Search

Purpose: Virtually all patients with malignant glioma (MG) eventually recur. This study evaluates the safety of concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and bevacizumab (BVZ), an antiangiogenic agent, in treatment of recurrent MG. Methods and Materials: Fifteen patients with recurrent MG, treated at initial diagnosis with surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy/temozolomide and then at least 1 salvage chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled in this prospective trial. Lesions <3 cm in diameter were treated in a single fraction, whereas those 3 to 5 cm in diameter received 5 5-Gy fractions. BVZ was administered immediately before SRS and 2 weeks later. Neurocognitive testing (Mini-Mental Status Exam, Trail Making Test A/B), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) quality-of-life assessment, physical exam, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) were performed immediately before SRS and 1 week and 2 months following completion of SRS. The primary endpoint was central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. Secondary endpoints included survival, quality of life, microvascular properties as measured by DCE-MRI, steroid usage, and performance status. Results: One grade 3 (severe headache) and 2 grade 2 CNS toxicities were observed. No patients experienced grade 4 to 5 toxicity or intracranial hemorrhage. Neurocognition, quality of life, and Karnofsky performance status did not change significantly with treatment. DCE-MRI results suggest a significant decline in tumor perfusion and permeability 1 week after SRS and further decline by 2 months. Conclusions: Treatment of recurrent MG with concurrent SRS and BVZ was not associated with excessive toxicity in this prospective trial. A randomized trial of concurrent SRS/BVZ versus conventional salvage therapy is needed to establish the efficacy of this approach. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background and purpose FaDu human squamous cell carcinoma (FaDu-hSCC) demonstrates accelerated tumor repopulation during fractionated irradiation with pathological validation (Ki-67 and BrdUrd makers) in a xenograft model system. However, these and other functional assays must be performed ex vivo and post hoc. We propose a novel, in vivo, real-time assay utilizing 18F-FLT PET. Material and methods Nude mice with FaDu-hSCC were irradiated with 12 or 18 fractions of 1.8 Gy ([Dm] = 3.0 Gy), either daily or every second day. 18F-FLT micro-PET scans were performed at different time points, FLT parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, and T/NT) were measured. Tumor sections were stained for Ki-67 and BrdUrd, a labeling index (LI) was calculated. Imaging-pathology correlation was determined by comparing FLT parameters and immunohistochemical results. Results Measured SUVmax, SUVmean and T/NT decreased significantly after daily irradiation with 12 fractions in 12 days (P < 0.05) and 18 fractions in 18 days (P < 0.05). In contrast, these parameters increased in mice treated with 12 fractions in 24 days (P > 0.05) and 18 fractions in 36 days (P > 0.05), suggesting accelerated repopulation. Similarly, Ki-67 and BrdUrd LIs demonstrated significant decreases with daily irradiation (P < 0.05), and increases with every-second-day irradiation (P > 0.05). 18F-FLT parameters correlated strongly with proliferation markers (r²: 0.679-0.879, P < 0.001). Conclusions 18F-FLT parameters were in good agreement with Ki-67 and BrdUrd Li. These results may support a potential role for 18F-FLT PET in real-time detection of tumor repopulation during fractionated radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite contemporary surgery, image-guided radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) persists or relapses in nearly all patients, and tumors almost always recur locally. Management of recurrent GBM is variable, but approaches include best supportive care, reoperation, reirradiation, and/or systemic therapy. Promising novel therapies include antiangiogenic agents and stereotactic radiosurgery, which have cytotoxic effects on tumor microvasculature. Emerging data suggest the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab and radiosurgery either alone or in combination. This report presents the case of a man with locally recurrent GBM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and concurrent bevacizumab, and reviews the preclinical and clinical data supporting this approach.

Unlabelled: The primary aim of this study was to use serial (18)F-3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT to measure tumor cell proliferation during radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus., Methods: Twenty-one patients with inoperable locally advanced SCC of the esophagus underwent serial (18)F-FLT PET/CT during radiotherapy. Each patient received a pretreatment scan, followed by 1-3 scans after delivery of 2, 6, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60 Gy to the tumor., Results: Among the 19 patients who completed radiotherapy without interruption, parameters reflecting (18)F-FLT uptake in the tumor (i.e., maximum tumor standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and proliferation target volume) decreased steadily. All patients demonstrated an almost complete absence of proliferating esophageal tumor after 30 Gy and a complete absence after 40 Gy. In the 2 patients whose radiotherapy course was interrupted, (18)F-FLT uptake in the tumor was greater after the interruption than before the interruption. Marked early reduction of (18)F-FLT uptake in irradiated bone marrow was observed in all patients, even after only 2 Gy. All showed a complete absence of proliferating marrow in irradiated regions after 10 Gy. Both patients who underwent scans after completing the entire radiotherapy course showed no tumor uptake on (18)F-FLT PET/CT but high uptake on (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Pathologic examination of these regions revealed inflammatory infiltrates but no residual tumor., Conclusion: (18)F-FLT uptake can be used to monitor the biologic response of esophageal SCC and normal tissue to radiotherapy. Increased uptake of (18)F-FLT after treatment interruptions may reflect accelerated repopulation. (18)F-FLT PET/CT may have an advantage over (18)F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating inflammation from tumor.

Purpose: To retrospectively determine whether inapparent tumor at endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging is a favorable prognostic finding in prostate cancer patients who select active surveillance for management., Materials and Methods: Committee on Human Research approval was obtained and compliance with HIPAA regulations was observed, with waiver of requirement for written consent. Ninety-two men (mean age, 64 years; range, 43-85 years) were retrospectively identified who had biopsy-proved prostate cancer, who had undergone baseline endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging, and who had selected active surveillance for management. Their mean baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 5.5 ng/mL, and the median Gleason score was 6. Two readers with 10 and 3 years of experience independently reviewed all MR images and determined whether tumor was apparent on the basis of evaluation of established morphologic and metabolic findings. Another investigator compiled data about baseline clinical stage, biopsy findings, and serum PSA measurements. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between the clinical parameters and tumor apparency at MR imaging and the biochemical outcome., Results: At baseline MR imaging, readers 1 and 2 considered 54 and 26 patients, respectively, to have inapparent tumor (fair interobserver agreement; kappa = 0.30). During a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 52 patients had a stable PSA level and 40 had an increasing PSA level. In multivariate analysis, no significant association was found between the baseline clinical stage, Gleason score, serum PSA level, or the presence of apparent tumor at endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging for either reader and the biochemical outcome (P > .05 for all)., Conclusion: Endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging findings of tumor apparency or inapparency in prostate cancer patients who select active surveillance for management do not appear to be of prognostic value., ((c) RSNA, 2008.)