Search

In 1988, the eradication of poliomyelitis (polio) was adopted by the World Health Organization as a goal to be achieved by the year 2000. The successful eradication of smallpox serves as an important reminder that concerted efforts can completely eliminate a disease. However, there are serious obstacles that make eradicating polio more challenging than eliminating smallpox. The authors review the current state of polio around the world and the impediments to its eradication. One serious problem is that many cases of polio are asymptomatic, which makes it difficult to quarantine known cases. The difficulty in identifying all cases of polio also make it difficult to monitor the progress of any immunization program. More sophisticated health facilities will be necessary for evaluating the status of polio in developing countries than were needed for evaluating smallpox. Other problems involve the vaccine itself. The trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (TOPV), a current version of the live virus Sabin vaccine, is much less stable than the smallpox vaccine. TOPV can lose much of its potency after only one day at 37 degrees centigrade. Furthermore, unlike the smallpox vaccine for which one dose can confer years of immunity, TOPV requires booster doses. While two doses are adequate in the US, at least four doses may be necessary in some developing countries to confer protective immunity. Obviously, this requires many small villages be visited more often, creating problems in both logistics and record-keeping. The eradication of smallpox cost about $300 million, but the elimination of this disease is estimated to save about $1 billion each year worldwide. Considering the greater difficulties, the eradication of polio is likely to be more costly. However, the eradication of polio would save $114 million each year in the US alone. (Consumer Summary produced by Reliance Medical Information, Inc.)

Good Morning! We can look forward to an exciting week and, more importantly, through our deliberations and debates, to making contributions to public policy and political action which will improve [...]

Background: The monitoring and evaluation of lymphatic filariasis (LF) has largely relied on the detection of antigenemia and antibodies in human populations. Molecular xenomonitoring (MX), the detection of parasite DNA/RNA in mosquitoes, may be an effective complementary method, particularly for detecting signals in low-level prevalence areas where Culex is the primary mosquito vector. This paper investigated the application of a household-based sampling method for MX in Tamil Nadu, India. Methods: MX surveys were conducted in 2010 in two evaluation units (EUs): 1) a hotspot area, defined as sites with community microfilaria prevalence ≥1%, and 2) a larger area that also encompassed the hotspots. Households were systematically selected using a sampling interval proportional to the number of households in the EU. Mosquito pools were collected and analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Two independent samples were taken in each EU to assess reproducibility of results. Follow-up surveys were conducted in 2012. Results: In 2010, the proportion of positive pools in the hotspot EU was 49.3% compared to 23.4% in the overall EU. In 2012, pool positivity was significantly reduced to 24.3% and 6.5%, respectively (p<0.0001). Pool positivity based on independent samples taken from each EU in 2010 and 2012 were not significantly different except for the hotspot EU in 2012 (p = 0.009). The estimated prevalence of infection in mosquitoes, measured by PoolScreen, declined from 2.2–2.7% in 2010 to 0.6–1.2% in 2012 in the hotspot area and from 0.9–1.1% to 0.2–0.3% in the larger area. Conclusions: The household-based sampling strategy for MX led to mostly reproducible results and supported the observed LF infection trends found in humans. MX has the potential to be a cost-effective, non-invasive monitoring and evaluation tool with sensitive detection of infection signals in low prevalence settings. Further investigation and application of this sampling strategy for MX are recommended to support its adoption as a standardized method for global LF elimination programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sri Lanka’s Anti Filariasis Campaign distributed 5 rounds of mass drug administration (MDA with DEC plus albendazole) to all endemic regions in the country from 2002–2006. Post-MDA surveillance results have generally been encouraging. However, recent studies have documented low level persistence of Wuchereria bancrofti in Galle district based on comprehensive surveys that include molecular xenomonitoring (MX, detection of filarial DNA in mosquitoes) results. The purposes of this study were to demonstrate the use of MX in large evaluation units (EUs) and to field test different mosquito sampling schemes. Methodology/Principal Findings: Galle district (population 1.1 million) was divided into two EUs. These included a coastal EU with known persistent LF and an inland EU with little persistent LF. Mosquitoes were systematically sampled from ~300 trap locations in 30 randomly selected clusters (health administrative units) per EU. Approximately 28,000 Culex quinquefasciatus were collected with gravid traps and tested for filarial DNA by qPCR. 92/625 pools (14.7%) from the coastal EU and 8/583 pools (1.4%) from the inland EU were positive for filarial DNA. Maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) for filarial DNA rates were essentially the same when the same number of mosquito pools were collected and tested from 75, 150, or 300 trap sites (range 0.61–0.78% for the coastal EU and 0.04–0.07% for the inland EU). The ability to use a smaller number of trap sites reduces the cost and time required for mosquito sampling. Conclusions/Significance: These results suggest there is widespread persistence of W. bancrofti infection in the coastal Galle EU 8 years after the last round of MDA in 2006, and this is consistent with other data from the district. This study has shown that MX can be used by national programs to assess and map the persistence of W. bancrofti at the level of large EUs in areas with Culex transmission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the text of a speech by Ralph H. Henderson, assistant director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), delivered at the "Conference on Global Disease Elimination and Eradication as Public Health Strategies," February 23 to 25, 1998, in which he discussed the nature of leadership, choosing a specific elimination or eradication goal, and resource mobilization.

The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) was launched in 2000. To understand why some national programs have been more successful than others, a panel of individuals with expertise in LF elimination efforts met to assess available data from programs in 8 countries. The goal was to identify: 1) the factors determining success for national LF elimination programs (defined as the rapid, sustained reduction in microfilaremia/antigenemia after repeated mass drug administration [MDA]); 2) the priorities for operational research to enhance LF elimination efforts. Of more than 40 factors identified, the most prominent were 1) initial level of LF endemicity; 2) effectiveness of vector mosquitoes; 3) MDA drug regimen; 4) population compliance. Research important for facilitating program success was identified as either biologic (i.e., [1] quantifying differences in vectorial capacity; [2] identifying seasonal variations affecting LF transmission) or programmatic (i.e., [1] identifying quantitative thresholds, especially the population compliance levels necessary for success, and the antigenemia or microfilaremia prevalence at which MDA programs can stop with minimal risk of resumption of transmission; [2] defining optimal drug distribution strategies and timing; [3] identifying those individuals who are "persistently non-compliant" during MDAs, the reasons for this non-compliance and approaches to overcoming it). While addressing these challenges is important, many key determinants of program success are already clearly understood; operationalizing these as soon as possible will greatly increase the potential for national program success.