Search

Patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), and especially those with freezing of gait (FOG), are known to experience impairments in gait rhythmicity, symmetry, and bilateral coordination between both legs. In the current study, we investigated whether deficits in perception of gait speed between limbs were more pronounced in freezers than in non-freezers and could explain some of these gait impairments. We also assessed cognitive ability and proprioception. Twenty-five PD patients (13 freezers, 12 non-freezers) and 12 healthy controls walked on a split-belt treadmill, while the speed of one of the belts was gradually increased. Participants had to indicate the moment at which they perceived belt speeds to be different. The main outcome variables were the number of correct responses (perception accuracy) and the difference in belt speeds at the moment the participants perceived belt speeds to be different (perception threshold). In addition, gait characteristics during both split- and tied-belt walking were determined. Results showed significantly lower perception accuracy in freezers, whereas the perception threshold did not differ between groups. During tied-belt walking, freezers exhibited more asymmetrical step lengths and limb excursions than non-freezers and healthy controls. Greater step length and limb excursions were associated with better perception, whereas more variable gait was associated with more impaired perception. The results confirm the hypothesis that freezers have impaired perception of locomotor asymmetry. While proprioceptive and cognitive ability did not explain these findings, the possible causal link with the occurrence of FOG needs further corroboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postural instability and freezing of gait (FOG) are key features of Parkinson's disease (PD) that are closely related to falls. Uncovering the postural control differences between individuals with and without FOG contributes to our understanding of the relationship between these phenomena. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether postural control deficits, as detected by clinical balance scales, were more apparent in FOG+ compared to FOG-. Furthermore, we aimed to identify whether different scales were equally sensitive to detect postural control deficits and whether medication affected postural control differentially in each subgroup. Relevant articles were identified via five electronic databases. We performed a meta-analysis on nine studies which reported clinical balance scale scores in 249 freezers and 321 non-freezers. Methodological analysis showed that in 5/9 studies disease duration differed between subgroups. Despite this drawback, postural control was found to be significantly worse in FOG+ compared to FOG-. All included clinical balance scales were found to be sufficiently sensitive to detect the postural control differences. Levodopa did not differentially affect postural control (p=0.21), as in both medication states FOG+ had worse postural stability than FOG-. However, this finding warrants a cautious interpretation given the limitations of the studies included. From subscore analysis, we found that reactive and dynamic postural control were the most affected postural control systems in FOG+. We conclude that our findings provide important evidence for pronounced postural instability in individuals with FOG, which can be easily picked up with clinical evaluation tools. Posturographic measures in well-matched subgroups are needed to highlight the exact nature of these deficits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]