Search

Context: When deciding to return to sport, in the literature, evaluations based on physical abilities have usually been used. However, in the current literature, we have been urged to use more than physical performance evaluations. Classical dual-task testing methods do not simulate in-game loads and cannot sufficiently measure football players' dual-task capacity., Objective: To create a dual-task test that would simulate football players' in-game situations and measure their capacity., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: Football pitch., Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-two football players (age = 17.37 ± 0.52 years) who played in a professional club (U19, elite league) were recruited for our study., Intervention(s): A novel dual-task test with questions containing scenarios from a football game to cognitively load players while they are performing a modified t test., Main Outcome Measure(s): After the warmup period, participants attended 4 tests in random order: juggling (foot), speed dribbling, long passing, and novel dual-task tests., Results: No significant relationship was found between physical performance parameters and dual-task parameters (all P > .05). A significant increase was found in the completion time of the modified t test when performed under the dual-task condition (Z = -7.568, P < .001). The increase in completion time was 2.14 ± 1.29 seconds. This duration difference was calculated as 22.79% ± 14.58%, as dual-task cost., Conclusions: Our test provides a new method to measure athletes' dual-task capacity, which is not related to physical performance and cannot be measured with current tests. This test also showed players with lower dual-task ability could not keep up their performance under dual-task conditions, such as passing a ball to a teammate when being pressed by an opponent. Players with good dual-task ability could maintain their performance (were affected only up to 10%); players with poor dual-task ability could not maintain their performance and were affected by up to 50% (with a mean of 22.79%)., (© by the National Athletic Trainers’ Association, Inc.)

Objective: This study investigates the effect of cervical mobilization on balance and cervical proprioception in patients with nonspecific neck pain., Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving a 3-week treatment protocol for which 66 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent conventional physiotherapy (hot pack and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) twice a week for 3 weeks along with additional cervical mobilization in the mobilization group, and sham mobilization in the sham control group. Static and dynamic balance, cervical proprioception, cervical mobility, and pain intensity were evaluated using a Kinesthetic Skill Training System 3000 device, the "Joint Position Error Test," Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument, and the visual analog scale, respectively., Results: After treatment, significant improvements were noted in dynamic balance, mobility, pain intensity (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively), and proprioception in the left direction of rotation in the mobilization group (P = .003) that were significantly greater than those observed in the sham mobilization group (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .003, respectively). Although a significant decrease was observed in the deficits of static balance (P = .044) and proprioception in the right direction of rotation (P = .011) after mobilization, the changes were similar in both the mobilization and sham mobilization groups (P = .192, P = .154, respectively)., Conclusion: Cervical mobilization led to significant improvements in dynamic balance, pain intensity, mobility, and partial improvements to proprioception in a comparison with a sham mobilization group, while the effect on static balance was not significant., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: This study aims to adapt the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index specific to shoulder osteoarthritis into Turkish and to evaluate its validity and reliability., Patients and Methods: The WOOS index was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish, systematically. It was applied to a total of 68 patients (17 males, 51 females; mean age: 61.5±8.7 years; range, 45 to 80 years) with osteoarthritis of the shoulder treated conservatively. The reliability of the scale was checked through internal consistency and test-retest methods. Internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach alpha value. Test-retest reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 25 patients. The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the Society of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) scores were used to conduct concurrent validity., Results: The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was found to be excellent as 0.92 (p<0.001). The ICC value was also excellent as 0.97 (p<0.001). There was an excellent positive correlation with WORC (0.847; p<0.001) and a very good positive correlation with SPADI (0.788; p<0.001). It was also negatively very good to correlate with the ASES (-0.754; p<0.001). Additionally, subsections of WOOS had a good correlation with the corresponding subsections of WORC (0.779-0.664; p<0.001)., Conclusion: The Turkish version of the WOOS index is a valid and reliable tool and is recommended for use in the assessment of patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder.