Search

Abstract Background The optimization of the management for elderly glioblastoma patients is crucial given the demographics of aging in many countries. We report the outcomes for a “real-life” patient cohort (i.e. unselected) comprising consecutive glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or more, treated with different radiotherapy +/− temozolomide regimens. Methods From 2003 to 2016, 104 patients ≥ 70 years of age, consecutively treated by radiotherapy for glioblastoma, were included in this study. All patients were diagnosed with IDH-wild type glioblastoma according to pathological criteria. Results Our patient cohort comprised 51 female patients (49%) and 53 male. The median cohort age was 75 years (70–88), and the median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 70 (30–100). Five (5%) patients underwent macroscopic complete resection, 9 (9%) had partial resection, and 90 (86%), a stereotactic biopsy. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 33/73 cases (45%). Fifty-two (50%), 38 (36%), and 14 (14%) patients were categorized with RPA scores of III, IV, and I-II. Thirty-three (32%) patients received normofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy, 30 sessions) with temozolomide (Stupp), 37 (35%) received hypofractionated radiotherapy (median dose 40 Gy, 15 sessions) with temozolomide (HFRT + TMZ), and 34 (33%) HFRT alone. Patients receiving only HFRT were significantly older, with lower KPSs. The median overall survival (OS; all patients) was 5.2 months. OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months, were 19%, 12%, and 5%, respectively, with no statistical differences between patients receiving Stupp or HFRT + TMZ (P = 0.22). In contrast, patients receiving HFRT alone manifested a significantly shorter survival time (3.9 months vs. 5.9 months, P = 0.018). In multivariate analyses, the prognostic factors for OS were: i) the type of surgery (HR: 0.47 [0.26–0.86], P = 0.014), ii) RPA class (HR: 2.15 [1.17–3.95], P = 0.014), and iii) temozolomide use irrespective of radiotherapy schedule (HR: 0.54 [0.33–0.88], P

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery are major therapeutic weapons in the brain, whether for tumor, vascular or functional treatments. They tend increasingly to democratize and to become standard treatments. However, human brain anatomy is very complex and not limited to the currently described organs at risk. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography is a simple tool that enables to identify reproducibly big white matter fiber tracts. Not only does tractography allow a redefinition of organs at risk in the brain, but it would also allow the identification of new targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) within the thalamus for treatment of movement disorders. We present here a review of the role of tractography and the anatomy, function and currently described dose-effect relationships of white matter fiber tracts with a major functional impact: the pyramidal tract for motor ability, the optic radiation for vision and the arcuate fasciculus for language., (Copyright © 2022 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The objective of our study was to report predictive factors of local control (LC) and radionecrosis (RN) of brain metastases (BM) of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated by multifractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (MF-SRT) according to French recommendations., Method: From 2012 to 2020, 87 patients with 101 BM were retrospectively included. The median age was 63 years (37-85). GTV was defined using contrast-enhanced T1w MRI and was isotropically extended by 2 mm to form PTV. Mean maximum BM diameter was 24.5 mm (10-46). Patients were treated with dynamic arctherapy from May 2012 to February 2016 and then with VMAT. The total prescribed dose was 23.1 Gy prescribed to the encompassing 70% isodose, in 3 fractions., Results: LC rates at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years was 95.7%, 90.7% and 87.9% respectively. In multivariate analysis, high GTV Dmin (HR = 0.822, p = 0.012) was in favor of better LC whereas a large maximum diameter was predictive of poor LC (HR = 1.124, p = 0.02). GTV Dmin of 27.4 Gy was identified as a discriminant threshold of LC. In case of GTV Dmin ≥ 27.4 Gy, LC at 1 year was 95.3% versus 75.1% with GTV Dmin < 27.4 Gy. Cumulative incidence of RN at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years was 6.3%, 15.4% and 18.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only dyslipidemia was predictive of RN (HR = 2.69, p = 0.03). No dosimetric predictive factor of RN was found in our study., Conclusion: MF-SRT (3x7.7 Gy on 70% isodose line, with PTV = GTV + 2 mm; according to French recommendations) of BM from NSCLC gives high LC rates with acceptable RN rate. A GTV Dmin of at least 27.4 Gy could be proposed to optimize dosimetric objectives. No dosimetric predictive factors of RN were found in this study. However, dyslipidemia was identified as a potential predictive factor of RN., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.)

Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy has developed recently, since the years 1990-2000. Devices specifically dedicated to this type of treatment were then developed and shared the favors of radiation oncologists: Tomotherapy® and especially Cyberknife®, which offered the advantage of "tracking" with the possibility of real time motion correction, allowing an increase in the precision of targeting volumes. Recently, the latest generations of linear accelerators (Linac) have been developed, integrating much higher dose rates, an improved ballistic precision with a very short treatment duration time and the possibility of real time motion management (with notably the possibility of adaptive radiotherapy in real time with the development of "MLC tracking"). So are Linacs able to perform equivalent (not inferior) extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy treatments to those with Cyberknife®, the historical gold standard in this field? This article presents a comparison of these two treatment devices, by successively considering dose distributions in the irradiated volume, distant received doses from this volume (including the "integral dose"), problems linked to the duration of the sessions and those linked to motion management., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgery is an important therapeutic option for brain metastases. Currently, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRT) leads to 6-month and 1-year local control estimated at 70 and 62% respectively. However, there is an increased risk of radio-necrosis and leptomeningeal relapse. Preoperative SRT might be an alternative, providing local control remains at least equivalent. It is an innovative concept that could enable the stereotactic benefits to be retained with advantages over post-operative SRT., Methods: STEP has been designed as a national, multicentre, open-label, prospective, non-randomized, phase-II trial. Seventeen patients are expected to be recruited in the study from 7 sites and they will be followed for 12 months. Patients with more than 4 distinct brain metastases, including one with a surgical indication, and an indication for SRT and surgery, are eligible for enrolment. The primary objective of the trial is to assess 6-month local control after preoperative SRT. The secondary objectives include the assessment of local control, radio-necrosis, overall survival, toxicities, leptomeningeal relapse, distant control, cognitive function, and quality of life. The experimental design is based on a Flemming plan., Discussion: There is very little data available in the literature on preoperative SRT: there have only been 3 American single or two-centre retrospective studies. STEP is the first prospective trial on preoperative SRT in Europe. Compared to postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy, preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy will enable reduction in the irradiated volume, leptomeningeal relapse and the total duration of the combined treatment (from 4 to 6 weeks to a few days)., Trial Registration Number: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04503772 , registered on August 07, 2020. Identifier with the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM): N°ID RCB 2020-A00403-36, registered in February 2020., Protocol: version 4, 07 December 2020., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is the standard treatment for brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma, mostly in combination with immunotherapy. The objective was to retrospectively evaluate the influence of the time-lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy on toxicity., Patients and Methods: From 2016 to 2019, 59 patients treated with SRT for 103 brain metastases of NSCLC (60%) and melanoma (40%) in combination with concomitant immunotherapy (≤30 days) were included. The prescribed dose was 20Gy/1f or 33Gy/3f at the isocentre and 14Gy or 23.1Gy (70%) respectively at the PTV envelope (PTV=GTV+2mm). The mean tumour diameter was 14mm (4-52mm). The immunotherapies used were anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. The 103 metastases were classified into 3 groups according to the time-lapse between instatement of immunotherapy and instatement of SRT for the patient concerned: 7 (7%) in group A (≤7 days), 38 (37%) in group B (7 to 14 days) and 58 (56%) in group C (14 to 30 days)., Results: The mean follow-up was 10.1 months. The median overall survival was 11.5 months for NSCLC and 12.5 months for melanoma. The percentage of local control (LC) at one year was 65.1% (93.6% for NSCLC and 26.5% for melanoma). The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of LC (P=0.86), while the histology was (P<0.001). The proportion of grade≥3 toxicities was 5.1%, and that of radionecrosis was 9.7% (among these patients, 80% were non-symptomatic): 0%, 13.1% and 8.6% for groups A, B and C respectively. The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of toxicity. Only tumour volume was a significant predictive factor (P=0.03)., Conclusion: The time lapse between immunotherapy and SRT does not influence brain toxicity. The tumour volume remains the main factor., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Purpose: Stereotactic radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of brain metastases (BM). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of four plans for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for large brain metastases., Material and Methods: Ten patients treated with upfront NovalisTx® non-coplanar multiple dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) HFSRT for≥25mm diameter single BM were included. Three other volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were evaluated: with coplanar arcs (Eclipse®, Varian, VMATc Eclipse® ), with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs (VMATnc Eclipse® ), and with non-coplanar arcs (Elements Cranial SRS®, Brainlab, VMATnc Elements® ). The marginal dose prescribed for the PTV was 23.1Gy (isodose 70%) in three fractions. The mean GTV was 27mm 3 ., Results: Better conformity indices were found with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (1.05 vs 1.28, P<0.05). Better gradient indices were found with VMATnc Elements® and DCA (2.43 vs 3.02, P<0.001). High-dose delivery in healthy brain was lower with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (5.6 to 6.3 cc vs 9.4 cc, P<0.001). Low-dose delivery (V5Gy) was lower with VMATnc Eclipse® or VMATnc Elements® than with DCA (81 or 94 cc vs 110 cc, P=0.02)., Conclusions: NovalisTx® VMAT HFSRT for≥25mm diameter brain metastases provides the best dosimetric compromise in terms of target coverage, sparing of healthy brain tissue and low-dose delivery compared to DCA., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) should be applied with a biologically effective dose with an α/β of 12 (BED 12 ) ≥ 40 Gy to reach a 1-year local control (LC) ≥ 70%. The aims of this retrospective study were to report a series of 81 unresected large brain metastases treated with Linac-based multifraction SRT according to the ICRU 91 and to identify predictive factors associated with LC., Methods: Included in this study were the first 81 brain metastases (BM) consecutively treated with Linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) multifraction SRT from 2017 to 2019. The prescribed dose was 33 Gy for the GTV and 23.1 Gy (70% isodose line) for the PTV in 3 fractions (3f). Mean BM largest diameter and GTV were 25.1 mm and 7.2 cc respectively. Mean follow-up was 10.2 months., Results: LC was 79.7% and 69.7% at 1 and 2 years respectively. Significant predictive factors of LC were GTV D 98% (HR = 0.84, CI 95% = 0.75-0.95, p = 0.004) and adenocarcinoma as the histological type (HR = 0.29, CI 95% = 0.09-0.96, p = 0.042) in univariate and multivariate analysis. A threshold of 29 Gy for GTV D 98% was significantly correlated to LC (1-year LC = 91.9% for GTV D 98%  ≥ 29 Gy vs 69.6% for GTV D 98%  < 29 Gy (p = 0.030)), corresponding to a BED 12  = 52.4 Gy. No tumor progression was observed for a BED 12  ≥ 53.4 Gy, corresponding to a GTV D 98%  ≥ 20 Gy /1f and GTV D 98%  ≥ 29.4 Gy 3f. Median OS was 15 months. Symptomatic radionecrosis occurred in 4.9% of cases., Conclusion: The GTV D 98% is a strong reproducible significant predictive factor of LC for brain SRT. Dose prescription should lead to