Search

Background: Many Postgraduate Year One (PGY1) Pharmacy residencies provide research training however, details of this training are not well described. Publication rates have been utilized to assess residency research learning experiences. Higher publication rates have been reported by programs that have implemented a structured research learning experience. Objective: The primary objective was to identify differences in the research learning experiences for American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) accredited PGY1 Pharmacy residencies with reported resident publication rates of ≥20% vs <20%. Methods: This survey was distributed to PGY1 Pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs). Seven sections were analyzed to identify research learning experience differences between programs with reported publication rates of ≥20% vs <20%: (1) program characteristics/research outcomes; (2) involved individuals; (3) requirements; (4) learning experience structure; (5) educational methods; (6) formal education; (7) barriers/RPD perceptions. Variables with P < 0.05 on logistic regression were considered statistically significant. Results: The survey response rate was 31.3% (308/984). Significant positive predictors for reported publication rates of ≥20% were: involved individuals: research director/coordinator, individuals trained in statistics, non-pharmacy medical staff; requirements: Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative training, research seminars/training courses, research manuscript; learning experience structure: research committee; educational methods: didactic residency-led lectures/courses, formal workshops, self-taught online modules; and formal education: manuscript preparation. Conclusion: This study suggests there are differences in the research learning experiences at PGY1 Pharmacy residencies with reported resident publications rates of ≥20% vs <20%. We encourage PGY1 Pharmacy residency programs to consider implementing elements associated with reported resident publication rates of ≥20%., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Cefazolin is guideline recommended for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. Despite its unique R1 side chain, cefazolin is often avoided in patients with beta-lactam allergy with concern for cross reactivity. Objectives: The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who received cefazolin perioperatively. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients with a beta-lactam allergy clarified following the telephone interview and clinical outcomes including acute kidney injury, surgical site infection, Clostridioides difficile infection, and re-admission at 30 and 90 days. Methods: This single-center, quasi-experimental study evaluated a pilot program in which a pharmacist phoned patients > 18 years of age with a scheduled orthopedic surgery and a documented beta-lactam allergy to assess their allergy preoperatively. Recommendations to use cefazolin were based on an algorithm. Patients were divided into pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Results: A total of 832 patients were screened for inclusion with 135 and 66 patients included in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts. No significant difference was identified in the primary outcome. In the post-intervention cohort, 62% had a beta-lactam reaction updated in the electronic medical record. Those with a beta-lactam allergy delabeled or made less severe were numerically more likely to receive cefazolin than those with an unchanged reaction or a reaction made more severe (95.2% vs 68% vs 65%). There were no differences in clinical outcomes between groups. Conclusion: A pharmacist-conducted preoperative beta-lactam allergy interview in adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery improved beta-lactam allergy documentation but, did not result in increased utilization of cefazolin., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Wesley D. Kufel has received research grants from Merck and Co. and Melinta Therapeutics and served on the advisory board for Theratechnologies. Jeffrey M. Steele has served on the advisory board for Paratek Pharmaceuticals. All other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: The objective of this project was to assess the percentage of interoperability compliance within our pediatric hematology/oncology patient care areas for intravenous chemotherapy medications before and after the implementation of circle priming., Methods: We conducted a retrospective quality improvement project at an inpatient pediatric hematology/oncology floor and outpatient pediatric infusion center before and after implementation of circle priming., Results: There was a statistically significant increase in percent interoperability compliance for the inpatient pediatric hematology/oncology floor from 4.1% prior to implementation of circle priming to 35.6% after (odds ratio 13.1 (95% CI, 3.96-43.1), p  < 0.001), as well as for the outpatient pediatric infusion center from 18.5% to 47.3%, respectively (odds ratio 3.9 (95% CI, 2.7-5.9), p  < 0.001)., Conclusion: Implementation of circle priming has significantly increased the percentage of interoperability compliance for intravenous chemotherapy medications in our pediatric hematology/oncology patient care areas., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Trauma patients are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism given alterations in the coagulation cascade. Chemoprophylaxis with standard dosing of enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneously twice daily has evolved to incorporate the use of anti-factor Xa (AFXa) trough level monitoring given concerns for decreased enoxaparin bioavailability in this patient population. Current available evidence suggests low rates of goal AFXa trough level achievement with standard enoxaparin dosing. Our study aims to identify the incidence of critically ill trauma patients that did not achieve goal AFXa trough levels and attempts to identify predictors that may influence the lack of achievement of goal levels. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort analysis performed at a single academic medical center. Adult patients 18 years or older admitted to the surgical intensive care unit secondary to trauma who were initiated on standard prophylactic enoxaparin and had at least 1 AFXa trough level representative of steady state were included. Patient demographics and clinical data were collected, and descriptive statistics were utilized. All statistical tests were 2-tailed and a P  < .05 was considered significant. Variables with a P  < .10 on univariable analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: A majority of our patient population did not achieve goal AFXa trough levels while receiving standard doses of prophylactic enoxaparin (82.4% [108/131]). Sub-target AFXa levels were associated with higher creatinine clearance values. Positive predictors of obtaining target AFXa levels included automobile versus pedestrian mechanism of injury and requiring an enoxaparin dose escalation to at least 40 mg twice daily. Conclusions: Our study found low rates of achievement of goal AFXa trough levels in critically ill trauma patients receiving standard prophylactic enoxaparin dosing. Certain variables were identified as negative and positive predictors for achievement of goal AFXa trough levels, although the biologic plausibility of these predictors is questionable and requires further investigation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second leading cause of death in patients with malignancy. The currently available guidelines have shown greater support for utilization of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) over direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in cancer-associated VTE. Current data on the safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in patients with cancer are lacking., Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the use of DOACs compared to LMWH in patients with cancer., Methods: A retrospective review of outpatient records was completed to identify patients with documented cancer diagnosis and either a DOAC or LMWH as a listed medication. Patients were excluded if they had atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, current pregnancy, body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m 2 or weight >120 kg, severe renal or hepatic impairment, or were on concomitant therapy with a significant interacting medication. The primary outcome was frequency of VTE recurrence, and secondary outcomes included the frequency of major and minor bleeding and other thrombotic events., Results: One hundred fifty-six patients were included in the study population, 78 in both the DOAC and LMWH groups. Venous thromboembolism recurrence occurred in 5 (6.4%) patients in the DOAC group and 8 (10.3%) patients in the LMWH group ( P = .39). There was no significant difference in major or minor bleeding or other thrombotic events between the 2 groups., Conclusion: The frequency of VTE recurrence was similar between DOACs and LMWH in patients with cancer. DOACs may be an alternative agent to LMWH for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer.

Purpose: To evaluate the chemical and physical stability of an admixture containing cefepime and vancomycin in a single volume of lactated Ringer solution at refrigerated temperatures. Methods: Cefepime 2000 mg and vancomycin 1000 mg were, respectively, reconstituted with 10 and 20 mL of sterile water for injection (SWFI) per manufacturer instructions. This resulted in cefepime and vancomycin concentrations of 200 and 50 mg/mL, respectively. The resulting cefepime and vancomycin solutions at 10 and 20 mL, respectively, were drawn up and injected into 1000 mL lactated Ringer solution. Aliquot samples were obtained on days 0 to 9, visually inspected for gross incompatibility, and then stored at -80°C. Samples were thawed on the day of the analysis and run through ultraperformance liquid chromatography. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) on each day was compared with baseline AUC values. Chemical stability was defined as an AUC more than 93% of the baseline value. Results: No evidence of gross physical incompatibility was observed by visual inspection. Cefepime and vancomycin replicants were more than 94.5% and 98% of baseline AUC values. Therefore, all sample replicants were found to be more than 93% of their baseline AUC value. Conclusion: An admixture containing cefepime 2000 mg and vancomycin 1000 mg in 1000 mL lactated Ringer solution appears to be chemically and physically stable at refrigerated temperatures for up to 9 days., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Purpose: After a sentinel event related to long-acting (LA) opioid administration at our institution and subsequent root cause analysis, an inpatient LA opioid restriction policy was implemented to improve patient safety. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of an inpatient LA opioid restriction policy on inpatient therapy utilization and to compare rates of naloxone reversal events among patients administered LA opioids before and after policy implementation. Methods: To evaluate the first objective, an electronic medical record report was created to capture all inpatient LA opioid orders prescribed to adults at our institution between March 1, 2014, and July 30, 2017. Utilization was compared before and after policy implementation and use controlled for by patient days. To evaluate the second objective, naloxone administrations were identified via a query of the medical record between March 1, 2014, and July 30, 2017. Naloxone reversal events were independently evaluated by 2 trained reviewers, and a third when discrepancies existed. Rates of naloxone reversal events related to LA opioid administration were compared between the pre- and post-policy phase. Results: The results of our first objective demonstrate that policy implementation was associated with a statistically significant reduction in LA opioid utilization that was sustained throughout the study duration. For our second objective, among the 144 patients deemed to have an opioid-related naloxone reversal event, a LA opioid was administered to 12 patients (18.9%) in the pre-policy phase and 17 patients (15.9%) in the post-policy phase. This difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] = 1.629, confidence interval [CI] = 0.711-3.732, P = .248). Conclusion: A LA opioid restriction policy significantly reduced LA opioid utilization at our institution. Despite this, we did not find a significant reduction in inpatient naloxone reversals related to LA opioids. Further study is warranted to identify an optimal method to reduce LA opioid-related toxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2018.