1. The role of internal climate variability on future streamflow projections.
- Author
-
Faghih, Mina and Brissette, François
- Subjects
- *
EFFECT of human beings on climate change , *STREAMFLOW , *GLOBAL warming , *CLIMATE change , *FLOODS , *DROUGHTS - Abstract
• The impact of internal variability and climate change on streamflow is studied in 133 catchments of different sizes. • Internal climate variability is important for masking anthropogenic climate change, especially in the near future. • The size of the catchment used to have a significant impact on the timing of the emergence of the extreme flow. • Smaller catchments experience floods (droughts) at earlier (later) times. • Instead of KS-test and standard error of the mean (SEM), signal-to-noise (SNR) approaches are too conservative to detect the timing of emergence. Uncertainty about the future impacts of climate change represents a significant barrier to implementing adaptation measures. This work explores the impact of internal climate variability on streamflow projections for 133 catchments across the eastern and northeastern United States. Using data from a single model initial-condition large ensemble (SMILE) at high spatial and temporal resolution, this work assesses the magnitude of anthropogenic climate change and internal climate variability on projected future streamflow. The impact of catchment size is studied by grouping catchments into three different size classes (less than500 km2, between 500 and 1000 km2, and greater than 1000 km2). Results show that in a warmer climate, low to middle quantiles of future streamflow will systematically decrease, while the upper quantiles will increase. Increases are largest for more extreme streamflow indices. Using three different approaches, the role of internal variability is studied to estimate the time of emergence (TOE). In this case, results show that the climate change signal of extreme floods and droughts emerges later than that of median flow quantiles, even though the changes for floods as droughts is more significant. There is a clear relationship between catchment size and TOE, with small catchments seeing an earlier TOE for floods, and a later one for droughts. These results provide insight into adaptation times for small to large watersheds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF