Search

Monica Bocchia,1 Angelo Michele Carella,2 Antonino Mulè,3 Lorenzo Rizzo,4 Mauro Turrini,5 Maria Chiara Abbenante,2 Roberto Cairoli,4 Valeria Calafiore,3 Marzia Defina,1 Angelo Gardellini,5 Giovanni Luzi,6 Caterina Patti,3 Maria Beatrice Pinazzi,6 Marta Riva,4 Giovanni Rossi,2 Vincenzo Sammartano,1 Luigi Rigacci6 1Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Division of Hematology with Hematologic Intensive Care Unit and Cellular Therapies, Department of Medical Science, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, Foggia, Italy; 3UOC Hematology and Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy; 4Department of Haematology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; 5Division of Hematology, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy; 6UOC Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, Ospedale S, Camillo, Rome, ItalyCorrespondence: Angelo Michele Carella, Division of Hematology with Hematologic Intensive Care Unit and Cellular Therapies, Department of Medical Science, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Viale Cappuccini, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, 71013, Italy, Tel +390882410054, Fax +390882410322, Email am.carella@operapadrepio.itAbstract: Acute myeloid leukemia is a malignant disorder of the bone marrow, characterized by differentiation, clonal expansion, and uncontrolled proliferation of malignant myeloid progenitor cells and by several molecular and genetic abnormalities. A mutation of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene can be observed in about one-third of cases of acute myeloid leukemia. Two FLT3 inhibitors are actually approved for FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia: midostaurin, a multikinase first generation inhibitor with lower affinity for FLT3 binding, and gilteritinib fumarate, a potent second-generation inhibitor of both FLT3-ITD and TKD. Gilteritinib is a new effective and well-tolerated drug for patients with relapsing or refractory FLT3-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Thanks to its efficacy, low toxicity, its good manageability (oral formulation), this drug is suitable for all the patients, including elderly frail patient with concomitant therapies or pre-existing or underlying diseases, and can be used also in the outpatient setting, reducing risks and costs related to the hospitalization. We report and discuss seven cases of different patients with FLT3 positive acute myeloid leukemia successfully managed with gilteritinib in the real clinical practice.Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, FLT3, midostaurin, gilteritinib

Anna Maria Frustaci, Alessandra Tedeschi, Paola Picardi, Roberto Cairoli, Marco MontilloDepartment of Hematology, Niguarda Cancer Center, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy Abstract: Treatment aim for chronic lymphocytic leukemia has been radically changed over the past years from providing only a palliative approach to reaching disease eradication and improving survival. Ofatumumab is a monoclonal humanized antibody with peculiar in vitro and in vivo properties, at present approved for double fludarabine and alemtuzumab refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Its efficacy in this subset of patients, who typically have an unfavorable prognosis, facilitated its use in different Phase II and III trials. Ofatumumab as single agent or combined with chemotherapeutic or biologic agents, led to sundry results in the setting of both previously treated or untreated patients. Its role in maintenance therapy is also under investigation. Further advances concerning ofatumumab administration as first line therapy in combination with chlorambucil, came recently from the COMPLEMENT 1 study. Results from this trial will open the door to new perspectives of its use in treatment-naïve patients. Ofatumumab was well tolerated in almost all the studies, with the main adverse events relating mostly to infusion reaction. Hematologic toxicity, especially neutropenia, was also common. A significant improvement in patients' quality of life was reported following ofatumumab treatment and this was mainly due to its effect on constitutional symptoms. Nevertheless, some concerns remain regarding the long-term efficacy of the drug in terms of response duration and survival. The real strength of this drug needs to be confirmed by further studies and direct comparative trials. Keywords: ofatumumab, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, refractory, alemtuzumab, fludarabine, high risk

All patients received four doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, one patient received tixagevimab-cilgavimab as prophylaxis. Successful treatment of prolonged, severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lower respiratory tract disease in a B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patient with an extended course of Remdesivir and Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Dual antiviral therapy in haematological patients with protracted SARS-CoV-2 infection. [Extracted from the article]

RS mutation profile was tested on pre-treatment cell free DNA. Rate of unmeasurable MRD and impact of mutations and chronic lymphocytic leukemia-RS clonal relation on outcomes will be presented at the meeting. B Introduction: b Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard first line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) variant of Richter syndrome (RS). [Extracted from the article]

Investigates the impact of early intensification programs on patients with primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (MLCL) with sclerosis presenting with adverse prognostic factors. Example of early intensification programs; Manifestations of MLCL; Information on the prior therapy and disease status at autologous stem cell transplantation of several MLCL patients with sclerosis; Details on the disease-free survival of the patients.

Examines the impact of invasive pulmonary and cerebellar mucormycosis on autologous stem cell transplantation in leukemia. Occurrence of mycotic reaction during bone marrow transplantation; Use of deferoxamine in transplant patients; Predisposing factors for mucormycosis.

Background: The diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) variant of Richter transformation (DLBCL-RT) is typically chemoresistant with poor prognosis. Aiming to explore a chemotherapy-free treatment combination that triggers anti-tumour immune responses, we conducted a phase 2 study of atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) in combination with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with DLBCL-RT., Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm, investigator-initiated, phase 2 study in 15 hospitals in Italy and Switzerland. Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma as per the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria with biopsy-proven transformation to DLBCL; had not previously received treatment for DLBCL-RT, although they could have received chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapies; were aged 18 years or older; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. No previous treatment with any of the drugs in the triplet combination was allowed. Patients received 35 cycles of 21 days of intravenous obinutuzumab (100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, 1000 mg on day 8 and day 15 of cycle 1; 1000 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-8) and intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg on day 2 of cycle 1 and 1200 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-18), and continuous oral venetoclax (ramp-up from 20 mg/day on day 15 of cycle 1 according to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia schedule, then 400 mg/day from day 1 of cycle 3 to day 21 of cycle 35). The primary endpoint was overall response rate at day 21 of cycle 6 in the intention-to-treat population. We considered an overall response rate of 67% or more to be clinically active, rejecting the null hypothesis of a response of 40% or less. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04082897, and has been completed., Findings: Between Oct 9, 2019, and Oct 19, 2022, 28 patients were enrolled (12 [43%] male patients and 16 [57%] female patients). Median follow-up was 16·8 months (IQR 7·8-32·0). At cycle 6, 19 of 28 patients showed a response, yielding an overall response rate of 67·9% (95% CI 47·6-84·1). Treatment-emergent adverse events that were grade 3 or worse were reported in 17 (61%; 95% CI 40·6-78·5) of 28 patients, with neutropenia being the most frequent (11 [39%; 21·5-59·4] of 28 patients). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in eight (29%; 14·2-48·7) patients, which were most commonly infections (five [18%; 6·1-36·9] of 28 patients). There were two (7%) deaths attributable to adverse events during the study: one from sepsis and one from fungal pneumonia, which were not considered as directly treatment-related by the investigators. Six (21·4%) patients had immune-related adverse events, none of which led to discontinuation. No tumour lysis syndrome was observed., Interpretation: The atezolizumab, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab triplet combination was shown to be active and safe, suggesting that this chemotherapy-free regimen could become a new first-line treatment approach in patients with DLBCL-RT., Funding: Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AT reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, Beigene, and Abbvie; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie, Janssen, and Beigene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Janssen, Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, and AstraZeneca. AMF reports consulting fees from Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca. ACo reports grants or contracts from Gilead, BMS, Beigene, Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Abbvie, and Janssen-Cilag; support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from BMS. MC reports grants or contracts from Johnson & Johnson and Abbvie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, and GSK. RC reports support for the present manuscript from the US National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute (R01CA196703–01). PLZ reports consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, BMS, MSD, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Abbvie, Beigene, Kyowa Kirin, and Janssen. MMot reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events; support for attending meetings or travel; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Abbvie, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. GG reports grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza; consulting fees from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beiene, Hikma, and Johnson & Johnson; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Hikma, Johnson & Johnson, and Lilly. LS reports consulting from Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Merck; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, Octapharma, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Merck; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Beigene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Merck. RCa reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, Gilead, Gentilipharma, Pierre Fabre, Celgene, and Menarini stemline; support for attending meetings or travel from Pierre Fabre, Beigene, and Servier; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Celgene, Abbvie, Gentilipharma, and Daichi Samkio. TZ report consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Abbvie. EZ reports consulting fees from Abbvie, Beigene, BMS, Cures, Elly and Lilly, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Miltenyibiomedicine, and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, and Gilead; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Merck. DR reports support for the present manuscript from Adaptive; grants or contracts, consulting fees, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Janssen, and Lilly. All other authors declare no competing interests. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship., (Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Richter's transformation (RT) is defined as the evolution of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This complication is rare and aggressive, with poor prognosis and dismal survival. Clonal relationship with the underlying CLL/SLL, observed in ∼80% of cases, represents one of the main factors affecting prognosis. Treatment has been historically based on chemoimmunotherapy, but frequent mutations in genes involved in cell survival and proliferation-such as TP53, NOTCH1, MYC, CDKN2A-confer resistance to standard treatments. During the last years, advances in the knowledge of the biological mechanisms underlying RT allowed to identify genetic and molecular lesions that can potentially be targeted by novel selective agents. Pathway and checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapy are currently under investigation and represent promising treatment options. This review summarizes current biological evidence and available data on novel therapeutic agents.

