Search

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

Simple Summary: The occurrence of resistance to the standard treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) (Luminal A) breast cancer emphasizes the search for new molecules. In recent years, the interest in multi-target drugs has been growing, and they have even been identified as future therapeutic strategies. In line with this, this study aims to understand the anti-cancer action and multi-target potential of three new steroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs): 7α-methylandrost-4-en-17-one (6), 7α-methylandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (10a) and androsta-4,9(11)-diene-3,17-dione (13). We report new compounds that are able to impair the growth of sensitive and resistant ER+ breast cancer cells by acting as AIs, ER modulators and AR agonists, which is a therapeutic advantage over the current drugs applied in clinic. Therefore, this study is a breakthrough on drug discovery as it allows the discovery of new multi-target drugs for the treatment of ER+ breast cancer. Background/Objectives: Endocrine therapies that comprise anti-estrogens and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the standard treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) (Luminal A) breast cancer—the most prevalent subtype. However, the emergence of resistance restricts their success by causing tumor relapse and re-growth, which demands a switch towards other therapeutic approaches in order to minimize or overcome resistance. Indeed, this clinical limitation highlights the search for new molecules to improve cancer treatment. Recently, strategies that address multiple targets have been emerging, and multi-target drugs have the potential to become the future anti-cancer molecules. Our group has been searching for new multi-target compounds, and as part of this, our study aims to understand the anti-cancer and multi-target potential of three new steroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs): 7α-methylandrost-4-en-17-one (6), 7α-methylandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (10a) and androsta-4,9(11)-diene-3,17-dione (13). Methods: Their in vitro actions and molecular mechanisms were elucidated in a sensitive ER+ aromatase-overexpressing breast cancer cell line, MCF-7aro cells, as well as in an AI-resistant ER+ breast cancer cell line, LTEDaro cells. Results: All the new AIs (10 µM) prevented the proliferation of MCF-7aro cells by arresting cell cycle progression. Interestingly, all AIs (10 µM) act as androgen receptor (AR) agonists and modulate ER levels, synthesis and signaling to induce the apoptosis of ER+ breast cancer cells. Additionally, these new AIs (10 µM) also re-sensitize resistant cells by promoting apoptosis, offering a therapeutic benefit. Conclusions: Overall, new steroidal polypharmacological compounds have been discovered that, by acting as AIs, ER modulators and AR agonists, impair ER+ breast cancer cell growth. Overall, this study is a breakthrough on drug discovery as it presents new molecules with appealing anti-cancer properties and multi-target action for the treatment of ER+ breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast cancer therapy has been facing remarkable changes. Classic treatments are now combined with other therapies to improve efficacy and surpass resistance. Indeed, the emergence of resistance demands the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Due to key estrogen signaling, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer treatment has always been focused on aromatase inhibition and ER modulation. Lately, the effects of phytocannabinoids, mainly Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), have been evaluated in different cancers, including breast. However, Cannabis sativa contains more than 120 phytocannabinoids less researched and understood. Methods: Here, we evaluated, both in silico and in vitro, the ability of 129 phytocannabinoids to modulate important molecular targets in ER+ breast cancer: aromatase, ER, and androgen receptor (AR). Results: In silico results suggested that some cannabinoids may inhibit aromatase and act as ERα antagonists. Nine selected cannabinoids showed, in vitro, potential to act either as ER antagonists with inverse agonist properties, or as ER agonists. Moreover, these cannabinoids were considered as weak aromatase inhibitors and AR antagonists with inverse agonist action. Conclusions: Overall, we present, for the first time, a comprehensive analysis of the actions of the phytocannabinoids in targets of ER+ breast tumors, pointing out their therapeutic potential in cancer and in other diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The third-generation of aromatase inhibitors (AIs)—Exemestane (Exe), Letrozole (Let), and Anastrozole (Ana)—is the main therapeutic approach applied for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC), the most common neoplasm in women worldwide. Despite their success, the development of resistance limits their efficacy. Genistein (G), a phytoestrogen present in soybean, has promising anticancer properties in ER+ BC cells, even when combined with anticancer drugs. Thus, the potential beneficial effects of combining G with AIs were investigated in sensitive (MCF7-aro) and resistant (LTEDaro) BC cells. Methods: The effects on cell proliferation and expression of aromatase, ERα/ERβ, and AR receptors were evaluated. Results: Unlike the combination of G with Ana or Let, which negatively affects the Ais' therapeutic efficacy, G enhanced the anticancer properties of the steroidal AI Exe, increasing the antiproliferative effect and apoptosis relative to Exe. The hormone targets studied were not affected by this combination when compared with Exe. Conclusions: This is the first in vitro study that highlights the potential benefit of G as an adjuvant therapy with Exe, emphasizing, however, that soy derivatives widely used in the diet or applied as auxiliary medicines may increase the risk of adverse interactions with nonsteroidal AIs used in therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most prevalent breast cancer subtype, accounting for 70–85% of all cases. The combination of endocrine therapy, such as aromatase inhibitors (AIs), with target therapy is one of the most recent approaches, but its effectiveness is not optimal. Cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated important anti-tumor effects on ER+ breast cancer cells. Considering this, our goal was to evaluate the effects of combining CBD with the AIs currently in use in the clinical context. Our results revealed that CBD may be particularly beneficial when combined with the AI exemestane (Exe), since it potentiates the anti-tumor