Search

Background: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are often caused by gram-positive bacteria that colonize the skin. Given the overuse of antibiotics, SSTIs are increasingly caused by resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Guidance on the utility of MRSA nasal screening for MRSA SSTI is limited., Objective: To determine whether MRSA nasal screening predicts the risk of MRSA SSTIs., Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with an SSTI diagnosis that had MRSA nasal screening and wound cultures obtained within 48 hours of starting antibiotics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated using VassarStats. Pretest and posttest probabilities were estimated with Microsoft Excel., Results: A total of 884 patient encounters were reviewed between December 1, 2018, and October 31, 2021, and 300 patient encounters were included. The prevalence of MRSA SSTI was 18.3%. The MRSA nasal colonization had a sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 93.9%, positive predictive value of 70.0% (95% CI = 55.2%-81.7%), negative predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI = 87.7%-94.9%), positive likelihood ratio of 10.39 (95% CI = 6.12-17.65), negative likelihood ratio of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.27-0.55), positive posttest probability of 70.0%, and negative posttest probability of 8.0%., Conclusions: Given the high positive likelihood ratio, a positive MRSA nasal screen was associated with a large increase in the probability of MRSA SSTI at our institution, and a negative MRSA nasal screen was associated with a small but potentially significant decrease in the probability of MRSA SSTI.

What Is Known and Objective: Current vancomycin monitoring guidelines recommend the use of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC 24 ) monitoring in patients with serious Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections by utilizing either a Bayesian approach or first-order analytic equations. Several open-access websites exist that allow estimation of vancomycin AUC 24 with the use of a single steady-state concentration. It is uncertain how these open-access calculators perform against guideline-recommended methods. The objective was to compare AUC 24 estimates from two online, open-access, single-concentration vancomycin calculators compared with the two-point pharmacokinetic (2PK) method., Methods: AUC 24 estimates were made using the 2PK reference method and the single-concentration vancomycin calculators, ClinCalc and VancoPK. The AUC 24 estimates from the 2PK reference method were compared to the online calculators by assessing bias (median AUC 24 difference) and precision (AUC 24 difference ± 100 mg*h/L). Clinical precision was also assessed by characterizing the frequency that the 2PK reference method and the online calculators showed clinical disagreement based on the following AUC 24 categories: (1) AUC 24  < 400 mg*h/L; (2) AUC 24 400-600 mg*h/L and (3) AUC 24  > 600 mg*h/L., Results and Discussion: A total of 253 patients were included in the study. The AUC 24 estimates from the ClinCalc and VancoPK single-concentration vancomycin calculators showed some bias and imprecision, though VancoPK appeared to have less. Clinical disagreement versus the 2PK reference method occurred in 31.2% and 19.4% of AUC 24 estimates from the ClinCalc and VancoPK single-concentration vancomycin calculators, suggesting clinical imprecision., What Is New and Conclusion: The AUC 24 estimates from single-concentration, online vancomycin calculators showed some bias and imprecision in comparison to the 2PK method. Institutions should validate these online, trough-only calculators relative to a 2PK method in their patient populations prior to adoption as standard-of-care., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: It is anticipated that the updated vancomycin monitoring guidelines will reconsider area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC:MIC)-based monitoring instead of trough-based monitoring for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. The AUC:MIC can be estimated using 2 steady-state serum concentrations and first-order pharmacokinetic equations or Bayesian modeling. The cost of AUC:MIC-based monitoring compared with trough-based monitoring is unknown and has been cited as a potential barrier to implementing this monitoring method. The objective of this study was to compare the total vancomycin drug and monitoring cost for patients with MRSA bacteremia who received AUC:MIC- or trough-based monitoring., Design: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study., Setting and Participants: This study included patients who were treated for MRSA bacteremia between May 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018, with an 8-month washout period between trough and AUC:MIC-based monitoring at our institution., Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the aggregate cost of vancomycin therapy, which included the cost associated with sample