Background: While the detrimental role of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) is well-described in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), few studies focus on non donor-specific ones and with controversial results., Methods: We here report our monocenter experience on 64 adult patients receiving allogeneic HSCT from a HLA-mismatched donor between 2014 and 2022 who were tested for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies before transplant, focusing on fifteen patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies., Results: The survival of patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies was inferior with respect to patients without anti-HLA antibodies and similar to patients with DSAs. Median survival of patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies was 21 months (95 % CI: 9-42) vs. 61 months (95 % CI: 17-77) among the anti-HLA antibody-negative patients, with a significantly higher mortality incidence rate ratio (3.3 times-fold greater, p = 0.01). No pattern of death causes was found CONCLUSIONS: In this monocenter series of HLA-mismatched HSCTs, impaired survival was observed in adult patients having non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies before transplant, similar to those with DSAs. Our findings support those antibodies as a negative predictive factor even if they are not directed against the donor, thus warranting further investigation on larger cohorts., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interests None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Administrative burdens have been identified as a major issue impacting patient care, professional practice, and the overall efficiency of healthcare systems. The aim of this study is to assess the administrative burden faced by Italian hematologists., Methods: A cross-sectional survey that included both closed-ended quantitative questions and open-ended free text answer options was administered to 1,570 hematologists working with malignancies and members of Italian GIMEMA Foundation - Franco Mandelli ONLUS and the Italian Linfomi Foundation (FIL). The survey was conducted online from May 24 to June 30, 2023. Descriptive statistics were computed for the quantitative data to clearly summarize the responses and descriptive analysis of free text responses was carried out., Results: Surveyed hematologists spend an average of 47.07% of their time on administrative tasks, with 63.22% (n = 110) of respondents reporting spending at least half of their time on these activities. More than half (57.47%, n = 100) reported that "Patient care" is the medical task most affected by a lack of time. Additionally, 55.17% (n = 96) reported experiencing burnout in the past 6 months, with filling out "Forms" being identified as the top contributing administrative task by 27.59% (n = 48) of respondents, followed by "Scheduling" (24.71%, n = 43) and "Managing IT system failures" (21.84%, n = 38). Nearly half of the surveyed hematologists (45.40%, n  =  = 79) identified patient care as the top priority requiring more time., Conclusions: The study confirms that the administrative workload of hematologists has a significant impact on patient care, communication, and burnout risk, reducing the time available for patient care, leading to exhaustion and concern about clinical errors., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Induction with daratumumab-based regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is the current standard for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients eligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, concerns emerged regarding potential negative effects following daratumumab-based treatment on CD34+ mobilization. We here compared CD34+ mobilization and clonogenic potential between daratumumab and non-daratumumab based therapy without upfront plerixafor administration among patients affected by NDMM., Materials and Methods: Clinical, mobilization and clonogenic data from 41 consecutively enrolled NDMM patients were analyzed. Patients underwent collection of autologous CD34+ by apheresis at the ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy, from January 2021 to March 2023. Clonogenicity analysis was performed on BFU-E and CFU-GM., Results: Seventy-five percent of daratumumab-treated patients underwent >1 apheresis, compared to 24% of non-daratumumab patients (p=0.0017). Daratumumab-treated patients had significantly lower CD34+ count (mean 38 vs 79/μL, respectively; p=0.0011), with a median CD34+ harvest of 3.98×10 6 /kg (range 1.68-9.18) vs 6.87×10 6 /kg (range 1.63-16.85) in non-daratumumab-treated (p=0.0006). In multivariate analysis the likelihood of undergoing >1 apheresis was significantly higher in older patients (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1-1.4, Z=2.10, p=0.03) and daratumumab-treated patients (OR 15, 95% CI 2.8-129, p=0.004). Moreover, daratumumab-based induction therapy demonstrated an independent negative association with BFU-E colony formation (p=0.0148), even when accounting for patient age and CD34+ levels., Discussion: Our findings underscore the impact of daratumumab-based treatment on CD34+ mobilization in a real-life, upfront plerixafor-free population of NDMM patients. Higher probability of requiring multiple apheresis occurred among daratumumab-treated patients. Interestingly, the observation that daratumumab might negatively impact BFU-E colony formation, independent of CD34+ cell count, offers novel biological perspectives. Appropriate strategies should be adopted by the Apheresis teams to mitigate these potential negative effects.

