Search

Given the paucity of safety data on fluoroquinolone antibiotics in pregnancy, a prospective observational cohort study was conducted in pregnant women who sought help and advice on drug use at two teratology information institutes in Japan. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of major congenital anomalies. The study population included pregnant women exposed to (i) fluoroquinolones (fluoroquinolone group), (ii) β‐lactams (infectious control group), or (iii) other agents considered to be nonteratogenic in humans (nonteratogenic control group) during the first trimester. The frequency of major congenital anomalies was compared across groups using a logistic regression model that adjusted for maternal age, smoking status, drinking status, facility consulted, and time of consultation. The fluoroquinolone group consisted of 411 women who had 383 children born alive. The infectious control and nonteratogenic control groups consisted of 1416 and 1482 women who had 1322 and 1401 children born alive, respectively. The incidence of major congenital anomalies was 1.5%, 2.0%, and 1.6% in the fluoroquinolone group, infectious control, and nonteratogenic control groups, respectively. Logistic regression showed that fluoroquinolone exposure is not a significant risk factor for major congenital anomalies. In conclusion, first‐trimester exposure to fluoroquinolone antibiotics was not associated with increased maternal or fetal risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the risk of major birth defects after first‐trimester exposure to carbocisteine and ambroxol during pregnancy, we conducted a prospective cohort study using counseling data for drug use during pregnancy provided by the Japan Drug Information Institute in Pregnancy and Toranomon Hospital. Counseling information, including drug usage and participants' demographic information, was collected between April 1988 and December 2017. Pregnancy outcome data, including major birth defects, were obtained using a questionnaire administered 1 month after delivery. The risks of major birth defects after first‐trimester exposure to carbocisteine (n = 588) and ambroxol (n = 341) were compared with those of nonteratogenic drug use during the first trimester (n = 1525). The adjusted odds ratio (aORs) for major birth defects was calculated using a multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders. The incidence of major birth defects was 1.2% (7/588) and 2.1% (7/341) in the carbocisteine and ambroxol groups, respectively, which was comparable to the control group (26/1525, 1.7%). Results of multiple logistic regression demonstrated similar nonsignificant risks for both carbocisteine (aOR: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–1.1, p = 0.11) and ambroxol (aOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.18–7.2, p = 0.88). No specific major birth defects were reported in the carbocisteine or ambroxol groups. This study demonstrated that carbocisteine and ambroxol exposure during the first trimester was not associated with an increased risk of major birth defects. These results could help in counseling for the use of these drugs during pregnancy and further alleviate anxiety in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Information on breastfeeding and safety of biologics in infants is lacking due to difficulties in case collection. We evaluated methods for determining the concentration of biologics in breast milk using a dry filter method that can simplify the collection, storage and transport of breast milk. Methods: To generate dried filter paper (DFP) samples, approximately 30 μL of breast milk was placed onto a Whatman 903 card and punched out. After extraction, the supernatant was measured using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Three concentrations of each drug were prepared in liquid breast milk (LBM) and DFP samples to determine their stability up to 28 days after storage at 2–8°C or −20°C for LBM and 25 ± 5°C for DFP. LBM and DFP samples were also provided by nursing mothers using biologics during lactation, and drug concentrations in both samples were compared. The agreement between the two measurement methods was confirmed by Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Breast milk was provided by 12 mothers who used biologics (tocilizumab, abatacept, etanercept, golimumab, sarilumab and belimumab). The coefficients of variation for within‐run and between‐run precision for the six drugs were within 15% for both LBM and DFP, and accuracy was within 90%–110% of the quality controls. After 28 days, concentrations remained at more than 90%. The difference between the values obtained by each method was within the acceptable range of error (−12.1 to +16.6 ng/mL). Conclusions: A method for determining the concentration of biologics using DFP is expected to help improve pharmacotherapy for lactating women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since pregnant women are excluded from clinical trials, it is essential to