Search

SHIFT has been one of the largest RCTs in the field of systemic family therapy in the UK. The study took place over five years, including three major centres with fifteen Trusts and twenty‐five family therapists who worked with a manualized treatment in CAMHS with adolescents who self‐harmed. While the results are not available at the time of this publication, this paper will briefly describe the pre‐ existing factors which were helpful in developing a successful bid, clinical and managerial elements of ‘real world research’ of complex psychological processes and the construction of the manualized systemic family therapy. It also offers examples of some of the unanticipated events in the life of such a large trial. Practitioner Points: Large trials develop from small studies and clinicians are urged to look for opportunities for research partnershipsInvestment in time for consideration of difficult issues as they arise is essential for effective trial managementThe balance between research rigour and ‘real life’ practice is an inevitable area of tension and requires consideration of both immediate and outcome consequences 尝试和痛苦 – 一种随机对照试验对比下的把干预当作惯常和在实施过程中出现的重要事件上的反思的家庭治疗 人工家庭治疗 摘要: SHIFT目前是英国家庭治疗领域最大的随机对照试验之一。本研究历时5年, 囊括了三个主要的中心在内的15个信托, 25位曾在CAMHS对自残青少年进行人工治疗的家庭治疗师。因为在发表这篇文章的时候, 结果还没有出来, 本文将简短地描述1）有助发展成功bid的已经存在的因素, 2）临床以及管理方面的复杂心理过程的”真实情况研究”元素, 3）以及人工系统家庭治理的建构。本文还提供了生活在这样一种大的的尝试下的一些意想不到事件的例子。 对实践者有用的几点建议: 大的尝试发展自小的研究, 临床工作者急需寻找研究合作者的机会困难事件需要及时解决, 不然就会对有效尝试管理产生重要影响研究活力和”真实生活”实践的平衡是一种不可避免的引起紧张的领域, 这需要对当下和结果的同时考虑 关键词：实证实践, 研究, 儿童和青少年精神健康, 培训 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Incorporating user's perspectives in healthcare delivery is important. Simple questionnaires may not capture these as well as a discrete choice experiment (DCE) which enables the exploration of users' trade-offs between different service attributes. Qualitative methods are increasingly used to improve a DCE's face validity, but few studies adequately describe them. This paper describes the qualitative investigations in the development of a DCE questionnaire to elicit parents' perspectives on centralized services for children with cleft lip and palate. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 16 parents from across the UK, except Wales. Data analysis was carried out by the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Five attributes and their levels were inductively identified: usefulness and amount of information (four levels); staff attitude at cleft centres (two levels); continuity of care (two levels); personal costs of attending appointments (four levels); and cleft centres facilities (two levels). An unexpected finding was that parents' sense of responsibility towards their child made a 'willingness-to-travel' attribute unacceptable to them, but they were receptive to a 'willingness-to-pay' attribute. CONCLUSION: Using qualitative methods with service users in attribute development for a DCE helps to uncover issues that may not be apparent to researchers or health service staff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]