Search

Abstract Background Studies comparing the effectiveness of arthroscopic knee surgery and conservative treatment on knee osteoarthritis (OA) came up with inconsistent results. Systematic review on this topic still is still lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic knee surgery on knee OA, compared to conservative treatments. Materials and methods Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before on 1st July 2024. Studies comparing the effectiveness of arthroscopy and conservative treatments only on knee OA were included. Quality of included studies was evaluated by risk of bias 2 (ROB2). Long-term results in terms of pain relief, functional recovery and patients reported satisfaction were meta-analyzed to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness. Results Ten studies were included in this review, among which only 1 was considered as low risk of bias. Five studies were involved in meta-analyses and no difference was found in therapeutic effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery and conservative treatment on knee OA, in the evaluation of VAS (p = 0.63), WOMAC (p = 0.38), SF-36 (p = 0.74) and patient satisfaction (p = 0.07). Conclusion The evidence does not support the effectiveness of arthroscopic knee surgery compared to conservative treatments in knee OA.

Background: Diabetic bone defects present significant challenges for individuals with diabetes. While metformin has been explored for bone regeneration via local delivery, its application in treating diabetic bone defects remains under-explored. In this study, we aim to leverage 3D printing technology to fabricate a GelMA-Nanoclay hydrogel scaffold loaded with metformin specifically for this purpose. The objective is to assess whether the in situ release of metformin can effectively enhance osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immunomodulation in the context of diabetic bone defects. Materials and methods: Utilizing 3D printing technology, we constructed a GelMA-Nanoclay-Metformin hydrogel scaffold with optimal physical properties and biocompatibility. The osteogenic, angiogenic, and immunomodulatory characteristics of the hydrogel scaffold were thoroughly investigated through both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Results: GelMA10%-Nanoclay8%-Metformin5mg/mL was selected as the bioink for 3D printing due to its favorable swelling rate, degradation rate, mechanical strength, and drug release rate. Through in vitro investigations, the hydrogel scaffold extract, enriched with metformin, demonstrated a substantial enhancement in the proliferation and migration of BMSCs within a high-glucose microenvironment. It effectively enhances osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immunomodulation. In vivo experimental outcomes further underscored the efficacy of the metformin-loaded GelMA-Nanoclay hydrogel scaffold in promoting superior bone regeneration within diabetic bone defects. Conclusions: In conclusion, while previous studies have explored local delivery of metformin for bone regeneration, our research is pioneering in its application to diabetic bone defects using a 3D printed GelMA-Nanoclay hydrogel scaffold. This localized delivery approach demonstrates significant potential for enhancing bone regeneration in diabetic patients, offering a novel approach for treating diabetic bone defects. The translational potential of this article: Our study demonstrates, for the first time, the successful loading of the systemic antidiabetic drug metformin onto a hydrogel scaffold for localized delivery. This approach exhibits significant efficacy in mending diabetic bone defects, presenting a promising new avenue for the treatment of such conditions.

Introduction: Bones are easily damaged. Biomimetic scaffolds are involved in tissue engineering. This study explored polydopamine (PDA)-coated poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-magnesium oxide (MgO) scaffold properties and its effects on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) osteogenic differentiation. Methods: PLGA/MgO scaffolds were prepared by low-temperature 3D printing technology and PDA coatings were prepared by immersion method. Scaffold structure was observed by scanning electron microscopy with an energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS), fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR). Scaffold hydrophilicity, compressive/elastic modulus, and degradation rates were analyzed by water contact angle measurement, mechanical tests, and simulated-body fluid immersion. Rat BMSCs were cultured in scaffold extract. Cell activity on days 1, 3, and 7 was detected by MTT. Cells were induced by osteogenic differentiation, followed by evaluation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity on days 3, 7, and 14 of induction and Osteocalcin, Osteocalcin, and Collagen I expressions. Results: The prepared PLGA/MgO scaffolds had dense microparticles. With the increase of MgO contents, the hydrophilicity was enhanced, scaffold degradation rate was accelerated, magnesium ion release rate and scaffold extract pH value were increased, and cytotoxicity was less when magnesium mass ratio was less than 10%. Compared with other scaffolds, compressive and elastic modulus of PLGA/MgO (10%) scaffolds were increased; BMSCs incubated with PLGA/MgO (10%) scaffold extract had higher ALP activity and Osteocalcin, Osteopontin, and Collagen I expressions. PDA coating was prepared in PLGA/MgO (10%) scaffolds and the mechanical properties were not affected. PLGA/MgO (10%)/PDA scaffolds had better hydrophilicity and biocompatibility and promoted BMSC osteogenic differentiation. Conclusion: Low-temperature 3D printing PLGA/MgO (10%)/PDA scaffolds had good hydrophilicity and biocompatibility, and were conducive to BMSC osteogenic differentiation.

