Search

Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD). Patients with diabetes and IHD experience worse clinical outcomes, suggesting that the diabetic heart may be more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). In contrast, the animal data suggests that the diabetic heart may be either more, equally, or even less susceptible to IRI. The conflicting animal data may be due to the choice of diabetic and/or IRI animal model. Ischemic conditioning, a phenomenon in which the heart is protected against IRI by one or more brief nonlethal periods of ischemia and reperfusion, may provide a novel cardioprotective strategy for the diabetic heart. Whether the diabetic heart is amenable to ischemic conditioning remains to be determined using relevant animal models of IRI and/or diabetes. In this paper, we review the limitations of the current experimental models used to investigate IRI and cardioprotection in the diabetic heart.

Guidelines recommend primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (PPICD) for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% only after 3 months of optimal medical therapy (OMT) or 6 weeks after acute MI with persistent LVEF dysfunction. A 73-year-old woman presented with decompensated heart failure secondary to ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Severe coronary disease with sufficient dysfunctional myocardial segments on cardiac MRI suggested potential benefit from revascularisation. Following discussion with the heart team, she underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PPICD implantation was deferred as per guideline recommendations. However, 20 days post-PCI, the patient died from malignant ventricular arrhythmia captured on a Holter monitor. This case demonstrates that some high-risk patients may not receive a potentially life-saving PPICD if guidelines are stringently adhered to. We highlight evidence that LVEF alone is of limited value in a risk assessment of arrhythmogenic death, and postulate that a more personalised ICD prescription should be considered using scar characteristics on cardiac MRI to prompt upstream ICD implantation in high-risk patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure: POK is editor-in-chief of Interventional Cardiology; this did not influence peer review. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Consent: Informed consent for publication of this care report has been obtained from the patient’s next of kin as the patient is deceased, sadly., (Copyright © 2023, Radcliffe Cardiology.)

Background: Acute stress is known to be associated with both negative and positive influences on cognitive performance. Hypertension is one of the risk factors for lowered cognitive performance. Mental stress testing is easier to administer and can be regulated by the investigator. Mental arithmetic using serial subtraction is the most widely used method to administer stress. Reaction time (RT) is widely used to assess cognitive domains like attention, execution and psychomotor speed. Researchers have shown choice reaction times are delayed in hypertension. It is not known whether acute mental stress improves or deteriorates attention, execution and psychomotor speed in hypertension. We hypothesized in the present study that acute mental stress deteriorates cognitive function in hypertensives without overt cerebrovascular disease or other vascular risk factors., Methods: After getting medical ethical clearance from our institution, this case-control study was carried out over eight months (January 2017 to September 2017). 60 subjects between the age group of 35 to 55 years were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 diagnosed cases of hypertension at least two years of duration. Group 2 consisted of 30 sex and age-matched controls. MMSE was performed to assess the cognitive function in these groups. Simple (S) and choice (C) auditory reaction time (ART) and visual reaction time (VRT)s were measured at rest and acute mental stress in these groups to assess cognitive function. Predictive value of VRTC resting and VRTC during acute mental stress among hypertensives for cognitive dysfunction was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve., Results: There was significant difference ART and VRT, both simple and choice, in hypertensive and nonhypertensive subjects and these reaction times further increased during mental stress (P<0.001). VRTC can be a predictor of cognitive dysfunction in hypertensives and during acute mental stress., Conclusion: A significant difference in cognitive functions in hypertensive and nonhypertensive subjects exists and this further deteriorates with acute mental stress., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Prior to ventricular tachycardia ablation, this patient's cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) was temporarily programmed to backup pacing mode with tachycardia therapies disabled. During radiofrequency energy delivery, the patient developed ventricular fibrillation requiring emergent cardioversion. Electrogram interrogation showed that the CIED switched to noise reversion mode during ablation. The consequent asynchronous pacing resulted in a paced QRS landing on an intrinsic T wave, inducing ventricular fibrillation. This serves as an important reminder that asynchronous pacing consequent to CIED oversensing could occur in any procedure that could cause electromagnetic interference such as radiofrequency cathteter ablation., Competing Interests: None., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.)