Background: When a hematological malignancy is diagnosed, the whole family carries the burden of the disease; parents often try to protect minor children from suffering by avoiding communication about their disease. Since 2009, patients with minors at the Adult Hematology Division at San Gerardo Hospital (Monza) can take part in the "Emanuela Project": children can visit parents and talk with psychologists and hematologists, who explain the disease through simple metaphors., Materials and Methods: The EMY STUDY aimed to evaluate the impact of illness-related communication on children's behavior, comparing Monza's experience with other Hematology Units, where the communication is delegated to parents or psychological support. Questionnaires exploring the children's main behaviors (school performance, appetite, sleeping patterns, attachment to family figures, and family dialogue) were administered to both sick (SP) and healthy (HP) parents. From 2017 to 2021, 32 patients were enrolled, 20 from Monza and 12 from other hospitals; 84 questionnaires were globally collected., Results: In Monza's group, no major changes in children's behavior were observed and an open dialogue about the disease was often possible. Disease communication is considered crucial and perceived as a responsibility of parents together with a professional figure, mainly the hematologist. Patients were satisfied with "Emanuela Project," reporting positive effects on doctor-patient relationship. Difficulties in separation were significantly higher at other hospitals (P = .019) than in Monza. While at other centers communication is considered parents' responsibility, Monza's patients emphasize the role of professional figures (P = .007). Differently from other hospitals, the role of the hematologist is crucial to Monza's patients (P = .001)., Conclusion: Disease communication to patients' offspring is a crucial moment in the process of care, and the hematologist can play a major role in this difficult task, with potential positive effects both on children's well-being and on doctor-patient relationship., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

