of interest included: overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and colostomy free survival (CFS)., Results: 180 patients were included in the study population. 72% (n = 130) female and 28% (n = 50) male. 6.7% (n = 12 males) of patients were HIV positive - all were on anti-retroviral therapy. 60% (n = 108) of patients were ever-smokers, mean patient age was 62 [range 35-90] years. The most frequent presenting symptoms were blood per rectum and anal pain. Treatment intent was curative in 87%. Treatment included radiotherapy (94%), brachytherapy (26%), chemotherapy (73%). Among patients treated with curative-intent, 72% had a complete response, 31% had local/regional recurrence, 16% required salvage surgery and 21% had distant recurrence. The colostomy rate was 23%. 5 year overall survival (OS) was not significantly different for patients by HIV status. Survival was superior if MMC-FU was used first vs. CIS-FU; OS HR 0.47 (0.24-0.94), p < 0.033., Conclusions: The outcomes of patients in this large retrospective cohort study are similar to the outcomes of patients in highly selective clinical trials. Five year overall survival and colostomy free survival are encouraging. MMC-FU was found to be superior to CIS-FU., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background The folate receptor alpha is selectively over-expressed in a number of human cancers. BMS-753493 is a folate conjugate of the epothilone analog BMS-748285 that was designed to selectively target folate receptor expressing cancer cells. Methods BMS-753493 was investigated in two parallel multi-institutional first-in-human phase I/IIa studies in patients with advanced solid tumors. In Study 1, patients were treated on a schedule of once daily dosing of BMS-753493 administered on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 every 21 days with a starting dose of 5 mg daily and in Study 2, patients were treated once daily on Days 1-4 every 21 days, with a starting dose of 2.5 mg daily. Results A total of 65 patients were treated across the two studies. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 26 mg in Study 1 and 15 mg in Study 2. Fatigue, transaminitis, gastrointestinal toxicity, and mucositis were dose-limiting toxicities. One patient in Study 2 developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome attributed to BMS-753493. Plasma exposures of both the conjugated and free epothilone increased in a dose related fashion in both studies and the half-life of the conjugated epothilone was 0.2-0.6 h across dose levels. No objective tumor responses were seen in either study. Conclusions BMS-753493 was generally tolerable and toxicities known to be associated with epothilone class of anticancer agents were common, although peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia appear to have been less frequent and less severe as compared to epothilones. Antitumor activity was not demonstrated and further development of BMS-753493 has been discontinued.

Targeted drug delivery systems have emerged as promising approaches for improving the efficacy and safety of cancer therapy. This review highlights recent advancements in drug delivery technologies aimed at achieving targeted and personalized treatment strategies for cancer patients. The integration of nanotechnology, biomaterials, and molecular targeting strategies has enabled the development of sophisticated drug delivery systems capable of selectively delivering therapeutic agents to tumour tissues while minimizing off-target effects on healthy tissues. Various targeting mechanisms, including passive and active targeting strategies, exploit the unique physiological characteristics of tumours, such as abnormal vasculature, overexpressed receptors, and altered microenvironments, to achieve selective accumulation and retention of drugs within tumour tissues. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and inorganic nanoparticles, offer advantages in terms of drug loading capacity, sustained release, and tumour targeting, making them attractive platforms for targeted cancer therapy. Moreover, the integration of smart drug delivery systems that respond to specific stimuli within the tumor microenvironment, such as pH, temperature, or enzyme activity, holds promise for enhancing tumor specificity and reducing systemic toxicity. Combination therapy approaches, which combine targeted drug delivery with other therapeutic modalities, such as immunotherapy or photodynamic therapy, offer synergistic effects and opportunities for overcoming treatment resistance. Despite these advancements, several challenges remain, including the translation of preclinical research findings into clinically viable therapies, regulatory approval, manufacturing scalability, and biomarker discovery. Addressing these challenges and embracing innovative approaches will be essential for realizing the full potential of targeted drug delivery systems in improving patient outcomes and advancing cancer therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis affects both men and women. However, therapeutic strategies and long-term outcomes could be influenced by patients' sex, due to variations in tumour biology, lifestyle, and dietary habits. By conducting a comprehensive comparative analysis, this study aims to detail differences in tumour characteristics, postoperative complications, recurrence rates, and survival outcomes between sexes. Methods: Single-centre retrospective analysis between 2010 and 2022 of all patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) at the Department of Surgery, Charité– Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Patients were stratified by sex. Statistical analysis was performed using RV4.2. Results: We analysed 642 patients who underwent hepatic resections for CRLM. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable between sexes: However, significant differences (p < 0.001) were noted in body mass index (BMI), with females exhibiting lower BMIs (median BMI in females: 23.7 kg/m² vs. males: 26.5 kg/m²). Primary tumour locations varied significantly (p = 0.008), with females presenting more sigmoid colon tumours (37%), while males predominantly had rectal tumours (35%). RAS mutation rates were higher in females (54%) than males (34%, p = 0.005). A higher prevalence of bilobar metastases were evident in men (62%, p = 0.011), yet surgical techniques and complications showed comparable distributions. The time for resection was longer in males (median 304 min vs. 290 min in females); however, conversion to open surgery took place more often in females (5.2% vs. 2.3% in males). Postoperative complications and survival rates showed no significant differences by patients' sex. Conclusion: Distinct sex-related patterns in tumour characteristics and postoperative outcomes in patients with CRLM were observed, emphasizing the need for further investigations to understand and address gender-based disparities for more personalized clinical management in the future. Trial registration: This research was conducted with ethical approval from the relevant institutional review board Ethikkommission der Charité– Universitätsmedizin Berlin' (reference numbers EA2/006/16 and EA4/084/17). No other registration applied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials. Methods: Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8. Results: A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2–57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14–0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37–0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62–0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77–0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79–0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS. Conclusions: In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Colorectal cancer is a common and fatal disease that affects many people globally. CRC is classified as the third most prevalent cancer among males and the second most frequent cancer among females worldwide. The purpose of this article is to examine how personalized medicine might be used to treat colorectal cancer. The classification of colorectal cancer based on molecular profiling, including the detection of significant gene mutations, genomic instability, and gene dysregulation, is the main topic of this discussion. Advanced technologies and biomarkers are among the detection methods that are explored, demonstrating their potential for early diagnosis and precise prognosis. In addition, the essay explores the world of treatment possibilities by providing light on FDA-approved personalized medicine solutions that provide individualized and precise interventions based on patient characteristics. This article assesses targeted treatments like cetuximab and nivolumab, looks at the therapeutic usefulness of biomarkers like microsatellite instability (MSI) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and investigates new approaches to combat resistance. Through this, our review provides a thorough overview of personalized medicine in the context of colorectal cancer, ultimately highlighting its potential to revolutionize the field and improve patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite advancements in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the effectiveness of these conventional treatments is limited, particularly in advanced cases. Therefore, transition to novel treatment is urgently needed. Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has shown promise in improving outcomes for CRC patients. Notably, patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors often benefit from ICIs, while the majority of CRC cases, which exhibit proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) or microsatellite-stable (MSS) status, generally show resistance to this approach. It is assumed that the MSI phenotype cause some changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), thus triggering antitumor immunity and leading to response to immunotherapy. Understanding these differences in the TME relative to MSI status is essential for developing more effective therapeutic strategies. This review provides an overview of the TME components in CRC and explores current approaches aimed at enhancing ICI efficacy in MSS CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Theranostics is a way of treating illness that blends medicine with testing. Specific characteristics should be present in the best theranostic agents for cancer: (1) the drugs should be safe and non-toxic; (2) they should be able to treat cancer selectively; and (3) they should be able to build up only in the cancerous tissue. Liposomes (LPs) are one of the most efficient drug delivery methods based on nanotechnology. Stealth LPs and commercial LPs have recently had an impact on cancer treatment. Using the valuable information from each imaging technique, along with the multimodality imaging functionality of liposomal therapeutic agents, makes them very appealing for personalized monitoring of how well therapeutic drugs are working against cancer in vivo and for predicting how well therapies will work. On the other hand, their use as nanoparticle delivery systems is currently in the research and development phase. Nanoscale delivery system innovation has made LP-nanoparticle hybrid structures very useful for combining therapeutic and imaging methods. LP-hybrid nanoparticles are better at killing cancer cells than their LP counterparts, making them excellent options for in vivo and in vitro drug delivery applications. Hybrid liposomes (HLs) could be used in the future as theranostic carriers to find and treat cancer targets. This would combine the best features of synthetic and biological drug delivery systems. Overarchingly, this article provided a comprehensive overview of the many LP types used in cancer detection, therapy, and theranostic analysis. An evaluation of the pros and cons of the many HLs types used in cancer detection and treatment has also been conducted. The study also included recent and significant research on HLs for cancer theranostic applications. We conclude by outlining the potential benefits and drawbacks of this theranostic approach to the concurrent detection and treatment of different malignancies, as well as its prospects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Central nervous system tumors are among the most lethal types of cancer. A critical factor for tailored neurosurgical resection strategies depends on specific tumor types. However, it is uncommon to have a preoperative tumor diagnosis, and intraoperative morphology-based diagnosis remains challenging. Despite recent advances in intraoperative methylation classifications of brain tumors, accuracy may be compromised by low tumor purity. Copy number variations (CNVs), which are almost ubiquitous in cancer, offer highly sensitive molecular biomarkers for diagnosis. These quantitative genomic alterations provide insight into dysregulated oncogenic pathways and can reveal potential targets for molecular therapies. Methods: We develop iSCORED, a one-step random genomic DNA reconstruction method that enables efficient, unbiased quantification of genome-wide CNVs. By concatenating multiple genomic fragments into long reads, the method leverages low-pass sequencing to generate approximately 1–2 million genomic fragments within 1 h. This approach allows for ultrafast high-resolution CNV analysis at a genomic resolution of 50 kb. In addition, concurrent methylation profiling enables brain tumor methylation classification and identifies promoter methylation in amplified oncogenes, providing an integrated diagnostic approach. Results: In our retrospective cohort of 26 malignant brain tumors, iSCORED demonstrated 100% concordance in CNV detection, including chromosomal alterations and oncogene amplifications, when compared to clinically validated assays such as Next-Generation Sequencing and Chromosomal Microarray. Furthermore, we validated iSCORED's real-time applicability in 15 diagnostically challenging primary brain tumors, achieving 100% concordance in detecting aberrant CNV detection, including diagnostic chromosomal gains/losses and oncogene amplifications (10/10). Of these, 14 out of 15 brain tumor methylation classifications aligned with final pathological diagnoses. This streamlined workflow—from tissue arrival to automatic generation of CNV and methylation reports—can be completed within 105 min. Conclusions: The iSCORED pipeline represents the first method capable of high-resolution CNV detection within the intraoperative timeframe. By combining CNV detection and methylation classification, iSCORED provides a rapid and comprehensive molecular diagnostic tool that can inform rapid clinical decision. The integrated approach not only enhances the accuracy of tumor diagnosis but also optimizes surgical planning and identifies potential molecular therapies, all within the critical intraoperative timeframe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]