accumulate post‐marketing information to evaluate the effects on the fetus of medication use during pregnancy. The Japan Drug Information Institute in Pregnancy (JDIIP) was established at the National Center for Child Health and Development as a Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare project to provide patients with information and conduct follow‐up surveys. In this study, we investigated the status of the accumulation of JDIIP consultation cases to identify issues for enhancing clinical information appropriate for use during pregnancy and to examine how information should be collected and provided. In addition, the status of descriptions of Japanese package inserts, which are representative of those used by healthcare professionals as a source of information, was confirmed for medications used by JDIIP consultation cases. The characteristics of the JDIIP consultation cases information were that the contents that needed to be adjusted when evaluating the effects on the fetus of medication use during pregnancy were obtained. In addition, the follow‐up rate was 83.1%. However, although the number of consultation facilities has increased, the number of consultations has not, indicating the need to further increase the number. It was found that there is limited information on epidemiological studies of clinical use in Japanese package inserts. To improve clinical information on the appropriate use of medications during pregnancy, it is necessary to accumulate more information in the future, and it is considered necessary to consider new approaches utilizing the JDIIP system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs), especially pranlukast, safety data during pregnancy is limited. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, two‐centered cohort study using data from teratogen information services in Japan to clarify the effects of LTRA exposure during pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes. Pregnant women who being counseled on drug use during pregnancy at two facilities were enrolled. The primary outcome of this study was major congenital anomalies. The incidence of major congenital anomalies in women exposed to montelukast or pranlukast during the first trimester of pregnancy was compared with that of controls. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the effects of maternal LTRA use during the first trimester of pregnancy on major congenital anomalies. The outcomes of 231 pregnant women exposed to LTRAs (montelukast n = 122; pranlukast n = 106; both n = 3) and 212 live births were compared with those of controls. The rate of major congenital anomalies in the LTRA group was 1.9%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that LTRA exposure was not a risk factor for major congenital anomalies (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–2.05; p = 0.653). In addition, no significant difference was detected in stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, and low birth weight between the two groups. The present study revealed that montelukast and pranlukast were not associated with the risk of major congenital anomalies. Our findings suggest that LTRAs could be safely employed for asthma therapy during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized anti‐interleukin‐6 receptor monoclonal antibody, is used to treat rheumatic diseases. There is limited information about the administration of TCZ during lactation. The dried spot method, a simple technique for processing biological samples which involves placement of a drop of specimen onto filter paper, has been used in clinical pharmacology to determine various drug concentrations. This study examined the feasibility of sample collection using the dried milk spot (DMS) method for obtaining data about the transfer of TCZ into breast milk. Methods: Concentrations of TCZ determined using DMSs prepared by patients were compared with those using liquid breast milk. Results: In an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay of TCZ in DMSs, the accuracy ranged from 93.0% to 113.8% and the precision ranged from 0.3% to 8.4%. All concentrations of TCZ were within 15% of the reference value when analyzed on separate days. TCZ in DMSs at room temperature, 4°C, and −20°C were stable for 28 days. Extracted TCZ concentrations from patient‐prepared DMSs were strongly correlated with those of liquid samples (r = 0.996). In a pharmacokinetic study, the median (range) maximum and minimum concentrations were 113 ng/mL (68‐205) and 8.5 ng/mL (4.8‐13.4), respectively. The milk‐to‐serum ratio at the trough TCZ concentration of 3 lactating mothers were 0.0015, 0.00082 and 0.0014. Conclusions: The DMS method for measuring TCZ transfer into breast milk may be reliable and feasible, and should contribute to evaluating the safety of breast‐fed infants whose mothers receive TCZ during lactation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The infant dose I via i breast milk was 0.95% of the maternal daily dose, that was