Search

Background and Objective: Nivolumab and Ipilimumab are immune checkpoint inhibitors. The combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab has been reported to have complementary effects in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The combination therapy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (N+I) has shown synergistic effects in cancer immunotherapy but this is still controversial due to the higher incidence of toxicity. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of Nivolumab combined with Ipilimumab and compared the different dosing schedules of the N+I combination. Methods: By searching in PubMed, PMC, Cochrane library and major conference abstracts, eligible sixteen studies including N+I therapy and Nivolumab monotherapy were selected to analyze overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and high-grade (3-4) adverse effects (AEs). Results: Compared with monotherapy of Nivolumab, N+I significantly improved ORR (RR=1.40 [95% CI 1.27, 1.54], P<0.00001) and PFS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.83 [95% CI 0.77, 0.90], P<0.00001), but not OS (HR=0.93 [95% CI 0.84, 1.03], P=0.16). In a sub-analysis, the combination of Nivolumab 1mg/kg plus Ipilimumab 3mg/kg (N1I3) and Nivolumab 3mg/kg plus Ipilimumab 1mg/kg (N3I1) achieved better ORR and PFS than Nivolumab 3mg/kg (N3) alone. Remarkably, OS was also prolonged with the N1I3 combination compared with the N3I1 combination or N3. Furthermore, a higher incidence of high-grade AEs also occurred with the combination therapy of N1I3. Conclusions: N+I combination therapy showed greater ORR and PFS compared with Nivolumab monotherapy. N1I3 combination provided the benefit of ORR, PFS and OS but was associated with a higher incidence of toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgery is considered to be the favored approach for the treatment of most solid tumor malignancies. The quality of life among cancer patients has significantly improved due to advancements in instrumentation and surgical techniques; however, the recurrence of tumors and metastasis after operation remains challenging and results in a decreased quality of life and an increase in the mortality rate. Therefore, there is a need to explore applicable approaches to eradicate the circulating tumor cells and any residual tumor at the surgical site to inhibit the recurrence of the tumor and reduce the threat of distant metastasis. Recently drug delivery systems have been used to deliver immunotherapy or chemotherapy agents, which could augment the efficacy of surgical resection. In this review, we have summarized the efficacy and the recent progress of controlled drug delivery systems based approaches for post-surgical cancer treatment. Clinical translation challenges and opportunities have also been discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]