Search

* Purpose.--To update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer guideline. Methods.--Based on the signals approach, an Expert Panel reviewed published literature and research survey results on the observed frequency of less common in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns to update the recommendations. Recommendations.--Two recommendations addressed via correspondence in 2015 are included. First, immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in >10% of tumor cells. Second, if the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not 'must') be ordered on the excision specimen based on specific clinical criteria. The HER2 testing algorithm for breast cancer is updated to address the recommended workup for less common clinical scenarios (approximately 5% of cases) observed when using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 (HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio [greater than or equal to] 2.0; average HER2 copy number (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142:1364-1382; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0902-SA), First released in 2007 and updated in 2013, the recommendations by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing [...]

Context.--Hormone receptors HER2/neu and Ki-67 are markers of residual risk in early breast cancer. An algorithm (IHC4) combining these markers may provide additional information on residual risk of recurrence in patients treated with hormone therapy. Objective.--To independently validate the IHC4 algorithm in the multinational Tamoxifen Versus Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter Trial (TEAM) cohort, originally developed on the trans-ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination Trial) cohort, by comparing 2 methodologies. Design.--The IHC4 biomarker expression was quantified on TEAM cohort samples (n = 2919) by using 2 independent methodologies (conventional 3,30-diaminobezidine [DAB] immunohistochemistry with image analysis and standardized quantitative immunofluorescence [QIF] by AQUA technology). The IHC4 scores were calculated by using the same previously established coefficients and then compared with recurrence-free and distant recurrence-free survival, using multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results.--The QIF model was highly significant for prediction of residual risk (P < .001), with continuous model scores showing a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.012 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.010-1.014), which was significantly higher than that for the DAB model (HR: 1.008, 95% CI: 1.006-1.009); P < .001). Each model added significant prognostic value in addition to recognized clinical prognostic factors, including nodal status, in multivariate analyses. Quantitative immunofluorescence, however, showed more accuracy with respect to overall residual risk assessment than the DAB model. Conclusions.--The use of the IHC4 algorithm was validated on the TEAM trial for predicting residual risk in patients with breast cancer. These data support the use of the IHC4 algorithm clinically, but quantitative and standardized approaches need to be used. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016; 140:66-74; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0599-OA), With progressively improving outcomes, particularly for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive early breast cancers, personalized risk stratification to direct appropriate therapy is increasingly important. Multiple approaches to the assessment of [...]

Purpose. To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer. Methods. ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing. Results. The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations. Recommendations. The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to >10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014; 138:241-256; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0953-SA), In 2007, a joint Expert Panel convened by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) met to develop guidelines for when and how [...]

Background: It is widely assumed that the integrity of tissue specimens remains stable indefinitely if preserved at cryogenic temperatures. With biobanking reaching a level of maturity where samples are increasingly stored for 10 years and beyond, this assumption of prolonged stability should be tested. Data from such an assessment are critical to verify if samples stored for extended durations remain "fit for purpose" or if there is need to reconsider the utility of samples stored beyond a certain timeframe. The Ontario Tumour Bank has been collecting samples since 2004, and assesses a random selection of frozen samples each year for RNA and DNA integrity as a part of ongoing quality control (QC) practices. This historical quality assessment data provide a unique opportunity to assess the impact of extended storage on nucleic acid integrity using replicate samples that remain in the bank in the present day as comparators. Methods: To examine the stability of fresh-frozen tumor tissue stored at cryogenic temperatures, RNA was extracted and