Search

Background. Unfractionated heparin is administered in patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Anticoagulation monitoring is recommended, with an anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) targeting 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL. Owing to heparin's heterogeneous pharmacokinetic properties, anti-Xa is unpredictable, generating a challenge in anticoagulation practices. The aim of this study was to build a pharmacokinetic model of heparin accounting for potential confounders, and derive an optimized dosing regimen for a given anti-Xa target. Methods. Adult patients undergoing VA-ECMO were included between January 2020 and June 2021. Anticoagulation was managed with an initial 100 IU/kg heparin loading dose followed by a continuous infusion targeting 0.2 to 0.7 IU/mL anti-Xa. The data were split into model development and model validation cohorts. Statistical analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed effects modeling population approach. Model-based simulations were performed to develop an optimized dosing regimen targeting the desired anti-Xa. Results. A total of 74 patients were included, with 1703 anti-Xa observations. A single-compartment model best fitted the data. Interpatient variability for distribution volume was best explained by body weight, C-reactive protein and ECMO indication (post-cardiotomy shock or medical cardiogenic shock), and interpatient variability for elimination clearance was best explained by serum creatinine and C-reactive protein. Simulations using the optimized regimen according to these covariates showed accurate anti-Xa target attainment. Conclusion. In adult patients on VA-ECMO, heparin's effect increased with serum creatinine and medical indication, whereas it decreased with body weight and systemic inflammation. We propose an optimized dosing regimen accounting for key covariates, capable of accurately predicting a given anti-Xa target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ICU patients with SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia are at risk to develop a central dysautonomia which can contribute to mortality and respiratory failure. The pupillary size and its reactivity to light are controlled by the autonomic nervous system. Pupillometry parameters (PP) allow to predict outcomes in various acute brain injuries. We aim at assessing the most predictive PP of in-hospital mortality and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IV). We led a prospective, two centers, observational study. We recruited adult patients admitted to ICU for a severe SARS-CoV-2 related pneumonia between April and August 2020. The pupillometry was performed at admission including the measurement of baseline pupillary diameter (PD), PD variations (PDV), pupillary constriction velocity (PCV) and latency (PDL). Fifty patients, 90 % males, aged 66 (60–70) years were included. Seven (14 %) patients died in hospital. The baseline PD (4.1 mm [3.5; 4.8] vs 2.6 mm [2.4; 4.0], P = 0.009), PDV (33 % [27; 39] vs 25 % [15; 36], P = 0.03) and PCV (3.5 mm.s−1 [2.8; 4.4] vs 2.0 mm.s−1 [1.9; 3.8], P = 0.02) were significantly lower in patients who will die. A PD value <2.75 mm was the most predictive parameter of in-hospital mortality, with an AUC = 0.81, CI 95 % [0.63; 0.99]. Twenty-four (48 %) patients required IV. PD and PDV were significantly lower in patients who were intubated (3.5 mm [2.8; 4.4] vs 4.2 mm [3.9; 5.2], P = 0.03; 28 % [25; 36 %] vs 35 % [32; 40], P = 0.049, respectively). A reduced baseline PD is associated with bad outcomes in COVID-19 patients admitted in ICU. It is likely to reflect a brainstem autonomic dysfunction. [Display omitted] • Pupillary parameters PD, PDV and slope were found significantly lower in COVID-19 patients who will die. • A reduced baseline PD <2.75 mm is the most predictive parameter of in-hospital mortality. • PD and PDV were also associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation with greater significance for PD. • A reduced PD could result from a central autonomic impairment related to a brainstem dysfunction in severe COVID-19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Visual Abstract: http://links.lww.com/EJA/A927., (Copyright © 2024 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.)

Background: Preventive anesthetic impact on the high rates of postoperative neurocognitive disorders in elderly patients is debated. The Prevention of postOperative Cognitive dysfunction by Ketamine (POCK) study aimed to assess the effect of ketamine on this condition., Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, interventional study. Patients ≥60 years undergoing major orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive preoperative ketamine 0.5 mg/kg as an intravenous bolus (n = 152) or placebo (n = 149) in random blocks stratified according to the study site, preoperative cognitive status and age. The primary outcome was the proportion of objective delayed neurocognitive recovery (dNR) defined as a decline of one or more neuropsychological assessment standard deviations on postoperative day 7. Secondary outcomes included a three-month incidence of objective postoperative neurocognitive disorder (POND), as well as delirium, anxiety, and symptoms of depression seven days and three months after surgery., Results: Among 301 patients included, 292 (97%) completed the trial. Objective dNR occurred in 50 (38.8%) patients in the ketamine group and 54 (40.9%) patients in the placebo group (OR [95% CI] 0.92 [0.56; 1.51], p = 0.73) on postoperative day 7. Incidence of objective POND three months after surgery did not differ significantly between the two groups nor did incidence of delirium, anxiety, apathy, and fatigue. Symptoms of depression were less frequent in the ketamine group three months after surgery (OR [95% CI] 0.34 [0.13-0.86])., Conclusions: A single preoperative bolus of intravenous ketamine does not prevent the occurrence of dNR or POND in elderly patients scheduled for major orthopedic surgery. (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02892916)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Postoperative delirium (POD) is one of the most frequent complication after surgery in elderly patients, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged length of stay, cognitive and functional decline leading to loss of autonomy, and important additional healthcare costs. Perioperative inflammatory stress is a key element in POD genesis. Melatonin exhibits antioxidative and immune-modulatory proprieties that are promising concerning delirium prevention, but in perioperative context literature are scarce and conflicting. We hypothesise that perioperative melatonin can reduce the incidence of POD., Methods and Analysis: The DELIRLESS trial is a prospective, national multicentric, phase III, superiority, comparative randomised (1:1) double-blind clinical trial. Among patients aged 70 or older, hospitalised and scheduled for surgery of a severe fracture of a lower limb, 718 will be randomly allocated to receive either melatonin 4 mg per os or placebo, every night from anaesthesiologist preoperative consultation and up to 5 days after surgery. The primary outcome is POD incidence measured by either the French validated translation of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) score for patients hospitalised in surgery, or CAM-ICU score for patients hospitalised in ICU (Intensive Care Unit). Daily delirium assessment will take place during 10 days after surgery, or until the end of hospital stay if it is shorter. POD cumulative incidence function will be compared at day 10 between the two randomised arms in a competing risks framework, using the Fine and Grey model with death as a competing risk of delirium., Ethics and Dissemination: The DELIRLESS trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee the Comité de Protection des Personnes (CPP) Sud-Est (ref CPP2020-18-99 2019-003210-14) for all study centres. Participant recruitment begins in December 2020. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals., Trial Registration Number: NCT04335968, first posted 7 April 2020., Protocol Version Identifier: N°3-0, 3 May 2021., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)