Search

Introduction: Rates of falls increase with ageing and age-related biological and functional changes. Most falls in later life occur as a result of a complex interaction between multiple intrinsic and environmental risk factors. Falls and falls-related injuries are major public health problems that often require healthcare intervention and rehabilitation (1) and recurrent falls are a frequent trigger for older people and their families seeking long term institutional care. Therefore, the prevention and management of falls has substantial relevance for integrated care systems. This study sought to obtain international insight into the implementation of pathways or programs addressing balance, mobility and/or falls prevention in primary care or community services. Methods: A survey template was created to include the key elements detected during a literature review conducted by MUG. The template included questions on screening, assessment, intervention components, target group, professionals involved and tools used for assessment and/or monitoring experience and outcomes. Members of IFIC's international Special Interest Groups(SIGs) on Ageing and Frailty, Intermediate Care were invited to complete an online EU Survey tool available from 01.06-01.08.2021. Responses were analysed by two researchers and results considered by the co-authors in an online focus group. Results: 16 people from 11 countries completed the online survey. 9/16 reported fully implemented falls programs or care pathways in their region or country: UK (3), Ireland (1), Spain (1), Indonesia (1), Peru (1), Australia (1) and Northwest USA (1). Seven examples are focused on older citizens but one is for older people with frailty & neurodegenerative diseases (New South Wales, Australia) and one is a pathway for patients in Indonesia, independent of disease and/or age limits. Professional disciplines involved differed across countries but allied health professionals and nurses were commonly involved. Family physicians were involved in only the examples from the USA and Indonesia. Specialist physicians in geriatric medicine were involved in five of the examples. Five programs involved pharmacists to advise on medication and two programs involved trained volunteers. Public/patient information and education was the most common intervention and was the sole intervention in the Spanish example reported. Three of the nine programs did not routinely evaluate patient experience or functional outcomes. Only three pathways enabled patient level data to flow through the electronic care record. Conclusion: The international survey offers initial insight into implemented pathways and programs for the prevention and management of falls in primary care and community settings in different countries. It paves the way for a more targeted survey and Delphi consensus process on the design and benchmarking of integrated services to address the challenge of falls in ageing societies. Implications: The evidence-based examples in the survey highlight processes and interventions that are readily transferable and where adoption will facilitate standardization and improved quality of care. The next phase aims to agree key components and performance indicators to allow future benchmarking and system-based evidence generation on prevention and management of falls in the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]