effects of Exe through the modulation of cell death and specific targets, including ERα and androgen receptor (AR). This reinforces the beneficial potential of cannabinoids in breast cancer and points to the possibility of improving Exe effects through an adjuvant therapy with CBD. Background: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most diagnosed subtype, with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) being one of the therapeutic drug types used in the clinic. However, endocrine resistance may develop after prolonged treatment, and different approaches, such as combining endocrine and targeted therapies, have been applied. Recently, we demonstrated that cannabidiol (CBD) induces anti-tumor actions in ER+ breast cancer cells by targeting aromatase and ERs. Considering this, we studied, in vitro, whether CBD when combined with AIs could improve their effectiveness. Methods: MCF-7aro cells were used and the effects on cell viability and on the modulation of specific targets were investigated. Results: CBD when combined with anastrozole (Ana) and letrozole (Let) caused no beneficial effect in comparison to the isolated AIs. In contrast, when combined with the AI exemestane (Exe), CBD potentiated its pro-cell death effects, abolished its estrogen-like effect, impaired ERα activation, and prevented its oncogenic role on the androgen receptor (AR). Moreover, this combination inhibited ERK1/2 activation, promoting apoptosis. The study of the hormonal microenvironment suggests that this combination should not be applied in early stages of ER+ breast tumors. Conclusions: Contrary to Ana and Let, this study highlights the potential benefits of combining CBD with Exe to improve breast cancer treatment and opens up the possibility of new therapeutic approaches comprising the use of cannabinoids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Around 70–85% of all breast cancer (BC) cases are estrogen receptor-positive (ER+). The third generation of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is the first-line treatment option for these tumors. Despite their therapeutic success, they induce several side effects and resistance, which limits their efficacy. Thus, it is crucial to search for novel, safe and more effective anti-cancer molecules. Currently, multi-target drugs are emerging, as they present higher efficacy and lower toxicity in comparison to standard options. Considering this, this work aimed to investigate the anti-cancer properties and the multi-target potential of the compound 1α,2α-epoxy-6-methylenandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (Oxy), also designated by Oxymestane-D1, a derivative of Exemestane, which we previously synthesized and demonstrated to be a potent AI. For this purpose, it was studied for its effects on the ER+ BC cell line that overexpresses aromatase, MCF-7aro cells, as well as on the AIs-resistant BC cell line, LTEDaro cells. Oxy reduces cell viability, impairs DNA synthesis and induces apoptosis in MCF-7aro cells. Moreover, its growth-inhibitory properties are inhibited in the presence of ERα, ERβ and AR antagonists, suggesting a mechanism of action dependent on these receptors. In fact, Oxy decreased ERα expression and activation and induced AR overexpression with a pro-death effect. Complementary transactivation assays demonstrated that Oxy presents ER antagonist and AR agonist activities. In addition, Oxy also decreased the viability and caused apoptosis of LTEDaro cells. Therefore, this work highlights the discovery of a new and promising multi-target drug that, besides acting as an AI, appears to also act as an ERα antagonist and AR agonist. Thus, the multi-target action of Oxy may be a therapeutic advantage over the three AIs applied in clinic. Furthermore, this new multi-target compound has the ability to sensitize the AI-resistant BC cells, which represents another advantage over the endocrine therapy used in the clinic, since resistance is a major drawback in the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a constituent of Cannabis sativa without psychotropic activity, whose medical benefits have been recognised. However, little is known about the potential toxic effects of CBD on reproductive health. Placental development involves tightly controlled processes of cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, autophagy and migration/invasion of trophoblast cells. Cannabis use by pregnant women has been increasing, mainly for the relief of nausea associated with the first trimester, which raises great concern. Regarding the crucial role of cytotrophoblast cells (CTs) and extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs) in placentation, the effects of CBD (1–10 µM) were studied, using in vitro model systems BeWo and HTR-8/SVneo cell lines, respectively. CBD causes cell viability loss in a dose-dependent manner, disrupts cell cycle progression and induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway, on both cell models. Moreover, CBD induces autophagy only in HTR-8/SVneo cells, being this process a promoter of apoptosis. Hypoxia-responsive genes HIF1A and SPP1 were also increased in CBD-treated HTR-8/SVneo cells suggesting a role for HIF-1α in the apoptotic and autophagic processes. In addition, CBD was able to decrease HTR-8/SVneo cell migration. Therefore, CBD interferes with trophoblast turnover and placental remodelling, which can have a considerable impact on pregnancy outcome. Thus, from an in vitro perspective our study adds new evidence for the potential negative impact of cannabis use by pregnant women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are one of the principal therapeutic approaches for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer in postmenopausal women. They block estrogen biosynthesis through aromatase inhibition, thus preventing tumour progression. Besides the therapeutic success of the third-generation AIs, acquired resistance may develop, leading to tumour relapse. This resistance is thought to be the result of a change in the behaviour of ER in these breast cancer cells, presumably by PI3K/AKT pathway enhancement along with alterations in other signalling pathways. Nevertheless, biological mechanisms, such as apoptosis, autophagy, cell cycle modulation and activation of androgen receptor (AR), are also implicated in acquired resistance. Moreover, clinical evidence demonstrated that there is a lack of cross-resistance among AIs, although the reason is not fully understood. Thus, there is a demand to understand the mechanisms involved in endocrine resistance to each AI, since the search for new strategies to surpass breast cancer acquired resistance is of major concern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]