Search

Background Patients with hematological malignancy or other cancers as well as immunosuppression bear a high risk for severe COVID-19. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are efficient at early stages of the disease but may lose potency with new variants. Trials on plasma from convalescent donors in unselected patients have not shown clinical benefit. No randomized trials focussing on patients with underlying disease have been published. Methods We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy of plasma (CVP - convalescent or after vaccination) in patients with COVID-19 at high risk for adverse outcome in Germany. We assessed the effect of high-titer CVP (2 units from different donors, 238-337 ml each, on subsequent days). Patients with hematological or other malignancy (group 1), immunosuppression (group 2), age >50 and ≤75 years and lymphopenia and/or high D-dimers (group 3) or age >75 years (group 4) who were hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and with an oxygen saturation ≤94% were included. Primary outcome measure was time to clinical improvement on a seven-point ordinal scale, secondary outcome was mortality (Janssen et al. Trials 2020 Oct 6;21(1):828). Results Overall, 133 patients were randomized, 68 received CVP with an additional 10 patients as a crossover on day 10. Median age (range) was 68 years (39-95) in the CVP group and 70 (38-90) in controls. For the entire cohort, no significant difference was seen in time to improvement (median days: CVP 12.5 vs. control 18; HR 1.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.85), p=0.29). Subgroup analysis (group 1+2) revealed shortened time to improvement (median days CVP 13 vs. control 32; HR 2.03 (95%CI 1.17-3.6), p=0.01) and mortality was reduced (mortality CVP n=6 (18%) vs. control n=10 (29%). No significant differences in time to improvement were observed in group 3 or 4 (HR 0.72 (95%CI 0.41-1.28), p=0.26). No relevant adverse events were observed. Conclusion CVP improves time to clinical improvement and mortality for COVID-19 patients with underlying hematological disease/cancer or other reasons of impaired immune response. Even with new variants, high-titer CVP may offer a widely available and inexpensive therapy option in high-risk groups. Funding BMBF FKZ 01KI20152; EudraCT 2020-001632-10. Disclosures Uta Merle, MD, Gilead: Sponsored congress travel and accommodation Markus Weigand, MD, Bbraun: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Biotest: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Eumedica: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Gilead: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|MSD: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Pfizer: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Shionogi: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|SOBI: Speakers fee/ad boards fee Martin Bornhäuser, MD, Alexion: Honoraria|Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria|MSD: Honoraria|Novartis: Honoraria Nael Alakel, MD, Amgen: personal fee, travel grant|Gilead: personal fee, travel grant|MSD Sharp and Dohme GmbH: personal fee, travel grant|Pfizer: personal fee, travel grant Timo Wolf, MD, Gilead Sciences: Lecture fee, travel grant|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Lecture fee, travel grant|Merck Sharp Dome: Lecture fee, travel grant Maria Vehreschild, Prof. Dr., 3M: speaker fee|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas: speaker fee|biologische heilmittel heel gmbh: Grant/Research Support|BioNtech: Grant/Research Support|EUMEDICA: Advisor/Consultant|Farmak International Holding: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Speaker fee|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Immunic AG: Advisor/Consultant|MaaT: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: speaker fee|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Grant/Research Support|MSD: speaker fees|Pfizer: speaker fee|Roche Molecular Systems: Grant/Research Support|Roche Molecular Systems: speaker fees|SocraRTec R&D GmbH: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda California: Grant/Research Support Hanns-Martin Lorenz, MD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Abbvie: Honoraria|Actelion: Advisor/Consultant|Actelion: Honoraria|Alexion: Advisor/Consultant|Alexion: Honoraria|Amgen: Advisor/Consultant|Amgen: Grant/Research Support|Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Honoraria|Baxter: Advisor/Consultant|Baxter: Advisor/Consultant|Baxter: Honoraria|Baxter: Honoraria|Bayer Vital: Advisor/Consultant|Bayer Vital: Honoraria|Biogen: Advisor/Consultant|Biogen: Honoraria|BMS: Advisor/Consultant|BMS: Honoraria|Boehringer Ingelheim: Advisor/Consultant|Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria|Celgene: Advisor/Consultant|Celgene: Honoraria|Fresenius: Advisor/Consultant|Fresenius: Honoraria|Genzyme: Advisor/Consultant|Genzyme: Honoraria|Gilead/Galapagos: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead/Galapagos: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria|Hexal: Advisor/Consultant|Hexal: Honoraria|Janssen-Cilag: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria|Lilly: Advisor/Consultant|Lilly: Honoraria|Medac: Advisor/Consultant|Medac: Honoraria|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Honoraria|Mundipharm: Advisor/Consultant|Mundipharm: Honoraria|Mylan: Advisor/Consultant|Mylan: Honoraria|Novartis: Advisor/Consultant|Novartis: Honoraria|octapharm: Advisor/Consultant|octapharm: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Honoraria|Roche/Chugai: Advisor/Consultant|Roche/Chugai: Honoraria|Sandoz: Advisor/Consultant|Sandoz: Honoraria|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: Honoraria|Shire: Advisor/Consultant|Shire: Honoraria|SOBI: Advisor/Consultant|SOBI: Honoraria|Thermo Fisher: Advisor/Consultant|Thermo Fisher: Honoraria|UCB: Advisor/Consultant|UCB: Honoraria.

Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) represent globally important nosocomial pathogens. A three-year study of ECC in Germany identified Enterobacter xiangfangensis as the most common species (65.5%) detected, a result replicated by examining a global pool of 3246 isolates. Antibiotic resistance profiling revealed widespread resistance and heteroresistance to the antibiotic colistin and detected the mobile colistin resistance (mcr)-9 gene in 19.2% of all isolates. We show that resistance and heteroresistance properties depend on the chromosomal arnBCADTEF gene cassette whose products catalyze transfer of L-Ara4N to lipid A. Using comparative genomics, mutational analysis, and quantitative lipid A profiling we demonstrate that intrinsic lipid A modification levels are genospecies-dependent and governed by allelic variations in phoPQ and mgrB, that encode a two-component sensor-activator system and specific inhibitor peptide. By generating phoPQ chimeras and combining them with mgrB alleles, we show that interactions at the pH-sensing interface of the sensory histidine kinase phoQ dictate arnBCADTEF expression levels. To minimize therapeutic failures, we developed an assay that accurately detects colistin resistance levels for any ECC isolate.

Neue ABS-Leitlinien und strukturelle Empfehlungen Neue Leitlinien fur „Antibiotic Stewardship“ (ABS) und EU-Empfehlungen raten zur Einrichtung von ABS-Teams an Krankenhausern. Mit einer personellen Ausstattung von (mindestens) einer Vollkraft pro 500 Betten scheint damit ein Basisbundel von ABS-Masnahmen kostenneutral durchfuhrbar. Empfohlen werden nun, je nach Versorgungschwerpunkt, ein bis drei Vollkrafte pro 500 Betten, darunter Infektiologiefacharzte und Apotheker, um eine verbesserte Versorgung von Patienten mit Infektionskrankheiten zu erreichen. Antiinfektivavisiten als wichtiges ABS-Instrument Wichtiges Instrument fur eine optimierte Antibiotikaverordnungsqualitat und die Vermeidung von Medikationsfehlern sind spezielle Infektionsvisiten. Mit diesen kann meistens auch eine Verkurzung der Therapie sowie eine Reduktion des Verbrauchs von Antibiotika erreicht werden. Antibiotikaverbrauch in deutschen Akutkrankenhausern Nach einer aktualisierten Querschnittsanalyse des Antibiotikaeinsatzes in mehr als 100 Akutkrankenhausern zeigte der Gesamtverbrauch 2013/2014 mit rund 40 Tagesdosen/100 Pflegetage wenige Anderungen gegenuber dem Vorjahr. Cephalosporine wurden im Vergleich zu anderen europaischen Landern immer noch relativ viel eingesetzt. Beispiele fur eine sinnvolle Reduktion des Antibiotikaverbrauchs im Krankenhaus Neue Studien unterstreichen die Empfehlungen, nach denen eine perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe nicht langer als 24 Stunden durchgefuhrt werden soll – dies gilt auch fur ICD- und Schrittmacherimplantationen. Antibiotika zur Pneumonieprophylaxe bei Schlaganfall sind nicht wirksam. Bisherige Studien zur kritischen Indikationsstellung fur Cephalosporine und zum reduzierten Verbrauch von Fluorchinolonen zeigen masige Effekte auf die Haufigkeit multiresistenter gramnegativer Bakterien.

Introduction Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) has historically been one of the major causes of severe sepsis and death among neutropenic cancer patients. There has been a recent increase of multidrug-resistant PA (MDRPA) isolates that may determine a worse prognosis, particularly in immunosuppressed patients. The aim of this study is to establish the impact of antibiotic resistance on the outcome of neutropenic onco-haematological patients with PA bacteraemia, and to identify the risk factors for MDRPA bacteraemia and mortality. Methods and analysis This is a retrospective, observational, multicentre, international study. All episodes of PA bacteraemia occurring in neutropenic onco-haematological patients followed up at the participating centres from 1 January 2006 to 31 May 2018 will be retrospectively reviewed. The primary end point will be overall case-fatality rate within 30 days of onset of PA bacteraemia. The secondary end points will be to describe the following: the incidence and risk factors for multidrug-resistant and extremely drug-resistant PA bacteraemia (by comparing the episodes due to susceptible PA with those produced by MDRPA), the efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam, the rates of persistent bacteraemia and bacteraemia relapse and the risk factors for very early (48 hours), early (7 days) and overall (30 days) case-fatality rates. Ethics and dissemination The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Bellvitge University Hospital approved the protocol of the study at the primary site. To protect personal privacy, identifying information of each patient in the electronic database will be encrypted. The processing of the patients’ personal data collected in the study will comply with the Spanish Data Protection Act of 1998 and with the European Directive on the privacy of data. All data collected, stored and processed will be anonymised. Results will be reported at conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.

In der Akutmedizin, insbesondere bei schweren Erkrankungen, die eine Behandlung auf der Intensivstation notwendig machen, ist in vielen Fallen eine empirische Initialtherapie, d. h. eine Behandlung mit Antiinfektiva vor Erregersicherung notwendig. Die Antiinfektivawahl in dieser Situation richtet sich nach dem erwarteten Erregerspektrum und der erwarteten Erregerempfindlichkeit (»kalkulierte«Therapie). Nach Erregersicherung kann und sollte in den meisten Fallen auf eine gezielte Therapie umgestellt werden. Dabei spielen die Aspekte Wirksamkeit, Nebenwirkungen, Resistenzentwicklung und Kosten eine Rolle.

Resin-containing aerobic and anaerobic blood culture media (NR 16A and NR 17A) for use with the new BACTEC infrared blood cultures system were compared with standard BACTEC media (NR 6A and NR 7A) in their efficacy to detect bacteremia in febrile granulocytopenic patients receiving antimicrobial treatment. A total of 1185 sets of blood cultures obtained from 341 patients during a 12-month period were evaluated. There were 109 positive cultures (9.2%) with 128 pathogenic organisms isolated from 52 patients (15.2%). Statistically significant differences were found between aerobic media, but not between anaerobic media. Aerobic resin bottles (NR 16A) were more often positive (90 versus 78, p less than 0.05) than standard aerobic bottles (NR 6A). They yielded a higher number of microorganismS (98 versus 80, p less than 0.05) per culture and per culture-positive patient (53 versus 42, p less than 0.01). NR 16A cultures also were more often positive after 1-day incubation (44% versus 21%, p less than 0.01) than NR 6A cultures and allowed earlier subcultivation. The use of NR 16A medium instead of resin-free aerobic NR 6A medium may enhance the detection of bacteremia in selected groups of patients receiving antimicrobial treatment, and can shorten the time until detection of bacteremia.

Morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies, especially leukemia and lymphoma, are increased by invasive fungal infections. Since diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is often delayed, antifungal prophylaxis is an attractive approach for patients expecting prolonged neutropenia. Antifungal prophylaxis has obviously attracted much interest resulting in dozens of clinical trials since the late 1970s. The non-absorbable polyenes are probably ineffective in preventing invasive fungal infections, but may reduce superficial mycoses. Intravenous amphotericin B and the newer azoles were used in clinical trials, but their role in antifungal prophylaxis is still not well defined. Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients are at particularly high risk for invasive fungal infections. Other well described risk factors are neutropenia10 days, corticosteroid therapy, sustained immunosuppression, graft versus host disease, and concomitant viral infections. The enormous study efforts are contrasted by a scarcity of risk stratified evidence based recommendations for clinical decision making. The objective of this review accumulating information on about 10.000 patients is to assess evidence based criteria primarily regarding the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients.

This study describes neuropsychiatric side effects in patients after treatment with mefloquine. Reactions consisted mainly of seizures, acute psychoses, anxiety neurosis, and major disturbances of sleep-wake rhythm. Side effects occurred after both therapeutic and prophylactic intake and were graded from moderate to severe. In a risk analysis of neuropsychiatric side effects in Germany, it is estimated that one of 8,000 mefloquine users suffers from such reactions. The incidence calculation revealed that one of 215 therapeutic users had reactions, compared with one of 13,000 in the prophylaxis group, making the risk of neuropsychiatric reactions after mefloquine treatment 60 times higher than after prophylaxis. Therefore, certain limitations for malaria prophylaxis and treatment with mefloquine are recommended.