Search

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper investigates the thermo-mechanical volume change behavior of municipal solid waste (MSW) by conducting drained heating–cooling tests at constant stresses and isothermal consolidation tests using a temperature-controlled triaxial apparatus. The experimental results show that the compression and swelling indexes of MSW specimen were temperature independent, and the heating-induced volumetric contraction was partially reversible upon cooling. Different from conventional soils, the thermally induced reversible and irreversible volumetric strains of MSW were much larger and stress level dependent. Apart from the experimental study, an isotropic thermo-elastoplastic constitutive model was developed in the framework of existing modified Cam-clay model, which allows the prediction of thermally induced volume changes of MSW. An important feature in this model was the derivation of thermally induced plastic volumetric strain based on the concept of equivalent stress. The capability of the proposed model was validated against the experimental results and showed good predictions. This paper serves as the first attempt to study the thermo-mechanical volume change behavior of MSW, and has provided additional data for the serviceability evaluation of existing pipes as well as settlement and capacity estimation of MSW landfills at elevated temperatures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The p–y method as a simplified analysis tool has been widely used to analyze the behavior of laterally loaded piles. This paper develops a novel cyclic p–y elastoplastic model within the framework of the single-surface bounding surface theory. The model can capture the soil stiffness degradation during cyclic loading by incorporating the cumulative plastic displacement to an interpolation function of the elastoplastic resistance coefficient. The model is relatively simple with only four parameters that can be determined from standard soil properties and stress–strain responses measured in direct simple shear tests. The performance of developed model is validated by predicting the cyclic lateral response of piles installed in soft clay during field and centrifuge tests published in the literature. The model can reliably simulate monotonic and cyclic responses of piles under different lateral loading patterns, and capture main characteristics of the pile-head load–displacement curve, such as nonlinearity, hysteresis, displacement accumulation, and stiffness degradation. It can also predict the evolution of the lateral deflection and sectional bending moment along the pile during cyclic loading. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the loading process of concrete members, the identification of characteristic damage states is not sensitive enough. This paper investigates the damage evolution of four concrete sandwich wallboards subjected to vertical compression by employing the strain energy density increment to enhance identification sensitivity. First, the equivalent elastic modulus model for a wallboard subjected to vertical compression is established based on the material stress–strain relationship. Then, the strain data of concrete, obtained from experiments and numerical simulations, are modeled as the normalized unit approximate strain energy density increments (NUASEDIs), which follow the damage evolution of the wallboard as a more sensitive index. The first cracking formation of wallboard corresponds to the first high NUASEDI. The failure damage state corresponds to the final high NUASEDI, which reflects the process changing from the local to the global failure. Finally, the strain energy density increment theory improves averagely the cracking identification sensitivity of concrete members by 13.32% and the failure identification sensitivity by 3.01%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a response to the discussions made by Robert K. Barrett and Dov Leshchinsky on the authors' paper "The influence of facing stiffness on the performance of two geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls." They appreciate the comments raised by Barrett and Leshchinsky. In doing so, they clarify and elucidate a number of points related to the details and contingents of the test program described in the referring paper. Moreover, they provide various implications to current practice.

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper presents a unified critical state parameter model for evaluating sand and overconsolidated clay, which is named as CASM-S. The model is formulated in terms of the modification of the clay and sand model, i.e., CASM, by incorporating the subloading surface theory with an overconsolidation state parameter R. Although the standard CASM proves to be useful in modelling overconsolidated clay and sand, the model (1) requires the rate of overconsolidated ratio to be constant which is in contrast to the observed behaviour of soils and (2) only allows elastic deformation to develop at the overconsolidated state that may underestimate the deformation corresponding to the peak stress or be unable to predict the actual stress path. By introducing a new material parameter u to those material properties of the standard CASM, the rate relationship of stress–strain for the CASM-S model is developed. The standard CASM can be either recovered or approximated as a special case of the overconsolidation state assumed in the CASM-S. The numerical integration of the newly proposed model is performed by the modified forward Euler method. Validation with undrained and drained overconsolidated clay and sand have demonstrated the capability of the CASM-S model to well predict the observed soil behaviours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Physics is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