a GTV BED 12 98%  ≥ 52.4-53.4 Gy to significantly improve LC, corresponding to respectively a GTV D 98%  ≥ 19.7-20 Gy/1f and 29-29.4 Gy/3f., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment option for vestibular schwannomas. Historically, a dose de-escalation of the marginal prescribed dose from 16 Gy to 12-13 Gy has been done to limit toxicity without reducing local control (LC). We aimed to retrospectively report outcomes of Linac-based SRS for vestibular schwannomas treated with different doses., Methods: Included in the study were 97 stage 1 (1%), 2 (56%), 3 (21.5%), and 4 (21.5%) vestibular schwannomas treated with Linac-based (Novalis ® ) SRS from 1995 to 2019. No margin was added to the GTV to create the PTV. The median marginal prescribed dose was 14 Gy (range: 12-16 Gy) before 2006 and then 11 Gy for all patients (61 pts). Mean tumor volume was 1.96 cm 3 , i.e., about 1.6 cm in diameter. Mean follow-up was 8.2 years., Results: Following SRS, LC at 3, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 98.4%, and 95.6%, respectively [100% for those with ≤ 13 Gy as the marginal prescribed dose (NS)]. Toxicity to the trigeminal nerve was reported in 7.2% of cases (3.3% and 0% for transient and permanent toxicity for 11 Gy). The marginal prescribed dose was the only significant predictive factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.07-3.10, p = 0.028). Toxicity to the facial nerve was reported in 6.2% of cases. The marginal prescribed dose was again the only significant predictive factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.77-2.23, p = 0.049)., Conclusion: Linac-based SRS for stages 1-3 vestibular schwannomas provides excellent outcomes: a 10-year LC rate of over 95%, with a permanent facial or trigeminal toxicity rate of under 5%. A marginal prescribed dose of 11 Gy seems to decrease nerve toxicity and facial toxicity in particular, without reducing LC. Prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed., (Copyright © 2020 Dupic, Urcissin, Mom, Verrelle, Dedieu, Molnar, El-Ouadih, Chassin, Lapeyre, Lemaire, Biau and Khalil.)

Background: After stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), more patients die of comorbidities, particularly severe pulmonary insufficiency, than of tumor progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate correlation between lung biologically effective dose (BED) with an α/β ratio of 3 Gy (BED 3 ) and overall survival (OS) for these patients., Methods: From 2012 to 2017, we have developed a prospectively updated institutional database for all first 100 consecutively treated patients with inoperable Stage 1 (T1T2N0M0) NSCLC. All SBRT were conducted on a Novalis Tx ® LINAC with two coplanar dynamic conformal arcs (84%) or with coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (16%). Mean GTV and PTV were 8.6 cc and 50.8 cc, respectively. The marginal dose prescribed to the PTV was the 80% isodose line (IDL), i.e., 54 Gy in 3 fractions for 76 patients (BED 10 = 126 Gy) and 50 Gy in 5 fractions for 24 patients (BED 10 = 83.3 Gy). Pulmonary heterogeneity has been taken into account by using Monte Carlo or AAA algorithms. Median follow-up was 25 months., Results: At 1, 2, 3 and 5 years, local control (LC) was respectively 100, 98.2, 98.2, and 77.7%, and OS was respectively 83, 71.2, 58.1, and 33.2% (median OS was 49 months). Significant OS prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analysis were mean lung BED 3 (HR = 1.14, p = 0.01) and PTV volume (HR = 1.01, p = 0.004). A mean lung BED 3 ≤ 5 Gy was significantly associated with a doubling of median OS from 29 months to more than 60 months (not achieved, p = 0.0068). For patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤ 40%, a mean lung BED 3 ≤ 4 Gy was significantly associated with a doubling of median OS from 23 to 46 months ( p = 0.019)., Conclusion: Mean lung BED 3 is strongly and significantly associated with OS in SBRT for inoperable Stage I NSCLC. For all treated patients, a mean lung BED 3 ≤ 5 Gy lead to a doubling of median OS. This threshold value should be reduced to 4 Gy for patients with FEV1 ≤ 40%., (Copyright © 2020 Dupic, Biau, Molnar, Chassin, Dedieu, Lapeyre and Bellière-Calandry.)