collection (i.e., supply cost and nursing time), sample analysis (i.e., assay cost and laboratory technician time), result interpretation (i.e., pharmacist time), and drug cost (i.e., cost of total administered vancomycin dose) during the hospital stay., Results: A total of 52 patients met inclusion criteria with 26 patients in each group. The median (interquartile range) total vancomycin drug and monitoring cost was $338.14 ($235.07-$601.05) for the AUC:MIC-based group compared with $316.79 ($253.36-$520.96) for the trough-based group (P = 0.687)., Conclusion: Vancomycin monitoring using 2 steady-state serum concentrations and first-order pharmacokinetic equations to calculate AUC:MIC was no more costly than a trough-based approach in patients with MRSA bacteremia at our institution., (Copyright © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Limited evidence exists evaluating pharmacokinetic thresholds for vancomycin efficacy and nephrotoxicity using non-Bayesian methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the 24-h steady-state vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC 24 ) thresholds for efficacy and nephrotoxicity in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (MRSA-B) after implementing two-point pharmacokinetic therapeutic drug monitoring. A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was performed including adult patients admitted between 1 June 2016 and 1 January 2018 with MRSA-B treated with vancomycin for ≥72 h. The AUC 24 was calculated using peak and trough vancomycin serum concentrations. Clinical success was defined as defervescence and blood culture sterilisation by Day 7. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of >0.5 mg/dL (or ≥50%) from baseline. Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to identify AUC 24 thresholds for efficacy and nephrotoxicity. Forty-six patients were included in the study. Clinical success and nephrotoxicity were observed in 81.8% and 13.0%, respectively. The CART-derived vancomycin AUC 24 thresholds for clinical success and nephrotoxicity were ≥297 mg·h/L and ≥710 mg·h/L, respectively. Patients with an AUC 24 ≥297 mg·h/L had a >2.7-fold increase in clinical success compared with those who did not (89.5% vs. 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.01), and patients with an AUC 24 ≥710 mg·h/L had a >7-fold increase in nephrotoxicity compared with those with an AUC 24 <710 mg·h/L (66.7% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P = 0.04). This study supports current recommendations to target vancomycin AUC 24 values of 400-600 mg·h/L when calculated using two-point pharmacokinetics, although a wider range may exist., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)

What Is Known and Objective: Limited evidence describes dalbavancin use in infective endocarditis (IE)., Case Description: A 27-year-old pregnant female received 4 weeks of dalbavancin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia and tricuspid valve IE after conventional therapy was no longer an option due to non-compliance. Despite having a smaller cardiac vegetation following dalbavancin, she was bacteraemic <2 weeks later with vancomycin-intermediate (VISA) and telavancin-non-susceptible S. aureus., What Is New and Conclusion: This is the first report of unsuccessful IE treatment with dalbavancin. Blood cultures grew VISA and lipoglycopeptide-non-susceptible S. aureus <2 weeks following dalbavancin. Both outcomes raise concerns about using dalbavancin for IE., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To determine whether there is an association between higher vancomycin trough concentrations and attainment of a calculated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥400., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among vancomycin-treated adult patients with a positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) culture. Attainment of a calculated AUC/MIC ≥400 was compared between patients with troughs in the reference range of 15 to 20 mg/L and those with troughs in the following ranges: <10, 10 to 14.9, and >20 mg/L. Nephrotoxicity was assessed as a secondary outcome based on corrected average vancomycin troughs over 10 days of treatment., Results: Overall, 226 patients were reviewed and 100 included. Relative to troughs ≥10, patients with vancomycin troughs <10 mg/L were 73% less likely to attain an AUC/MIC ≥400 (odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.75). No difference was found in the attainment of an AUC/MIC ≥400 in patients with troughs of 10 to 14.9 mg/L and >20 mg/L when compared to patients with troughs of 15 to 20 mg/L. The mean corrected average vancomycin trough was higher in patients developing nephrotoxicity compared to those who did not (19.5 vs 14.5 mg/L, P < .001)., Conclusion: Achieving vancomycin serum trough concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L did not result in an increased attainment of the AUC/MIC target relative to troughs of 10 to 14.9 mg/L but may increase nephrotoxicity risk.

Purpose of Review: Managing antimicrobial therapy in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) constitutes a growing challenge due to the wide spectrum of potential pathogens and resistance phenotypes. Today, microbiological documentation relies on cultural methods. This review summarizes the available evidence regarding the clinical input of rapid microbiological diagnostic tools (RMDT) and their impact on the management of antimicrobial therapy in SSTI., Recent Findings: Accurate tools are already available for the early detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in SSTI samples and may help avoiding or shortening empirical anti-MRSA coverage. Further research is necessary to develop and evaluate RMDT detecting group A streptococci (e.g., antigenic test) and Gram-negative pathogens (e.g., multiplex PCR assays), including through point-of-care utilization. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods could provide pivotal information for the stewardship of antimicrobial therapy, especially in case of polymicrobial or fungal SSTI and in the immunocompromised host; however, a shortening in the turnaround time and prospective data regarding their therapeutic input are needed to better appraise the clinical positioning of these promising approaches., Summary: The clinical input of RMDT in SSTI is currently limited due to the scarcity of available dedicated assays and the polymicrobial feature of certain cases. NGS appears as a relevant tool but requires further developments before its implementation in routine clinical practice., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: The preferred antibiotic salvage regimen for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB) is unclear. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vancomycin plus ceftaroline for persistent MRSAB. The primary outcome was time to MRSAB clearance post-ceftaroline initiation. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, 90-day readmission for MRSAB, 90-day all-cause mortality, MRSAB-related mortality, and incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse effects., Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021., Setting: State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, a 748-bed tertiary care, academic medical center in Syracuse, NY., Patients: Adult patients were included if they had blood cultures positive for MRSA ≥72 h, received vancomycin monotherapy initially, and received vancomycin plus ceftaroline for ≥24 h. Patients were excluded if they received other anti-MRSA antibiotics, were pregnant, or were incarcerated. Of the 178 patients identified, 30 unique patients were evaluated., Measurements and Main Results: Patients were medically complex with a median Pitt bacteremia score of 3, 63.3% (19/30) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 66.7% (20/30) had infective endocarditis. Vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury was observed in 10% (3/30) of patients, which resulted in dose adjustments. No patients experienced ceftaroline-associated neutropenia or Clostridioides difficile infection, but 6.7% (2/30) developed a rash attributed to ceftaroline. Median time to MRSAB clearance post-ceftaroline initiation was 2.6 days. Microbiologic cure occurred in nearly all patients 96.7% (29/30). Median hospital length of stay was 19.5 days, and 6.7% (2/30) of patients had 90-day readmission for MRSAB. 90-day all-cause mortality and MRSAB-related mortality occurred in 26.7% (8/30) and 13.3% (4/30) of patients, respectively., Conclusions: Vancomycin plus ceftaroline may represent an effective and well-tolerated salvage regimen option for persistent MRSAB., (© 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

These updated guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice review the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in solid organ transplantation. Despite an increasing armamentarium of antimicrobials active against MRSA, improved diagnostic tools, and overall declining rates of infection, MRSA infections remain a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Pre- and post-transplant MRSA colonization is a significant risk factor for post-transplant MRSA infection. The preferred initial treatment of MRSA bacteremia remains vancomycin. Hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing in the ICU, central-line bundles that focus on reducing unnecessary catheter use, disinfection of patient equipment, and the environment along with antimicrobial stewardship are all aspects of an infection prevention approach to prevent MRSA transmission and decrease healthcare-associated infections., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: We evaluated the impact of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol on the vancomycin length of therapy (LOT) for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Design: Retrospective quasi-experimental pre- and post- MRSA nasal PCR protocol implementation study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center in Jacksonville, Florida. Patients: Eligible patients received empiric vancomycin for SSTIs from January 1st to September 30th 2020 (pre-implementation group) and from January 1st to September 30th 2022 (post-implementation group). Intervention: The electronic health system software was modified to provide a best-practice advisory (BPA) prompt to the pharmacist upon order verification of vancomycin for patients with SSTIs. Methods: We