Search

Abstract Background Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are common following lung transplantation (LuTx), yet their role in graft damage is inconclusive. Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) is the main read-out of DSA diagnostics; however its value is often disregarded when analyzing unwanted post-transplant outcomes such as graft loss or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Here we aim to evaluate an MFI stratification method in these outcomes. Methods A cohort of 87 LuTx recipients has been analyzed, in which a cutoff of 8000 MFI has been determined for high MFI based on clinically relevant data. Accordingly, recipients were divided into DSA-negative, DSA-low and DSA-high subgroups. Both graft survival and CLAD-free survival were evaluated. Among factors that may contribute to DSA development we analyzed Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infection in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens. Results High MFI DSAs contributed to clinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and were associated with significantly worse graft (HR: 5.77, p

Abstract Background After lung transplantation (LuTX), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) are associated with changes in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid mononuclear cell profile (PBMC and BALIC). PBMC is also influenced by immunosuppressive regimen and its changes with postoperative time. First‐year PBMC and BALIC changes were evaluated in this study with rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) and alemtuzumab (AL) induction therapy. Methods In total, 64 LuTX recipients were included, 53 of them received AL and 11 ATG as induction therapy. PBMC and BALIC were examined routinely and in cases suspicious of infection and/or rejection. A PBMC‐ and BALIC‐based algorithm for infection and rejection prediction was also tested. Results In the AL group, peripheral blood lymphocyte and basophil cell numbers were significantly reduced, while the neutrophil cell number elevation during LRTI was significantly higher compared to the control. Early postoperative measurements showed a lower BALIC lymphocyte count. The algorithm had 17% sensitivity and 94% specificity for ACR in all patients and 33% sensitivity and 95% specificity for ACR with coexisting LRTI. Conclusion BALIC is not significantly influenced by the immunosuppressive regimen. PBMC‐ and BALIC‐based algorithm may improve the differential diagnosis of ACR.

Background: Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant. Methods: Searches were conducted from the beginning to 7 March 2022 using the terms “exercise,” “rehabilitation,” “lung transplant,” “exercise ability,” “survival,” “quality of life” and “telerehabilitation” in six databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the effects of an exercise training programme concurrent with lung transplantation as well as patients and candidates (>18 years old) through any lung diseases. The term “lung transplant rehabilitation” was used to refer to all carefully thought-out physical activities with the ultimate or intermediate objective of improving or maintaining physical health. Results: Out of 1422 articles, 10 clinical- and 3 telerehabilitation studies, candidates (n = 420) and recipients (n = 116) were related to the criteria and included in this review. The main outcome significantly improved in all studies. The 6-min walk distance, maximum exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, or endurance for constant load rate cycling improved measuring physical activity [aerobic exercises, breathing training, and aerobic and inspiratory muscle training sessions (IMT)]. Overall scores for dyspnoea improved after exercise training. Furthermore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) also improved after aerobic exercise training, which was performed unsupervised or accompanied by breathing sessions. Aerobic training alone rather than combined with inspiratory muscle- (IMT) or breathing training enhanced exercise capacity. Conclusion: In conclusion, rehabilitation programmes seem to be beneficial to patients both preceding and following lung transplantation. More studies are required to determine the best training settings in terms of time scale, frequency, and work intensity in terms of improving exercise ability, dyspnoea, and HRQOL.