Search

The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is mainly expressed in liver, intestine and kidney. We investigated whether 6-ethyl chenodeoxycholic acid (6ECDCA), a semisynthetic derivative of chenodeoxycholic aicd (CDCA, an FXR ligand), protects against kidney injury and modulates small heterodimer partner (SHP) in cisplatin-induced kidney injury. Cisplatin inhibited SHP protein expression in the kidney of cisplatin-treated mice and human proximal tubular (HK2) cells; this effect was counteracted by FXR ligand. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed the presence of tubular casts, obstructions and dilatations in cisplatin-induced kidney injury, which was attenuated by FXR ligand. FXR ligand also attenuated protein expression of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), Smad signaling, and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition process, inflammatory markers and cytokines, and apoptotic markers in cisplatin-treated mice. Cisplatin induced NF-κB activation in HK2 cell; this effect was attenuated by pretreatment with FXR ligand. In SHP knockdown by small interfering RNA, cisplatin-induced activation of TGF-β1, p-JNK and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio was not attenuated, while SHP overexpression and FXR ligand inhibited expression of these proteins in cisplatin-pretreated HK2 cells. In conclusion, FXR ligand, 6ECDCA prevents cisplatin-induced kidney injury, the underlying mechanism of which may be associated with anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects through SHP induction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The present study was performed to examine whether paricalcitol may prevent the cisplatin-induced kidney injury. Furthermore, potential molecular mechanisms underlying the protective effect of paricalcitol were explored. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were treated with vehicle (n=12), cisplatin (n=12, 6mg/kg/day, i.p.), or cisplatin+paricalcitol (n=12, 0.2μg/kg/day, s.c.) for 4days. In another series of experiment, HK-2 cells were treated with cisplatin (50μM), with or without paricalcitol (0.2ng/ml). Paricalcitol counteracted the cisplatin-induced decline in renal function. Paricalcitol also suppressed the expression of TGF-β1, Smad signaling, and the subsequent epithelial-to-mesenchymal process in cisplatin-treated rats. The expression of P-p53 and p21 was increased in cisplatin-induced nephropathy. These changes were completely prevented or significantly attenuated with paricalcitol co-treatment. The expression of p27kip1 was increased in cisplatin-treated rats, which was, however, further augmented by the paricalcitol co-treatment. In HK-2 cells, cisplatin increased the expression of p-ERK1/2 and P-p38. Cisplatin also increased the expression of fibronectin and CTGF. Cisplatin increased the expression of pro-apoptotic markers. The expression of CDK2 and Cyclin E as well as that of PCNA was increased. These changes were completely prevented or significantly attenuated by the paricalcitol pretreatment. In contrast, cisplatin increased the expression of p27kip1, which was further augmented by the paricalcitol-pretreatment. These results suggest that paricalcitol may ameliorate cisplatin-induced renal injury by suppressing the fibrotic, apoptotic and proliferative factors. Its underlying mechanisms may include inhibition of TGF-β1, mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, p53-induced apoptosis, and augmentation of p27kip1. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]