Search

The use of cover crops within olive groves, be they legume, non-legume or a mixture, has become more widespread in recent years as a practice of environmental sustainability to improve soil organic matter. Using both SC: a sole-crop and AC: an alley-cropping, Hordeum vulgare L. and Vicia sativa L. were studied with olive trees 2016 to 2019. The aim was to determine the effects of both of these systems on: TB: total biomass, POXC: Permanganate oxidizable Carbon and SOC: Soil Organic Carbon, TN: Total Nitrogen, C:N ratio; and P: available Phosphorus. These parameters were measured on 192 soil samples collected at 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil depths before planting and after crop harvesting. The results showed that within the relatively short time of three seasons, cover crops increased SOC slightly overall. Compared to the SC, AC limited crop and weed growth and produced significantly less TB, especially in 2017–18, a particularly dry season. This can be explained by the initial state of the soil which was significantly affected by the cropping system. AC enhanced SOC and stabilized the POXC during all three cropping seasons for all treatments. Mixed crop (barley and vetch) significantly increased TN in the AC over the three cropping seasons and decreased the C:N ratio. However, with barley and vetch in pure stand, the mean TN was similar to that of fallow. Also, this type of agroforestry increased the mean available phosphorus with barley, vetch and a mixture of the two compared to fallow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rainfall and temperature are unpredictable factors in Mediterranean environments that result in irregular environmental conditions for crop growth, thus being a critical source of uncertainty for farmers. This study applied divergent single-plant selection for high and low yield within five barley varieties and two Tunisian landraces under semi-arid conditions at an ultra-low density of 1.2 plants/m2 for two consecutive years. Progeny evaluation under dense stands following farmers' practices was conducted in two semi-arid locations in Tunisia during one cropping season and in one location during a second season, totalling three environments. The results revealed significant genotypic effects for all recorded agronomic and physiological traits. No genotype × environment interaction was shown for biological yield, implying a biomass buffering capacity for selected lines under different environmental conditions. However, genotype × environment interaction was present in terms of grain yield since plasticity for biomass production under drought stress conditions was not translated directly to yield compensation for some of the lines. Nevertheless, several lines selected for high yield were identified to surpass their source material and best checks in each environment, while one line (IH4-4) outperformed consistently by 62.99% on average, in terms of grain yield, the best check across all environments. In addition, improved agronomic performance under drought conditions induced an indirect effect on some grain quality traits. Most of the lines selected for high yield maintained or even improved their grain protein content in comparison to their source material (average increase by 2.33%). On the other hand, most of the lines selected for low yield indicated a poor agronomic performance, further confirming the coherence between selection under ultra-low density and performance under dense stand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Arab Journal of Plant Protection is the property of Arab Society for Plant Protection and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)