Search

To enhance the cellulose digestibility of energy grass hybrid Pennisetum ( P. americanum × P. purpureum , HP) with low energy-consumption and high efficiency, a novel combinatorial pretreatment of oxygen-aqueous alkaline ionic liquid (IL) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([Emim]Ac) media (OEA) was developed in this work. The combinatorial pretreatment was performed under the relatively low temperature (120 °C), short retention time (30 min), and 12 bar oxygen pressure. The combinatorial pretreatment of OEA was demonstrated effectively for pretreatment of hybrid Pennisetum , which evidenced by the removal of lignin, degradation of carbohydrate, and porosity property of the regenerated biomass. Subsequently, a higher glucose recovery (96.9%) at a low enzyme loading (20 FPU/g substrate) was obtained by the OEA pretreatment, and it was 9.1 times as much as the untreated samples. Overall, the novel OEA combinatorial pretreatment has the advantages of low thermal energy input and enzyme usage, and short retention time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biofuel production from lignocellulose has recently been gaining much more attention as a result. One major problem of using lignocellulosic materials for the production of biofuel is the low accessibility of cellulose to enzymes and microorganisms. Therefore, pretreatment of lignocellulose is a critical step in biofuel production from such materials. Of the pretreatments, fungal treatment has become an important process due to its low energy demands and selective degradation of lignin and hemicellulose. This capability comes from the unique enzymatic systems, cellulolytic and ligninolytic enzymes, especially in white rot fungi. The low energy demand of fungal pretreatment has generated interest in studying the applicability of fungal pretreatment for biofuel production from woody materials. The most significant drawback of fungal pretreatment is the lengthy time required for the process. Combining fungal pretreatment with other pretreatment methods might reduce the time necessary for the whole process to operate. It can also introduce cost-effectiveness. Thus combining fungal pretreatment with other physical and chemical methods has been recently contemplated. This paper provides a comprehensive review of current fungal pretreatments and feasibility for biofuel production, with a focus on combining fungal pretreatment with other methods. The advantages and disadvantages of all physical and chemical methods were also briefly reviewed. The applicability of the combination of fungal with other pretreatment methods has been considered in a number of recent publications. To be commercially attractive, both energy demand and processing time should be reduced. In terms of energy demand reduction, combined fungal physico-chemical pretreatment has been effective. However, the lengthy time taken for the whole process has not been significantly improved upon. A great deal of work is still required to be done regarding time reduction for the process (combined fungal-physico chemical pretreatment). Therefore, it seems to remain an open field for research and process development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combined pretreatment with hot compressed water and wet disk milling was performed with the aim to reduce the natural recalcitrance of oil palm biomass by opening its structure and provide maximal access to cellulase attack. Oil palm empty fruit bunch and oil palm frond fiber were first hydrothermally pretreated at 150–190 °C and 10–240 min. Further treatment with wet disk milling resulted in nanofibrillation of fiber which caused the loosening of the tight biomass structure, thus increasing the subsequent enzymatic conversion of cellulose to glucose. The effectiveness of the combined pretreatments was evaluated by chemical composition changes, power consumption, morphological alterations by SEM and the enzymatic digestibility of treated samples. At optimal pretreatment process, approximately 88.5% and 100.0% of total sugar yields were obtained from oil palm empty fruit bunch and oil palm frond fiber samples, which only consumed about 15.1 and 23.5 MJ/kg of biomass, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pretreatment was the essential step for industrial application of lignocellulosic biomass. Combination of steam explosion and fungal treatment was conducted, and synergistic mechanism of the combined pretreatment was evaluated in terms of pore size distribution, crystallinity index, chemical compositions and enzymatic hydrolysis. The results showed that steam explosion destroyed the rigid structure of corn stalk, increased pore size and porosity, and exposed crystalline component of cellulose. Steam explosion broke the lignin-carbohydrate-complex structure of lignocellulosic biomass and facilitated the fungal treatment.Phellinus baumii could selectively degrade 34.7% and 36.58% of lignin for 1.4 MPa and 1.7 MPa steam-exploded corn stalk, respectively. As a result, the highest glucose yield of corn stalk pretreated by the condition of 1.7 MPa steam explosion associated with 21 d P. baumii reached 313.31 g kg-1, which was 2.88 and 1.32 times higher than that of the untreated corn stalk and the 1.7 MPa steam-exploded corn stalk, respectively. The combined pretreatment enhanced the enzymatic hydrolysis, which was a promising technology that might be explored as alternative to the existing pretreatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Ensiling may act as a pretreatment of fresh grass biomass and increase the enzymatic conversion of structural carbohydrates to fermentable sugars. However, ensiling does not provide sufficient severity to be a standalone pretreatment method. Here, ensiling of grass is combined with hydrothermal treatment (HTT) with the aim of improving the enzymatic biomass convertibility and decrease the required temperature of the HTT. Results Grass silage (Festulolium Hykor) was hydrothermally treated at temperatures of 170, 180, and 190°C for 10 minutes. Relative to HTT treated dry grass, ensiling increased the solubilization of dry matter (DM) during HTT and gave increased glucan content, but lower lignin in the insoluble fiber fraction. Ensiling improved glucose yields in the enzymatic hydrolysis of the washed solid fiber fraction