Background: Ripple mapping (RM) displays electrograms as moving bars over a three-dimensional surface displaying bipolar voltage, and has shown in a single-center series to be effective for atrial tachycardia (AT) mapping without annotation of local activation time or window-of-interest assignment. We tested the reproducibility of these findings in operators naïve to RM, using it for the first time in postablation AT., Methods: Maps were collected with multielectrode catheters and CARTO ConfiDENSE. A diagnosis of the tachycardia mechanism was made using RM and an assessment of operator confidence was made according to a three-grade scale (1 highest-3 lowest)., Results: The first 20 patients (64 ± 9 years, median two previous ablations) undergoing RM-guided AT ablation across five sites were studied. High-density maps (2,935 ± 1,328 points) in AT (CL = 296 ± 95 milliseconds) were collected. Macroreentrant ATs bordered by scar or anatomical obstacles were identified in n = 12 (60%), small reentrant ATs around scar in n = 3 (15%), and focal ATs from scar in n = 5 (25%). Diagnostic confidence with RM was grade 1 in n = 13 (65%), where operators felt confident to proceed to ablation without entrainment. Ablation offered the correct diagnosis n = 18 (90%). Retrospective review of the accompanying LAT maps demonstrated potential sources for error related to the window of interest selection, interpolation, and differentiating regions of scar during tachycardia on the voltage map., Conclusion: RM was easy to adopt by operators using it for the first time, and identified the correct target for ablation with high diagnostic confidence in most cases of complex AT., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Age is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with heart failure. We aimed to assess the impact of age and noncardiac co-morbidities in the outcome of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and determine which of these two factors is the most important predictor of survival. The study involved a single-center retrospective assessment of 697 consecutive CRT implants during a 12-year period. Patient co-morbidity profile was assessed using the Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) and the Charlson Age-Co-morbidity Index (CACI). Predictors of survival free from heart transplantation were assessed. CRT-related complications and cause of death analysis were assessed within tertiles of the CACI. During a mean follow-up of 1,813 ± 1,177 days, 347 patients (49.9%) died and 37 (5.3%) underwent heart transplantation. On multivariate Cox regression, female gender (HR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 0.99, p = 0.041), estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR per ml/min = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99, p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR per % = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00, p = 0.022), New York Heart Association class (HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.20, p < 0.001), presence of left bundle branch block (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87, p = 0.001), and CACI tertile (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.59, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality or heart transplantation. Compared with age and the CCI, the CACI was the best discriminator of all-cause mortality. Inappropriate therapies occurred less frequently in higher co-morbidity tertiles. In conclusion, patient co-morbidity profile adjusted to age impacts on mortality after CRT implantation. Use of the CACI may help refine guideline criteria to identify patients more likely to benefit from CRT., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dual-site right ventricular pacing (Dual RV) has been proposed as an alternative for patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with a failure to deliver a coronary sinus (CS) lead. Only short-term hemodynamic and echocardiographic results of Dual RV are available. We aimed to assess the long-term results of Dual RV and its impact on survival., Methods: Multicenter retrospective assessment of all CRT implants during a 12-year period. Patients with failed CS lead implantation, treated with Dual RV, were followed and assessed for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality and/or heart transplant. A control group was obtained from contemporary patients using propensity matching for all available baseline variables., Results: Ninety-three patients were implanted with Dual RV devices and compared with 93 matched controls. During a median of 1,273 days (interquartile range 557-2,218), intention-to-treat analysis showed that all-cause mortality and/or heart transplant was higher in the Dual RV group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.47, P = 0.012). As-treated analysis yielded similar results (HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.31-2.96, P = 0.001). Cardiac device-related infections occurred seven times more frequently in the Dual RV site group (HR = 7.60, 95% CI 1.51-38.33, P = 0.014). Among Dual RV nonresponders, four had their apical leads switched off, five required an epicardial LV lead insertion, a transseptal LV lead was implanted in two, and in nine patients, after reviewing the CS venogram, a new CS lead insertion was successfully attempted., Conclusion: Dual RV pacing is associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher complication rates than conventional CRT., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of triventricular pacing (Tri-V) on long-term survival., Background: Biventricular pacing (Bi-V) is an important adjunctive treatment in advanced heart failure, but almost one-third of patients experience no improvement with this therapy and are labeled as nonresponders. Adding a third ventricular lead (Tri-V) has been shown to be feasible and provides favorable acute results when assessed by using echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and clinical endpoints. However, the long-term effects of Tri-V pacing and how it affects long-term survival remains unknown., Methods: This single-center, propensity score-matched cohort study compared 34 patients with advanced heart failure who underwent implantation with Tri-V devices versus 34 control subjects treated with Bi-V pacing. Clinical outcomes during a median of 2,478 days (IQR: 1,183 to 3,214 days) were compared., Results: Tri-V-treated patients compared with Bi-V-treated patients presented with a trend for shorter battery longevity (time to box change, 1,758 ± 360 days vs. 1,993 ± 408 days; p = 0.072). Incidence of lead dislodgement (Tri-V vs. Bi-V, 0.86 vs. 1.10 per 100 patient-years; p = 0.742), device-related infection (Tri-V vs. Bi-V, 1.83 vs. 1.76 per 100 patient-years; p = 0.996), and refractory phrenic nerve capture (Tri-V vs. Bi-V, 0.48 vs. 1.84 per 100 patient-years; p = 0.341) was comparable in the 2 groups. Episodes of ventricular arrhythmia requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator intervention occurred more frequently in the Bi-V group versus the Tri-V group (6.55 vs. 16.88 per 100 patient-years; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.31; 95% confidence interval: 0.14 to 0.66; p = 0.002). Lower all-cause mortality and heart transplant was observed in the Tri-V group compared with the Bi-V group (6.99 vs. 11.92 per 100 patient-years; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.44; 95% confidence interval: 0.23 to 0.85; p = 0.015)., Conclusions: Tri-V displayed a similar safety profile compared with Bi-V and was associated with potential benefits regarding long-term survival and ventricular arrhythmia burden., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is associated with a high risk of stroke. The efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in this setting is poorly characterised. We aimed to systematically review the existing literature and to perform a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HCM., Methods: Random-effects meta-analysis of studies comparing HCM versus non-HCM controls. The outcomes of freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia, and acute procedure-related complications were assessed. Studies were searched on MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE and clinicaltrials.gov., Results: Fourteen studies were considered eligible for the systematic review, of which five were included in the meta-analysis. Freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia relapse was higher in patients without HCM (after a single procedure: 38.7% HCM vs 49.8% controls, OR=2.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.64, p=0.03; after ≥1 procedure: 51.8% HCM vs 71.2% controls, OR=2.62, 95% CI 1.52 to 4.51, p=0.0006; I(2)=33% and 26%, respectively). Risk of procedure-related adverse events was low. Repeat procedures (mean difference=0.16, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.32, p=0.05, I(2)=53%) and antiarrhythmic drugs (OR=4.70, 95% CI 2.31 to 9.55, p<0.0001, I(2)=0%) are more frequently needed in patients with HCM to prevent arrhythmia relapse. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the outcome in patients with HCM with less dilated atria and paroxysmal AF may be more comparable to the general population., Conclusions: The observed complication rate of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HCM was low. Even though the risk of relapse is twofold higher, catheter ablation can be effective in patients with HCM and AF, particularly in patients with paroxysmal AF and smaller atria., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