considered to be acceptable,8 even though the drug information states that etizolam use should be avoided during breastfeeding.5 To clarify more accurate information about etizolam excretion into breastmilk, a detailed etizolam concentration profile including maximum concentration in breastmilk following oral etizolam administration will be required. Anxiety disorders may require pharmacological treatment, and it has been estimated that 10% to 26% of pregnant women with these disorders are prescribed benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine-like hypnotic drugs.1,2 These medications cross the placental and blood-brain barriers, may affect fetal growth and development,3 and have been associated with increased risks of preterm birth, low Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.4 Etizolam, a benzodiazepine-class anxiolytic, is prescribed for the treatment and management of agitation, tension, insomnia and anxiety.5 Due to the limited market distribution and use of etizolam worldwide, only one report from Japan published the information on etizolam transfer into breast milk.6 Furthermore, the information on etizolam transfer into the fetal circulation is limited. Benzodiazepine concentrations in the breast milk and plasma of nursing mothers: Estimation of relative infant dose. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: In recent years, safety concerns about modafinil exposure during pregnancy have emerged. In particular, increased risks for major congenital anomalies (MCA) and impaired fetal growth were reported, although study results were conflicting. Our investigation aims to examine previously reported safety signals., Method: Multicenter case series based on data from 18 Teratology Information Services from 12 countries. Modafinil exposed pregnancies with an estimated date of birth before August 2019 were included in this study. For prospectively ascertained pregnancies, cumulative incidences of pregnancy outcomes, rate of nonchromosomal MCA in first trimester exposed pregnancies and percentiles of neonatal/infant weight and head circumference (HC) were calculated. Potential dose-dependent effects on fetal growth were explored by linear regression models. Retrospectively ascertained cases were screened for pattern of MCA and other adverse events., Results: One hundred and seventy-five prospectively ascertained cases were included, of which 173 were exposed at least during the first trimester. Cumulative incidences for live birth, spontaneous abortion and elective termination of pregnancy were 76.9% (95% CI, 68.0%-84.8%), 9.3% (95% CI, 5.0%-16.9%), and 13.9% (95% CI, 8.1%-23.1%), respectively. Nonchromosomal MCA was present in 3/150 live births, corresponding to an MCA rate of 2.0% (95%CI, 0.6%-6.1%), none were reported in pregnancy losses. Compared to reference standards, birth weight (BW) tended to be lower and neonatal HC to be smaller in exposed newborns (data available for 144 and 73 of 153 live births, respectively). In nonadjusted linear regression models, each 100 mg increase of average dosage per pregnancy day was associated with a decrease in standard deviation score (SDS) of -0.28 SDS (95% CI, -0.45 to -0.10) for BW and of -0.28 SDS (95% CI, -0.56 to 0.01) for HC. Screening of 22 retrospectively reported cases did not reveal any specific pattern of MCA or other adverse outcomes., Conclusion: The results do not indicate an increased risk of MCA after in utero exposure to modafinil, but a tendency toward lower BW and reduced neonatal HC. However, these findings should be regarded as preliminary. Until further studies allow for a definite conclusion, modafinil should not be used during pregnancy., (© 2023 The Authors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background Amlodipine is used for the treatment of hypertension, but reports on its use in early pregnancy are limited. Methods and Results In the present study, we recruited 231 women with chronic hypertension, including those who received amlodipine or other antihypertensives during early pregnancy, and investigated frequencies of morphologic abnormalities in their 231 offspring. Specifically, we evaluated 48 neonates exposed to amlodipine in the first trimester (amlodipine group, Group A), 54 neonates exposed to antihypertensives other than amlodipine (other antihypertensive group, Group O), and 129 neonates not exposed to antihypertensives (no-antihypertensive group, Group N). The number of morphologic abnormalities of offspring in each group were 2 in Group A (4.2%; 95% CI, 0.51-14.25); 3 in Group O (5.6%; 95% CI, 1.16-15.39) and 6 in Group N (4.7%; 95% CI, 1.73-9.85). The odds ratio of the primary outcome comparing Group A and Group O was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.118-4.621) and Group A and Group N was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.174-4.575). Conclusions The odds of birth defects in Group A in the first trimester were not significantly different from those with or without other antihypertensives.