Search

While the relationships between dry land surface conditions, heat, and aridity have been well‐established, few studies have addressed whether global warming will affect the ability of wet conditions to moderate high temperatures and atmospheric aridity. Using Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 models, we demonstrate that absolute changes in the monthly maximum temperature distribution during Central North American summers strongly outweigh the historical cooling effect of high precipitation and soil moisture conditions. Although wet conditions nearly always prevent concurrent extreme temperatures in the baseline period, these conditions are 40%–48% and 96%–98% less effective at 1 and 2° of global warming, respectively. However, high precipitation and soil moisture partially retain the ability to constrain concurrent high vapor pressure deficit conditions below historical thresholds at 1–2° of warming. Our results highlight the growing vulnerability of Central North America to warmer temperatures and drier atmospheric conditions, even during periods of high precipitation and soil moisture. Plain Language Summary: In this study, we examine whether warming global temperatures will affect the ability of wet conditions, which we define with precipitation or soil moisture, to prevent the occurrence of concurrent high temperatures and dry atmospheric conditions. Focusing on the Central Plains region in North America, we show that even at 1° of global warming, high precipitation, and high soil moisture conditions already partially lose the ability to prevent high maximum temperatures in the summer months. In contrast, we show that high precipitation and high soil moisture conditions are able to better retain the ability to prevent dry atmospheric conditions even at 2° of global warming. Our results indicate that the Central Plains region will quickly become more exposed to warmer and drier climate conditions, even during periods with high precipitation and soil moisture, with potentially serious implications across public health, economic, and environmental sectors. Key Points: Absolute changes in the temperature distribution due to global warming outweigh cooling effects from wet conditions in the Central PlainsMeanwhile, wet conditions can still partially constrain extreme atmospheric aridity below historical levels under global warmingDifferences in heat and aridity responses are mainly dependent on underlying changes in the temperature and aridity distributions [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditional, mainstream definitions of drought describe it as deficit in water‐related variables or water‐dependent activities (e.g., precipitation, soil moisture, surface and groundwater storage, and irrigation) due to natural variabilities that are out of the control of local decision‐makers. Here, we argue that within coupled human‐water systems, drought must be defined and understood as a process as opposed to a product to help better frame and describe the complex and interrelated dynamics of both natural and human‐induced changes that define anthropogenic drought as a compound multidimensional and multiscale phenomenon, governed by the combination of natural water variability, climate change, human decisions and activities, and altered micro‐climate conditions due to changes in land and water management. This definition considers the full spectrum of dynamic feedbacks and processes (e.g., land‐atmosphere interactions and water and energy balance) within human‐nature systems that drive the development of anthropogenic drought. This process magnifies the water supply demand gap and can lead to water bankruptcy, which will become more rampant around the globe in the coming decades due to continuously growing water demands under compounding effects of climate change and global environmental degradation. This challenge has de facto implications for both short‐term and long‐term water resources planning and management, water governance, and policymaking. Herein, after a brief overview of the anthropogenic drought concept and its examples, we discuss existing research gaps and opportunities for better understanding, modeling, and management of this phenomenon. Plain Language Summary: This article reviews research and progress on the notion of anthropogenic drought broadly defined as drought events caused or intensified by human activities. Most commonly used drought definitions are based on deficit in hydrologic/meteorologic drivers such as precipitation and runoff. Within coupled human‐water systems, however, drought must be defined and understood as the complex and interrelated dynamics of both natural and human‐induced changes. This anthropogenic drought definition considers the full spectrum of dynamic feedbacks and processes (e.g., land‐atmosphere interactions and water and energy balance) within human‐nature systems. Ideally, anthropogenic drought and the corresponding human interactions should be incorporated in models that include land‐atmosphere interactions, water balance, and energy balance. In this article, we review existing research gaps and opportunities for better understanding, modeling, and management of this phenomenon. Key Points: Anthropogenic drought is primarily governed by the joint impacts of natural renewable water variability, climate change, and human decisionsAnthropogenic drought and water bankruptcy will become more ubiquitous under current development and climate change trajectoriesIdeally, human interactions should be incorporated in models that include land‐atmosphere interactions, water balance and energy balance [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]