reviewed patient records to determine the time from vancomycin prescription to de-escalation. The secondary outcomes were incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), number of vancomycin levels collected, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: The study included 131 patients (pre-implementation, n = 86 and post-implementation, n = 45). There was no significant difference in vancomycin length of therapy (LOT) between implementation groups: mean LOT in days and standard deviation (SD) were 2.7 (1.9) and 2.6 (1.3), respectively, p-value 0.493. Of significance, in the post-implementation group, vancomycin LOT between patients with a negative and positive MRSA PCR were 2.3 (1.1) and 3.9 (1.6), p-value 0.006. There was no difference in secondary outcomes. Conclusion: The utilization of the MRSA nasal PCR to guide vancomycin de-escalation did not significantly change the vancomycin LOT, however in the post-implementation group there was a significant difference in vancomycin LOT between negative and positive MRSA PCRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & objective: The Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines recommend vancomycin trough levels of 15–20 mg/L for severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. However, recent consensus guidelines of four infectious disease organizations no longer recommend vancomycin dosing using minimum serum trough concentrations. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of low (< 15 mg/L) vs. high (≥ 15 mg/L) vancomycin trough levels on clinical outcomes in adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections. Method: A systematic literature review from inception to December 2022 was conducted using four online databases, followed by a meta-analysis. The outcomes of interest included clinical response/efficacy, microbial clearance, length of ICU stay, treatment failure, nephrotoxicity, and mortality. Results: Fourteen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria from which vancomycin trough concentration data were available for 5,228 participants. Our analysis found no association between vancomycin trough levels and clinical response [OR = 1.06 (95%CI 0.41–2.72], p = 0.91], microbial clearance [OR = 0.47 (95% CI 0.23–0.96), p = 0.04], ICU length of stay [MD=-1.01 (95%CI -5.73–3.71), p = 0.68], or nephrotoxicity [OR = 0.57 (95% CI 0.31–1.06), p = 0.07]. However, low trough levels were associated with a non-significant trend towards a lower risk of treatment failure [OR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.73–1.10), p = 0.28] and were significantly associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality [OR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.62–0.90), p = 0.002]. Conclusion: Except for a lower risk of treatment failure and all-cause mortality at low vancomycin trough levels, this meta-analysis found no significant association between vancomycin trough levels and clinical outcomes in adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a serious threat to public health. Vancomycin (VAN) remains the primary treatment for these infections, and achieving the recommended area under the curve (AUC) target has been linked to improved clinical outcomes. The current VAN therapeutic monitoring guidelines recommend a loading dose (LD) of 20–35 mg/kg to rapidly attain targeted VAN exposures within 24 h of therapy. However, there is a paucity of data describing the impact of VAN LD on day 1 area under the curve (AUC0–24). This study aims to employ pharmacokinetic (PK) equations to calculate and describe the AUC0–24 following a VAN LD of 20 mg/kg. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who were loaded with VAN 20 mg/kg, received ≥ 48 h of treatment, and had two consecutive serum VAN levels collected within 24 h. Linear, non-trapezoidal PK equations and two post-infusion VAN levels were used to calculate AUC0–24. Therapeutic AUC0–24 was defined as 400–600 mg/l*h. Results: Among 123 included patients, the median age was 46 years (IQR 36, 62), 54% (67/123) of the patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 27% (33/123) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Following a LD of 20 mg/kg, 50% (61/123) of the patients met the therapeutic AUC0–24, while 22% (27/123) of the patients were subtherapeutic, and 28% (35/123) were supratherapeutic. Compared with patients who achieved therapeutic AUC0–24, patients with subtherapeutic AUC0–24 were more likely to be younger (44 vs. 37 years old) and have a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (67 vs. 52%). In contrast, patients with supratherapeutic AUC0–24 were more likely to be older (64 vs. 44 years old) and to have chronic kidney disease diagnosis (23 vs. 7%) when compared to patients who achieved a therapeutic AUC0–24. Conclusions: Only 50% of patients achieve the target AUC0-24 following a VAN 20 mg/kg LD, with younger, heavier patients underexposed and older patients with renal impairment overexposed, suggesting that different dosing strategies are needed for these populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the clinical outcomes of linezolid and vancomycin regimens combined with one-stage surgery in treating traumatic osteomyelitis of the limbs caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. A retrospective study was performed to analyze patients with traumatic osteomyelitis of the limbs attributable to MRSA infection. All of these patients received