A retrospective survey was conducted in hematologic centres of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL) on 529 older AML patients seen between 2020-2022. Compared to 2008-2016, the use of intensive chemotherapy (ICT) decreased from 40% to 18.1% and of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) from 19.5% to 13%, whereas the combination of Venetoclax/HMA, initially not available, increased from 0% to 36.7%. Objective treatment-specific fitness criteria proposed by SIE/SIES/GITMO in 2013 allow an appropriate choice between ICT and HMAs by balancing their efficacy and toxicity. Venetoclax/HMA, registered for patients unfit to ICT, has a unique toxicity profile because of prolonged granulocytopenia and increased infectious risk. Aiming at defining specific fitness criteria for the safe use of Venetoclax/HMA, a preliminary investigation was conducted among expert REL hematologists, asking for modifications of SIE/SIES/GITMO criteria they used to select candidates for Venetoclax/HMA. While opinions among experts varied, a general consensus emerged on restricting SIE/SIES/GITMO criteria for ICT-unfit patients to an age limit of 80-85, cardiac function > 40%, and absence of recurrent lung infections, bronchiectasis, or exacerbating COPD. Also, the presence of an adequate caregiver was considered mandatory. Such expert opinions may be clinically useful and may be considered when treatment-specific fitness criteria are updated to include Venetoclax/HMA.

