Search

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represents heterogeneous and relapsing intestinal conditions with a severe impact on the quality of life of individuals and a continuously increasing prevalence. In recent years, the development of sequencing technology has provided new means of exploring the complex pathogenesis of IBD. An ideal solution is represented by the approach of precision medicine that investigates multiple cellular and molecular interactions, which are tools that perform a holistic, systematic, and impartial analysis of the genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and microbiomics sets. Hence, it has led to the orientation of current research towards the identification of new biomarkers that could be successfully used in the management of IBD patients. Multi-omics explores the dimension of variation in the characteristics of these diseases, offering the advantage of understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms that affect intestinal homeostasis for a much better prediction of disease development and choice of treatment. This review focuses on the progress made in the field of prognostic and predictive biomarkers, highlighting the limitations, challenges, and also the opportunities associated with the application of genomics and epigenomics technologies in clinical practice.

Background and Objectives : Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) without a unique, gold standard diagnostic test. UC and Crohn's colitis are impossible to distinguish in approximately 10% of cases. The term IBD type unclassified (IBD-U) is recommended for cases of chronic colitis showing overlapping endoscopic, radiological, and biopsy histological features between UC and CD, while indetermined colitis is reserved for colectomy specimens. Our aim was to assess the role of small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) in the diagnostic work-up of IBD-U. Materials and Methods : We retrospectively studied the cases of IBD-U explored by SBCE in a tertiary referral gastroenterology center. Patients were investigated using SBCE after contraindications were excluded. Diagnostic criteria for small bowel CD consisted in more than three ulcerations, irregular ulcers, or stenosis, and the Lewis score was used for the quantification of inflammation. The immediate impact of reclassification and outcome data was recorded over a follow-up period of more than one year. Results : Twenty-eight patients with IBD-U were examined using SBCE. Nine patients had small bowel lesions that met the diagnostic criteria for CD, resulting in a reclassification rate of 32.1%. In five of these cases, the treatment was subsequently changed. In the remaining nineteen examinations, no significant findings were observed. There were no complications associated with SBCE. Median follow-up time was 32.5 months (range 12-60). During follow-up, twelve patients were classified as having UC, and seven remained as having an unclassified type; one case of colectomy, for medically refractory UC, was recorded. Conclusions : SBCE is a useful safe tool in the work-up of IBD-U, allowing reclassification in about one third of cases, with subsequent treatment modifications. SBCE may provide a definite diagnosis, enhance the comprehension of the disease's progression, and optimize the short- and long-term management strategy.

