Search

Aim: To evaluate whether a daily full-dose aspirin regimen after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction reduces the risk of postoperative symptomatic deep-venous thrombosis (DVT).Materials and Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from 2007 to 2016. One thousand two hundred thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria: 821 patients received no chemoprophylaxis and 412 patients received daily full-dose aspirin.Results: A total of 10 patients, seven receiving no chemoprophylaxis and three using aspirin, sustained a postoperative symptomatic DVT. Calculated adjusted odds ratio for symptomatic postoperative DVT for aspirin versus no chemoprophylaxis was 0.928 (95% CI 0.237-3.629, P value = 0.91). Odds ratio for symptomatic postoperative DVT occurrence among tobacco users versus non-tobacco users was 3.76 (95% CI 1.077-13.124, P = 0.04).Conclusions: No statistically significant difference was observed in postoperative symptomatic DVT after ACL reconstruction in those who received full-dose aspirin chemoprophylaxis versus those with no chemoprophylaxis. Additionally, there was a significantly increased risk of postoperative symptomatic DVT with tobacco use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microblogs, with their interactive nature, can engage students in community building and sensemaking. Using Weick's model of organizing as a framework, we integrated the use of micromessaging to increase student engagement in the large-lecture classroom. Students asked significantly more questions and asked a greater diversity of questions when micromessaging was available to them. The microblog format facilitated student-to-student connectedness, where students could post questions to the microblog alongside questions from their peers. This communication strategy provided increased requisite variety to match the equivocal nature of the large-lecture, medical humanities classroom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have produced substantial weight loss effects in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cohorts, but these effects have not been thoroughly studied in patients with obesity and without diabetes. This review aimed to analyze direct comparative studies for semaglutide versus other GLP-1 RA (liraglutide and efinopegdutide) in facilitating weight loss and evaluating adverse events in patients with obesity. A systematic search following the guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for direct comparative studies comparing semaglutide with other GLP-1 RA on weight loss in patients with obesity. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were performed to analyze the differences in weight loss between cohorts. A meta-analysis found that semaglutide produced a greater effect on mean weight loss compared to liraglutide, but did not produce a significant difference compared to efinopegdutide. Semaglutide, liraglutide, and efinopegdutide were well-tolerated and were associated with primarily minimal to moderate severity adverse effects, most of which were gastrointestinal. Future studies should continue to focus on conducting direct comparisons between GLP-1 RAs and emerging multi-receptor GLP-1 RAs, such as efinopegdutide, tirzepatide, and retratrutide, to determine clinical efficacy, long-term safety, and identifying the most effective regimens for clinical practice., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Wen et al.)