High-cycle accumulation (HCA) models may be used for the prediction of settlements or stress relaxation in soils due to a large number of cycles (N > 103) with a relatively small-strain amplitude (εampl < 10-3). This paper presents a discussion of the elastic stiffness, [IMG], used in the basic constitutive equation of an HCA model, εεε[IMG], where [IMG] is the trend of effective stress, ε[IMG] is the trend of strain, ε[IMG] is the rate of strain accumulation, and ε[IMG] is the plastic strain rate. [IMG] interrelates the “trends” of stress and strain evolution. For the experimental assessment of the bulk modulus, ε[IMG], the rate of pore-water pressure accumulation, [IMG], in undrained cyclic triaxial tests and the rate of volumetric strain accumulation, ε[IMG], in drained cyclic tests have been compared. The pressure-dependent bulk modulus, K, was quantified from 15 pairs of drained and undrained tests with different consolidation pressures and stress amplitudes. It is demonstrated that both the curves ε[IMG] in the drained tests and u(N) in the undrained tests are well predicted by the authors’ HCA model if the elastic stiffness is determined using the method described in the present paper. A simplified determination of K from the unloading and reloading curve in an oedometric compression test is discussed. Les modèles d’accumulation à cycles élevés (HCA) peuvent être utilisés pour la prédiction des tassements ou de la relaxation des contraintes dans les sols en raison du nombre élevé de cycles (N > 103) ayant une amplitude relativement petite (εampl < 10–3). Cet article présente une discussion de la rigidité élastique, [IMG], utilisée dans l’équation constitutive de base du modèle HCA, εεε[IMG], où [IMG] est la tendance de la contrainte effective, ε[IMG] est la tendance de déformation, ε[IMG] est le taux d’accumulation des déformations et ε[IMG] est le taux de déformation plastique. [IMG] relie les « tendances » de l’évolution des contraintes et des déformations. Afin d’évaluer expérimentalement le module de compressibilité, ε[IMG], on a comparé le taux d’accumulation de pression interstitielle, [IMG], avec le taux d’accumulation de déformation volumique, ε[IMG], dans les essais triaxiaux cycliques non drainés. Le module de compressibilité, K, dépendant de la pression a été quantifié à partir de 15 paires d’essais drainés et non drainés ayant des pressions de consolidation et des amplitudes de contrainte différentes. Il a été démontré que les courbes ε[IMG] dans les essais drainés et u(N) dans les essais non drainés sont bien prédites par le modèle HCA développé, lorsque la rigidité élastique est déterminée de la manière décrite dans cet article. Une méthode de détermination du K à partir de la courbe de déchargement et de rechargement obtenue par un essai en compression oedométrique est discutée. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The authors offer a discussion of the article "Improved cone penetration test predictions of the state parameter of loose mine tailings." Topics include dominant properties differentiating drained cone penetration test (CPT) response from one soil to another, history of CPT scaling to spherical cavity expansion, and comparison of spherical cavity idealization to stresses during CPT sounding.

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents a response to the discussion made by S. K. Alfred Au and Albert T. Yeung on the authors' paper "Forms and sand transport in shallow hydraulic fractures in residual soil." They appreciate both the interest of Au and Young on their work and the opportunity to address some of the questions that arose from discussers' study. They are grateful for the discussers for pointing out their (Au and Young) papers and dissertations, and describing results that resemble those from their work. In this article, they discuss and clarify some points presented by the discussers.