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of area under the curve (AUC)-based vancomycin monitoring on pharmacist-initiated dose adjustments after transitioning from a trough-only to an AUC-based monitoring method at our institution., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients treated with vancomycin for complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection between November 2013 and December 2016 was conducted. The frequency of pharmacist-initiated dose adjustments was assessed for patients monitored via trough-only and AUC-based approaches for trough ranges: 10 to 14.9 mg/L and 15 to 20 mg/L., Results: Fifty patients were included: 36 in the trough-based monitoring and 14 in the AUC-based-monitoring group. The vancomycin dose was increased in 71.4% of patients when troughs were 10 to 14.9 mg/L when a trough-only approach was used and in only 25% of patients when using AUC estimation ( P = .048). In the AUC group, the dose was increased only when AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <400; unchanged regimens had an estimated AUC/MIC ≥400. The AUC-based monitoring did not significantly increase the frequency of dose reductions when trough concentrations were 15 to 20 mg/L (AUC: 33.3% vs trough: 4.6%; P = .107)., Conclusions: The AUC-based monitoring resulted in fewer patients with dose adjustments when trough levels were 10 to 14.9 mg/L. The AUC-based monitoring has the potential to reduce unnecessary vancomycin exposure and warrants further investigation.

Purpose: The United States has seen an increased consumption of carbapenem antibiotics in recent years. The increased utilization of these agents has potential negative consequences, including the increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Reasons for the rise in carbapenem use among providers in acute care hospitals are not well elucidated in literature. The objectives of this study were to identify factors that influence empiric carbapenem use among providers in a single academic medical center, and to assess therapeutic knowledge pertaining to carbapenem use. Methods: A cross-sectional, single-center, 9-item electronic research survey was developed independently and validated by an infectious diseases pharmacist and infectious diseases physician. The survey was distributed to email accounts of providers at a single academic medical center. Demographic data, factors affecting carbapenem prescription, and baseline therapeutic knowledge were assessed. Results: Ninety-five of 416 providers responded to the survey (response rate of 22.8%). Respondents were well distributed across all levels of training with primary roles in internal medicine and surgery. The most important factors influencing empiric carbapenem use were suspected pathogens at the site of infection, drug allergies, history of multidrug resistant organisms, severity of illness, type of infection, and local resistance rates. A recommendation from a pharmacist was selected as the most likely factor for deterring carbapenem use. Misconceptions pertaining to penicillin drug allergy and beta-lactam cross reactivity, knowledge of local resistance rates according to the institutional antibiogram, and comparative efficacy data for carbapenems were apparent across all levels of training. Conclusions: Provider misconceptions regarding several factors appear to contribute to unnecessary use of carbapenems. An opportunity exists for hospital pharmacists to improve the prescribing patterns of carbapenems by correcting provider misconceptions through education., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Despite the numerous benefits of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), appreciable risks of drug-related problems (DRPs) exist. No studies to date comprehensively assess DRPs in this population., Objectives: Objectives of this study were to (1) characterize the frequency and types of DRPs experienced by patients discharged on OPAT and (2) determine the fraction of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) resulting in hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) presentation and changes in therapy., Methods: This was a retrospective chart analysis evaluating consecutive adult patients discharged on OPAT between May 2015 and October 2015. Patients were assessed for the presence of DRPs until the cessation of antimicrobial treatment, including oral step-down therapy. The outcome of each ADR was recorded, including those resulting in hospital readmissions, presentation to the ED, or changes in antimicrobials., Results: Among 144 patients discharged on OPAT, 199 DRPs occurred in 91 (63.2%) patients. Harm and potential impaired efficacy occurred in 76.9% and 23.1%, respectively. The ADRs comprised 59% of DRPs, occurring in 44.4% of patients. The second most common DRP type was drug interactions (DIs), accounting for 22.6% of DRPs. Rifampin, fluoroquinolones, and daptomycin had the highest frequencies of preventable DRPs in the form of DIs, whereas cephalosporins had the fewest DRPs. Approximately 26% of ADRs caused changes in therapy and 9% resulted in hospital readmission or ED utilization., Conclusion: DRPs with the potential to cause patient harm or impair treatment efficacy often occur with OPAT, most commonly ADRs and DIs. Enhanced monitoring and transitions of care management may reduce the incidence of these DRPs.

