Search

Wind gusts present challenges to operational meteorologists, both to forecast accurately and also to verify. Strong wind gusts can damage structures and create costly risks for diverse industrial sectors. The meteorologically stratified gust factor (MSGF) model incorporates site-specific gust factors (the ratio of peak wind gust to mean wind speed) with wind speed and direction forecast guidance. The MSGF model has previously been shown to be a viable operational tool that exhibits skill (improvement over climatology) in forecasting peak wind gusts. This study assesses the performance characteristics of the MSGF model by evaluating peak gust predictions during several types of gust-producing weather phenomena. Peak wind gusts were prepared and verified for seven specific weather conditions over an 8-yr period at 16 sites across the United States. When coupled with two forms of model output statistics (MOS) wind guidance, the MSGF model generally shows skill in predicting peak wind gusts at forecast projections ranging from 6 to 72 h. The model performed best during high pressure and nocturnal conditions and was also skillful during conditions involving snow. The model did not perform well during the "rain with thunder" weather type. TheMSGF model is a viable tool for the operational prediction of peak gusts for most gust-producing weather types. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Wind gusts are an important and potentially costly environmental hazard. Wind gusts affect many industrial sectors, including transportation, power generation, forestry, construction, and insurance, but predicting gusts remains a challenging component of weather forecasting. Recent studies have demonstrated that the meteorologically stratified gust factor (MSGF) model shows skill in predicting peak gusts. This study shows that the MSGF model is skillful at predicting peak gusts during specific types of gust-producing weather phenomena at forecast projections up to 72 h, providing further confirmation that the MSGF model is a viable tool for the operational prediction of peak gusts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What determines a team’s home advantage, and why does it change with time? Is it something about the rowdiness of the hometown crowd? Is it something about the location of the team? Or is it something about the team itself, the quality of the team or the styles it may or may not play? To answer these questions, season performance statistics were downloaded for all NBA teams across 32 seasons (83–84 to 17–18). Data were also obtained for other potential influences identified in the literature including: stadium attendance, altitude, and team market size. Using an artificial neural network, a team’s home advantage was diagnosed using team performance statistics only. Attendance, altitude, and market size were unsuccessful at improving this diagnosis. The style of play is a key factor in the home advantage. Teams that make more two point and free-throw shots see larger advantages at home. Given the rise in three-point shooting in recent years, this finding partially explains the gradual decline in home advantage observed across the league over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]