one-stage surgery to debride their wounds, with subsequent implantation of a vancomycin-loaded calcium sulfate artificial bone. Patients received either intravenous linezolid (study group) or vancomycin (control group) during the perioperative period. The postoperative inflammatory markers, renal function, duration of drainage catheter placement, duration of antibiotic administration, length of hospital stay, adverse events, and recurrence of osteomyelitis in these two groups were compared. The study group had a shorter duration of antibiotic administration and length of hospital stay (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the incidences of adverse events between the two groups (5.88% and 17.65% in the study and control groups, respectively, p < 0.05). There was no recurrence in either group during the three-year follow-up period. As of year, five after the surgery, one patient in the control group had a recurrence of osteomyelitis. The linezolid regimen should be preferred to the vancomycin regimen in patients with traumatic osteomyelitis of the extremities caused by MRSA infection because the linezolid regimen showed fewer adverse events, shorter periods of antibiotic use, and shorter hospital stay. However, both treatment regimens achieved satisfactory outcomes and warranted further investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current recommendation for therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin has recently suggested AUC-guided dosing in patients with serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. The study objective was to evaluate mathematical equations and trapezoidal methods for calculating the 24h area under the plasma vancomycin concentration-time curve (AUC24). The analysis of plasma vancomycin concentrations was performed in 20 adult patients treated with intravenous vancomycin. For each patient, AUC24 was estimated using two methods including, equation and trapezoidal calculation. The AUC24 from two methods was analyzed for correlation. The correlation between the equation and trapezoidal methods was strong. The coefficient of determination (R²) values was greater than .99. The two plasma vancomycin concentrations to achieve the highest correlation were concentration at 2.5 to 3 h after starting the infusion and concentration at 1 h before the next dose. Moreover, the AUC24 calculation from trapezoidal and equation methods showed that 19 out of 20 patients (95%) had AUC24 of more than 400mg-h/L, and more than 50% in this group had AUC24/MIC greater than 600. Of those patients with AUC-trapezoidal >600, 15.38% of patients had trough under 15mg/L, 15.38% of patients had trough in the range 15 to 20mg/L and 69.23% of patients had trough more than 20mg/L. The results of AUC-equation were similar to those of the AUC-trapezoidal method. Our study confirmed that the AUC monitoring is more appropriate than the trough vancomycin concentration. Given these considerations, the AUC-equation method is better and more practical to use in part of a point-of-care treatment, especially in the part of the Bayesian program is not available. The best sampling time point of the peak concentration was 0.5-1 h after 2-h infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The latest vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines for serious MRSA infections have made a pivotal change in dosing, switching from targeting trough levels to AUC dosing. Because of these new recommendations, antimicrobial stewardship programs across the country are tasked with implementing AUC based dosing. Objectives: To assess plans for institutional adoption of vancomycin AUC dosing programs and perceptions of currently used programs in hospitals across the US. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy IDprn Listserv and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists between May and June 2020 to assess current institutional vancomycin dosing. Institutional program use and multiple software user parameters were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Two hundred two pharmacists responded to the survey with the majority practicing in institutions with 251-500 beds. Most respondents have yet to implement AUC dosing (142/202, 70.3%) with many of them planning to do so in the next year (81/142, 57.0%). Of those that already implemented AUC dosing programs, purchased Bayesian software (23/60, 38.3%) and homemade software (21/60, 35.0%) were the 2 methods most frequently utilized. Purchased Bayesian software users were more likely to recommend their software to other institutions and ranked user friendliness higher compared to non-purchased software. Conclusion: Most respondents have not made the switch to vancomycin AUC dosing, but there is a growing interest with many institutions looking to adopt a program within the next year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A patient with end-stage renal disease received 2 doses of dalbavancin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) arteriovenous fistula infection and presented 5 weeks later with infective endocarditis secondary to vancomycin, daptomycin, and dalbavancin nonsusceptible MRSA. Resistance was associated with walK and scrA mutations, reduced long-chain lipid content, and reduced membrane fluidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vancomycin was introduced nearly 65 years ago and remains the standard antibiotic for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Staphylococcus