Search

This article provides a reinterpretation of Stalinism through the lens of Marx's concept of primitive accumulation. It connects a series of defining events that are usually viewed separately – the debates and oppositional movements of the 1920s, industrialization, collectivization, and the "Great Terror" – to the state's need to accumulate capital for development. Using the idea of "primitive socialist accumulation", first introduced by the Soviet theorist and left oppositionist Evgeny Preobrazhensky, it examines the challenges of building socialism in an underdeveloped, overwhelmingly peasant country. It argues that the emergence of the left and right oppositions in the 1920s and the grain crisis in 1927–1928 resulted from the state's struggle to create a stable balance between rural and urban exchange. The hastily implemented move to collectivize resulted in a cascade of unintended consequences, including a disastrous famine, decrease in food supplies, and a precipitous fall in real wages that impelled record numbers of women into the labor force. Against a background of social instability and discontent, the Kirov murder proved a fearful trigger, igniting fears among Party leaders that ultimately resulted in mass political and social repression. The article is part of a dossier, comprising an introduction and three articles, which offers a new approach to our understanding of socialism in the Soviet Union, China, and Romania. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this dossier, Marx's concept of primitive accumulation is applied to socialist development in the Soviet Union, China, and Romania, three countries in which socialist revolution occurred before the full development of capitalism. The introduction profiles the ideas of Evgenii Preobrazhensky, the Soviet theorist and left oppositionist, who first applied Marx's concept to the problems of socialist development, and was executed under Stalin in 1937. Preobrazhensky advanced the idea of "primitive socialist accumulation", a process that would fund industrialization by extracting surplus through planned, non-coercive transfers from market-based and state sectors. Preobrazhensky's ideas sparked debates within communist parties over collectivization and the tempo of development. The introduction and articles in the dossier point the way towards future comparative research, suggesting that the processes of primitive capitalist and socialist accumulation shared painful similarities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article responds to the essay "The Question of the Perpetrator in Soviet History," by Lynne Viola, published within the issue. The author discusses Viola's comparison of Stalinism to Nazism and why historians have ignored the question of who the perpetrators were in these regimes. She explores how literature on the German-sponsored mass genocide Holocaust sheds light on the perpetrators involved, examines how Soviet socialism relates to German fascism, and analyzes how Soviet leader Joseph Stalin was at the top of a pyramid of perpetrators.

In this article the authors discuss the historical research of everyday life, or Alltagsgeschichte. The authors discuss how they see everyday life history in their field of work and their definition of Alltagsgeschichte. They consider if the politics of communist regimes in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe factor in how researchers think of everyday life history.

Using squirrel monkeys as experimental subjects, we reexamined the disputed role of the area postrema (AP) in motion-induced vomiting. After anesthetization, the obex and rhomboid fossa were exposed surgically, and the AP was ablated by thermal coagulation using either a battery cautery or a CO2 microsurgical laser. Sham operations were performed on another sample of monkeys. Two or more weeks after surgery, all animals were given 10 daily 2-hour horizontal rotations at 30 rpm. Every monkey in both the lesions and sham samples vomited on two or more test days. While the vomiting characteristics were modified following ablation of AP, its function is not indispensible for the development of motion sickness in horizontally-rotated squirrel monkeys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]