Search

Showing total 38,290 results

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Search Limiters Peer Reviewed Remove constraint Search Limiters: Peer Reviewed Publication Year Range Last 3 years Remove constraint Publication Year Range: Last 3 years Publication Type Academic Journals Remove constraint Publication Type: Academic Journals Publisher public library of science Remove constraint Publisher: public library of science
38,290 results

Search Results

1. How, and why, science and health researchers read scientific (IMRAD) papers.

2. Detection of bisphenol A in thermal paper receipts and assessment of human exposure: A case study from Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

3. Cost and statistical efficiency of posture assessment by inclinometry and observation, exemplified by paper mill work.

4. Correction: Cost and statistical efficiency of posture assessment by inclinometry and observation, exemplified by paper mill work.

5. How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?

6. Scientific misconduct responsibility attribution: An empirical study on byline position and team identity in Chinese medical papers.

7. "Best Paper" awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science.

8. Implementing paper-based patient-reported outcome collection within outpatient integrative health and medicine.

9. Expansive data, extensive model: Investigating discussion topics around LLM through unsupervised machine learning in academic papers and news.

10. The prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes by periodontal treatment during pregnancy (PROBE) intervention study-A controlled intervention study: Protocol paper.

11. Studying the context of psychoses to improve outcomes in Ethiopia (SCOPE): Protocol paper.

12. Genetic identification of three CITES-listed sharks using a paper-based Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC).

13. Developing a disease-specific patient reported outcome measure to enhance understanding of the lived experiences of ANCA associated vasculitis: A protocol paper.

14. Evaluating fomite risk of brown paper bags storing personal protective equipment exposed to SARS-CoV-2: A quasi-experimental study.

15. Predicting the main pollen season of Broussonetia Papyrifera (paper mulberry) tree.

16. Conducting epidemiological studies on snakebite in nomadic populations: A methodological paper.

17. An analysis of retracted papers in Computer Science.

18. Product innovation design process combined Kano and TRIZ with AD: Case study.

19. Sampling is decisive to determination of Leishmania (Viannia) species.

20. Citizen-led sampling to monitor phosphate levels in freshwater environments using a simple paper microfluidic device.

21. Silicosis, tuberculosis and silica exposure among artisanal and small-scale miners: A systematic review and modelling paper.

22. Anchoring effects in the assessment of papers: An empirical survey of citing authors.

23. Rapid identification and quantitation of single plant seed allergen using paper-based microfluidics.

24. Distinguishing ChatGPT(-3.5, -4)-generated and human-written papers through Japanese stylometric analysis.

25. Women's representation as authors of retracted papers in the biomedical sciences.

26. Higher theta-beta ratio during screen-based vs. printed paper is related to lower attention in children: An EEG study.

27. A stochastic generative model for citation networks among academic papers.

28. Diagnostic accuracy of qPCR and microscopy for cutaneous leishmaniasis in rural Ecuador: A Bayesian latent class analysis.

29. Caste-specific storage of dopamine-related substances in the brains of four Polistes paper wasp species.

30. Gene silencing for invasive paper wasp management: Synthesized dsRNA can modify gene expression but did not affect mortality.

31. Bacterial and fungal gut microbiota of supralittoral talitrid amphipods feeding on brown macroalgae and paper.

32. Call for Papers: PLOS Medicine Special Issue on Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance-Surveillance and Prevention

34. Correction: Paper-based ELISA diagnosis technology for human brucellosis based on a multiepitope fusion protein.

35. Using a design-based research approach to develop a technology-supported physical education course to increase the physical activity levels of university students: Study protocol paper.

36. Improved DNA extraction on bamboo paper and cotton is tightly correlated with their crystallinity and hygroscopicity.

37. Intravenous iron and iron deficiency anemia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review.

38. Remanufacturing and channel strategies in e-commerce closed-loop supply chain.

39. A scoping review on the use of consumer-grade EEG devices for research.

40. Self-correction in science: The effect of retraction on the frequency of citations.

41. A protocol paper for the MOTION Study-A longitudinal study in a cohort aged 60 years and older to obtain mechanistic knowledge of the role of the gut microbiome during normal healthy ageing in order to develop strategies that will improve lifelong health and wellbeing.

42. Who tweets climate change papers? investigating publics of research through users' descriptions.

43. The impact of corporate digital transformation on the export product quality: Evidence from Chinese enterprises.

44. An investigation into gender distributions in scholarly publications among dental faculty members in Iran.

45. Using citation networks to evaluate the impact of text length on keyword extraction.

46. Collection of cancer Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) to link with primary and secondary electronic care records to understand and improve long term cancer outcomes: A protocol paper.

47. The boundary-spanning mechanisms of Nobel Prize winning papers.

48. Review of guidance papers on regression modeling in statistical series of medical journals.

49. Understanding challenges to medical and dental student research practices. An insight from a cross-sectional study of the public sector in Pakistan.

50. Anchoring effects in the assessment of papers: The proposal for an empirical survey of citing authors.