Search

Deficit drip irrigation is an advanced agricultural technology widely promoted and applied around the world to maintain/increase yield and quality while simultaneously minimizing water consumption. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive research on the effects of deficit drip irrigation at different stages on apple yield, water productivity, and quality. The aim was to investigate the effects of deficit drip irrigation treatments (DDITs) on apple yield, quality, and water productivity (WP), and optimize the deficit drip irrigation strategy for apples in the Loess Plateau of China. a two-year field experiment was conducted with 17 irrigation treatments, including a control treatment (CK, full irrigation (FI)) and four DDITs (D15%, D30%, D45%, D60%) during the bud burst to leafing stage (I), flowering to fruit set stage (II), fruit expansion stage (III), and fruit maturation stage (IV). The optimal irrigation management was determined using the fuzzy Borda combined model, which was based on four different single evaluation models of the TOPSIS method, principal component analysis (PCA), grey correlation analysis (GCA), and membership function analysis (MFA). The DDITs at stage IV decreased midday leaf water potential (Ψs) by 2.57–20.00% compared with CK, and the difference of Ψs between IV-D30%, IV-D45%, IV-D60%, and CK were significant in two years (P<0.05). DDITs at stages I, II, and IV improved fruit weight (FW), fruit shape index (FSI), and fruit firmness (FN), but did not significantly affect fruit water content (FWC). The DDITs at stages III and IV significantly enhanced total soluble solids (TSS), soluble sugars (SS), and vitamin C (V c) in 2021 and 2022, but a notable decrease in titratable acidity (TA) was observed. DDITs at stage IV exhibited the highest comprehensive benefit of apple, followed by DDITs at stages I and II, and DDITs at stage III had the lowest values. The DDITs of D15%, D30%, CK, and D15% at stages I, II, III, and IV were identified as the optimal irrigation strategy to improve apple yield, quality, and WP. Our findings can guide the development of appropriate irrigation strategies for apple cultivation in Loess Plateau of China, promoting efficient and sustainable apple production. • Deficit drip irrigation treatments (DDITs) greatly decreased midday leaf water potential. • Proper DDITs at fruit maturation stage improved apples physical/ chemical quality. • Proper DDITs during the early growth stage greatly improved WP without yield loss. • The optimal irrigation strategy was determined using the fuzzy Borda combined model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The great challenges of food security, climate change and environmental degradation resulting from unreasonable nitrogen fertilizer (NF) inputs necessitate the optimization of fertilizer application to ensure fruit production and environmental sustainability. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis on the effects of NF inputs on apple yield and reactive nitrogen losses (N 2 O emission, NH 3 volatilization, and nitrate leaching) at the global scale. Therefore, we used a meta-analysis of 159 observations from 31 published studies to evaluate the response of apple yield and reactive nitrogen losses to NF. We aim to identify suitable NF rates, environmental conditions, and planting factors that improve apple yield while minimizing reactive nitrogen losses. Our results showed that NF significantly increased apple yield, N 2 O emission, NH 3 volatilization, and nitrate leaching by 17.1%, 255.7%, 236.4%, and 68.7% compared with no nitrogen fertilizer (NNF), respectively. The effects of NF rates and environmental factors on the response of N 2 O emission, NH 3 volatilization, and nitrate leaching to NF were prior to those of planting factors, but the result of apple yield was the opposite. Apple production under NF in regions with MAT (mean annual air temperature) ≥ 10 °C and MAP (mean annual precipitation) < 600 mm declined the risk of reactive nitrogen losses and significantly increased apple yield by 24.4%−28%. NF application was more beneficial in soil with pH ≥ 7 and SOM < 15 g kg−1 for apple production. We found that the suitable NF rate was 250–450 kg ha−1, which can increase apple yield by 0.8%−21.3% while significantly reducing reactive nitrogen losses compared with lower NF rate (< 250 kg ha−1) and higher NF rate (> 450 kg ha−1). Our findings provide guidance for optimizing NF management in apple orchard to achieve high crop yields, reduce emissions, and mitigate pollution. • Nitrogen (N) fertilizer significantly boosted apple yield and reactive nitrogen losses. • N fertilizer application was more beneficial in soil with pH ≥ 7 and SOM < 15 g kg−1. • Recommended N fertilizer rate was 250–450 kg ha−1, which can increase apple yield while minimizing reactive nitrogen losses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]