Search

Non-metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Lacking prospective studies, the optimal multimodal treatment approach has not yet been clearly defined. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with non-metastatic NECC treated with surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, according to pathologic prognostic factors and multimodal treatments received. We retrospectively examined data from patients with non-metastatic NECC candidate to receive surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and discussed at the European Institute of Oncology’s Multidisciplinary Neuroendocrine Tumor Board, between January 2003 and December 2021. Primary endpoints were event-free survival and overall survival. A total of 27 consecutive patients were evaluated, 15 with early stage NECC and 12 with a locally advanced NECC. Eight patients received neoadjuvant and 19 adjuvant platinumbased chemotherapy; 14 received adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, half with external-beam radiation therapy alone, and half combined with brachytherapy. No patients progressed or relapsed during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The median event-free survival was 21.1 months and the median overall survival was 33.0 months. Pathological FIGO stage ≥ IIB, adjuvant external-beam radiation therapy with or without brachytherapy emerged as significant and independent prognostic factors for event-free survival. Brachytherapy was also prognostic for overall survival. Non-metastatic NECC requires a multimodal approach, mainly weighted on the FIGO stage. The addition of brachytherapy should be considered, especially in patients with locally advanced disease. Because of the scarcity of robust clinical data, treatment strategy should be discussed in multidisciplinary board, taking into account patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare entity with different behavior compared to high-grade serous (HGSOC). Because of its general low chemosensitivity, complete cytoreductive surgery with no residual disease is crucial in advanced stage LGSOC. We evaluated the impact of optimal cytoreduction on survival outcome both at first diagnosis and at recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced LGSOCs who underwent cytoreductive surgery in two oncological centers from January 1994 to December 2018. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using the Greenwood formula. Results: A total of 92 patients were included (median age was 47 years, IQR 35– 64). The median overall survival (OS) was 142.3 months in patients with no residual disease (RD), 86.4 months for RD 1–10 mm and 35.2 months for RD >10 mm (p = 0.002). Progression-free survival (PFS) was inversely related to RD after primary cytoreductive surgery (RD = 0 vs RD = 1–10 mm vs RD >10 mm, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, RD 1–10 mm (HR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.30– 4.06, p = 0.004), RD >10 mm (HR = 3.89, 95% CI 1.92–7.88, p = 0.0004), FIGO stage IV (p = 0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (p = 0.010) were independent predictors of PFS. RD >10 mm (HR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.52–6.46, p = 0.004), FIGO stage IV (p <0.0001) and NACT (p = 0.030) were significantly associated with a lower OS. Conclusions: Optimal cytoreductive surgery improves survival outcomes in advanced stage LGSOCs. When complete debulking is impossible, a RD <10 mm confers better OS compared to an RD >10 mm in this setting of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental digital contents are available in the text. Objectives: The surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer involves complex surgery. Implementation of a quality management program has a major impact on survival. The goal of this work was to develop a list of quality indicators (QIs) for advanced ovarian cancer surgery that can be used to audit and improve the clinical practice. This task has been carried out under the auspices of the European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO). Methods: Quality indicators were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. A 4-step evaluation process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and the documentation of scientific evidence, physical meetings of an ad hoc multidisciplinarity International Development Group, an internal validation of the targets and scoring system, and an external review process involving physicians and patients. Results: Ten structural, process, or outcome indicators were selected. Quality indicators 1 to 3 are related to achievement of complete cytoreduction, caseload in the center, training, and experience of the surgeon. Quality indicators 4 to 6 are related to the overall management, including active participation to clinical research, decision-making process within a structured multidisciplinary team, and preoperative workup. Quality indicator 7 addresses the high value of adequate perioperative management. Quality indicators 8 to 10 highlight the need of recording pertinent information relevant to improvement of quality. An ESGO-approved template for the operative report has been designed. Quality indicators were described using a structured format specifying what the indicator is measuring, measurability specifications, and targets. Each QI was associated with a score, and an assessment form was built. Conclusions: The ESGO quality criteria can be used for self-assessment, for institutional or governmental quality assurance programs, and for the certification of centers. Quality indicators and corresponding targets give practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes in the surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diagnosis of ovarian mass during pregnancy is a rare event. Treatment of ovarian malignancies during pregnancy depends on histology, grade, stage, and gestational weeks. When possible, surgical excision is indicated, and sometimes, fertility-sparing surgery is recommended. Administration of systemic treatment before or after surgery is indicated as in nonpregnant women. Preliminary data suggest that platinum salts and taxanes are safe during pregnancy. Management of ovarian tumors in pregnancy requires a multidisciplinary approach to guarantee an optimal treatment for the mother and the fetus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe two rare cases of multiple extrauterine adenomyomas, their clinical management, and their response to surgical and hormone therapy with GnRH agonist. Design: Case report and review of