Search

Objectives: To investigate the effect of pure passive movement on both cortical and subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)., Methods: Median nerve SEPs were recorded in 8 patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD) and two patients with essential tremor. PD patients underwent electrode implantation in the subthalamic (STN) nucleus (3 patients) and pedunculopontine (PPTg) nucleus (5 patients), while 2 patients with essential tremor were implanted in the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus. In anesthetized patients, SEPs were recorded at rest and during a passive movement of the thumb of the stimulated wrist from the intracranial electrode contacts and from the scalp. Also the high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were analyzed., Results: Amplitudes of both deep and scalp components were decreased during passive movement, but the reduction was higher at cortical than subcortical level. Also the HFOs were reduced by movement., Conclusion: The different amount of the movement-related decrease suggests that the cortical SEP gating is not only the result of a subcortical somatosensory volley attenuation, but a further mechanism acting at cortical level should be considered., Significance: Our results are important for understanding the physiological mechanism of the sensory-motor interaction during passive movement., (Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Despite consensus on some neurophysiological hallmarks of the Parkinsonian state (such as beta) band increase) a single mechanism is unlikely to explain the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Most experimental evidence to date correlates with an extreme degree of nigral neurodegeneration and not with different stages of PD progression. It seems inappropriate to combine substantially different patients – newly diagnosed, early fluctuators or advanced dyskinetic individuals – within the same group. An efficacious STN‐DBS imposes a new activity pattern within brain circuits, favouring alpha‐ and gamma‐like neuronal discharge, and restores the thalamo‐cortical transmission pathway through axonal activation. In addition, stimulation via the dorsal contacts of the macro‐electrode may affect cortical activation antidromically. However, basal ganglia (BG) modulation remains cardinal for 'OFF'‐'ON' transition (as revealed by cGMP increase occurring during STN‐DBS in the substantia nigra pars reticulata and internal globus pallidus). New research promises to clarify to what extent STN‐DBS restores striato‐centric bidirectional plasticity, and whether non‐neuronal cellular actions (microglia, neurovascular) play a part. Future studies will assess whether extremely anticipated DBS or lesioning in selected patients are capable of providing neuroprotection to the synuclein‐mediated alterations of synaptic efficiency. This review addresses these open issues through the specific mechanisms prevailing in a given disease stage. In patients undergoing early protocol, alteration in endogenous transmitters and recovery of plasticity are concurrent players. In advanced stages, re‐modulation of endogenous band frequencies, disruption of pathological pattern and/or antidromic cortical activation are, likely, the prominent modes. This manuscript proposes a new perspective in interpreting the efficacy of STN‐DBS in PD patients. The main concept is that the burden of neurodegeneration and PD stage represent the major factors. Whereas rescuing neuroplasticity plus rebalancing of endogenous band frequencies are early players, instead, in advanced PD stages, antidromic impact on cortex and circuitry disruption exert major roles. The understanding of the specific mechanisms prevalent in any given subject is crucial for on‐going trials, either experimenting adaptive DBS or targeting young patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent introduction of frameless devices has enabled stereotactic neurosurgery to reach a level of accuracy that is comparable to traditional frame-based methodologies. Among frameless devices, the Nexframe appears to be very useful in implanting electrodes into the subthalamic nucleus or other structures for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. However, frameless devices, including the Nexframe, limit the possibility of intraoperative visual control of the placement of electrodes in the brain. Utilizing intraoperative O-arm Computed tomography (CT) scan or high-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could overcome this limitation, but their high cost restricts their use. Thus, in this paper we propose an innovation in Nexframe surgical planning that allows the intraoperative use of a C-arm X-ray apparatus to establish: (1) the progression of the electrode guide tube and the electrode in the brain; (2) the accuracy of the electrode trajectory; and (3) the correct attainment of the target. The proposed frameless technique using the Nexframe has been developed and successfully applied in our practice. It was shown to be helpful in overcoming the major issues that are usually encountered when electrodes are placed in the brain with frameless neurosurgery and reduced the risk of having to re-operate on patients to reposition the electrodes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]