Search

Northern and high-latitude alpine treelines are generally thought to be limited by available warmth. Most studies of tree-growth–climate interaction at treeline as well as climate reconstructions using dendrochronology report positive growth response of treeline trees to warmer temperatures. However, population-wide responses of treeline trees to climate remain largely unexamined. We systematically sampled 1558 white spruce at 13 treeline sites in the Brooks Range and Alaska Range. Our findings of both positive and negative growth responses to climate warming at treeline challenge the widespread assumption that arctic treeline trees grow better with warming climate. High mean temperatures in July decreased the growth of 40% of white spruce at treeline areas in Alaska, whereas warm springs enhance growth of additional 36% of trees and 24% show no significant correlation with climate. Even though these opposing growth responses are present in all sampled sites, their relative proportion varies between sites and there is no overall clear relationship between growth response and landscape position within a site. Growth increases and decreases appear in our sample above specific temperature index values (temperature thresholds), which occurred more frequently in the late 20th century. Contrary to previous findings, temperature explained more variability in radial growth after 1950. Without accounting for these opposite responses and temperature thresholds, climate reconstructions based on ring width will miscalibrate past climate, and biogeochemical and dynamic vegetation models will overestimate carbon uptake and treeline advance under future warming scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents multi-proxy tree-ring data from twenty productive stands of white spruce in the interior of Alaska. Evidence that radial tree growth has decreased with increasing temperature; Effect of temperature-induced drought; Suggestion that drought stress may have been an important factor limiting carbon intake in North American forests; Implications for the future capacity of northern latitudes to sequester carbon.

Investigates competition and microenvironmental modification in an Alaskan postfire boreal forest. Establishment of seedlings by white spruce and paper birch in patches dominated by horsetail and bluestem; Reduction of survivorship, growth and nitrogen accumulation in the presence of aboveground vegetation.

Needle hardiness of introduced yellow pine, Pinus banksiana Lamb., lodgepole pine, P. contorta Dougl. and native white spruce, Picea glauca (Moench) Voss, were assessed by the effective prefreezing temperature method. Yellow pine needles were less hardy than lodgepole pine or white spruce needles in Alaska on each date measured. Although hardiness decreased in springtime in all species, decreases in hardiness in yellow pine began before temperatures were above -20°C, apparently in response to day length, while decreases in hardiness in lodgepole pine and white spruce began only when mean temperatures were above 0°C. Hardiness was increased by decreasing the water content of yellow pine and spruce needles. However, only the latter increased its field hardiness by decreased water contents, and only to a small degree. Large decreases in phospholipid occurred during the dehardening period, indicating the presence of major membrane-associated changes. However, changes in hardiness did not closely parallel those in phospholipid; hardiness decreased before phospholipid did in spruce and after phospholipid did in lodgepole pine. In yellow pine, changes in hardiness were more closely related to changes in phospholipid content. Decreases in phospholipid appeared to be correlated with the day length in all species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Spatial Alaskan Forest Ecosystem Dynamics (SAFED) model was validated across four of the most common vegetation types found in interior Alaska. The vegetation types were an alder (Alnus spp.) - balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera L.) site (FP2), an old-growth balsam poplar and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) site (FP3), a mixed deciduous (primarily birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) and aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.)) and white spruce site (UP2), and a mature white spruce site (UP3). The FP site types are common on the floodplain along the Tanana River and the UP site types are common in the uplands in interior Alaska. SAFED is based on nitrogen productivity for vegetation growth, litter fall quantity and quality, and microbial efficiency for forest floor decomposition. The state factors (climate, topography, and disturbance) are used to describe a broad-scale classification of the landscape to define basic limitations for the driving variables. Climate and ecosystem-level disturbances are handled as restricted stochastic processes. The model has been programed in a spatial framework as an ARC/INFO AML within the GRID package. The current version of the model has been validated as functional from an individual tree basis (1-m2 cell size) in a number of forest types found in interior Alaska. The growth, litter fall, and forest floordecomposition were compared with data from the sites. An estimate ofyearly carbon balance for the four sites was calculated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]