aureus remains highly susceptibility to vancomycin (>97%). Despite this, MRSA treatment failure with vancomycin is high in complicated bacteremia. Additionally, vancomycin can cause nephrotoxicity, leading to new therapeutic drug monitoring guidance. This demonstrates how difficult it is to dose vancomycin in a way that is both efficacious and safe, especially during long courses of therapy. Often underappreciated are the cost, resources, and complexity of vancomycin care at a time when alternative antibiotics are becoming cost comparable. This perspective highlights a bigger picture of how the treatment repertoires of many other diseases have changed and advanced since vancomycin's introduction in the 1950s, yet the vancomycin MRSA treatment standard remains. While vancomycin can still have a role, 65 years may be a practical retirement age for vancomycin in highly complex endovascular infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare between current evidence of novel glycopeptides against vancomycin for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections. Methodology: A systematic review and meta-analysis was done. Major databases were searched for eligible randomized control trials that assessed clinical success, microbiological success and safety profile of novel glycopeptides versus vancomycin for infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Results: This meta-analysis included eleven trials (7289 participants) comparing telavancin, dalbavancin and oritavancin with vancomycin. No differences were detected between novel glycopeptides and vancomycin for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) among modified intent-to-treat patients (OR: 1.04, CI: 0.92–1.17) as well as within the clinically evaluable patients (OR: 1.09, CI: 0.91–1.30). Data analysed from SSTIs, HAP and bacteremia studies on telavancin showed insignificant high clinical response in microbiologically evaluable patients infected with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (OR: 1.57, CI: 0.94–2.62, p: 0.08) and in the eradication of MRSA (OR: 1.39, CI: 0.99–1.96, P:0.06). Dalbavancin was non-inferior to vancomycin for the treatment of osteomyelitis in a phase II trial, while it was superior to vancomycin for the treatment of bacteremia in a phase II trial. Data analysed from all trials showed similar rates of all-cause mortality between compared antibiotics groups (OR: 0.67, CI: 0.11–4.03). Telavancin was significantly related with higher adverse events (OR: 1.24, CI: 1.07–1.44, P: <0.01) while dalbavancin and oritavancin were associated with significant fewer adverse events (OR: 0.73, CI: 0.57–0.94, p: 0.01; OR: 0.72, CI: 0.59–0.89, p: <0.01 respectively). Conclusion: Efficacy and safety profiles of both dalbavancin and oritavancin were the same as vancomycin in the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections in different clinical settings, while telavancin might be an effective alternative to vancomycin in MRSA infections, but caution is required during its clinical use due to the high risk of adverse events, especially nephrotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets of vancomycin therapy have been recognized for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections but not for other gram-positive bacterial infections. Therefore, we investigated whether vancomycin concentration targets such as the trough level and ratio of the area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) are associated with the treatment outcome in enterococcal bacteremia.Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis enrolled patients with bacteremia caused by vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis who were treated with vancomycin from January 2007 to December 2017 at a tertiary hospital located in Seoul, South Korea. Patients without vancomycin concentrations were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality.Results: A total of 37 patients were enrolled-26 with E. faecium infection and 11 with E. faecalis infection. The 28-day all-cause mortality rate was 21.6 %. In univariate analysis, vancomycin trough level (≤ 15 µg/mL; p = 0.042), age (p = 0.044), and septic shock (p = 0.049) were associated with 28-day mortality but not AUC24/MIC (> 389; p = 0.479). In multivariate analysis, vancomycin trough concentration (≤ 15 µg/mL; p = 0.041) and younger age (p = 0.031) were associated with 28-day mortality in patients with enterococcal bacteremia.Conclusions: In this study, a vancomycin trough level of 15 µg/mL or lower was associated with 28-day mortality in enterococcal bacteremia. However, relatively large prospective studies are needed to examine the efficacy of vancomycin PK/PD parameters in patients with enterococcal bacteremia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy / Journal Canadien de la Pharmacie Hospitalière is the property of Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Optimal vancomycin exposure is important to minimize treatment failure of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. We aimed to analyze the impact of initial vancomycin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters, including the initial vancomycin C trough and the area under the curve (AUC)/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) on the outcomes of pediatric MRSA bacteremia. The study population consisted of hospitalized children aged between 2 months and 18 years with MRSA bacteremia, in whom C trough