Search

Hypothesis The study purpose was to assess 6 shoulder patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) values in asymptomatic, healthy, pathology-free individuals. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in PROM values in pathology-free individuals when considering sex, age, ethnicity, and geographical location. Methods Electronic questionnaires were completed by 635 individuals (323 Australians and 312 Canadians) without dominant shoulder pathology for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score; Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (CSS); Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI); and Stanmore Percentage of Normal Shoulder Assessment (SPONSA). Shoulder range of motion and strength were assessed. Results No difference was identified between subjective-only and subjective-objective PROMs. Handedness and a current elbow or wrist problem were not associated with differences in PROM values. Poorer PROM values were associated with a history of an inactive shoulder problem and increasing age. Female participants tended to report similar or poorer PROM scores. No significant difference was found between ethnicities. Geographical location was associated with differences in the ASES shoulder score, UCLA shoulder score, and SPADI but not the CSS, SPONSA, and OSS. Conclusions Differences in sex, age, and geographical location will affect PROM shoulder scores in pathology-free individuals and should be taken into consideration when PROMs are being used to compare patient outcomes. This study has established normative values for the ASES shoulder score, CSS, OSS, UCLA shoulder score, SPADI, and SPONSA. Future studies assessing a pathologic patient cohort should perform comparisons against a sex- and age-matched control cohort, ideally sourced from the same geographical location. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the imaging methods for identifying the various morphological variations of the articular surfaces at the midcarpal joint. Methods: Thirteen cadaveric wrists were examined by plain neutral anteroposterior radiographs; 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT); 3-dimensional CT reconstruction, and 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Carpal measurements were performed, and the parameters that defined the scaphoid, lunate, hamate, and capitate morphological types were investigated, with dissection being used as the definitive measure of morphology. The dissection findings were compared to the results of each imaging technique to determine the accuracy of morphological determination from each technique. Results: Lunate type was the most accurately identified morphological variant amongst all imaging techniques. Lunate type was most accurately determined from coronal MRI. A lunate with a small, cartilaginous ulnar facet (intermediate type) could be differentiated only by coronal MRI and dissection. Scaphoid type could not be determined accurately using any of the imaging modalities described. Capitate type was most accurately determined from coronal MRI. However, flat and spherical-type capitates could not be routinely differentiated from V-shaped capitates. Hamate type was most accurately determined from 3-dimensional CT reconstruction. Conclusions: Accurate identification of carpal bone morphology is required to improve our understanding of carpal mechanics and pathology. Not all morphological features can be identified radiographically. Direct visualization is required to differentiate types of scaphoid, and to differentiate V-type capitates. MRI provides the most accurate identification of lunate type, and 3-dimensional CT provides the best method of differentiating hamate types. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We report 3 cases of translunate fractures with associated perilunate dislocations (or subluxation). We believe the translunate injury reflects a higher-velocity trauma and produces further destabilization of the carpus when compared with the established greater and lesser arc injuries. A modification to Johnson''s perilunate injury classification system is proposed: the addition of a translunate arc injury subgroup, which would include all perilunate injuries with translunate fractures. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To assess the influence of lunate type on scaphoid kinematics. Methods: One hundred normal wrists had fluoroscopic assessment of the wrist in maximal radial, neutral, and ulnar deviation. The shortest distance in a neutral position between the capitate and triquetrum, C-T distance, determined lunate type. A type I lunate had a C-T distance of ≤2 mm, a type II lunate ≥4 mm, and an intermediate group lay between these values. Scaphoid flexion and translation in radial and ulna deviation was measured. Results: There were 18 subjects with a type I lunate, 19 with an intermediate lunate, and 63 with a type II lunate. There was no statistically significant difference between lunate type, subject age, or hand dominance. There was a statistically significant higher proportion of women with a type I lunate. Subjects with a type II lunate had a statistically greater amount of flexion during radioulnar deviation as determined by CR index (0.79 vs 0.91) and scaphoid flexion index (0.21 vs 0.09). Subjects with a type II lunate had statistically less translation during radioulnar deviation as determined by translation ratio (0.22 vs 0.31) and scaphoid inclination index (0.18 vs 0.23). The average scaphoid kinematic index in subjects with a type II lunate was 1.24, intermediate 0.86, and type I 0.42. A scaphoid kinematic index of greater than 1 indicates the scaphoid has more flexion during radioulnar deviation than translation. Conclusions: Wrists with a type I lunate show statistically greater scaphoid translation with radial deviation. Wrists with a type II lunate show statistically greater scaphoid flexion with radial deviation. Intermediate lunates have intermediate scaphoid mechanics. This allows the surgeon to determine the likely wrist scaphoid mechanics based on the lunate type determined from a single posterior-anterior x-ray. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]