Search

Objective: This study aimed to investigate COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, and unmet informational needs in a cancer population during the first phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination rollout in Australia. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a large tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia, between 10 May and 31 July 2021. The survey assessed health beliefs, experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and informational needs. Results: COVID-19 was perceived to be a significant threat to both physical and mental health. While 57.9% (n = 110) of respondents believed the COVID-19 vaccines were safe and 64.2% (n = 122) believed they were effective, more than half (52.6%; n = 100) agreed that they worried about vaccine side effects. Most respondents (84.2%; n = 160) planned to receive the COVID-19 vaccine; however, feelings of hesitancy remained. There was a statistically significant association between those aged under 60 years (P = 0.003), those with previous vaccine hesitancy (P = 0.000), those who felt they had not received adequate information (P = 0.000) and vaccine hesitancy. Requested information pertained to interactions with cancer treatments, those with a history of blood clotting and information for those undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Conclusions: There is a need for tailored COVID-19 vaccine communication that is responsive to the concerns of people with cancer. This will be beneficial during current and future vaccination rollouts. What is known about topic? People with cancer are a COVID-19 vaccine priority group, as they are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from this disease. There is currently a dearth of information regarding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, or informational needs for this population. What does this paper add? This paper has shown that although vaccine refusal rates were low in this population, feelings of hesitancy remained. Women, those in younger age categories, those with previous vaccine hesitancy and those who felt they had not received adequate information had stronger vaccine hesitancy and higher refusal rates. What are the implications for practitioners? There is a need for tailored information and open communication regarding COVID-19 vaccines and people with cancer. There is an opportunity to build upon established relationships of trust between cancer patients and their clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The harmful use of alcohol is a global issue. This study aimed to describe and compare the profiles, emergency department (ED) clinical characteristics, and outcomes of alcohol-related ED presentations (ARPs) and non-alcohol-related ED presentations (NARPs). Methods: A multi-site observational study of all presentations to four EDs between 4 April 2016 and 31 August 2017, was conducted. Routinely collected ED clinical, administrative and costings data were used. Classification of ARPs were prospectively recorded by clinicians. Analysis was performed at the presentation, rather than person level. Univariate tests were undertaken to compare demographics, ED clinical characteristics and outcomes between ARPs and NARPs. Results: A total of 418 051 ED presentations occurred within the 17-month study period; 5% (n = 19 875) were ARPs. Presentations made by people classified as ARPs were younger, more likely to be male, present on weekends or at night, and arrive by ambulance or police compared to NARPs. Compared with NARPs, ARPs had a longer median ED length of stay of over 20 min (95% CI 18–22, median 196 min vs 177 min, P < 0.001), a 5.5% (95% CI 4.9–5.3) lower admission rate (36% vs 42%, P < 0.001), and a AUD69 (95% CI 64–75) more expensive ED episode-of-care (AUD689 vs AUD622, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Clinically meaningful differences were noted between alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related ED presentations. The higher cost of care for ARPs likely reflects their longer time in the ED. The healthcare and economic implications of incidents of alcohol-related harm extend beyond the ED, with ARPs having higher rates of ambulance and police use than NARPs. What is known about the topic? The harmful use of alcohol is a major health issue globally contributing to morbidity and mortality. What does this paper add? The demographic profile, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of people presenting to emergency departments with alcohol-related harm differ to people arriving for other reasons. What are the implications for practitioners? Indicating alcohol as a cause of an ED presentation, as standard practice, may foster quality assurance/improvement activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to provide a detailed description of the flexible working arrangements (FWA) used by allied health professionals (AHP) on return from maternity leave. This is a crucial issue for staff management practices in a changing regulatory context. Methods: A retrospective convenience sample of AHP employed by Queensland Health (QH) in 2006, using deidentified payroll data, was analysed descriptively to determine employment status on return from maternity leave in 2006 to December 2014. A qualitative study that surveyed managers of AHP departments was subsequently undertaken to complement the data from the payroll study. Twelve managers, across six allied health professions in three hospitals in south-east Queensland were surveyed for this component. Results: The payroll study included 169 employees (138 full-time equivalent (FTE)), 61 of whom resigned over the study period. Of those who returned to work after the 2006 maternity event (n = 152), 92% (n = 140) initially returned part-time. At 31 December 2014, of the 108 staff working for QH, 77% (n = 83) were part-time. In total, 75.4 FTE positions were released over the 8-year period through reduced working hours and resignations. The perceptions of surveyed managers were consistent with the data from the payroll study. Conclusion: The study showed that most AHPs who took maternity leave returned to work part-time and remained part-time for an extended period. The data suggest that managers could permanently backfill a proportion of hours released due to FWA after maternity leave without major budgetary risk due to the need to accommodate existing employees' entitlements. However, this would require a significant policy change. What is known about this topic?: Current research on this topic has concentrated on the benefits of paid maternity leave, timing of return to work and use of FWA by employees on return to work after maternity leave. What does this paper add?: This paper presents the first comprehensive data on patterns of return to work and part-time hours following maternity leave for AHP employees. Access to a unique payroll dataset provided the opportunity to describe this for a cohort of AHP employees over a period of 8 years following a maternity event. A survey of AHP managers' experience with maternity leave and return to work arrangements supported the findings, underlining the associated difficulties with staff management. What are the implications for practitioners?: The hours released through resignations or reduced hours over this period of study suggest that management could backfill a proportion of released hours permanently, or at least offer temporary staff longer-term contracts, once an employee returns from maternity leave on reduced hours [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aims of this study were to assess: (1) concordance between patient preferences stated in advance care plans (ACPs) and hospital care over the subsequent 12 months; (2) change in preferences over time; (3) justifications for discordant care; and (4) effects of ACP completion on hospital utilisation. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of 198 patients with an ACP form registered with an ACP registry and tagged with a hospital unique record number. Data collected from ACP forms and hospital records comprised ACP completion and revisions, care preferences, patient characteristics and hospital care. Instances of care discordant with preferences were analysed as Type A (no ascertainable justification) and Type B (direct patient request or appropriate clinical indications). In a survivor subset, hospital utilisation was compared before and after ACP completion. Results: Mean (± s.d.) patient age was 79.5 ± 11.8 years. Patients had a mean (± s.d.) of 5.5 ± 2.5 comorbidities and 90 (46.4%) died within the 12 months after ACP completion. Most ACPs (130; 65.5%) were completed during index hospitalisation and 13 (6.5%) underwent revision, on average, 6.8 months later, all related to rescinding request for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Hospital care was fully concordant for 154 (77.8%) patients, with 39 (22.2%) receiving 60 instances of discordant care (15 (25%) Type A, 45 (75%) Type B), mostly related to surgical procedures (20; 33%) and intravenous fluids or antibiotics (26; 43%). Patients receiving discordant care had higher mortality (77% vs 45%; P < 0.001) and more rapid response team activations (34% vs 13%; P = 0.001) at 12 months than patients with concordant care. Among the 108 confirmed survivors at 12 months after ACP completion, emergency department presentations and hospital admissions per patient had decreased by ≥50% (P < 0.001) and hospital days had decreased by 25% (P = 0.042) compared with the 12 months before ACP completion. Conclusion: Most patients completing an ACP received hospital care fully concordant with their stated preferences, with few revising their preferences over time. Discordant care mostly related to justified supportive treatments or surgical procedures. Among survivors, ACP completion was associated with decreased use of hospital care. What is known about the topic?: ACPs that list patient preferences and care goals relieve family and patient distress and uncertainty regarding future care decisions as death approaches, decrease unwanted medical interventions and hospitalisations, and are associated with more patients dying at home. However, uncertainty surrounds the extent to which in-patient care provided to patients' concords with preferences stated in ACPs, which preferences are most adhered to, and whether preferences change over time, warranting revision of ACPs. What does this paper add?: This retrospective study of 198 patients completing an ACP, of whom almost half died within the following 12 months, showed that more than 75% received hospital care fully concordant with their stated preferences and, for decedents, most died at their preferred place of death. Relatively few patients changed their documented preferences over time, and all changes were for less use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Instances of discordant care mostly related to the administration of supportive treatments or surgical procedures and most were justified on the basis of patient request or appropriate clinical indications. Among 108 survivors, the number of emergency department presentations and hospital admissions per patient at 12 months after ACP completion was half those seen in the 12 months before ACP completion, whereas hospital days per patient decreased by 25%. What are the implications for practitioners?: Encouraging patients with progressive chronic disease to complete an ACP reduces their risk of receiving care they do not want, reflected in decreased use of hospital care. Preferences stated in ACPs are mostly stable over time and, if changed, tend to become more conservative in terms of CPR. Conversely, preferences stated in the ACP do not, as circumstances change, bind patients or clinicians to withholding care that relieves symptoms or prevents major morbidity in the short term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many GPs undertake postpartum care for women and their infants. GP follow-up enables early identification and management of problems, education and support for parenting, and reconnection with general practice following the birth. However, there is little information about GPs' understanding of their role in postpartum care and how it is undertaken. This cross-sectional survey of GPs in Southern Queensland, conducted between February and July 2013, describes the involvement of GPs in postpartum care. GPs were posted a 52-item questionnaire adapted from a previous Victorian GP study and were telephoned 2 weeks later. GPs completed the survey on paper or online. The response rate was 17.4% (163 GPs). Approximately 39% were uncertain whether women were happy with the GP-provided postpartum care. GPs' recommendations for the timing of postpartum reviews were inconsistent within and across birthing sectors and consultations took longer than anticipated. Developing guidelines around the timing and appropriate length of postpartum consultations could assist GPs in providing appropriate care for mothers and infants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]