Aims: Although several studies on outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign meningiomas have been reported, Linac-based SRS outcomes have not been as widely evaluated. The aim of this retrospective institutional single-centre study was to determine long-term outcomes of Linac-based SRS for benign intracranial meningiomas., Materials and Methods: From July 1996 to May 2011, 60 patients with 69 benign meningiomas were included. All patients were treated with single-fraction Linac-based SRS with four to five non-coplanar arcs, dynamic or not. The marginal dose prescribed for the periphery was 16 Gy. Prognostic factors associated with local control, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were tested., Results: The median follow-up was 128 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. The values observed at 1, 5 and 10 years were, respectively, 100%, 98.4% and 92.6% for local control, 94.9%, 93.2% and 78% for PFS and 100%, 94.7% and 92.7% for overall survival. In univariate analysis, local control after SRS was significantly higher for skull base and parasagittal meningiomas compared with convexity meningiomas (P = 0.031). Multivariate analyses showed significantly longer PFS when the minimum dose delivered to the tumour was greater than 10 Gy (P = 0.0082). No grade 5 toxicity was reported., Conclusion: Our long-term results from a large sample size of benign meningiomas treated with Linac-based SRS confirmed excellent local control (>90%) and good safety, which is in line with published studies on Gamma Knife surgery. Above all, we showed significantly poorer PFS if the minimum dose to the tumour was under 10 Gy., (Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive technique that enables to create brain focal lesions with a high precision and localization. Thus, functional brain disorders can be treated by SRS in case of pharmacoresistance or inoperability. To date, treatment of trigeminal neuralgia is the most described and known indication. Other indications will be developed in the future like movement disorders, refractory epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disorder and severe depression. We present here a review of actual and future indications of functional brain SRS with their level of evidence. All these SRS treatments have to be strictly conducted by trained teams with an excellent collaboration between radiation physicists, medical physicists, neurosurgeons, neurologists, psychiatrists and probably neuroradiologists., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Numerous studies have assessed the predictive factors for the arteriovenous malformation (AVM) response to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, only a few have discussed the causes of failure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the patterns of failure in patients with AVM who had undergone linear accelerator SRS., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 288 patients who had undergone linear accelerator SRS in our institution from 1995 to 2011. Failure was defined from the findings of the follow-up angiogram at 5 years, with failure identified in 44 patients. The distribution of causes was estimated using a descriptive analysis of literature-based causes, including a minimal margin dose of <18 Gy, a residual nidus outside the initial targeted volume, previous embolization, recanalization, and the size of the target volume. We also analyzed the associations among the causes., Results: Incomplete nidus identification (41%) and previous embolization (77%) were the most frequently observed conditions in patients with failure. Patients who had undergone previous embolization, for whom the cause of failure had always been identified (P = 0.001), were younger (P = 0.004) and had had a larger nidus volume (P = 0.025). Recanalization was rare (5 of 34 patients) and had occurred exclusively in women (P = 0.048). Larger nidus volumes were less frequent (mean, 2.18 ± 2.2 cm 3 ; range, 0.13-10.8 cm 3 ) and had been observed mainly in women when >2 cm 3 (P = 0.012). An insufficient dose was observed in 9 patients and had occurred in the case of a larger volume (P = 0.031), which had resulted in dosimetry constraints in 3 patients and treatment in the vicinity of eloquent zones in 6 patients. No known cause was found in 5 patients, 4 of whom had had a low Spetzler-Martin grade (I and II; P = 0.003), suggestive of radioresistance., Conclusion: The results of our detailed analysis have highlighted the distribution of the causes of failure and the potential role of radioresistance in treatment failure., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Demyelination can occur after brain radiotherapy in tissue adjacent to irradiated tumours. To date, no correlation has been found between conventional-dose radiotherapy and the development of multiple sclerosis, but radiotherapy could be a triggering factor among women with known multiple sclerosis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first well-documented case of this association with a dosimetric analysis., Case Presentation: The case we report here describes the development of multiple sclerosis in a 36-year-old woman without significant past medical history 3 months after the last session of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for a pituitary macroadenoma. Our dosimetric analysis suggests that all the multiple sclerosis lesions occurred in the brain regions irradiated with a mean biologically effective dose (BED 2 ) of 33.9 Gy (27.3-49.6 Gy)., Conclusion: Consequently special caution towards radiotherapy is required among patients with demyelinating illnesses or for 35-45-year-old women who are at risk. In addition, multiple sclerosis lesions can look like metastases. We should therefore keep differential diagnoses in mind in order not to make mistakes that would delay treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2020 The Author(s).)