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents the author's discussion on the paper "The influence of facing stiffness on the performance of two geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls," by Richard J. Bathurst and colleagues. It is noted that the paper provides an experimental work combined with Bathurst et al. interpretation of the results to demonstrate and quantify the effects of facing stiffness on the strain and force in geosynthetic reinforced wall. In this article, the author questions whether the interpretations of Bathurst et al. are fully supported by the experiments and whether the implications of some experimental measurements were ignored.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The authors of the article "Large-Strain Elastic Viscoplastic Consolidation Analysis of Very Soft Clay Layers With Vertical Drains Under Preloading" that appeared in a 2014 issue of the "Canadian Geotechnical Journal" respond to a report within the issue by Gholamreza Mesri and Cai Wang criticized their research. Topics include design of preloading, the calculation of the void ratio, soil consolidation, and related equations.

The article presents the author's discussion on the paper "The influence of facing stiffness on the performance of two geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls," by Richard J. Bathurst and colleagues. The author contravenes the claims of Bathurst et al. that the two walls described in the paper are comparable to each other and to walls available commercially. He stresses that the wrapped-face walls are never built with a clamping system. Moreover, he opines that the better wrapped walls have much closer spacing of reinforcements.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The reliability-based design of shallow foundations is generally implemented via a load and resistance factor design methodology embedded in a limit state design framework. For any particular limit state, the design proceeds by ensuring that the factored resistance equals or exceeds the factored load effects. Load and resistance factors are determined to ensure that the resulting design is sufficiently safe. Load factors are typically prescribed in structural codes and take into account load uncertainty. Factors applied to resistance depend on both uncertainty in the resistance (accounted for by a resistance factor) and desired target reliability (accounted for by a newly introduced consequence factor). This paper concentrates on how the consequence factor can be defined and specified to adjust the target reliability of a shallow foundation designed to resist bearing capacity failure. La conception basée sur la fiabilité pour des fondations peu profondes est généralement appliquée à partir d'une méthodologie de conception basée sur des facteurs de chargement et résistance, celle méthodologie étant introduite dans un cadre de conception selon les états limites. Pour tout état limite particulier, la conception s'effectue par une vérification afin que la résistance prévue soit égale ou supérieure aux effets de chargement prévus. Les facteurs de chargement et de résistance sont déterminés de telle sorte que la conception finale est suffisamment sécuritaire. Les facteurs appliqués à la résistance dépendent de l'incertitude dans la résistance (considérée par le facteur de résistance) et de la fiabilité visée (considérée par le facteur de conséquence, nouvellement introduit). Cet article discute de la manière dont le facteur de conséquence peut être défini et spécifié afin d'ajuster la fiabilité visée d'une fondation peu profonde conçue pour résister à la rupture en capacité portante. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Simple numerical methods that allow to obtain stress and strain paths in sand during self-boring pressuremeter tests are presented in this paper. The material is considered to undergo deformation in drained and plane-strain conditions. The flow rules of Rowe, Cambridge-type (Cam clay and Nova) model, and the sawtooth model are used in the analysis. Elastic strains are also considered in relation with the flow rule of Rowe. The proposed approach has been evaluated using a reference pressuremeter test performed on Ticino sand in a calibration chamber. The results indicate that the stress–strain–volume change responses of the sand predicted by the various models are quite similar, with and without consideration of the elastic strain components. Des méthodes numériques simples, qui permettent d’obtenir les cheminements de contraintes et déformations pendant les essais pressiométriques autoforeurs dans le sable, sont présentées dans cet article. Le matériau est considéré être sollicité en conditions drainées et en déformation plane. Les règles d’écoulement plastique utilisées sont celles de Rowe, de type Cambridge (Cam clay et Nova), et le modèle « dents de scie ». L’approche proposée tient aussi compte des déformations élastiques dans le cadre du modèle de Rowe. La méthode a été évaluée à l’aide d’un essai pressiométrique de référence, effectué dans une chambre de calibration, sur le sable de Tessin. Les résultats indiquent que les réponses du sable en termes des relations contraintes – déformations – changements de volume, prédites par les différents modèles, sont assez similaires, avec ou sans la prise en compte des déformations élastiques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]