was measured at least one time within the time period of January 2010 to March 2018. Demographic profiles, underlying diseases, and clinical/microbiological outcomes were abstracted retrospectively. During the study period, 73 cases of MRSA bacteremia occurred in children with a median age of 12.4 months. Severe clinical outcomes leading to intensive care unit stay and/or use of mechanical ventilation occurred in 47.5% (35/73); all-cause 30-day mortality was 9.7% (7/72). The median dosage of vancomycin was 40.0 mg/kg/day. There was a weak linear relationship between C trough and the corresponding AUC/MIC (r = 0.235). ROC curves for achieving an AUC/MIC of 300 suggested that the initial C trough at 10 μg/mL could be used as a cut-off value with a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 44%. Although persistent bacteremia at 48–72 hours after vancomycin administration was observed more frequently when the initial C trough was < 10 μg/mL and initial AUC/MIC was < 300, initial AUC/MIC < 300 was the only risk factor associated with persistent bacteremia at 48–72 hours (adjusted OR 3.05; 95% CI, 1.07–8.68). Initial C trough and AUC/MIC were not associated with 30-day mortality. Although there was a weak relationship between C trough and AUC/MIC, initial AUC/MIC < 300 could be used as a predictor of persistent MRSA bacteremia at 48–72 hours. Further prospective data on optimal vancomycin dosing are necessary to improve clinical and microbiological outcomes in pediatric MRSA bacteremia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the relationship between vancomycin (VCM) monitoring strategies and VCM effectiveness and safety.Methods: We conducted our analysis using the MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases searched on August 9, 2020. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: Adult patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia with VCM trough concentrations ≥15 μg/mL had significantly lower treatment failure rates (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.85). The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) increased with increased trough concentrations and was significantly higher for trough concentrations ≥20 μg/mL compared to those at 15-20 μg/mL (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.78-3.20). Analysis of the target area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ratios (AUC/MIC) showed significantly lower treatment failure rates for high AUC/MIC (cut-off 400 ± 15%) (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18-0.45). The safety analysis revealed that high AUC value (cut-off 600 ± 15%) significantly increased the risk of AKI (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.13-3.89). Our meta-analysis of differences in monitoring strategies included four studies. The incidence of AKI tended to be lower in AUC-guided monitoring than in trough-guided monitoring (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.28-1.01); however, it was not significant in the analysis of mortality.Conclusions: We identified VCM trough concentrations and AUC values that correlated with effectiveness and safety. Furthermore, compared to trough-guided monitoring, AUC-guided monitoring showed potential for decreasing nephrotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is known and objective: The influence of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV‐ECMO) on the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of vancomycin in recipients after lung transplantation (LTx) is unknown. We investigated whether VV‐ECMO influences vancomycin PPK and determined optimal recommended dosage for patients after LTx. Methods: We tested vancomycin serum concentration and calculated PPK parameters using NONMEM. To check for any potential influence of ECMO on vancomycin PK, we compared ECMO patients with a non‐ECMO patient control group, and patients before and after ECMO weaning as self‐control to analysed changes in vancomycin PK. Monte Carlo dosing simulation was conducted to explore vancomycin dosing regimens. Results: Nineteen ECMO and 6 non‐ECMO lung transplant recipients were enrolled. Vancomycin serum concentrations did not significantly differ between patients with and without ECMO support. Comparison of separate vancomycin population pharmacokinetic models showed that ECMO patients had smaller peripheral compartment volume of distribution (V2) [Estimate (relative standard error, RSE, %) 19.7 (12) vs. 22 (17) L, P =.003] than non‐ECMO patients. For treatment of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with MIC ≤ 0.5 µg/mL, venous infusion of 400 mg vancomycin every 8 hours was recommended. For MRSA infection with MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL, the proposed dosage was 600 mg every 8 hours. What is new and conclusion: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation slightly alters vancomycin PK but does not significantly impact vancomycin serum concentration in patients after LTx. Dose adjustment is not necessary for VV‐ECMO support. Specific vancomycin dosing regimens with lower nephrotoxicity may benefit LTx recipients with VV‐ECMO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A vancomycin target of area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC:MIC) ratio ≥400 is recommended for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Objective: To evaluate vancomycin total daily dose (TDD) achieving trough targets versus a calculated strategy achieving AUC targets based on body mass index (BMI). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed within a large hospital network. Patients with MRSA bacteremia were eligible if they received vancomycin with a steady-state trough (15-20 mg/L). Cockcroft-Gault was used to estimate creatinine clearance, calculating vancomycin clearance and AUC. Patients were stratified by BMI (less than/greater than 30 kg/m2). The primary outcome was vancomycin TDD for the trough-based strategy compared with an AUC-dosing strategy. Results: A total of 119 patients were included, including 51 (42.9%) and 68 (57.1%) patients with high- and low-BMI, respectively. The TDD for trough-based dosing (2390.76 ± 1224.59 mg) differed significantly from AUC-based dosing (1985.07 ± 616.18 mg) across the cohort (P = 0.0014). For patients with high BMI, there was a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in TDD between trough (2637.25 ± 1327.89 mg) versus AUC (1918.71 ± 625.89 mg) strategies. No difference in TDD between dosing strategies was observed among low-BMI patients. Across all patients, 46 (38.7%) experienced acute kidney injury (AKI); high-BMI patients experienced higher rates of AKI compared with low-BMI patients (54.9 vs 26.5%; P = 0.002). Conclusions and Relevance: An AUC-based dosing strategy may reduce vancomycin TDD required for MRSA bacteremia compared with trough-based dosing, particularly for patients with higher BMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information related to medical industry. Topics include that Measles virus infection cause loss of immune memory that can be reconstituted by reexposure to pathogens; and a case study of a 55-year-old resident with a 2-week history of fever and confirmation of a severe acute hepatitis and liver failure caused by Leishmaniasis.

Background Vancomycin is the most commonly administered antibiotic in hospitalized patients, but optimal exposure targets remain controversial. To clarify the therapeutic exposure range, this study evaluated the association between vancomycin exposure and outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter (n = 14), observational study of 265 hospitalized adults with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin. The primary outcome was treatment failure (TF), defined as 30-day mortality or persistent bacteremia ≥7 days. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI). The study was powered to compare TF between patients who achieved or did not achieve day 2 area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) thresholds previously found to be associated with lower incidences of TF. The thresholds, analyzed separately as co-primary endpoints, were AUC/MIC by broth microdilution ≥650 and AUC/MIC by Etest ≥320. Results Treatment failure and AKI occurred in 18% and 26% of patients, respectively. Achievement of the prespecified day 2 AUC/MIC thresholds was not associated with less TF. Alternative day 2 AUC/MIC thresholds associated with lower TF risks were not identified. A relationship between the day 2 AUC and AKI was observed. Patients with day 2 AUC ≤515 experienced the best global outcomes (no TF and no AKI). Conclusions Higher vancomycin exposures did not confer a lower TF risk but were associated with more AKI. The findings suggest that vancomycin dosing should be guided by the AUC and day 2 AUCs should be ≤515. As few patients had day 2 AUCs <400, further study is needed to define the lower bound of the therapeutic range. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We observed poor uptake of vancomycin AUC monitoring with the use of first-order PK analytic equations, with only 25% of regimens meeting criteria having AUC monitoring performed. Our institutional vancomycin monitoring guidelines recommend AUC monitoring for patients with severe MRSA infections, excluding patients on hemodialysis, those with unstable/acutely changing renal function, or if lab draws must be limited. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of area under the curve (AUC)-based vancomycin monitoring on pharmacist-initiated dose adjustments after transitioning from a trough-only to an AUC-based monitoring method at our institution. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients treated with vancomycin for complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection between November 2013 and December 2016 was conducted. The frequency of pharmacist-initiated dose adjustments was assessed for patients monitored via trough-only and AUC-based approaches for trough ranges: 10 to 14.9 mg/L and 15 to 20 mg/L. Results: Fifty patients were included: 36 in the trough-based monitoring and 14 in the AUC-based-monitoring group. The vancomycin dose was increased in 71.4% of patients when troughs were 10 to 14.9 mg/L when a trough-only approach was used and in only 25% of patients when using AUC estimation (P =.048). In the AUC group, the dose was increased only when AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <400; unchanged regimens had an estimated AUC/MIC ≥400. The AUC-based monitoring did not significantly increase the frequency of dose reductions when trough concentrations were 15 to 20 mg/L (AUC: 33.3% vs trough: 4.6%; P =.107). Conclusions: The AUC-based monitoring resulted in fewer patients with dose adjustments when trough levels were 10 to 14.9 mg/L. The AUC-based monitoring has the potential to reduce unnecessary vancomycin exposure and warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]