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a major issue in the management of brain metastases. Radionecrosis is a major concern, especially for large lesions. Optimizing dosimetric parameters is essential to allow optimal local control rate while minimizing potential toxicity. We report the case of a 30-mm brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy after initial whole brain radiotherapy, complicated with symptomatic radionecrosis. A dose of 24Gy in three fractions on the 80% isodose were delivered using a dynamic conformal arc technique (Novalis TX ® ). We realized a dosimetric comparison with: (i) optimization of initial conformal arc plan, (ii) volumetric modulated arctherapy with coplanar arcs and (iii) volumetric modulated arctherapy with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs. The optimal dose planning in terms of planning target volume coverage (99.2%) and normal brain sparing (V24Gy=0.4cm 3 , V18Gy=6.5cm 3 , V10Gy=25.4cm 3 , V5=83.9cm 3 ) was obtained with volumetric modulated arctherapy with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs. Volumetric modulated arctherapy-based stereotactic irradiation with coplanar and non-coplonar arcs seems an interesting option for the treatment of large brain metastases to optimize dosimetric parameters., (Copyright © 2018 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

In the present study, we have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of repeated brain metastases (BM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS2) following local failure of a prior radiosurgical procedure (SRS1). Between December 1996 and August 2015, 30 patients with 36 BM underwent SRS2 with a median dose of 18Gy. All BM were located outside critical structures. Following SRS2, local control at 6 months and one year were respectively 82.9% (IC 95%: 67.6-91.9) and 67.8% (IC 95%: 51-81). On multivariate analysis, planning target volume (PTV) < 3cc (HR: 0.19 (0.1-0.52)) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) prior to SRS2 (HR: 0.25 (0.1-0.64)) were significantly associated with a better local control. One- and two-year overall survival rates after SRS2 were respectively 65.5% (IC 95%: 47.3-80%) and 27.6% (IC 95%: 14.7-45.7). Median overall survival following SRS2 was 14.2 months (range 1-106). Nineteen (63%) patients died from progressive systemic disease. Three (10%) patients died from out-field progressive brain disease and 8 (27%) in-field. Concerning toxicities, edema, radionecrosis, and hemorrhages were identified in 5 (12.8%), 4 (10.2%), and 5 (12.8%) patients respectively. No toxicity resulted in a neurological deficit. On univariate analysis, toxicities were significantly associated with PTV > 7cc (p = 0.02) and all patients had a WBRT before SRS2. A second course of SRS for locally recurrent brain metastases showed encouraging rates of local control. This treatment led to acceptable toxicities, especially for brain metastases smaller than 7cc, in our selected cohort of patients with BM located outside critical structures. Further studies are needed.

Adrenal glands are a common site for metastatic spread since they represent the fourth metastatic site of solid tumors. Interest in local ablative treatments of oligometastases is growing since literature suggests better progression-free survival, quality of life and potentially overall survival in selected patients. Surgery remains the first treatment of adrenal oligometastases because results are good, with a long enough follow-up. However, stereotactic radiotherapy appears to be comparable to surgery and could be proposed to elderly, unfit, inoperable patients, or even to patients whose systemic treatment should not be suspended for too long. This article aims to present a review of published studies to date on stereotactic radiotherapy of adrenal metastases and to propose a treatment protocol., (Copyright © 2017 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Description of the treatment technique of stereotactic lung radiotherapy on Novalis Tx ® and prospective study of the first 100 pulmonary nodules treated at centre Jean-Perrin (France)., Material and Methods: From October 2012 to December 2015, 100 inoperable pulmonary nodules (62 stage I non-small-cell lung cancer and 38 metastases) of 90 patients with a mean age of 68.2 years (range: 46-89 years) were prospectively treated with dynamic arctherapy on Novalis Tx ® . Mean gross tumour and planning target volumes were respectively 6.9 cm 3 (range: 0.2-31.4 cm 3 ) and 38.7 cm 3 (range: 1.7-131 cm 3 ), which correspond to diameters equal to 2.3cm and 4.2cm. Prescribed doses to the 80% isodose line were 54Gy in three fractions for peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer, 50Gy in five fractions for central non-small-cell lung cancer and 45Gy in three fractions for lung metastases. Clinical and radiological follow-up was done every three months with RECIST criteria for efficacy and NCI-CTCAE v4 scale for toxicity. Median follow-up was 12.5 months., Results: Complete response was observed in 23.8% of cases. Local control rates were 100% and 90.7% respectively at 12 and 24 months, with 96% at 24 months for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Overall survival rates of patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer were 77.4% and 73.5% at 12 and 24 months (median overall survival was 32 months). Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide corrected for alveolar volume below 40% was significantly associated to a poor prognostic factor on univariate analysis (P=0.00013). At least three deaths were due to an acute respiratory failure, which correspond to about 4.8% of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis. Overall survival rate for metastatic patients were 95.2% and 59.5% respectively at 12 and 24 months (median overall survival was 25 months); 23.3% of grade 2 or less radiation pneumonitis, 7.8% of grade 2 or less radiation dermatitis, 2.2% of asymptomatic ribs fracture and 3.3% of chest pains were observed., Conclusion: Stereotactic lung radiotherapy is an effective treatment for inoperable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer and lung oligometastases of well informed and selected patients. Initial respiratory state, and especially the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide corrected for alveolar volume, seems to be important for tolerance., (Copyright © 2017 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

People over the age of 65 are often excluded from participation in oncological clinical trials. However, more than half of patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer are older than 65 years. Any therapeutic strategy must be discussed in multidisciplinary meetings after adapted geriatric assessment. Patients who benefit from the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of Balducci and Extermann are those whose G8 screening tool score is less than or equal to 14. Age itself does not contraindicate a curative therapeutic approach. Stereotactic radiotherapy is an alternative to surgery for early stages in elderly patients who are medically inoperable or who refuse surgery, because it significantly increases overall survival. Mostly sequential (rarely concomitant) chemoradiotherapy can be proposed to elderly patients with locally advanced stages in good general state of health. For the others, an exclusive palliative radiotherapy, a single or dual agent of chemotherapy, a targeted drug or best supportive care only may be discussed., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier SAS.)

The rate of local failure of stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer is 20 to 40%, even if they are managed with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control, but its benefit on global survival remains to be demonstrated. Considered for many years as an adjuvant treatment option for pN2 cancers, it continues nevertheless to be deemed too toxic. What is the current status of postoperative radiotherapy? The Lung Adjuvant Radiotherapy Trial (Lung ART) phase III trial should give us a definitive, objective response on global survival, but inclusion of patients is difficult. The results are consequently delayed. The aim of this review is to show all the results about efficacy and tolerance of postoperative radiotherapy and to define the target volume and dose to prescribe., (Copyright © 2016 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw have been widely described. Denosumab has recently been associated to ONJ. Guidance to clinicians is based on criteria established by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS). Treatment should be multidisciplinary. Two options are available and have to be discussed on the basis of associated therapeutic, patient's general state of health and possibility of therapeutic window during cancer treatment: conservative (medication and conservative surgery like superficial debridement) and extensive surgery. Therefore, we report an update about management strategies of osteonecrosis of the jaw and two cases of patients with a stage 2 osteonecrosis of the jaw only treated with mouth rinses, antibiotics and debridement and complete healing., (Copyright © 2015 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer among European males with a high survival rate. The economic impact of treatments and follow-up are significant. The objectives of the follow-up after prostate radiotherapy is multiple: diagnosis and treatment of side-effects, early detection of biochemical recurrence, with the aim of proposing a second local treatment to improve quality of life or overall survival and feedback of the treatment results to better inform patients at the beginning of the disease. This article reports incidence of main side-effects (digestive, urinary and sexual) with their treatments and guidelines for clinical and biological follow-up with strategies of imaging studies and salvage treatments., (Copyright © 2015 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)