Purpose: To determine whether there is an association between higher vancomycin trough concentrations and attainment of a calculated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥400., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among vancomycin-treated adult patients with a positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) culture. Attainment of a calculated AUC/MIC ≥400 was compared between patients with troughs in the reference range of 15 to 20 mg/L and those with troughs in the following ranges: <10, 10 to 14.9, and >20 mg/L. Nephrotoxicity was assessed as a secondary outcome based on corrected average vancomycin troughs over 10 days of treatment., Results: Overall, 226 patients were reviewed and 100 included. Relative to troughs ≥10, patients with vancomycin troughs <10 mg/L were 73% less likely to attain an AUC/MIC ≥400 (odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.75). No difference was found in the attainment of an AUC/MIC ≥400 in patients with troughs of 10 to 14.9 mg/L and >20 mg/L when compared to patients with troughs of 15 to 20 mg/L. The mean corrected average vancomycin trough was higher in patients developing nephrotoxicity compared to those who did not (19.5 vs 14.5 mg/L, P < .001)., Conclusion: Achieving vancomycin serum trough concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L did not result in an increased attainment of the AUC/MIC target relative to troughs of 10 to 14.9 mg/L but may increase nephrotoxicity risk.

Background: Anti-Xa monitoring is utilized to measure the extent of anticoagulation in certain patient populations receiving enoxaparin. It is essential to accurately obtain this pharmacodynamic marker for safe and effective anticoagulation management. Objectives: To determine the frequency of correctly drawn anti-Xa concentrations in accordance with predefined institutional criteria and to determine the number of dose adjustments implemented based on incorrectly drawn anti-Xa concentrations. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study among adult patients who received treatment doses of enoxaparin with measured anti-Xa concentrations. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, on hemodialysis, or received prophylactic dosing. Anti-Xa levels were defined as correctly measured if they were drawn 3 to 5 hours after the dose during steady state concentrations. Descriptive statistics were performed and analyzed via SPSS software. Results: Overall, 203 patients were reviewed and 59 patients with 74 anti-Xa levels were included. The majority of anti-Xa levels (57/74; 77%) were drawn incorrectly and often resulted in collection of repeat anti-Xa samples. There were 12 documented dose adjustments and approximately 42% (5/12) were based on incorrectly drawn anti-Xa levels. Anti-Xa levels were within target range approximately 45% of the time. Conclusions: Enoxaparin anti-Xa concentrations are frequently drawn incorrectly and dose adjustments are often performed based on these unsupported anti-Xa levels. This may present a potential risk to compromise patient safety.

Background: Published literature has demonstrated commercially available premix vancomycin (5 mg/mL) and piperacillin-tazobactam (67.5 mg/mL) as physically compatible via simulated Y-site methodology. Compatibility via actual Y-site infusion has yet to be established. Objective: To assess and compare the compatibility of commercially available premix concentrations of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam via simulated and actual Y-site evaluation. Methods: Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam were tested using simulated and actual Y-site infusion methodologies. Simulated Y-site compatibility was performed using previously published methods via visual inspection, turbidity evaluation, and pH evaluation. Evaluation occurred immediately, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 240 minutes following mixing for each mixture and control. Mixtures were considered physically incompatible if there was visual evidence of precipitation or haze, an absorbance value was greater than 0.01 A, or an absolute change of 1.0 pH unit occurred. Actual Y-site infusion was simulated to mirror antibiotic infusion in the clinical setting by nursing personnel using smart pumps and intravenous tubing. Results: No evidence of physical incompatibility was observed during simulated Y-site testing via visual inspection, turbidity assessment, and pH evaluation. Conversely, physical incompatibility was observed to the unaided eye within 2 minutes during actual Y-site infusion. Conclusions: Despite observed compatibility between vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam via simulated Y-site testing, visual evidence of physical incompatibility was observed during actual Y-site infusion. This poses a potential compromise to patient safety if these antibiotics are administered simultaneously in the clinical setting. Actual Y-site testing should be performed prior to clinical adoption of compatibility studies that are based solely on simulated methodologies.