Search

Presents a response to a discussion of the study "Diffusion of Oxygen Through a Pulp and Paper Residue Barrier." Importance of adapting the laboratory procedures to account for the large oxygen (O[sub2]) consumption potential of the deinking residues; Difficulty of monitoring O[sub2] in the source and in the collecting reservoirs; Migration of O[sub2] through a partially saturated soil layer under a concentration gradient.

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents a discussion of the research paper "Influence of Particle-Size Distribution Homogeneity on Shearing of Soils Subjected to Internal Erosion" by S. Li, A. R. Russell and D. Muir Wood published in the "Canadian Geotechnical Journal" in 2020. The discussion provided a few observations about the test procedure and preparation of soil samples used to study the internal erosion process of granular soils. It also addressed the threshold value of fines.

Applications of Bayesian updating commonly treat soil parameters as random variables. A significant issue with this is that soil parameters are highly subjective. Therefore, using traditional parameter-based models, Bayesian analysis starts from a subjective prior and it is unclear how this may influence the overall results of a study. In this paper, Bayesian updating is combined with a data-driven method, known as CRACA (i.e., CReep And Consolidation Analysis), for predicting the settlement of embankments on soft soil. Importantly, the method directly ingests measured oedometer data and, therefore, avoids the subjectivity involved in parameter selection. Because parameters are not used, scaling factors are introduced that account uncertainty associated with the laboratory measurements and the automated interpretation process. These factors have an initial value of unity (returning the prior) and are updated in a Bayesian framework as settlement monitoring data are revealed over time to improve future forecasts. The model was applied to an embankment case history and was shown to result in a rapid improvement in the accuracy and a narrowing of the 95% confidence interval as settlement monitoring data are revealed to the model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tolerably mobile subsea foundations are designed to slide on the seabed to accommodate flowline thermal expansion and contraction, and are a potential alternative to conventional (fixed) foundations. During the periodic sliding events that occur during operation, soil berms form at the extremities of the foundation footprint. The size of the berm increases throughout the life-cycle of the foundation, leading to increasing peak sliding resistance. This may hinder mobility of the foundation and overstress the pipeline connections that the foundation is designed to support. Equally, the berms may be relied on to reduce sliding and thus minimize settlement of the foundation, which can also overstress pipeline connections. This paper analyses the mechanism leading to berm accumulation and its mobilisation, also addressing periodic remoulding and reconsolidation of the sediment in the berm. A framework is proposed to predict the accumulation of soil berms and the resulting peak sliding resistance, and is validated by eight centrifuge model tests performed on a kaolin clay and a calcareous silt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The main objective of this paper is investigation of clayey soil setup effects on axial "resistance" and "stiffness" of small-scale piles with special attention on "overconsolidation ratio" (OCR) and "installation method". A consolidation chamber is developed and an instrumented model pile is either driven or jacked-in through saturated consolidated Kaolinite clay at different OCRs of 1.2 (normally consolidated, NC) and 4.8 (over consolidated, OC). The pile was static load tested at different time intervals of 1 h through 90 days. Higher pore pressures are induced during pile installation in NC compared to OC clay. The frictional resistance of OC soil is higher than NC at end of drive as well as end of setup in both driven and jacked-in piles. The frictional resistance of jacked-in piles is greater than driven piles at end of drive, but due to higher rate of setup, the long-term frictional resistance of driven piles is shown to be greater, attributed to more disturbance of the soil during installation of driven piles. Attempts are made to differentiate between the contributions of dissipation of excess pore pressure and non-pore pressure components for each consolidation condition and pile installation method. A relation is proposed to quantify the pile stiffness variations over time due to soil setup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soft soils often contain important fractions of fines and organic matter which are characterized by high shrinkage potential. Investigating the shrinkage behaviour of soft soils is of primary importance to assess the durability of infrastructures exposed to climatic stresses. This paper investigates the influence of soil fabric on the shrinkage properties and the change in the microporosity structures over drying. Soil shrinkage tests were performed on Shenzhen soft clay (SZ soft clay) and fibrous peat. The effect of the initial fabric was investigated by comparing the samples at natural and reconstituted states, and the reconstituted peat samples with different fibre contents. To assist in the interpretation of the results, microstructural changes in the soil fabric were investigated by mercury intrusion porosimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and micro-CT scan. As the water gradually drains from the multilevel pores, different drying stages were identified. Pore refinements occurred during the drying process, accompanied by a progressive reduction in the peak pore entrance. Contrary to SZ soft clay, intensive shrinkage occurred in the last stage of fibrous peats, due to the collapse of interpores and cracks created during drying. The results showed that the magnitude of the intensive shrinkage increased with the fibre content. It suggests that fibres act as an unstable element in peat upon drying. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unsaturated soils with a high degree of saturation (HDS) are commonly encountered in marine and lacustrine sediments. In these soils, the gas phase generally exists in the state of discrete bubbles, which is sensitive to stress and temperature changes and can dramatically change the soil's engineering properties. This paper explores the thermal-induced behaviour of HDS soils using an efficient extended precise integration method (XPIM). Biot poroelasticity theory, extended to include thermal effects and compressibility of gas–water mixture, is employed to analyze the soil behaviour under non-isothermal conditions. Based on the Laplace–Fourier transform and Taylor series expansion, such problems can be solved by XPIM. The robustness of XPIM was confirmed by comparing the present results with analytical solutions and test data. Extensive parametric studies are undertaken to examine both the effects of soil grain thermal expansion and anisotropic permeability on soil behaviour and temperature effects on the degree of saturation (Sr). The thermal-induced variations in Sr are more pronounced with lower initial values (e.g., 90% compared to 99%). These quantitative results demonstrate the benefits of the proposed method, which proves to be extremely efficient and several orders more precise than conventional numerical approaches, with its precision limited only by the computational effort used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Excessive settlements or failure of piles observed in some Brazilian unsaturated soil sites indicates that the shaft resistance can vary with the seasonal variability of top soil water content, especially in the case of foundations of transmission towers or installed at the periphery of buildings, situations in which the soil is more susceptible to suction fluctuation due to the higher exposure to rainfall action. The objective of the research described in this paper was to provide field evidence with the purpose of alerting practising engineers and to help researchers to better understand the contribution of matric suction on pile capacity. For this aim, the seasonal variability of the shaft resistance of Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) piles in a typical Brazilian unsaturated tropical soil was evaluated by performing axial tensile load tests on eight instrumented CFA piles in different periods of the year. Soil suction was monitored throughout the period of tests, and the results indicate that the shaft resistance of the pile upper part varies considerably during the year and tends to decrease with decreasing soil suction. This work provides valuable insights into the application of unsaturated soil mechanics, which is usually disconnected to classical geotechnical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper presents a new interpretation procedure to estimate the initial state parameter from cone penetration testing (CPTu) in undrained conditions based on the results from a comprehensive set of numerical simulations of CPTu in low permeability liquefiable soil. CPTu simulations are performed using the Particle Finite Element Method, whereas the material response is modelled with the Clay and Sand Model. The effects of soil constitutive parameters and roughness of the soil–steel interface are examined. It turns out that the numerical results are correctly summarized by an analytical relation derived from undrained cavity expansion results in critical state soils, as long as the constraints resulting from cone geometry are taken into account. The resulting adapted analytical formulation is notable for its simplicity and ease of use, comparing favorably with existing alternatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Geotechnical problems with total stress changes occurring rapidly relative to the soil consolidation time can be conveniently addressed using an effective stress-based approach. For saturated states, analytical formulations of pore-pressure coefficients adopting coherent effective stress concepts exist. These formulations allow the induced pore water pressure variations and the corresponding effective stress changes to be determined. For unsaturated states, there are no analytical formulations of pore-pressure coefficients that adopt a suitable effective stress concept. This paper presents analytical derivations of pore-pressure coefficients for unsaturated elastic isotropic soils using the generalized effective stress (valid for saturated and unsaturated states) for different total stress changes. The model performance is described, and flowcharts to