analyzed from 87 cases over 14 disease sites stored long term in vapor-phase liquid nitrogen (LN2) (approximately −180°C). Historical QC data were compared against new data after re-extraction of replicate samples to determine the effect of extended storage on RNA quality. In addition, DNA was extracted from a subselection of samples (n = 20) to determine the effect of prolonged storage on DNA integrity. Results: No time-dependent decrease in tissue RNA or DNA quality, as measured by RNA integrity number (RIN) and DNA integrity number, was observed over an 11-year period. As a secondary observation, RNA integrity was not predictive of DNA integrity: DNA quality may still be very good, and as such RIN scores should not be used as a substitute indicator for evaluating DNA. Conclusions: Extended cryogenic storage beyond 2–11 years remains a viable option for maintaining the high quality of specimens in biobanks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Accurate determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is critical for optimizing breast cancer outcomes. In 2007, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) developed guidelines for HER2 testing to reduce inaccuracy. However, current ASCO/CAP criteria may restrict access to HER2-targeted therapy for some patient groups who would derive a clear clinical benefit. ASCO/CAP are currently reviewing their guidelines to further optimize HER2 testing and include emerging techniques. Guidelines are critical for optimizing care, as is ongoing research into techniques that accurately and reproducibly assess HER2 status. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Pharmacogenomics is defined as research into inherited genetic variations that determine an individual’s response to therapeutic agents. In oncology, pharmacogenomics based on somatic molecular alterations inherited by subsequent cancer cell generations forms the basis of molecular targeting of novel therapeutic agents. What has emerged from clinical experience with such agents is the need for appropriate pharmacodiagnostic approaches to ensure the drugs are correctly targeted. Given the broad range of pharmacogenomic agents currently under evaluation for cancer therapy, it appears that a rapid extension of pharmacodiagnostic profiling will be required in the next 5–10 years, if not sooner. If this is to be successfully achieved, lessons learned in the past, particularly during the development of HER2 (ERBB2) testing for directing trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer, may provide a valuable framework for the development of future pharmacodiagnostic assays system. This article reviews the biological and clinical rationale for targeting breast cancer with trastuzumab and the steps taken to validate and improve pharmacodiagnostic procedures for testing tumor HER2 protein expression and HER2 gene amplification. Attention is given to quality assurance and reproducibility of testing approaches and the optimal selection of patients for response to trastuzumab. This approach serves as a paradigm for the future development of pharmacodiagnostic tests in oncology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The promising effect of antibody–drug conjugates on breast cancer with low expression of HER2 (HER2-low) raises many questions regarding the optimal selection of patients for this treatment. A key question is whether HER2 immunohistochemistry, an assay optimised to detect HER2 amplification, is reliable enough to assess HER2 protein levels to select patients with HER2-low breast cancer in daily pathology practices worldwide. Moreover, whether this assessment can be performed with sufficient reproducibility between pathologists in daily practices is debatable. Herein, we address the historical track record of the CAP-ASCO HER2 Guidelines, the reported limited reproducibility by pathologists of HER2 immunohistochemistry in the non-amplified cases, and the performance variation of different antibodies. Based on this summary, we propose solutions to improve the robustness to enable reliable identification of patients with HER2-low breast cancer. • The definitions of HER2 0 and 1+ by IHC need to be redefined by the ASCO/CAP. • HER2 IHC assays are not calibrated to detect low-levels of HER2. • Other issues include reproducibility, different HER2-assay performance, etc. • The errors of the PDL1-saga are currently being repeated in the HER2-low narrative. • Solutions are proposed to industry, regulators, and academia (Table 1). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: The oestrogen receptor (ERα) may be activated in a ligand-dependent manner, via oestrogen, or in a ligand-independent manner, via signal transduction pathways. Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) is known to directly phosphorylate ERα at serine 118 in a ligand-independent manner. This study investigated the interaction between MAPK and ERα in breast cancer. Materials & methods: Immunohistochemical experiments were undertaken to determine the expression of MAPK, pMAPK and pER(ser118) in breast tumours to determine their clinical relevance. Immunofluorescent experiments were performed, on MCF-7 breast cancer cells, to monitor the phosphorylation and localisation of MAPK and ERα in response to oestrogen, heregulin and a MAPK inhibitor. Results: Oestrogen and Heregulin stimulated phosphorylation of ERα and its nuclear translocation, but heregulin induced this at levels much lower than those observed with oestrogen. Following stimulation with heregulin, but not oestrogen, treatment with MAPK inhibitor reduced the levels of nuclear pER(ser118). In cells treated with both oestrogen and heregulin, nuclear pER(ser118) was visible; but at levels comparable with heregulin treatment alone. Conclusion: This study confirms that ligand-mediated phosphorylation is associated with rapid nuclear localisation of ERα, due to oestrogen binding. ERα is phosphorylated at serine 118 in a ligand-independent manner. Preventing nuclear translocation of pMAPK reduced the levels of ligand-independent, but not ligand-dependent phosphorylation of ERα. Co-stimulation with both oestrogen and heregulin suggested that heregulin mediated signalling determines the subcellular localisation of ERα. Activation of ERα by direct phosphorylation may result in its rapid deactivation due to degradation or nuclear export. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Overdiagnosis, and thus overtreatment, are inevitable consequences of most screening programmes; identification of ways of minimising the impact of overdiagnosis demands new prospective research, in particular the need to separate clinically relevant lesions that require active treatment from those that can be safely left alone or monitored and only need treated if they change characteristics. Breast cancer screening has led to a large increase in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnoses. This is a widely heterogeneous disease and most DCIS detected through screening is of high cytonuclear grade and therefore likely to be important clinically. However, the historic practice of surgical treatment for all DCIS is unlikely to be optimal for lower risk patients. A clearer understanding of how to manage DCIS is required. This article describes the background and development of ‘The low risk’ DCIS trial (LORIS), a phase III trial of surgery versus active monitoring. LORIS will determine if it is appropriate to manage women with screen detected or asymptomatic, low grade and intermediate grade DCIS with low grade features, by active monitoring rather than by surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this pilot study was to assess the role of immune markers in fast relapse (<2 years) of high-grade muscle invasive urothelial carcinomas of the bladder (HGUC) treated by cystectomy. A series of 40 such cases was investigated for immune protein (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CD163, FOXP3 and PD-1) status by immunohistochemistry. Decreased expression of all immune cell markers was observed in tumors of patients who relapsed quickly. In Kaplan-Meier (log-rank test) analysis, low CD3, CD4 and CD8 expression was associated with fast relapse (P = 0.005, 0.028, 0.036 respectively). Additional evaluation of the immune transcriptome by NanoString Human PanCancer Immune Panel v.1.1 has identified 5 differentially expressed genes significantly associated with fast relapse. Among these, KLRB1 and HLA-DQA1 were also significant on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test P = 0.007 and 0.006, respectively). These findings strengthen the potential clinical utility and, hence, the need for further evaluation of immune markers in HGUC prognostication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary We integrated clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic data from 224 primaries and 95 metastases from 289 patients to characterize progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Driver gene alterations and mutational and expression-based signatures were preserved, with truncations, inversions, and translocations most conserved. Cell cycle progression (CCP) increased with sequential inactivation of tumor suppressors, yet remained higher in metastases, perhaps driven by cell cycle regulatory gene variants. Half of the cases were hypoxic by expression markers, overlapping with molecular subtypes. Paired tumor heterogeneity showed cancer cell migration by Halstedian progression. Multiple PDACs arising synchronously and metachronously in the same pancreas were actually intra-parenchymal metastases, not independent primary tumors. Established clinical co-variates dominated survival analyses, although CCP and hypoxia may inform clinical practice. Graphical Abstract Highlights • Higher cell cycle progression in PDAC metastases; increases with driver gene loss • Half of PDACs are hypoxic and are associated with subtypes and treatment response • Paired tumors show molecular conservation and Halstedian progression • Multiple PDACs arising in the same pancreas are intra-parenchymal metastases Connor et al. molecularly characterize primary and metastatic PDAC and show conserved alterations between primary and metastatic lesions. Clinical features outperform molecular alterations in survival analyses, but cell cycle progression and hypoxia signatures may inform clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]