Search

Partial heart transplantation is a new type of transplant that delivers growing heart valve replacements for babies. Partial heart transplantation differs from orthotopic heart transplantation because only the part of the heart containing the heart valve is transplanted. It also differs from homograft valve replacement because viability of the graft is preserved by tissue matching, minimizing donor ischemia times, and recipient immunosuppression. This preserves partial heart transplant viability and allows the grafts to fulfill biological functions such as growth and self‐repair. These advantages over conventional heart valve prostheses are balanced by similar disadvantages as other organ transplants, most importantly limitations in donor graft availability. Prodigious progress in xenotransplantation promises to solve this problem by providing an unlimited source of donor grafts. In order to study partial heart xenotransplantation, a suitable large animal model is important. Here we describe our research protocol for partial heart xenotransplantation in nonhuman primates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the historic progress in xenotransplantation, specifically the successful transplantation of genetically-edited pig kidneys into living recipients. The transplantation of genetically-edited porcine hearts and kidneys into gravely ill patients has been performed at the University of Maryland and Massachusetts General Hospital, respectively. These transplants are considered major milestones in advancing clinical xenotransplantation and are based on decades of preclinical research. Other centers, such as NYU Langone Medical Center, have also made advancements in xenotransplantation, including the dual transplant of a device and thymo-kidney in a living recipient. These efforts aim to provide more readily available organs to patients and depend on the collaboration of large multispecialty teams and industrial partners. The article acknowledges the courage and support of the recipients and their families in advancing the field of xenotransplantation. [Extracted from the article]

We have been testing genetically engineered (GE) pig hearts and optimizing immunosuppression (IS) in non‐human primates (NHPs) since 2005. We demonstrate how we translated this preclinical investigation into a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved clinical cardiac xenotransplantation. First, genetically engineered (GE) pig hearts were transplanted into the abdomen of NHP along with IS, which included anti‐CD20 and anti‐CD40‐based co‐stimulation blockade antibodies. We reported 945 days of survival of three gene GE pig hearts in NHPs. Building on this proof‐of‐concept, we tested 3–10 gene‐modified GE pig hearts (in order to improve the immunocompatibility of the xenograft further) in a life‐supporting orthotopic model, but had limited success due to perioperative cardiac xenograft dysfunction (PCXD). With novel non‐ischemic continuous perfusion preservation (NICP), using the XVIVO Heart solution (XHS), life‐supporting survival was extended to 9 months. We approached the FDA under an application for "Expanded Access" (EA), to transplant a GE pig heart in a patient with end‐stage non‐ischemic cardiomyopathy. He was without other therapeutic options and dependent on VA‐ECMO. A team of FDA reviewers reviewed our preclinical research experience and data and allowed us to proceed. This clinical cardiac xenotransplantation was performed, and the patient survived for 60 days, demonstrating the translational preclinical investigation of cardiac xenotransplantation from bench to bedside. The ultimate etiology of graft failure is currently a topic of investigation and lessons learned will progress the field forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report orthotopic (life‐supporting) survival of genetically engineered porcine cardiac xenografts (with six gene modifications) for almost 9 months in baboon recipients. This work builds on our previously reported heterotopic cardiac xenograft (three gene modifications) survival up to 945 days with an anti‐CD40 monoclonal antibody‐based immunosuppression. In this current study, life‐supporting xenografts containing multiple human complement regulatory, thromboregulatory, and anti‐inflammatory proteins, in addition to growth hormone receptor knockout (KO) and carbohydrate antigen KOs, were transplanted in the baboons. Selective "multi‐gene" xenografts demonstrate survival greater than 8 months without the requirement of adjunctive medications and without evidence of abnormal xenograft thickness or rejection. These data demonstrate that selective "multi‐gene" modifications improve cardiac xenograft survival significantly and may be foundational for paving the way to bridge transplantation in humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Post‐transplantation cardiac xenograft growth in an orthotopic pig to baboon model is a life‐limiting phenomenon that is poorly understood. Possible causes of growth include both intrinsic and extrinsic etiologies. Extrinsic causes are thought to be attributed to maladaptive hypertrophy as a result of increased mean arterial pressure experienced by the cardiac xenograft after transplantation. Intrinsic causes are thought to be a result of discordant growth between pig xenografts and recipients. This results in intrinsic xenograft growth that parallels the donor and continues in a recipient in which growth is relatively minimal, controlled in part by the growth hormone receptor, IGF‐1 axis. Recently, Zaman, et al. published a study titled, "Selective loss of resident macrophage‐derived insulin‐like growth factor‐1 abolishes adaptive cardiac growth to stress," in Immunity, Volume 54; Issue 9, pp. 2057–2071. They demonstrated that insulin growth factor‐secreting resident macrophages that sense hypertensive stress are a mechanistic link to hypertension and maladaptive hypertrophy in the setting of hypertension. While notable in its own right, we comment on how this work may shed light on a new underlying mechanism for the use of growth hormone receptor knockout (GHRKO) pig donors and its role in addressing post‐transplantation xenograft growth. We hypothesize that GHRKO pig donors contain syngeneic resident cardiac macrophages that abrogate IGF‐1 mediated maladaptive hypertrophy from hypertension. Futures studies in post‐transplantation cardiac xenotransplantation growth should examine this mechanism as a potential contributor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]