Search

Copyright of Prudentia Iuris is the property of Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional is the property of Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Derecho del Estado is the property of Universidad Externado de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

El texto examina el concepto de titularidad de derechos fundamentales bajo la interpretación de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, particularmente, en la Opinión Consultiva OC -22/16, sobre Titularidad de Derechos Humanos de las Personas Jurídicas en el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos. La interpretación de la Corte ha restringido el alcance de la titularidad de derechos humanos a las personas naturales, salvo ciertas excepciones. El texto evalúa las razones tras esta interpretación y cómo debe articularse en relación con el derecho constitucional de los Estados partes, analizando el caso chileno para tal efecto.

Copyright of Revista Ibero-Latinoamericana de Seguros is the property of Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

El presente trabajo de investigación estudia la figura del control de convencionalidad en los tribunales arbitrales y en los laudos arbitrales, acudiendo al estudio del derecho comparado, y realiza un análisis a los sistemas regionales de protección de los derechos humanos en América, Asia, África y Europa para así evidenciar que existe un vacío legislativo en la aplicación del control de convencionalidad a los laudos arbitrales. Se toman precedentes de la jurisprudencia internacional para establecer qué mecanismos procesales pueden utilizarse para la anulación de un laudo que viole normas convencionales contenidas en un tratado internacional de derechos humanos.

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the beginning of the work of the Inter-American Court. The article analyzes some of the main trends that have characterized the performance of this court throughout its first four decades of existence. It shows the expansive growth character and warns about some of the risks that this entails. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Derecho del Estado is the property of Universidad Externado de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Il controllo di convenzionalità è la possibilità riconosciuta ad alcuni organi giurisdizionali di verificare la compatibilità di alcuni atti interni con trattati di diritto internazionale, in particolare con la Convenzione americana dei diritti umani. Tale tipo di controllo non costituisce una novità nell’ordinamento giuridico messicano, seppure per lungo tempo sia stato svolto soltanto da alcuni organi dello Stato. Il caso Radilla Pacheco e l’Expediente Varios 911/2010 hanno comportato una estensione dell'obbligo di effettuare tale controllo, che ora ricade su tutti gli organi dello Stato. Partendo da queste considerazioni, si analizzano in questo articolo le origini e l'evoluzione del controllo di convenzionalità in materia elettorale, soprattutto da parte della Sala Superior del Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, giurisdizione “pioniera” nell’applicazione di tale controllo. / 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑠, 𝑡𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠, 𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐴𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑛 𝐻𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑅𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠. 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚, 𝑎𝑙𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑖𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑏𝑦 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑠. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 911/2010 𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙, 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑠. 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠, 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑙𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙 𝑖𝑛 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐽𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝐹𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜́𝑛, 𝑎 "𝑝𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑟" 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙.

Copyright of Revue Generale de Droit is the property of Universite d'Ottawa, Section de Droit Civil and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ius et Praxis (07172877) is the property of Universidad de Talca and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

El presente artículo tiene como finalidad establecer que en Colombia el control de convencionalidad ex officio es una necesidad que se evidencia al buscar garantizar los estándares mínimos de protección de los derechos humanos fijados por el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos y el Derecho Internacional Humanitario en el marco de la Justicia Transicional derivada del post conflicto propio de las negociaciones con las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia. Frente al tema en concreto la Corte Constitucional colombiana bajo una concepción dualista del bloque constitucionalista ha motivado que lo establecido en la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos y la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana constituyen un mero criterio hermenéutico por parte de los jueces, permitiendo de esta manera que los mismos puedan apartarse de dichos criterios que son vinculantes para los Estados parte de la Convención Americana a la hora de tomar decisiones en el marco de la Justicia Transicional. De esta forma, se hace referencia en la necesidad de establecer como criterio obligatorio para los Magistrados de Paz el control de convencionalidad ex officio debido a la temática polémica de la protección de los derechos humanos, mediante la ampliación del bloque de constitucionalidad en sentido estricto y la exactitud conceptual frente a los delitos políticos conexos que pueden generar un marco de impunidad frente a los principios de verdad, justicia, reparación y garantías de no repetición.

Copyright of Saber, Ciencia y Libertas is the property of Saber, Ciencia y Libertad and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

El objetivo esencial es el análisis y la demostración de la influencia que ha tenido la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Corte IDH) en los sistemas jurídicos de protección de derechos humanos de México y Colombia. Asimismo analiza el grado de cumplimiento de la Sentencia Radilla Pacheco y la masacre de Santo Domingo. El trabajo se ha dividido en cuatro ejes temáticos: el primero se enfoca en la evolución del concepto de Control de Convencionalidad (CCV); el segundo revisa la forma en la que la Corte IDH interpreta la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos (CADH); el tercero analiza el grado de cumplimiento de la Sentencia Radilla Pacheco versus México dictada el 30 de noviembre de 2009 y su influencia en el sistema jurídico mexicano; y el cuarto eje expone la Sentencia de la masacre de Santo Domingo versus Colombia dictada en noviembre de 2012; además se constata la efectividad de la propia Corte IDH ante este controvertido caso. La conclusión muestra que el CCV ha ido evolucionando en los últimos años a fin de superar los obstáculos que ha encontrado dentro de algunos sistemas jurídicos estatales de protección de derechos humanos. Por tal motivo, se concluye afirmando que la Corte IDH sí ha sido efectiva para la resolución de casos controversiales y ha coadyuvado al cumplimiento de la protec-ción de los derechos humanos.

Due to the imposition of a general inability to exercise public functions to Mayor of the Capital District of Bogotá, the disciplinary control of public officials elected by popular vote is located in the center of the political and legal discussions of the country. The present document aims to present and analyze the disciplinary control of public officials elected by popular vote based on the national and international case law that has been issued on the matter. The considerations present hereby carry out a comparative analysis of the experiences in other Latin-American countries that have signed the American Convention of Human Rights in order to suggest an alternative to reconcile the claim to empower judges and control authorities to face government corruption and to give an adequate protection to political rights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent development of the concept of "conventionality control" in the precedent case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights generates a transmutation of the sources of law and a translation of the principle of constitutional supremacy in the national legal orders. This has induced an important discussion about constitutional dogmatic which has had a tremendous influence on the understanding of law in the Colombian legal system. Based on these reasons, the main objective of this research was to establish appropriate criteria of interpretation to allow solving regulatory differences between the American Convention on Human Rights and Political Constitution of Colombia, and in this manner achieve a harmonic interpretation of both. From this perspective, this research determines how the sources of law in Colombian legal system work based on the study of the inability sanction-particular case where both legal sources collide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Científica General José María Córdova is the property of Escuela Militar de Cadetes General Jose Maria Cordova and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper aims to understand the interrelationships between the international environmental protection and the human rights protection systems, as well as the contributions of the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to the strengthening of the civil and political rights protection in cases involving environmental issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Frónesis is the property of Universidad del Zulia (Fronesis) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)