Over the past 15 years, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased both in incidence and severity. Traditional risk factors for CDI are similar in IBD and non-IBD populations, but there is a significant proportion of IBD patients which have distinctive characteristics. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are more susceptible to CDI and have more severe outcomes than those with Crohn's disease (CD). CDI may be difficult to distinguish from an IBD flare due to similar clinical presentation, and therefore screening for CDI is recommended at every flare in such patients. Several studies showed worse clinical outcomes in IBD patients with CDI, including longer hospital stay, higher colectomy and mortality rates than in those without CDI. Vancomycin and metronidazole appear to have similar efficacy in patients with moderate disease, but vancomycin is preferred in severe disease. Measures must be taken to prevent the spread of infection. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for CDI when evaluating a patient with IBD flare, as rapid detection and prompt treatment of infection improve outcomes. This review summarizes the available literature on epidemiology, risk factors, clinical aspects, diagnostic methods, treatment, outcome, and prevention of CDI in IBD patients.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) represent a global phenomenon, with a continuously rising prevalence. The strategies concerning IBD management are progressing from clinical monitorization to a targeted approach, and current therapies strive to reduce microscopic mucosal inflammation and stimulate repair of the epithelial barrier function. Intestinal permeability has recently been receiving increased attention, as evidence suggests that it could be related to disease activity in IBD. However, most investigations do not successfully provide adequate information regarding the morphological integrity of the intestinal barrier. In this review, we discuss the advantages of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), which allows in vivo visualization of histological abnormalities and targeted optical biopsies in the setting of IBD. Additionally, CLE has been used to assess vascular permeability and epithelial barrier function that could correlate with prolonged clinical remission, increased resection-free survival, and lower hospitalization rates. Moreover, the dynamic evaluation of the functional characteristics of the intestinal barrier presents an advantage over the endoscopic examination as it has the potential to select patients at risk of relapses. Along with mucosal healing, histological or transmural remission, the recovery of the intestinal barrier function emerges as a possible target that could be included in the future therapeutic strategies for IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are frequently associated with extraintestinal manifestations, hepatic injury being of concern in these patients. Current literature reports an increased prevalence of liver steatosis and fibrosis in subjects with IBD and the pathophysiology is yet to be completely understood. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with IBD, as well as to determine the factors that connect these two disorders. Methods: From September 2021 to June 2022, 82 consecutive IBD patients were enrolled from a tertiary care center hospital in Iasi. Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography with Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) was used to assess the presence of NAFLD, with a cut-off score for CAP of 248 dB/m. Significant liver fibrosis was considered at a cut-off for liver stiffness measurements (LSM) of 7.2 kPa. Results: In total, 82 IBD patients (54.8% men, mean age of 49 ± 13 years) were included, 38 (46.3%) of them being diagnosed with NAFLD, with a mean CAP score of 286 ± 35.4 vs. 203 ± 29.7 in patients with IBD only. Age (β = 0.357, p = 0.021), body mass index (BMI) (β = 0.185, p = 0.048), disease duration (β = 0.297, p = 0.041), C—reactive protein (β = 0.321, p = 0.013), fasting plasma glucose (β = 0.269, p = 0.038), and triglycerides (β = 0.273, p = 0.023) were strongly associated with the presence of liver steatosis. The multivariate analysis showed that older age, BMI, and disease duration were strongly associated with significant liver fibrosis in our group. Conclusions: NAFLD is a multifaced pathology with growing prevalence among IBD patients. Additional studies are needed to completely understand this problem and to create a solid evidence-based framework for more effective preventative and intervention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Diverticular disease of the colon is a common clinical condition in developed countries, and is associated with significant (direct and indirect) economic burden. The aim of this Position Paper is to provide clinical guidance for appropriate definition, prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of colonic diverticular disease. Methods: A working group of recognized experts established by the Board of the Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (RSGH) screened the literature and the available guidelines on colonic diverticular disease. Statements were formulated based on literature evidence. These statements were discussed within the working group and decision for each of them was taken by consensus. Results: Thirty two statements were elaborated. The grade of recommendation, according to the level of evidence was established for each statement. Short comments with literature support accompany each statement. Conclusion: This Position Paper represents a practical guide for clinicians dealing with patients affected by colonic diverticular disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims. Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are caused by a dysregulated immune response in the hosts, favored by genetic susceptibility. In addition to symptoms related to the digestive tract, about 40% of patients with IBD also experience extraintestinal manifestations. Although, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been frequently associated with IBDs, the relationship between these two pathologies remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of NAFLD among IBD patients, as well as the factors that connect these two conditions. Material and methods. From January 2022 to November 2022, consecutive IBD patients were enrolled from a tertiary care center hospital in Iasi. Patients' demographic information, clinical characteristics including blood pressure, biological parameters, and anthropometric measurements were collected. Following informed consent, participants underwent a fibroscan evaluation for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Results. 93 patients with IBD were enrolled (65,3% men, 55,6% with ulcerative colitis). 45 (48,3%) of them were diagnosed with NAFLD, with a mean CAP score of 283 ± 33.4 vs. 215 ± 23.7 in patients with IBD only. Regarding liver fibrosis, mean LSM value in the NAFLD group was 6.8 ± 1.9 kPa vs. 5.7 ± 2.3 kPa in the non-NALFD group. Subjects with NAFLD exhibited higher body mass indexes than those with IBD only (26.2 vs. 33.1, p<0.05). In addition, the prevalence of diabetes was much greater among this group (27.5% vs. 0%; p=0.0001), as was the prevalence of elevated HbA1c levels in the absence of a diabetes diagnosis (14% vs. 7.35%; p=0.23). They also had a non-significantly higher mean systolic blood pressure and greater incidences of hypertension. Compared to those without NAFLD, the NAFLD cohort had higher rates of diagnosed hypercholesterolaemia, were older with a higher mean disease duration and had a higher nonsignificant level of triglycerides. The 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or death estimated by the Framingham risk scores for hard coronary heart disease was higher in the NAFLD group (2.32% vs. 4.27%, p=0.0024). Conclusions. NAFLD is a multifaceted condition that is becoming more common in IBD patients. Although the present evidences in the literature suggest a small risk for the advance of liver fibrosis, the cardiovascular risk seems to be of a greater interest. Considering the above data, patients with IBD should be evaluated with a multidisciplinary approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]