Search

Introduction: This practice-based research study capitalized on the statewide implementation of a comprehensive, locally-driven initiative to implement evidence-based policy, system and environmental changes related to obesity and tobacco use. The study examined local health department (LHD) performance and factors such as organizational quality improvement (QI) maturity, structure and governance. Methods: State health department staff reviewed grant reports and documentation pertaining to all LHD grantees, which collectively represented all 87 counties and 4 cities in Minnesota (MN), in order to designate grantees as either: "Exceeds Expectations," "Meets Expectations" or "Approaching Expectations." A study team of state, local and academic partners then used select measures from the QI Maturity Tool to calculate a QI Maturity Score, and subsequently place grantees into three levels of QI maturity: low, medium and high. Multivariate regression was performed to examine the potential relationship between grantee performance and QI maturity, as well as other covariates. Results: Of the final sample of 91 counties/cities, 87 had complete data for multivariate analysis. The distribution of grantee performance was: exceeds expectations (29.7%), meets expectations (55.0%) and approaching expectations (15.3%). Organizational QI maturity was strongly, positively associated with grantee performance comparing the "exceeds expectations" to those who "met or approached expectations" (OR=4.29, 95 % CI: 1.90-9.73, p=0.0005). Implications: Organizational QI maturity was strongly associated with LHD performance. More research is needed to determine whether a more mature approach to quality improvement is merely a marker for overall LHD capacity or has its own unique contribution to performance. Findings have been used to inform the next funding cycle of this initiative and provide support to implementing annual assessment of QI maturity in MN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Institute of Medicine argues that the integration of primary care (PC) and public health (PH) is of paramount importance. We undertook this qualitative study to better understand how these collaborations function., Data Sources: Investigators from PC and PH practice-based research networks in Colorado, Minnesota, Washington, and Wisconsin identified 40 key informants from the PH and PC fields within their respective states., Study Design: The key informants participated in standardized, semistructured interviews., Data Collection: Coinvestigators from each state conducted telephone interviews. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo 10., Principal Findings: Participants described 2 main types of themes. One, which we have termed "foundational" aspects of partnership, includes leadership, communication, mutual awareness, formal processes, history and values. The other, which we have characterized as "energizing" aspects of partnerships, includes having a shared strategic vision, opportunity, and the shifting culture in PC and PH. While the vast majority of participants described the value of foundational aspects of partnership, those who reported having more active collaborations were more likely to also describe the energizing aspects of partnerships., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that interactions between foundational aspects and energizing aspects of partnerships are dynamic. Further exploration of these aspects may help us to understand how best to support the integration of PC and PH., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© Copyright 2017 by the American Board of Family Medicine.)