Background: Sabatolimab is an immunotherapy targeting T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3), an immuno-myeloid regulator expressed on immune cells and leukaemic stem cells. In this trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agent with placebo plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes., Methods: STIMULUS-MDS1 was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study done at 54 investigational sites in 17 countries. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (according to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System criteria) who had not received previous treatment were included. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous sabatolimab (400 mg on day 8 and 22) or placebo plus a hypomethylating agent (intravenous decitabine 20 mg/m 2 on day 1-5 or intravenous or subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 on day 1-7 or day 1-5 and day 8 and 9) every 28 days until treatment discontinuation. The two primary endpoints were complete response rate and progression-free survival, assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients. Complete response was analysed, as prespecified, 7 months after the last patient was randomly assigned. All other analyses presented, including progression-free survival, were done at the final data cutoff prespecified via a protocol amendment on Sept 2, 2021. Safety was assessed in in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03946670, and is ongoing., Findings: Between July 29, 2019, and Aug 10, 2020, 127 patients were randomly assigned to sabatolimab plus a hypomethylating agent group (sabatolimab group; n=65) or placebo plus a hypomethylating agent (placebo group; n=62). The median age of participants was 73 years (IQR 69-77), of whom 86 (68%) of 127 patients were male and 77 (61%) were White. The primary endpoints were not met. Complete response (cutoff date of March 10, 2021) was achieved in 14 (22%; 95% CI 12·3-33·5) of 65 patients in the sabatolimab group vs 11 (18%; 9·2-29·5) of 62 patients in the placebo group (p=0·77). At the cutoff date of the final analysis (March 1, 2022), median follow-up for progression-free survival was 17·8 months (IQR 16·6-19·4) in the sabatolimab group and 19·2 months (17·7-22·3) in the placebo group, and the median progression-free survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 7·6-17·6) in the sabatolimab group vs 8·5 months (6·9-11·3) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·75 [95% CI 0·48-1·17]; p=0·1022). The most common adverse events of any grade were neutropenia (35 [56%] of 62 patients in the sabatolimab group vs 43 [68%] of 63 patients in the placebo group), thrombocytopenia (30 [48%] vs 32 [51%]), constipation (29 [47%] vs 24 [38%]), diarrhoea (27 [44%] vs 14 [22%]), anaemia (22 [35%] vs 34 [54%]), febrile neutropenia (22 [35%] vs 15 [24%]), and leukopenia (15 [24%] vs 20 [32%]). One patient developed a serious potential treatment-related immune-mediated adverse event in the sabatolimab group. There was one treatment-related death in the sabatolimab group due to pneumonitis., Interpretation: The addition of sabatolimab to hypomethylating agents in this study did not result in a significant improvement in complete response rates or progression-free survival. Sabatolimab had a manageable safety in most patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. A randomised phase 3 trial is ongoing to assess the potential benefit of sabatolimab plus azacitidine on overall survival in this setting., Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AZ is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar in clinical research; reports research grants (to their institution) from Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff Oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics; reports fees for participation on advisory board and consultancy, or honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Genentech, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, Mendus, Foran, Syros, and Tyme; participation on clinical trial committees for Novartis, AbbVie, Gilead, BioCryst, AbbVie, ALX Oncology, Geron, and Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb; and travel expenses from Pfizer, Novartis, and Cardiff Oncology. RC reports speakers bureaus from Novartis, Beigene, Astellas, and Takeda; research grants from Novartis; fees for advisory board participantion from AbbVie and Gilead; and travel expenses from Janssen. H-AH has received honoraria, travel expenses, and consultancy fees from Novartis, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb. YLK has received consultancy fees from Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Beigene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda; and received research grants from Novartis, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb. MA reports honoraria from AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz, and Novartis; and has served on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb. SM has received consulting fees or served on advisory boards for Alexion, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda; and reports honoraria from AbbVie, Alexion, Janssen, and Novartis. VP reports consultancy fees and honoraria from Novartis. VS has served on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Geron, Gilead, Menarini, Novartis, Syros, Servier, Otsuka, and Takeda; and reports travel expenses from Janssen. KM, FK, JN, PM-R, and HM are employees of Novartis. PF reports honoraria and grants from Novartis. YM reports honoraria from Nippon-Shinyaku, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Sumitomo Pharma, Kyowa-Kirin, AbbVie, and Astellas; and research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical. UP reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Curis, Geron, AbbVie, Janssen, and Jazz; and research grants from Curis, Jazz, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study compared the burden of fatigue between treatment-naïve patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and the general population and investigated patient factors associated with fatigue severity., Methods: Pretreatment patient-reported fatigue was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue questionnaire in a sample of 463 newly diagnosed patients with AML who were enrolled in a clinical trial. Multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate the adjusted mean differences in fatigue between patients with AML and adults from the general population (n=847) by AML disease risk categories. A clinically meaningful difference in fatigue was defined as ≥3 points. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were used to identify sociodemographic, clinical and molecular correlates of worse fatigue in patients with AML., Results: Patients with AML reported adjusted mean fatigue scores that were 7.5 points worse than the general population (95% CI -8.6 to -6.4, p<0.001). Across AML disease risk categories, adjusted mean differences in fatigue compared with the general population ranged from 6.7 points worse (patients with favourable risk: 95% CI -8.6 to -4.8, p<0.001) to 8.9 points worse (patients with poor risk, 95% CI -10.5 to -7.2, p<0.001). Overall, 91% of patients with AML reported fatigue that was equal to or worse than the general population's median fatigue score. Higher pretreatment fatigue was independently associated with female sex, WHO performance status ≥1 and lower platelet levels., Conclusions: Patients with newly diagnosed AML reported worse fatigue than the general population, and mean differences exceeded twice the threshold for clinical significance. Our findings may help to identify patients with AML most likely to benefit from supportive care interventions to reduce fatigue., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ACa: advisory board participation and consultancy: Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Gilead, Pfizer, Jazz and Amgen. ATa: grants: Celgene, Roche, Novartis and AbbVie, outside the submitted work. DC: president of FACIT.org. FE: personal fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Orsenix and Takeda, and grants and personal fees from Amgen, outside the submitted work. ML: advisory boards: Celgene, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. MPM: advisory board and speaker bureau: Novartis, Astellas, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, AbbVie and Janssen; advisory board: Celgene and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. MV: personal fees from Amgen, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis and Incyte. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Competing Interests: No conflicts of interest to disclose.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling is critically required for the development and maintenance of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by constitutive activation of myeloid regeneration-related pathways. Cell-intrinsic activation of canonical Wnt signaling propagates in the nucleus by β-catenin translocation, where it induces expression of target oncogenes such as JUN , MYC and CCND1 . As the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is now well established to be a key oncogenic signaling pathway promoting leukemic myelopoiesis, targeting it would be an effective strategy to impair LSC functionality. Although the effects of the adenosine analogue cordycepin in repressing β-catenins and destabilizing the LSC niche have been highlighted, the cellular and molecular effects on AML-LSC have not been fully clarified. In the present study, we evaluated the potency and efficacy of cordycepin, a selective repressor of Wnt/β-catenin signaling with anti-leukemia properties, on the AC133 + LSC fraction. Cordycepin effectively reduces cell viability of the AC133 + LSCs in the MUTZ-2 cell model and patient-derived cells through the induction of apoptosis. By Wnt-targeted RNA sequencing panel, we highlighted the re-expression of WIF1 and DKK1 among others, and the consequent downregulation of MYC and PROM1 (CD133) following MUTZ-2 cell exposure to increasing doses of cordycepin. Our results provide new insights into the molecular circuits involved in pharmacological inhibition mediated by cordycepin reinforcing the potential of targeting the Wnt/β-catenin and co-regulatory complexes in AML.