at the lower HTT temperatures. At 170°C glucose yield improved from 17 to 24 (w/w)% (45 to 57% cellulose convertibility), and at 180°C glucose yield improved from 22 to 29 (w/w)% (54 to 69% cellulose convertibility). Direct HTT of grass at 190°C gave the same high glucose yield as for grass silage (35 (w/w)% (77% cellulose convertibility)) and improved xylan yields (27% xylan convertibility). The effect of ensiling of grass prior to HTT improved the enzymatic conversion of cellulose for HTT at 170 and 180°C, but the increased glucose release did not make up for the loss of water soluble carbohydrates (WSC) during ensiling. Overall, sugar yields (C6 + C5) were similar for HTT of grass and grass silage at both 170 and 180°C, but at 190°C the overall sugar yield was better for HTT of dry grass. Conclusions This study unequivocally establishes that ensiling of grass as a biomass pretreatment method comes with a loss of WSC. The loss of WSC by ensiling is not necessarily compensated for by providing a lower temperature requirement for HTT for high enzymatic monosaccharide release. However, ensiling can be an advantageous storage method prior to grass processing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Additives in pretreatment notably raised fermentable sugars and bioethanol yields. • Mechanisms of reducing lignin repolymerization by additives were investigated. • −OH groups of additives suppressed lignin repolymerization by forming a new reaction. • More hydrophilic groups of lignin reduced non-specific binding into enzymes. • Enlarged biomass porosity and lower surface coverage reduced surface lignin barrier. Pretreatment is the key factor for producing fermentable sugars and biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass. However, during pretreatment lignin repolymerization occurs which reduces the efficiency of carbohydrates hydrolysis. In the present study, three additives (2-naphthol-7-sulfonate, 2-naphthol, and mannitol) were evaluated for boosting the effectiveness of combined pretreatment (liquid hot water + green liquor) of pine-wood biomass. The results revealed that supplied additives into combined pretreatment changed the physicochemical structure of lignin, therefore, alleviating the inhibitory effect of lignin repolymerization and notably raised sugars yield (glucose, xylose) ranging from 85% to 93%. XPS and FTIR analyses confirmed that −OH groups of additives led to lower formation of phenolic hydroxyl (PhOH) and higher hydrophilic groups of lignin, accounting for reduced non-specific binding of lignin into cellulase enzymes. Furthermore, additives increased surface lignin coverage, biomass porosity, and fiber swelling by 1.96–2.59, 1.66–1.86, and 1.13–1.29 folds respectively, comparing to corresponding sample without additives caused more liquified and extractable lignin, which notably reduced the surface lignin barrier. Hence, both factors including non-specific binding effect and surface lignin barrier, contributed to reducing lignin repolymerization, thereby increased cellulose accessibility for high production of fermentable sugars and bioethanol in softwood biomass. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Pretreatment is an essential step for the breakdown of lignocellulosic biomass. • Combining pretreatment helps to lower the severity of the drawbacks of a single step. • Biological-chemical/physicochemical combined pretreatment strategies were reviewed. • The order of pretreatment in the combined studies affects the overall efficiency. Sustainable biorefinery concepts based on lignocellulosic biomass are gaining worldwide research interest because of their inexpensiveness and abundance. The recalcitrance of lignocellulosic biomass poses a major hindrance to enhance biofuel production. Therefore, a pretreatment step is critical to prepare the substrates for the downstream process. Combining pretreatment steps help to lower the severity of the drawbacks of a single pretreatment step. This paper systematically reviews the combined biological and chemical/physicochemical pretreatment based on fiber degradation and sugar yield. An energy-efficient biological pretreatment method combined with a chemical pretreatment that accelerates the pretreatment times has been seen to be efficient for fiber degradation and sugar yields. However, fungal species, culture conditions, biomass type, the severity of chemical pretreatment and the order of sequential pretreatment influences the relative component contents and sugar yield. Even the same biomass from different sources undergoing similar pretreatment conditions could result in a varying amount of digestibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ensiling cannot be utilized as a stand-alone pretreatment for sugar-based biorefinery processes but, in combination with hydrothermal processing, it can enhance pretreatment while ensuring a stable long-term storage option for abundant but moist biomass. The effectiveness of combining ensiling with hydrothermal pretreatment depends on biomass nature, pretreatment, and silage conditions. Results: In the present study, the efficiency of the combined pretreatment was assessed by enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation, and it was demonstrated that ensiling of sugarcane bagasse produces organic acids that can partly degrade biomass structure when in combination with hydrothermal treatment, with the consequent improvement of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and of the overall 2G bioethanol process efficiency. The optimal pretreatment conditions found in this study were those using ensiling and/or hydrothermal pretreatment at 190 °C for 10 min as this yielded the highest overall glucose recovery yield and ethanol yield from the raw material (0.28–0.30 g/g and 0.14 g/g, respectively). Conclusion: Ensiling prior to hydrothermal pretreatment offers a controlled solution for wet storage and long-term preservation for sugarcane bagasse, thus avoiding the need for drying. This preservation method combined with long-term storage practice can be an attractive option for integrated 1G/2G bioethanol plants, as it does not require large capital investments or energy inputs and leads to comparable or higher overall sugar recovery and ethanol yields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]