The acute administration of atorvastatin has been reported to reduce myocardial infarct size in animal studies. However, this cardioprotective effect is lost with the chronic administration of atorvastatin, although it can be recaptured by administering an acute high-dose of atorvastatin. We hypothesised that pre-treatment with high-dose atorvastatin, on a background of chronic standard 'statin' therapy, would reduce myocardial injury in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. One hundred and one consenting patients undergoing elective CABG surgery at a single tertiary cardiac centre were recruited into two randomised controlled, single-blinded clinical studies. Study 1: 45 patients were randomised to receive either 160 mg of atorvastatin 2 h preoperatively and 24 h following surgery or their standard statin therapy. Study 2: 56 patients were randomised to receive either 160 mg of atorvastatin 12 h preoperatively and 24 h following surgery or their standard statin therapy. Blood samples for troponin T and creatine kinase were taken prior to surgery and then at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h post-surgery. Cardiac enzyme levels at each time point and the total area-under curve (AUC) were calculated. The group characteristics and surgical methods were well matched. High-dose atorvastatin was not associated with any significant side effects. There was no significant difference in serum troponin T or creatine kinase in either study at each time point or over 72 h. Study 1: AUC, troponin T: atorvastatin 29.6 ± 34.8 μg/L versus control 25.0 ± 22.0 μg/L:P > 0.05. Creatine kinase: atorvastatin 33,544 ± 20,063 IU/L versus control 30,620 ± 10,776 IU/L:P > 0.05. Study 2: AUC, troponin T: atorvastatin 21.8 ± 14.3 μg/L versus control 20.9 ± 8.7 μg/L:P > 0.05. Creatine kinase: atorvastatin 36,262 ± 28,821 IU/L versus control 33,448 ± 14,984:P > 0.05. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes. We report that the administration of high-dose atorvastatin to low risk patients undergoing elective CABG surgery, who are already on standard dose 'statin' therapy is safe, but does not further reduce perioperative myocardial injury.