Search

Objective: To investigate the effects on the blink reflex (BR) of single stimuli applied to the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg)., Methods: The BR was evoked by stimulating the supraorbital nerve (SON) in fifteen patients suffering from idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) who had electrodes monolaterally or bilaterally implanted in the PPTg for deep brain stimulation (DBS). Single stimuli were delivered to the PPTg through externalized electrode connection wires 3-4 days following PPTg implantation., Results: PPTg stimuli increased the latency and reduced duration, amplitude and area of the R2 component of the BR in comparison to the response recorded in the absence of PPTg stimulation. These effects were independent of the side of SON stimulation and were stable for interstimulus interval (ISI) between PPTg prepulse and SON stimulus from 0 to 110 ms. The PPTg-induced prepulse inhibition of the BR was bilaterally present in the brainstem. The R1 component was unaffected., Conclusions: The prepulse inhibition of the R2 component may be modulated by the PPTg., Significance: These findings suggest that abnormalities of BR occurring in PD may be ascribed to a reduction of basal ganglia-mediated inhibition of brainstem excitability., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate the subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to electrical stimulation of either muscle or cutaneous afferents., Methods: SEPs were recorded in 6 patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD) who underwent electrode implantation in the pedunculopontine (PPTg) nucleus area. We compared SEPs recorded from the scalp and from the intracranial electrode contacts to electrical stimuli applied to: 1) median nerve at the wrist, 2) abductor pollicis brevis motor point, and 3) distal phalanx of the thumb. Also the high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were analysed., Results: After median nerve and pure cutaneous (distant phalanx of the thumb) stimulation, a P1-N1 complex was recorded by the intracranial lead, while the scalp electrodes recorded the short-latency far-field responses (P14 and N18). On the contrary, motor point stimulation did not evoke any low-frequency component in the PPTg traces, nor the N18 potential on the scalp. HFOs were recorded to stimulation of all modalities by the PPTg electrode contacts., Conclusions: Stimulus processing within the cuneate nucleus depends on modality, since only the cutaneous input activates the complex intranuclear network possibly generating the scalp N18 potential., Significance: Our results shed light on the subcortical processing of the somatosensory input of different modalities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) region has received considerable attention in clinical studies as a target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson disease. These studies have yielded variable results with an overall impression of improvement in falls and freezing in many but not all patients treated. We evaluated the available data on the surgical anatomy and terminology of the PPN region in a companion paper. Here we focus on issues concerning surgical technique, imaging, and early side effects of surgery. The aim of this paper was to gain more insight into the reasoning for choosing specific techniques and to discuss shortcomings of available studies. Our data demonstrate the wide range in almost all fields which were investigated. There are a number of important challenges to be resolved, such as identification of the optimal target, the choice of the surgical approach to optimize electrode placement, the impact on the outcome of specific surgical techniques, the reliability of intraoperative confirmation of the target, and methodological differences in postoperative validation of the electrode position. There is considerable variability both within and across groups, the overall experience with PPN DBS is still limited, and there is a lack of controlled trials. Despite these challenges, the procedure seems to provide benefit to selected patients and appears to be relatively safe. One important limitation in comparing studies from different centers and analyzing outcomes is the great variability in targeting and surgical techniques, as shown in our paper. The challenges we identified will be of relevance when designing future studies to better address several controversial issues. We hope that the data we accumulated may facilitate the development of surgical protocols for PPN DBS., (© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Several lines of evidence over the last few years have been important in ascertaining that the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) region could be considered as a potential target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat freezing and other problems as part of a spectrum of gait disorders in Parkinson disease and other akinetic movement disorders. Since the introduction of PPN DBS, a variety of clinical studies have been published. Most indicate improvements in freezing and falls in patients who are severely affected by these problems. The results across patients, however, have been variable, perhaps reflecting patient selection, heterogeneity in target selection and differences in surgical methodology and stimulation settings. Here we outline both the accumulated knowledge and the domains of uncertainty in surgical anatomy and terminology. Specific topics were assigned to groups of experts, and this work was accumulated and reviewed by the executive committee of the working group. Areas of disagreement were discussed and modified accordingly until a consensus could be reached. We demonstrate that both the anatomy and the functional role of the PPN region need further study. The borders of the PPN and of adjacent nuclei differ when different brainstem atlases and atlas slices are compared. It is difficult to delineate precisely the PPN pars dissipata from the nucleus cuneiformis, as these structures partially overlap. This lack of clarity contributes to the difficulty in targeting and determining the exact localization of the electrodes implanted in patients with akinetic gait disorders. Future clinical studies need to consider these issues., (© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To investigate the generators of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) components recorded from the Pedunculopontine Tegmental nucleus (PPTg)., Methods: Twenty-two patients, suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD), underwent electrode implantation in the PPTg area for deep brain stimulation (DBS). SEPs were recorded from the DBS electrode contacts to median nerve stimulation., Results: SEPs recorded from the PPTg electrode contacts could be classified in 3 types, according to their waveforms. (1) The biphasic potential showed a positive peak (P16) whose latency (16.05 ± 0.61 ms) shifted of 0.18 ± 0.07 ms from the lower to the upper contact of the electrode. (2) The triphasic potential showed an initial positive peak (P15) whose latency (15.4 ± 0.2 ms) did not change across the DBS electrode contacts. (3) In the last SEP configuration (mixed biphasic and triphasic waveform), the positive peak was bifid including both the P15 and P16 potentials., Conclusion: While the P16 potential is probably generated by the somatosensory volley travelling along the medial lemniscus, the P15 response represents a far-field potential probably generated at the cuneate nucleus level., Significance: Our results show the physiological meaning of the somatosensory responses recorded from the PPTg nucleus area., (Copyright © 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) relays basal ganglia signals to the thalamus, lower brainstem and spinal cord. Using the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rat model of parkinsonism, we investigated whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the PPTg (40 Hz, 60 μs, 200-400 μA) may influence the preparative and executive phases in a conditioned behavioural task, and the motor asymmetries induced by apomorphine. In the conditioned task, rats had to press two levers according to a fixed delay paradigm. The 6-OHDA lesion was placed in the right medial forebrain bundle, i.e. contralaterally to the preferred forepaw used by rats to press levers in the adopted task. The stimulating electrode was implanted in the right PPTg, i.e. contralateral to left side, which was expected to be most affected. The lesion significantly reduced correct responses from 63.4% to 16.6%. PPTg-DBS effects were episodic; however, when rats successfully performed in the task (18.9%), reaction time (468.8 ± 36.5 ms) was significantly increased (589.9 ± 45.9 ms), but not improved by PPTg-DBS (646.7 ± 33.8 ms). Movement time was significantly increased following the lesion (649.2 ± 42.6 ms vs. 810.9 ± 53.0 ms), but significantly reduced by PPTg-DBS (820.4 ± 39.4 ms) compared to sham PPTg-DBS (979.8 ± 47.6 ms). In a second group of lesioned rats, rotations induced by apomorphine were significantly reduced by PPTg-DBS compared to sham PPTg-DBS (12.2 ± 0.6 vs. 9.5 ± 0.4 mean turns/min). Thus, it appears that specific aspects of motor deficits in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats may be modulated by PPTg-DBS., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)