Search

Simple Summary: We evaluated the real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), or esophageal adenocarcinoma. In addition, we identified subgroups that may experience superior outcomes. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 11.7 months and 18.2 months, respectively, whereas the objective response rate was 70.3%. Our results showed that nivolumab plus chemotherapy is effective and safe for first-line treatment of Turkish patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric, GEJ, or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patient selection is crucial for optimal outcomes. Future studies are needed to identify predictive biomarkers and treatment strategies to further improve the prognosis of patients. Based on the CheckMate 649 trial, nivolumab plus chemotherapy is the recommended first-line treatment for HER2-negative unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of this regimen in Turkish patients and identified subgroups that may experience superior outcomes. Conducted across 16 oncology centers in Turkey, this study retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of adult patients diagnosed with HER2-negative unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric, GEJ, or esophageal adenocarcinoma from 2016 to 2023. This study included 111 patients (54 women, 57 men) with a median age of 58 years. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11.7 months and 18.2 months, respectively, whereas the objective response rate (ORR) was 70.3%. Multivariable analyses revealed that previous curative surgery was a favorable independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. Conversely, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 emerged as an adverse independent prognostic factor for OS. The safety profile of nivolumab plus chemotherapy was found to be manageable. Our findings support the use of nivolumab plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Turkish patients with HER2-negative unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric, GEJ, or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patient selection based on clinical characteristics is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is a well-defined treatment modality for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Although there are several options in terms of conditioning regimens before AHCT, no one treatment is accepted as a standard of care. This study aimed to compare different conditioning regimens for the treatment of NHL and HL. Materials and Methods: Medical records of 62 patients who had undergone AHCT following BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) and high-dose ICE (hICE; ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) conditioning regimens were analyzed retrospectively and compared in terms of efficacy and adverse effects. Results: The study included a total of 29 and 33 patients diagnosed with relapsed/refractory NHL and HL, respectively. Patients received BEAM (n=37) or hICE (n=25) regimens for conditioning. One-year overall survival was 73±6% in all patients. One-year overall survival was 71 ±8% and 74±9% in the BEAM and hICE groups, respectively (p=0.86). The incidences of nausea/vomiting (grade ≥2) (84% vs. 44.7%; p=0.04) and mucositis (grade ≥2) (13% vs. 3%; p=0.002) were higher in the hICE group compared to the BEAM group. In addition, we witnessed significantly more hepatotoxicity of grade ≥2 (40% vs. 2.7%; p<0.005) and nephrotoxicity of grade ≥2 (48% vs. 2.7%; p<0.005) among patients who received hICE. Significantly more patients (n=4; 25%) in the hICE group experienced veno-occlusive disease (VOD) compared to the BEAM arm, where no patients developed VOD(p=0.01). Conclusion: There was no difference in terms of overall survival between the BEAM and hICE groups. We observed significantly more adverse effects among patients treated with hICE. The BEAM regimen seems to be superior to hICE in terms of toxicity profile with comparable efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL and HL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]