be adopted in engineering practice are provided. Compared with an existing approach that is not based on the effective stress, the proposed one requires fewer constitutive parameters (one of which, conveniently, is the soil bulk modulus), allows to analytically obtain the existing expressions for saturated states when the degree of saturation is 1 and to readily determine the retention curve under undrained conditions. Existing experimental data were analysed, and satisfactory interpretations and predictions of the experimental results were obtained. The proposed framework is a valuable tool for undrained mechanical analyses of unsaturated soils under different practical applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents a unified critical state parameter model for evaluating sand and overconsolidated clay, which is named as CASM-S. The model is formulated in terms of the modification of the clay and sand model, i.e., CASM, by incorporating the subloading surface theory with an overconsolidation state parameter R. Although the standard CASM proves to be useful in modelling overconsolidated clay and sand, the model (1) requires the rate of overconsolidated ratio to be constant which is in contrast to the observed behaviour of soils and (2) only allows elastic deformation to develop at the overconsolidated state that may underestimate the deformation corresponding to the peak stress or be unable to predict the actual stress path. By introducing a new material parameter u to those material properties of the standard CASM, the rate relationship of stress–strain for the CASM-S model is developed. The standard CASM can be either recovered or approximated as a special case of the overconsolidation state assumed in the CASM-S. The numerical integration of the newly proposed model is performed by the modified forward Euler method. Validation with undrained and drained overconsolidated clay and sand have demonstrated the capability of the CASM-S model to well predict the observed soil behaviours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Environmental Reviews is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The authors discuss a study by X. Cui and colleagues about clogging of pervious concrete pile caused by soil piping. Topics discussed include brief information about the delimiting particle size, a graph showing grain-size distribution of the sand-gravel mixtures, and methods of determining maximum size of movable particle.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

High-cycle accumulation (HCA) models may be used for the prediction of settlements or stress relaxation in soils due to a large number of cycles (N > 103) with a relatively small-strain amplitude (εampl < 10-3). This paper presents a discussion of the elastic stiffness, [IMG], used in the basic constitutive equation of an HCA model, εεε[IMG], where [IMG] is the trend of effective stress, ε[IMG] is the trend of strain, ε[IMG] is the rate of strain accumulation, and ε[IMG] is the plastic strain rate. [IMG] interrelates the “trends” of stress and strain evolution. For the experimental assessment of the bulk modulus, ε[IMG], the rate of pore-water pressure accumulation, [IMG], in undrained cyclic triaxial tests and the rate of volumetric strain accumulation, ε[IMG], in drained cyclic tests have been compared. The pressure-dependent bulk modulus, K, was quantified from 15 pairs of drained and undrained tests with different consolidation pressures and stress amplitudes. It is demonstrated that both the curves ε[IMG] in the drained tests and u(N) in the undrained tests are well predicted by the authors’ HCA model if the elastic stiffness is determined using the method described in the present paper. A simplified determination of K from the unloading and reloading curve in an oedometric compression test is discussed. Les modèles d’accumulation à cycles élevés (HCA) peuvent être utilisés pour la prédiction des tassements ou de la relaxation des contraintes dans les sols en raison du nombre élevé de cycles (N > 103) ayant une amplitude relativement petite (εampl < 10–3). Cet article présente une discussion de la rigidité élastique, [IMG], utilisée dans l’équation constitutive de base du modèle HCA, εεε[IMG], où [IMG] est la tendance de la contrainte effective, ε[IMG] est la tendance de déformation, ε[IMG] est le taux d’accumulation des déformations et ε[IMG] est le taux de déformation plastique. [IMG] relie les « tendances » de l’évolution des contraintes et des déformations. Afin d’évaluer expérimentalement le module de compressibilité, ε[IMG], on a comparé le taux d’accumulation de pression interstitielle, [IMG], avec le taux d’accumulation de déformation volumique, ε[IMG], dans les essais triaxiaux cycliques non drainés. Le module de compressibilité, K, dépendant de la pression a été quantifié à partir de 15 paires d’essais drainés et non drainés ayant des pressions de consolidation et des amplitudes de contrainte différentes. Il a été démontré que les courbes ε[IMG] dans les essais drainés et u(N) dans les essais non drainés sont bien prédites par le modèle HCA développé, lorsque la rigidité élastique est déterminée de la manière décrite dans cet article. Une méthode de détermination du K à partir de la courbe de déchargement et de rechargement obtenue par un essai en compression oedométrique est discutée. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)