Objective Hyaluronic acid (HA) intra‐articular injection after arthroscopic knee surgery has been widely applied but its efficacy and safety remain controversial. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the efficacy and safety of HA intra‐articular injection after arthroscopic knee surgery, and to compare the efficacy of HA with different molecular weights. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Google scholar and the Cochrane library from inception to 16 September 2022 for English‐written articles, in order to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the clinical efficacy and/or safety of HA intra‐articular injection after arthroscopic knee surgery. Then we meta‐analyzed the outcomes of patients given intra‐articular HA injections postoperatively and control patients. We also evaluated the influence of HA with different molecular weights. In every calculation, sensitive analysis was performed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and adverse events were selected as the primary outcome measurements, while Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner score were selected as the secondary outcome measurements. Publication bias of every outcome was evaluated using egger test. Results Fifteen studies involving 951 knees were included and 12 of them were used to performed the meta‐analysis. The results showed no significant difference between the HA group and control group according to VAS, whether assessed at less (P = 0.90) or more than 6 months (P = 0.55). Besides, there were no statistical differences between the HA group and control group according to subgroup analysis (Ps = 0.77, 0.91 and 0.81 in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, meniscectomy and overall groups, respectively). Compared to control group, the overall effect of WOMAC score showed no significant differences (P = 0.25), nor did in two subgroups (P = 0.37 and P = 0.22). Outcomes measured by Lysholm (P = 0.13), IKDC (P = 0.86) and Tegner (P = 0.42) scores showed no significant differences, either. The analysis of the risk of adverse events indicated no increase in HA groups (P = 0.06). We found no significant differences between high‐ and low‐molecular‐weight HA at 6 (P = 0.96) or 12 months (P = 0.93) postoperatively. Two studies failed to pass the sensitive analysis and the reasons were discussed detailly and acceptable publication bias was observed. Conclusions Although HA injection after arthroscopic knee surgery is safe, the available evidence does not support its efficacy in pain relief and functional recovery. Therefore, the application of HA injection after arthroscopic knee surgery is not recommended.

Abstract Background Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common progressive disorder that causes restricted motion and refractory pain undermining quality of life. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injection is a widely adopted conservative therapy relieving symptomatic FS, whereas the effect of which were contradictory and unclear in current literatures. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether intra-articular HA administration facilitates symptomatic pain relief and functional improvements in patients diagnosed with shoulder FS. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library electronic databases and Google scholar were searched, from inception to 15th Jan 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intra-articular HA administration with any other non-surgical treatment in patients with FS were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and meta-analyses were undertaken to pool the data of visual analog scale for pain, range of motion (ROM) in external rotation, abduction, and flexion, as well as Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Constant score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES). Results The present study included 7 RCTs involving 504 patients. The results provided no support for superior pain control in patients undergoing HA injection compared with any other treatment (p = 0.75). Furthermore, HA group failed to exert superior improvements to other treatments in ROM concerning abduction (p = 0.69) and flexion (p = 0.33). However, HA injection was observed to facilitate functional recovery in external rotation (p = 0.003). In addition, the pooled data showed a significant higher SPADI score in control group than in HA group (p = 0.01), while no statistical significance between two groups was observed in Constant score (p = 0.36) and ASES (p = 0.76). Conclusions The current meta-analysis suggested that HA is a beneficial treatment procedure in improving the ROM of the shoulder for patients with FS, whereas the effect in relieving pain may be equal to the existing therapy. In conclusion, Intra-articular HA injection is recommended for FS patients.

Abstract Background The radiological indicators can help doctors determine whether to make tibial tubercle transfer. But which indicator is better is still in question. Methods 117 knees in 103 patients who had undergone patellar surgery and 60 knees in 58 patients who had no history of patellar dislocation from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed. Significant differences of tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) on CT and tibial tubercle–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) on MRI between the case group and the control group were estimated by an unpaired t test. Significant differences between TT-TG on CT and TT-TG on MRI were estimated by a paired t test. The correlation between TT-PCL on MRI and tibial width was estimated by Pearson test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were measured to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TT-TG and TT-PCL on MRI. Results The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for TT-TG between CT and MRI evaluated by two raters was were 0.566. When comparing TT-TG on CT with that on MRI, the mean difference was 2.5 mm (p

Tissue engineering is a promising treatment strategy for meniscal regeneration after meniscal injury. However, existing scaffold materials and seed cells still have many disadvantages. The objective of the present study is to explore the feasibility of peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (PBMSCs) augmented with demineralized cortical bone matrix (DCBM) pretreated with TGF-β3 as a tissue-engineered meniscus graft and the repair effect. PBMSCs were collected from rabbit peripheral blood and subjected to three-lineage differentiation and flow cytometry identification. DCBM was prepared by decalcification, decellularization, and cross-linking rabbit cortical bone. Various characteristics such as biomechanical properties, histological characteristics, microstructure and DNA content were characterized. The cytotoxicity and the effects of DCBM on the adhesion and migration of PBMSCs were evaluated separately. The meniscus-forming ability of PBMSCs/DCBM complex in vitro induced by TGF-β3 was also evaluated at the molecular and genetic levels, respectively. Eventually, the present study evaluated the repair effect and cartilage protection effect of PBMSCs/DCBM as a meniscal graft in a rabbit model of medial meniscal reconstruction in 3 and 6 months. The results showed PBMSCs positively express CD29 and CD44, negatively express CD34 and CD45, and have three-lineage differentiation ability, thus can be used as tissue engineering meniscus seed cells. After the sample procedure, the cell and DNA contents of DCBM decreased, the tensile modulus did not decrease significantly, and the DCBM had a pore structure and no obvious cytotoxicity. PBMSCs could adhere and grow on the scaffold. Under induction of TGF-β3, PBMSCs/DCBM composites expressed glycosaminoglycan (GAG), and the related gene expression also increased. The results of the in vivo experiments that the PBMSCs/DCBM group had a better repair effect than the DCBM group and the control group at both 12 and 24 weeks, and the protective effect on cartilage was also better. Therefore, the application of DCBM augmented with PBMSCs for meniscus injury treatment is a preferred option for tissue-engineered meniscus.