Background and Objectives : This study aimed to investigate the causes of continuous deep fluctuations in the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) in an untreated patient with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), who has had a favorable prognosis since the time of diagnosis. Up until now, the patient has voluntarily chosen to adopt a predominantly vegetarian and fruitarian diet, along with prolonged periods of total fasting (ranging from 4 to 39 days) each year. Materials and Methods : For this purpose, we decided to analyze the whole transcriptome profiling of peripheral blood (PB) CD19+ cells from the patient (#1) at different time-points vs. the same cells of five other untreated CLL patients who followed a varied diet. Consequently, the CLL patients were categorized as follows: the 1st group comprised patient #1 at 20 different time-points (16 time-points during nutrition and 4 time-points during fasting), whereas the 2nd group included only one time point for each of the patients (#2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) as they followed a varied diet. We performed microarray experiments using a powerful tool, the Affymetrix Human Clariom™ D Pico Assay, to generate high-fidelity biomarker signatures. Statistical analysis was employed to identify differentially expressed genes and to perform sample clustering. Results : The lymphocytosis trend in patient #1 showed recurring fluctuations since the time of diagnosis. Interestingly, we observed that approximately 4-6 weeks after the conclusion of fasting periods, the absolute lymphocyte count was reduced by about half. The gene expression profiling analysis revealed that nine genes were statistically differently expressed between the 1st group and the 2nd group. Specifically, IGLC3 , RPS26 , CHPT1 , and PCDH9 were under expressed in the 1st group compared to the 2nd group of CLL patients. Conversely, IGHV3-43 , IGKV3D-20 , PLEKHA1 , CYBB , and GABRB2 were over-expressed in the 1st group when compared to the 2nd group of CLL patients. Furthermore, clustering analysis validated that all the samples from patient #1 clustered together, showing clear separation from the samples of the other CLL patients. Conclusions : This study unveiled a small gene expression signature consisting of nine genes that distinguished an untreated CLL patient who followed prolonged periods of total fasting, maintaining a gradual growth trend of lymphocytosis, compared to five untreated CLL patients with a varied diet. Future investigations focusing on patient #1 could potentially shed light on the role of prolonged periodic fasting and the implication of this specific gene signature in sustaining the lymphocytosis trend and the favorable course of the disease.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a rare myeloproliferative disorder caused by the reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11) in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). This chromosomal translocation results in the formation of an extra-short chromosome 22, called a Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), containing the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene responsible for the expression of a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that causes uncontrolled growth and replication of leukemic cells. Mechanisms behind the formation of this chromosomal rearrangement are not well known, even if, as observed in tumors, repetitive DNA may be involved as core elements in chromosomal rearrangements. We have participated in the explorative investigations of the PhilosoPhi34 study to evaluate residual Ph+ cells in patients with negative FISH analysis on CD34+/lin- cells with gDNA qPCR. Using targeted next-generation deep sequencing strategies, we analyzed the genomic region around the t(9;22) translocations of 82 CML patients and one CML cell line and assessed the relevance of interspersed repeat elements at breakpoints (BP). We found a statistically higher presence of LINE elements, in particular belonging to the subfamily L1M, in BP cluster regions of both chromosome 22 and 9 compared to the whole human genome. These data suggest that L1M elements could be potential drivers of t(9;22) translocation leading to the generation of the BCR-ABL1 chimeric gene and the expression of the active BCR-ABL1 -controlled tyrosine kinase chimeric protein responsible for CML.

Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.