the English-language scientific literature. Setting: Cases presented in a tertiary health care academic institution. Patient(s): Two patients without urogenital malformations diagnosed with extrauterine adenomyoma, which is a benign tumor composed of smooth muscle and endometrium, typically originating within the uterus. Intervention(s): Surgical radical excision of adenomyomas followed by a long-term hormone therapy with GnRH agonist. Main Outcome Measure(s): Anatomical and clinical outcomes. Result(s): Surgical treatment followed by long-term GnRH agonist therapy appeared effective in keeping the disease stable. After a long-term follow-up of 10 and 4 years, the two patients are still asymptomatic and stable. Conclusion(s): Only 19 other cases of extrauterine adenomyomas are reported in the English-language scientific literature, and no cases of multiple masses are described until now. It is probable that these extrauterine adenomyomas arose from a metaplastic transformation of the subcelomic mesenchyme. Long-term GnRH agonist therapy after surgery appeared effective in keeping the disease stable. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary is a rare and distinct histotype of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Women diagnosed with clear cell carcinomas are usually younger and diagnosed at earlier stages than those with the most common high-grade serous histology. Endometriosis is considered a main risk factor for the development of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary, and it can be considered a precursor of of this tumor, as it is identified in more than 50% of patients with clear cell carcinoma. Different molecular pathways and alterations heve been identified in ovarian clear cell carcinoma, including the most common mutations of AT-rich interaction domain 1A [ARID1A] and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase [PIK3] catalytic subunit alpha [PIK3CA]. The prognosis of patients at early stage is favorable, while patients with advanced or recurrent disease experience a poor oncologic outcomes. Despite a lower rate of responses due to an intrinsic chemoresistance, the treatment strategy for advanced disease resembles the treatment of high-grade serous carcinoma, which includes aggressive cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. For this reason, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I disease undergoing complete surgical staging is still under debate. Alternative treatments, including biological agents that target different pathways constitute the most promising treatment strategies, and well-designed, collaborative international trials should be designed in order to improve the oncologic outcomes and the quality of life of patients with this aggressive disease. • CCC is a relatively uncommon carcinoma of the ovary, often associated with endometriosis • ARID1A mutations, and PIK3CA mutations are the most frequent gene alterations in CCC • Although the response to platinum-based chemo is not clearly defined, it remains the standard of the first-line therapy • Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IA CCC is under debate • Targeted therapies represent a novel approach to specifically improve the outcome of patients with CCC [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although women with endometrial cancer generally have a favourable prognosis, those with high-risk disease features are at increased risk of recurrence. The PORTEC-3 trial was initiated to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy during and after radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer.Methods: PORTEC-3 was an open-label, international, randomised, phase 3 trial involving 103 centres in six clinical trials collaborating in the Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup. Eligible women had high-risk endometrial cancer with FIGO 2009 stage I, endometrioid-type grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion or lymph-vascular space invasion (or both), endometrioid-type stage II or III, or stage I to III with serous or clear cell histology. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or radiotherapy and chemotherapy (consisting of two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 given during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2) using a biased-coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage of cancer, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis for final analysis by intention to treat and adjusted for stratification factors. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013, after achieving complete accrual; follow-up is ongoing. PORTEC-3 is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138.Results: 686 women were enrolled between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013. 660 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 330 were assigned to chemoradiotherapy and 330 were assigned to radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 60·2 months (IQR 48·1-73·1). 5-year overall survival was 81·8% (95% CI 77·5-86·2) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·7% (72·1-81·6) with radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·54-1·06; p=0·11); 5-year failure-free survival was 75·5% (95% CI 70·3-79·9) versus 68·6% (63·1-73·4; HR 0·71, 95% CI 0·53-0·95; p=0·022). Grade 3 or worse adverse events during treatment occurred in 198 (60%) of 330 who received chemoradiotherapy versus 41 (12%) of 330 patients who received radiotherapy (p<0·0001). Neuropathy (grade 2 or worse) persisted significantly more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy (20 [8%] women vs one [1%] at 3 years; p<0·0001). Most deaths were due to endometrial cancer; in four patients (two in each group), the cause of death was uncertain. One death in the radiotherapy group was due to either disease progression or late treatment complications; three deaths (two in the chemoradiotherapy group and one in the radiotherapy group) were due to either intercurrent disease or late treatment-related toxicity.Interpretation: Adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after radiotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer did not improve 5-year overall survival, although it did increase failure-free survival. Women with high-risk endometrial cancer should be individually counselled about this combined treatment. Continued follow-up is needed to evaluate long-term survival.Funding: Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant and Cancer Australia, L'Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]